how is the bonus calculated. by total amount of GLBSE share or the amount of shares claimed on Bitfunder? when will the bonus get payed out?

Reserves issue has sorted itself for me.

Got a rather annoying problem at moment - somehow most of my BTC is committed to an order that doesn't seem to exist.

My total BTC is correct (it matches the amount calculated by summing all transactions and also matches what my spreadsheet tells me I have).  But nearly all of it is committed - yet no Bids show up either in the My Assets/Market Orders tab (just my one Ask shows there) or on any assets (I looked at all 4).  There WAS one order of mine earlier which I cancelled - but that was only a very small one (and worked fine when I cancelled it).  Problem arose when I started looking for the other order(s) and there just weren't any.  It's a bit strange - as it's unlike me to go offline and leave BTC sitting around that AREN'T committed to an order, so I wuold have expected to find a bid of mine somewhere

Have checked on Firefox and Chrome - same on both.

If I got into any asset, BTC balance shows as :

BTC Balance    ฿1.799350    ฿1.725050    ฿0.07430

i.e. it's saying 1.725 BTC is reserved for a bid - yet no bids show anywhere.

Looking at all 4 assets, only place is could possibly be would on S-Dice (other 3 don't have total Bids even adding up to 1.72 BTC).  But only bid large enough there to contain my funds is the one for 3200 units at .0033 - and 1.72505 doesn't divide evenly by 0.0033.  So my funds must be either spread over multiple orders or tied up in a completely invisible (to me) one.  Or is there some other way to reserve funds that I've inadvertently clicked?

The changes in previous psot partially work for me - can't say for sure on all as I can't unreserve funds to test on the Bid side

Max Cost field is editable still (pretty sure it went uneditable for a while last night - whie it was still called Cost).

Here's how the quick-fill (semi) works for me.  This is on CoinBr.MPBPT-O.

Bid side is:

Quantity    Price    
5    ฿0.050    
1    ฿0.010    

If I click Quick Fill by the 5@.05 it correctly sets quantity to 5 and min price to .05.  Min earned stays at .05 even if I click calculate button - would expect it to change to .25 or .25*(100%-fee%).

If I click Quick Fill by the 1@.01 it correctly sets quantity to 6 and min price to .01.  Min earned stays at .05 even if I click calculate button - would expect it to change to .26 or .26*(100%-fee%).

It seems Min Earned is just staying at the price of 1 unit at the highest Bid.  No big deal - but not all that useful.

It then occurred to me that maybe you'd put something very useful in - so I entered (it's editable) 0.2 into "Min Earned" and clcked calculate.  Nothing happened (had hoped maybe it would set quantity to 4 and min price to .05).  So not quite sure what this field does.

Quick Fill on bid side looks to work similar - i.e. sets price/quantity right but the Max Cost field does nothing beyond stick at lowest Ask.

1.  At top of screen where you show BTC balance it currently shows the uncommitted balance (i.e. excluding BTC committed to buys).  Showing your actual BTC balance would be far more useful (for me at least) - largely because that changes if a Bid of mine gets filled, whereas uncommitted balance doesn't.  So at present there's no indication when an order of mine has filled - I have to remember to check assets screen.  You'd need to make this change anyway if you're working on the change to allow same BTC to back orders on different assets.

2.  On trading screen, at present the Total field allows user input but does nothing.  It should either be non-editable (to avoid the temptation to enter price by mistake there then when click Buy/Sell, act straight into the other side of order book as you didn't change actual price) OR should work (on Bid side) that you enter an amount there then click calculate and it works out how many shares you can buy at the price you entered.  Personally I'd prefer it be made non-editable.

3.  On trading screen is it possible to make it so that you can click on an order (bid OR ask) and it sets both BOTH prices to the value you clicked on - often when placing an Ask or Bid you want to place just above/below current ones: click to set price allows you to just edit last digit without the possibility to enter wrong number of zeros and sell/buy from other side book of book.

I am working on a couple more mini-feature's for the order lists/areas that should prove useful to some.

4.  More complicated (this works on btc-e) would be getting calculate to work properly (combined with point 3 above)

Say Ask side of book is

3 @ 1
5 @ 2

Then an order of 8 @ 2 should compute a total of 13, not 16.  And if you click the 5@2 it would ideally set quantity to 8 and price to 2 on Buy - giving correct quantity/price to buy down to (and including) that point.

Since MPOE bonds contain user serviceable parts (the interest rate), any word on what strategy you will be using?

The interest rate requested on the MPOE bonds will be set to the discretion of the issuer to maximize profit.

Hey, I might be misunderstanding, but when viewing an asset, and you see the orders, you would like to know which one is yours right?
Do you see the cancel button like pictures above? That button will help you locate all of your orders for that asset. The number in the ()'s is the number of shares you are buying/selling within that price group.

I found a way to view orders by clicking on "My assets" (second menu row) and then clicking on "Market Orders" (third menu row).

This does seem a bit un-intuitive and hard to find, it would be nice if on the asset listing page where it lists all the orders, mine had an option to cancel or change there on that page, rather than going through two page loads.

Today I walked into a random bank.  Asked for a notary.  Got the document notarized in about 10 minutes.  They did not charge me anything and never even asked me if I had an account at their bank.  Don't the banks elsewhere provide a similar service for free?

I still have to spring for the darn postage stamp to send it in though.

Further to previous post have now found a way to cancel bids (they're listed under My Assets).  Would far prefer them to be identifiable and cancellable in the main market trading screen.

Thanks - answered my questions, however a new one now arises.

FAQ says : "Selling fees range between between 1% and 0.5%(or lower with discounts) based on your account tier.
We be offering some promo permenant discounts and can lower your accounts fee rate per tier."

But the table listing permanent rates (no discounts) has all rates between 0.1% and 0.05%.  Either there's a decimal place error somewhere or the table is listing some sort of initial promotional rate rather than the actual permanent rates.

On 2. I think you missed my point.  The FAQ tells me that there ARE different fee rates (from .5% to 1%) but not what the volume requirements for those points are.  e.g. you start off at 1%, after paying X BTC fees it drops to .9% after another Y BTC to .8% etc.

On 3. You part-answered half the question (it's instant to withdraw from site to my WeExchange wallet) but not the main issues:  Do they charge me a fee for using their service and are withdrawls from them instant (I tried going to their website but there's basically no info there unless I register which involves giving a name, address etc).

On 4.  The question isn't whether everything's backed - obviously any order on the book MUST be able to be filled: if someone places an Ask at .00001 then it should fill every Bid on there without exception (assuming prices are limited to 5 dec places precision).  But allowing the same funds to cover multiple orders on DIFFERENT assets doesn't break that - it just means that if someone clears one order book then some orders on other books may go.  That can happen anyway - key is that every book is still 'honest' in that every order in it is backed all the time it's up.  The system I prefer helps pretty much everyone: daytraders (like me) can leverage their funds better, covering multiple (relatively) illiquid markets with the same cash.  Investors who want whichever of a few 'good' deals fills first can do that.  That adds more liquidity meaning lower spreads for those investing - and more confidence in liquidity for investors which leads to more sales for asset issuers.  And the increased volume gives more revenue for the site.  To be completely clear i absolutely do NOT support anyone being able to place bids exceeding available cash on a single asset - but using the same cash to bid on multiple assets (with auto-cancellation when a purchase would otherwise make a bid uncovered) is totally fine: it's no different to anyone else to if the bidder actually had more cash but was cancelling their orders on other assets when a sale on one occurred.

I have an account and just tried the trading interface, I would have to agree with the post above about showing more info.  May i suggest something JUST like btc-e site.  shows the calculation of the trade .. I should not have to use a calculator to know how much btc i need to make a trade.

Nice simple interface......  thank you ( I tend to shy away from the crazy DHTML type sites)

1.  Is it possible to change the BTC address associated with an account or are you tied to the one you enter on account creation?  I haven't actually fired up a BTC client for ages (use just exchange accounts) but would obviously need to so so if the account I enter on creation is not changable thereafter.

2.  I see there's a floating scale for trading fees.  Where can I find a list of the rates and volumes needed to qualify for them?

3.  I see references to Weexchange.  As best I can make out, I'd need to create an account there then deposits/withdrawals to/from my account on your exchange would be done through them.  Two questions arise from this (if my understanding is correct - if not, then I'm totally at a loss as to what they do):
a) Is there any fee charged for using them as an intermediary (fee to me that is - don't care whether or not you pay a fee on top)?
b) Do you know if deposits/withdrawals to/from them are instant or have to go through some approval process?  i.e. if I withdraw from your site can I be confident to get the BTC to wherever I want 6 blocks later (I'm assuming the withdrawal from site to my wallet on Weexchange would be immediate)?

4.  Can't tell from looking at orders - but is it possible to apply the same funds to orders on different securities (as on BTC.CO) or does every order have to be backed by seperate BTC (as on GLBSE and CRYPTO)?

5.  Is there a reason for listing volume per asset in number of shares not in BTC?  BTC gives a much clearer picture of activity level (10 shares at 0.1 BTC is, to me, same economic activity as 1 share at 1 BTC - not 10 times as much)?

Good to see a nice clean/clear interface like BTC.CO rather than the abortion that Crypto is (can't find ANY way there to see my orders on an asset at the same time as the market orders for it).

It looks like one can place more bids for an asset than they currently have in their account? Is this expected? To me it seems the platform should not allow people to place more bids than they have bitcoins?

You are going to make a profit, and the longer you wait, the bigger the profit.  less than 50k shares of S.DICE left before 2nd tier IPO sells out.
2.5M of the IPO sold in the last 48 hours.

Thanx for the info.

It's hard to decide with of the two (BitFunder and BTC-TC) is the best. BitFunder has lower trading fee and BTC-TC has more features and more users I think?

Was just having irc chat with Ukto and it looks there is going to be some mechanism for moving the reinstated GSDPT shares between bitfunder and btct, maybe it can be extended for this use case, too?

[14:25] <Ukto> jurov: actually, he said for now there would be no transfers between

[14:26] <Ukto> it may change at a later time, but shares issued on each are for good
[14:26] <Ukto> this doesnt mean someone else couldnt use my direct trade feature to act as transfer agent between sites either

Last time I checked there custom cert options required a cert with private key on there servers, if they changed that good for them. If your sure the encryption is 100% end-to-end it should be fine, I still dislike and avoid supporting them sins they offer insecure services as well.