If that's the cause, why we should look for a reason not to support them? This will be a show match and the problem is how they will manage to make this charity match into reality? They are old and they are no longer in their primes, we can't expect an intense fight but it should be a good show.
|
|
|
If I'll follow the conditions, here are my possible choices. Most of the top 100 are newcomers and I'm not familiar with most of them.
|
|
|
Op posted only this thread and never get back. If some investments promise you that you'll get xx% of returns, don't put yourself into greater risk and don't trust them.
|
|
|
besides that security is also very good and full responsibility to the customers there if something happens
They have proven this with one incident when they were hacked. And most exchanges when they were already hacked, which makes them the number one exchange to be avoided by their customers but Binance handled it well. It's how the #fundssafu started. Binance offers full refund after $40m hack
|
|
|
Both has timing in selling. You hold long or short term, it's the key to know whether you profit or not. Having low patience will make you sell in the short term even if the prices don't go with your plans. We have our own timeline and the thing to remember is to sell in appropriate time.
|
|
|
Ok, so you're into an auction having a trustless system. I guess almost everything can be applied this technology, you know what I'm saying when bitcoin was borned. A lot of ideas came out and mimicked the idea that it brought to us. As for the example you have saying about minted coins, I think the correct word should be newly mined coins.
The word "mint" in that context is still OK in my opinion. I understand why some would prefer the word to the other. It conveys the actual meaning (production of new/fresh coin) more. Mining is more suitable for Bitcoin-like Proof of Work while the other sounds better for the PoS Yes, that's PoW and when he used minted he's talking about it. Anyway, you're right that either terms are correct and understandable, not a big deal. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
New slots for BitDice but for full and senior members. I am posting to let everyone know that we're potentially adding 2-3 new participants. Full members and Senior members only this time.
|
|
|
Online casinos. I'm not used to the environment of local casinos and I've been into online for a long time so that's base on real experience and no bias included. And the stay at home made everyone of us to appreciate more online casinos.
|
|
|
I’m leaving bye guy! Some haters are reporting my thread twice in a day. It’s very disgusting!
Don't be disgusted, it's probably because you're posting one after another. 32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.
|
|
|
The good idea for limited bounty participate with with consider fixed rewards because one of the important thinking investors profits. We know many projects want promote with lots of bounty rewards even thinking me totally a unless project. Therefore a real project want fixed rewards analysis there investors profits.
A real project won't determine the number of its bounty hunters. A project with or without limitation to bounty hunters can be real or fake. The thinking of making a project with fixed participants is just to limit the budget of a campaign. This is why some bounties don't look to the bounty pool rewards they have because they can get many people to join them which is in favor of them.
|
|
|
Please detail the initial deposit offer - 7 BTC bonus on your first deposits. Thanks
There's no need for any details, just look to the posts of cwil and SyGambler. That gives you the idea what kind of casino they are.
|
|
|
They blocked social media sites and that's why blocking any other thing such as cryptocurrencies is easy for them. They are a communist country so they can do whatever they want, let what they want to enter, ban what they want to ban and block apps that they want.
|
|
|
All those alts mentioned are already well established and you can't expect a big profit from it, it will just follow Bitcoin's price. But what if you stumbled upon a gem like I did and have high hopes of getting rich with it? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Idena Network (DNA) is one of the greatest ideas I've ever seen in crypto universe. I just hope that it delivers. :fingerscrossed: Good luck with what you have found but the mindset of thinking you'll be rich with it got it wrong. It's ok to think of it but putting too much hope might frustrate you. I looked at it and the volume isn't that much knowing that this was just launched a few months ago. Good luck anyway.
|
|
|
Not interested with the partnership. But I have a question, is there anything you can do to resolve those account of yours and just gamble on your own? I'm just curious.
|
|
|
What was that level means? I'm thinking what kind of leveling is that. Is that an exchange, a casino, I don't know.
OP is probably talking about multi-level marketing (MLM) where you ask a few people to become your downline by purchasing a product of their choice (that is available in the company you are working for). Yeah that's prolly what he's saying. So in unusual manner, he got to know about bitcoin through that kind of marketing. Those years way back were seen to have a lot of such companies and most people thought that bitcoin is all about like those marketing schemes.
|
|
|
If you have been investing that long and you made money with bitcoin which made you a millionaire of today's time. What makes you think that a new cryptocurrency will be that profitable? if you missed the year 2018, you probably not aware how many altcoins didn't make it up to the next year - 2019. And currently, most people are just into bitcoin and as you see the bitcoin dominance, it's always as high as 60%+ and it won't go down from that percentage unless it will.
|
|
|
Ok, so you're into an auction having a trustless system. I guess almost everything can be applied this technology, you know what I'm saying when bitcoin was borned. A lot of ideas came out and mimicked the idea that it brought to us. As for the example you have saying about minted coins, I think the correct word should be newly mined coins.
|
|
|
But it wouldn't be an ICO anymore. They can still have a crowdfunding but there's no need to let it through an ICO. Most startups that comes from Silicon Valley have higher chances of getting investors than any ICO and they don't have to make it as an ICO. Angel investors looks forward to them and I don't think they've been thinking of this idea.
yeah, agree, it is hard to expect that ICO time will come back, today or any day after, since there was a bit of scams within ICO time, and most of people do not want to invest in those schemes, new people will be introduced to the market, but do not think that they will join ICO's with IEO and similar investment opportunities available we need good projects to create new hype, no matter which type of financing will be dominant in that era There will be no comeback for ICO. That's already glued in my mind that if people will still see an ICO kind of project, there will be no longer an investor on it. The factor of being a known company is high and there's a chance but I will not take that moment to invest whether they will be the most popular company.
|
|
|
|