Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 10:53:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 95 »
661  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why Bitcoin and Not a better improved crypto? on: February 27, 2015, 02:12:58 AM
No, the payment system is being built on Bitcoin, without an anonymous creator there will be plenty of trash and threats to the creator, too many new crypto's are pump & dump/premines. Bitcoin is viable and for anything like micro transactions or lower fees for third world nations Litecoin can take of that.

That makes no sense. Gavin Anderson, etc etc, are not anonymous, and to be honest, they contributed more to Bitcoin core than satoshi did orignally(Satoshi created this ingenius thing tho!). If anything, having an anonymous creator is bad for a coin.

Litecoin cant handle microtransactions or anything at all really, anymore than bitcoin can(its just a bitcoin clone). Its a failed coin.
Have you seen the shit thrown at everyone who is a developer for Bitcoin? Any new coin creator will have to have a spotless history, and I think Litecoin can handle micro transactions as it only has a 2.5 minute blocktime which is fine for small transfers while Bitcoin and large transfers would probably prefer the longer block times for security. That and I think most would like a blockchain to track transactions even for micro transactions then just off the chain.

Do you even know what microtransactions are? It has to do with blockchain bloat, not blocktime. Litecoin is just a bitcoin clone, and it cannot handle any sort of microtransactions...Litecoin is 100% useless. Pandacoin has more utility than Litecoin...
662  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Coinbase CEO: bitcoin is far ahead! Altcoins are distractions! on: February 26, 2015, 02:05:09 AM

Everything listed could have been done, without leeching off of the market cap.

Are you serious ? Leeching off what marketcap ? Nobody owns this market. Altcoins have attracted their own markets through distinctive technologies that others do not support. They haven't "leeched" off anything.

How are altcoins addressing this (bold)?

There are 2 "flavours" of fiat pegged alt currencies - 1 which uses supply restricted algorithms to manage the flow of coins to market and another who's blockchain supports the dynamic creation of pegged currencies by the matching of short and long positions in that currency - sort of like very granular banking.

In the latter case, as the adoption of the pegged asset increases, so does the value of the underlying collateral. This makes for a very elegant solution because it satisfies 2 disparate market requirements in a complimentary way - 1. The demand for risk assets which deliver a return on investment 2. The demand for a stable trading currency for use in retail and commercial markets.

You only have to look at coinmarketcap.com to see that they work:



.
The points you have presented are valid, LaudaM just lost $ trading Darkcoin, and is "mad" at all altcoins. Shame.
663  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Coinbase CEO: bitcoin is far ahead! Altcoins are distractions! on: February 26, 2015, 12:12:09 AM
Litecoin is a joke

You know Litecoin is a joke when it's lead developer and creator stops developing for it:

The fact that Charlie Lee works for Coinbase, probably the largest Bitcoin based company, is a joke in itself.

You know Bitcoin is a joke when it's lead developer and creator stops developing for it. :p

The "there can only be one" camp of Bitcoiners do not understand that altcoins supporters don't necessarily think that any altcoin will overtake Bitcoin in value. I can't speak for everyone, but I believe that Bitcoin will always be the "one" cryptocurrency, the crypto reserve currency.* But there will always be room for a few more cryptocurrencies that are adopted widely just like Bitcoin. These cryptocurrencies will have independent economic models and not pegged to Bitcoin and will have a free-floating market price. As toknormal said, the market has already decided that altcoins have a future. The market is smarter and more efficient that any one of us. You can say "shitcoins are dead" a million times, but that doesn't change the fact that Litecoin has a $60M market cap and that people are willing to trade them at ~$1.80 a coin today. This doesn't guarantee that Litecoin will survive in the long run. But one thing I know for sure is that there will always be altcoins.

For those that think Bitcoin and sidechains (pegged Bitcoin) will cause market cap of all altcoins to go to 0, do you also think that all countries should adopt the USD or peg their currency to USD?

* And that is why I work for Coinbase.

Words of wisdom, makes sense.
664  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Litecoin is officially dead on: February 25, 2015, 11:13:22 PM
be sure LTC is dead... i just sold my last LTC crap coin to buy more Darkcoin...

who dont see this is ether blind or stupid

True LTC is crap, but then again Darkcoin was also instamined

As was Bitcoin... how far along are we going to play this argument.

The obvious difference, mr litecoin bagholder, is that Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency and thus has a high network effect. Litecoin is nothing but a clone, its not event the first altcoin. Since Litecoin is nothing but a clone, that means it can only compete with Bitcoin, but Bitcoin has already taken residence as the top cryptocurrency in it's field, making Litecoin obselete and worthless.

Hmm, never knew I was a Litecoin bagholder. Guess we learn something new everyday. *shrug*

Bagholder isn't necessarily a bad thing. Don't be so hard on yourself.

Yea, bagholding worthless coins is quite the new fad these days.

Aren't you a dogecoin community member?

Of course not. I'm not apart of any community.

Ahh ok, it was another person in here whos handle begins with a D.

Well I mean, you are posting here, I can assume that you are a bitcoin community member Tongue.

Cryptocurrency community member*
665  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why Bitcoin and Not a better improved crypto? on: February 25, 2015, 10:51:02 PM
No, the payment system is being built on Bitcoin, without an anonymous creator there will be plenty of trash and threats to the creator, too many new crypto's are pump & dump/premines. Bitcoin is viable and for anything like micro transactions or lower fees for third world nations Litecoin can take of that.

That makes no sense. Gavin Anderson, etc etc, are not anonymous, and to be honest, they contributed more to Bitcoin core than satoshi did orignally(Satoshi created this ingenius thing tho!). If anything, having an anonymous creator is bad for a coin.

Litecoin cant handle microtransactions or anything at all really, anymore than bitcoin can(its just a bitcoin clone). Its a failed coin.
666  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: February 25, 2015, 08:12:59 AM
Just watched Morgan Freeman's latest wormhole, our ocean is alive. One huge life form connected by microbes and a nerve system. There you have it, the God who raised us.

Electromagnetic life forms predates hydrocarbon based life forms billions of years, they exist in the stars, metal cores of planets, galaxies and the vast span of the intergalactic space. They are many orders of magnitude more advanced than us. They are God.



No such thing as electromagnetic life just so you know. It's the affects of electromagnetic radiation on life. Just because something is complex, doesn't mean some god created it. In fact, it's most likely the opposite(that no god created it). Thousands of years ago human beings couldn't dream of exploring space through high powered telescopes, the very sky itself was a thing of immense mystery. Now we know more about, and know it has nothing to do with god or "the heavens". The same will be said for everything else today that we find mysterious. Hundreds of years from now there will be explanations, as we have explanations now for what was deemed miraculous in the past.

667  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: February 24, 2015, 08:26:44 PM
Get some of the New Testament into yourself, so the Holy Spirit has something to work with in you, even if you understand very little of what you are reading.

So in other words your encouraging me to give up my life of peace and embraced a life of intolerance?
For example I have a couple of friends that are gay, *shrug* don't bother me, none of my business. (And no I'm not, I have a wife and kids if your wondering.)

Would I then have to dislike them?

The thing that confounds me the most, is that the old testament is clearly against any type of homosexual activity, yet in thet very same testament there are laws that show it is against women's rights, forgiveness, love, compassion, etc, all of which highly contradict what is spoken by Christ in the New Testament. So it makes absolutely no sense for people to "hate on gays", cause if they do, they should also hate on women, forgiveness, etc.

"Hating on gays" is not the way it is supposed to be done. However, even the New Testament is against gays. It's in one of the Corinthian books.

Will gays not be saved? God will judge, but it looks like His judgement will be against them.

The fact that the Old Testament seems to be against women is misleading. Actually, women were being given a gift. They were being settled in a home with a husband to do the exact thing that they were made for... having and raising children. When a woman married, she wasn't responsible for her actions except in the case of adultery. Her husband was responsible for her actions in the community, and she could make him downright miserable if she wanted to.

The O.T. laws were written for the people of Israel because they asked for it at Mount Sinai at the time Moses gave them the Ten Commandments. The other nations weren't being given these law. Only Israel. But the laws are absolutely the best. And they were made to match the customs that Israel had in those times. Most of our present-day nations would be given the laws in different ways than ancient Israel was, just because of our traditions and common law.


Quote
This also most likely means one thing: Christ was never god, he simply witnessed the suppression around him(Rome controlled Israel at that time), and choose to make a stand. The only way he thought he could effectively make a stand however, was to agree upon the old testaments teachings(as that's what the jews believed in), and extend further from there. Wasn't perfect, but look at how big Christianity is today.

You can do Internet searches and find sites with all kinds of Bible verses that show that Jesus is God.


Quote
That would explain why the teachings of christ differ extremely, extremely far from the teachings, laws, and words of the god in the old testament. Christ himself said he is god the son, and one with god the father, so if a christian is to listen to christ, then he/she must also listen to the atrocious laws that god has made in the old testament.



The O.T. teachings were supposed to revolve around two basic laws: Love for God above everything, and love for ones fellow person a much as for himself. The O.T. laws would produce the best living conditions if they were done out of love. The government of Jesus' day had changed the laws to be legalistic things, things without the love. Jesus was simply bringing them back to the love. He abolished nothing.

Smiley

Reading your words gives me faith that people like you, delusional, misinformed, and extremely gullible, cannot be changed.

" Actually, women were being given a gift. They were being settled in a home with a husband to do the exact thing that they were made for... having and raising children. " - BADecker

I'm done here, it seems you do not respect women and place them as being worth only for childbearing and motherhood. If you can't even respect women, then you obviously don't have the capability to respect anyone with a sexuality besides your own.

You BADecker, are the classical case of an ignorant and intolerant human being. Have fun believing in one of the cruelest books ever written and good luck in obtaining your everlasting life through intolerance of others. It's people like you that passively contribute to the epidemic of violence against women and gays around the world. I'm sure your mother, sister, daughter, or any female you encounter would be proud. /sarcasm
668  Other / Off-topic / Re: Users who sign their post on: February 24, 2015, 07:39:04 PM
Thank you OP for this thread. I've long wondered this as well, but never looked for others opinions or researched it.

And yea, it annoys me just a bit as well lol.
669  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: February 24, 2015, 07:26:29 PM
Get some of the New Testament into yourself, so the Holy Spirit has something to work with in you, even if you understand very little of what you are reading.

So in other words your encouraging me to give up my life of peace and embraced a life of intolerance?
For example I have a couple of friends that are gay, *shrug* don't bother me, none of my business. (And no I'm not, I have a wife and kids if your wondering.)

Would I then have to dislike them?

The thing that confounds me the most, is that the old testament is clearly against any type of homosexual activity, yet in thet very same testament there are laws that show it is against women's rights, forgiveness, love, compassion, etc, all of which highly contradict what is spoken by Christ in the New Testament. So it makes absolutely no sense for people to "hate on gays", cause if they do, they should also hate on women, forgiveness, etc.

This also most likely means one thing: Christ was never god, he simply witnessed the suppression around him(Rome controlled Israel at that time), and choose to make a stand. The only way he thought he could effectively make a stand however, was to agree upon the old testaments teachings(as that's what the jews believed in), and extend further from there. Wasn't perfect, but look at how big Christianity is today.

That would explain why the teachings of christ differ extremely, extremely far from the teachings, laws, and words of the god in the old testament. Christ himself said he is god the son, and one with god the father, so if a christian is to listen to christ, then he/she must also listen to the atrocious laws that god has made in the old testament.

670  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Mintpal/Moolah CEO scammer is arrested for BTC theft on: February 24, 2015, 07:20:25 PM
http://siliconangle.com/blog/2015/02/23/mintpal-scammer-ryan-kennedy-arrested-in-u-k-over-theft-of-3700-bitcoins/

Portion of SYScoin devs statement: "Undoubtedly people are wondering what is going on with the legal battle regarding the 750btc stolen from the Syscoin Escrow fund, Mintpal / Moolah / Ryan Kennedy / Alex Green / etc. We are permitted to disclose that both Ryan Kennedy and Chelsea Hopkins were arrested by UK authorities. We’re working with UK authorities, UK courts, Interpol and the legal bodies to resolve this properly and make sure any wrong doing is met with the full force of UK Justice. We’re also ensuring any accomplices who were complicit in this crime are being held accountable. There are no free rides."

671  Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists? on: February 24, 2015, 06:49:00 PM


+1,000,000,000,000 X infinite

That speaks volumes.

Even then, I doubt the god of the bible would ever beg for forgiveness: "And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword."  Joshua 6:21

" Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him again." Levictus 24:20 - Here again, the god of the bible practices revenge and hate, instead of forgiveness.
672  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Four Strikes Against Bitcoin on: February 22, 2015, 02:47:05 AM
If you notice a small box where there is a coin slot for to take your chance to control the claw machine to grab the plush toys, that's illegal too as the chance is practically 1 out if 10.

If we go by the OP's assumptions, then living life itself is illegal as everyday there's a probability that you might die, and the "ticket" to sustain life is oxygen, your heart, lungs, water, etc. OP is an idiot.
673  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Stellar on: February 22, 2015, 02:30:07 AM
Stellar is the future of cryptocurrencies. The fact that people don't notice yet is quite amazing.

Except, wait for it... Stellar isn't even a cryptocurrency, since it's not decentralized.
674  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Four Strikes Against Bitcoin on: February 21, 2015, 11:45:57 PM
Everything said in the OP is mostly useless. The only negative things about Bitcoin are: it's volatility, it's lack of regulation, it's name.

Simply put, Bitcoin is decentralized(Mining is not like a lottery), etc etc. (sorry dont have the time to put into creating a deep, long post).
675  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The ICO/Pre-sale/crowd funding "Marketing Scam" on: February 21, 2015, 10:54:38 PM
Honestly, I thought the OP was gonna give us an actual scam. But OP, this is how marketing works like in the real world. Companies pay marketing individuals or firms, help market their product. What koinify is doing is not wrong, nor is it a scam.

You sound like you are totally clueless with how marketing works...Pretty stupid thread.
676  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RZR] Razor - Cutting Edge of Technology ☆[TOR]☆[No Pre/ICO] Updated Nodes! on: February 21, 2015, 08:24:28 AM
Razor never had anything going for it, it's main feature of TOR in the wallet, is already incorporated in every single altcoin/Bitcoin by design.

No, they do not run on TOR.

Yes they do, all coin wallets have TOR capabilities. Are you trolling or just this misinformed? You can run your bitcoin, darkcoin, dogecoin, peercoin, orangecoin, fleecoin, zeecoin...wallet over TOR. This makes Razor's main feature the stupidest I've ever seen for an altcoin, while also making Razor worthless.

The Network does not run on TOR for any of those coins. You're an idiot.

The Network? What, are you high? I said you can run your Wallet, over TOR. It has nothing to do with "the network". Are you trying to troll, sir?
677  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Litecoin is officially dead on: February 21, 2015, 07:03:52 AM
be sure LTC is dead... i just sold my last LTC crap coin to buy more Darkcoin...

who dont see this is ether blind or stupid

True LTC is crap, but then again Darkcoin was also instamined

As was Bitcoin... how far along are we going to play this argument.

The obvious difference, mr litecoin bagholder, is that Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency and thus has a high network effect. Litecoin is nothing but a clone, its not event the first altcoin. Since Litecoin is nothing but a clone, that means it can only compete with Bitcoin, but Bitcoin has already taken residence as the top cryptocurrency in it's field, making Litecoin obselete and worthless.

Hmm, never knew I was a Litecoin bagholder. Guess we learn something new everyday. *shrug*

Bagholder isn't necessarily a bad thing. Don't be so hard on yourself.

Yea, bagholding worthless coins is quite the new fad these days.

Aren't you a dogecoin community member?

Of course not. I'm not apart of any community.
678  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Litecoin is officially dead on: February 21, 2015, 06:30:32 AM
be sure LTC is dead... i just sold my last LTC crap coin to buy more Darkcoin...

who dont see this is ether blind or stupid

True LTC is crap, but then again Darkcoin was also instamined

As was Bitcoin... how far along are we going to play this argument.

The obvious difference, mr litecoin bagholder, is that Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency and thus has a high network effect. Litecoin is nothing but a clone, its not event the first altcoin. Since Litecoin is nothing but a clone, that means it can only compete with Bitcoin, but Bitcoin has already taken residence as the top cryptocurrency in it's field, making Litecoin obselete and worthless.

Hmm, never knew I was a Litecoin bagholder. Guess we learn something new everyday. *shrug*

Bagholder isn't necessarily a bad thing. Don't be so hard on yourself.

Yea, bagholding worthless coins is quite the new fad these days.
679  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Litecoin Is NOT Dead (It Is Just Dying A Slow Death) on: February 21, 2015, 06:28:12 AM
I'm very pleased to see this coin die every day.
It makes everybody focus on the right thing.
You cannot serve to masters and y'all know who the master is, right.

lol, interesting post.
680  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RZR] Razor - Cutting Edge of Technology ☆[TOR]☆[No Pre/ICO] Updated Nodes! on: February 20, 2015, 04:44:55 AM
Razor never had anything going for it, it's main feature of TOR in the wallet, is already incorporated in every single altcoin/Bitcoin by design.

No, they do not run on TOR.

Yes they do, all coin wallets have TOR capabilities. Are you trolling or just this misinformed? You can run your bitcoin, darkcoin, dogecoin, peercoin, orangecoin, fleecoin, zeecoin...wallet over TOR. This makes Razor's main feature the stupidest I've ever seen for an altcoin, while also making Razor worthless.

There is a difference between the capability of running a client while connecting via TOR and having it built into the client so it *only* connects via TOR.

Again, you can make it so that your bitcoin/any altcoin wallet Only runs over TOR. So again, Razor's main feature is obselete.

Are you saying a developer can implement this or that a user can do this to their own client?  If the former, that's the nature of open source software and by that logic the features of all currencies are thus obsolete, and so it's pointless to even bring up.

If you mean the latter, then you are assuming way more technical knowledge than most people have, and you're also ignoring that Tor only works well if it's used 100% consistently, and used entirely within a Tor network, which wouldn't happen if you expect individuals to set it up and run it themselves.

So there is an actual distinction between Tor being built in and always-on, vs a client merely being capable of using it.


Ok, you've made a point. However, simply making this your main feature is useless. It isn't that hard to run a wallet over TOR with any other altcoin, so Razor taking that one step further yes, makes it more accessible to less technical people to do, but is also pretty useless, since that is Razor's only feature... TOR has been "hacked" before as well.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 [34] 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 ... 95 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!