|
Friends, if anyone has ideas for the 4th round of the quiz (related to the history of the forum), do not hesitate to write to me in a PM.
If the questions/answers for the quiz are interesting and have not been published before, then I will be happy to add them to the new quiz.
|
|
|
|
You used to be cool man. You have changed.
Well, if you insist...  |
|
|
|
Hi icopress, can you please change my address to
bc1q8zgejysj2aetn7g3jdf7mjy8gql7ecmq8yrxfu
Thanks
No  |
|
|
|
Since you are a campaign manager, let me ask you something (a question to all campaign managers), if someone had negative feedback from 1miau for being pro-Russian or a Pro-puerto Rican for that matter, applied to a campaign you run, would you even consider looking at his post quality with that negative feedback? Do you think that in the campaigns I manage there are no users with red tags? Btw, the political position has nothing to do with when someone justifies the killing of Ukrainians (or any other nation). Therefore, if you were an incredibly high-quality poster, you had 100 positive reviews, then I would not care about it and I would definitely not accept you into the campaign. I think we could spare the forum at least 90% of the trust system drama if ALL campaign managers start evaluating participants only based on post quality with no consideration for feedback, this way nobody will be afraid of expressing their opinion on any subject, because the current system is directly tied to money, people have to keep their mouth shut to earn some BTC, [..] What do you think I do? I recommend that you look through the lists of Webmixer, eXch, MixTum or UniJoin and tell me what % of people wearing advertising signatures are spammers. And what % of spammers are in other campaigns? Then we will have a clear comparison of those who accept users in the campaign really because of the quality of posts. But until that happens, being a DT member means you have a lot of power, enough power to dictate who gets to make money and who does not, and as long as someone has that much power -- it's no longer a matter of " it's up to me to exclude, or tag people for things that I personally see fit". Anyone who looks at DT from a power standpoint doesn't deserve to be there, although in reality it all means little considering that 95% of users using the feedback system are misusing it... sending positive and negative feedback for any reason . In addition, I repeatedly refused to those who were in the top 10 most recognizable, asking to remove this or that participant from the campaign (btw, some of them also spread rumors that the now deceased Zepher was a drug addict all his life). That’s why I don’t agree with you that someone can dictate their terms to someone. |
|
|
|
Unijoin.store is now suspended  Dude, who are you? I don’t remember accepting a user with that name into a campaign. Please don't tell me  |
|
|
|
After the introduction of the flag system, red feedback can serve for other "overconfident things (c)". I have always been surprised how everyone vehemently quotes the admin’s phrase in which he talks about the correct use of the feedback system, referring to “trading risks,” but everyone forgets that the feedback system was created for the community and works only thanks to it. By the way, I am the first to leave negative feedback to this user, because I am deeply convinced that he deserves it, since his rude nationalist statements and repeated calls for the murder of other people are one of the worst things that can happen in our community. And based on this, I am convinced that if he had the opportunity to take away any material property from you or me with impunity, he would do it without any hesitation, so yes ... my tag addressed to this user will remain red, since I believe that this is more than a “trading risk”. It's rather simple, 1miau is not denying any of the accusations, he simply thinks that it is perfectly fine to use the trust system (both the trust list and the feedback) for the sole purpose of expressing his political views. Here is an example of a negative feedback he left on someone's profile Spreading deceitful bullshit and advocating for Putler's invasion against Ukraine + expressing his support for the Russians to kill more people in Ukraine. Engagement in such criminal activity is far worse compared to scamming someone. By legitimazing the invasion, Snork1979 passively helps Putin to kill innocent Ukrainians (and Snork1979 seems to be even proud of it). This is as disgusting as it gets. 1- He asked me to remove my positive feedback on his profile because of the political disagreement. (first red flag on his incompetence of being a DT member) [...]
4- He added me to his "distrust" list.
Using my own example, I can say that I asked some users at least three times to remove both neutral and positive feedback simply because I did not agree with it. And after I put forward my arguments, these feedbacks were deleted. If he asked you to do this, he probably had a reason. The other side of the coin is that the system of checks and balances of the trust system allows you to make subjective adjustments to personal trust lists, regardless of the opinion of a particular user... moreover, this does not require anyone's permission. And if at some point 1m' stopped trusting your feedback (even if it was positive), then he had every right to do so. Moreover... if I asked you to remove positive feedback from which I did not agree, and if you refused me... then I would definitely add you to my list of mistrust at least so that this feedback ceased to be visible to me. 5- He suddenly remembered to tag this user who also happened to disagree with his political views on the same topic, you could argue that his feedback was correct, but given the timing, it's an obvious retaliation, that user has been tagged since 2018, well the reference he used goes back to 2018, why tag him right after he disagrees with you on a political matter? We are all human, and most of us, if not all, are quite selfish about other people's problems, so I take this situation as a "catalyst" for getting involved in this matter. And given that you mentioned that the feedback was correct, then I think there is nothing more to discuss here. |
|
|
|
Could I know why the contest is hosted by that user Peanutswar? I don't mean it is bad but I would like to know more information about this. Like is Peanutswar a member of CoinRoyale team? Or was is hired by the team to host the contest? I guess the second possibility is slim because if Coin Royale team hire a Bitcointalk member to host it, they can go with icopress or they can simply host it by themselves with their representative account in Bitcointalk. The information is very needed, to avoid scammers open a thread, host a contest and run. It will be harmful for CoinRoyale reputation. An excellent question, but I am still convinced that if you were torn by curiosity, you could write to me and ask. I assume you are familiar with me and the way I do business, and I can assure you that without my knowledge, no one on this forum would promote the project that I oversee. This also means that if the user you mentioned announces weekly competitions, he was instructed by me and acts according to the template that was compiled in conjunction with the CoinRoyale team. Therefore, I believe that you have nothing to worry about. But I appreciate your observation. |
|
|
|
Don’t know where to put the hardware wallets left over from the Betnomi (with the Betnomi logo engraved)? [...]
Buddy, instead of making up facts, you should probably look up a little higher and see what the discussion is about. |
|
|
|
|
No, because one of my close friends confirmed the authenticity of the wallets, and as far as I know, they were delivered by MJ.
As for this year, I wanted to ask MJ to directly order 100 cold wallets from the manufacturer, which would not have the sponsor's initials on them.
Changed: I just received a letter from Trezor dedicated to Black Friday.
The essence of this conversation comes down to the fact that so many people use custodial wallets and this event is a great opportunity to allow many users to switch to the light side.
|
|
|
|
Thanks icopress. The spreadsheets Start Post count's in red did I do something wrong?
Everything is fine... I just decided to watch you more closely, so I left a note for myself. |
|
|
|
5 more days for the awaiting match were waiting on you! See you in the match event!
Damn... I wanted to check the odds for this match but I realized that it wasn't in the lobby yet. |
|
|
|
To be honest, I'm not too happy with this week's results / Payments for 10 week are on their way. [Exchange rate: 37.100] We have several vacancies. |
|
|
|
Friends, thank you all for a great week / Week 32 payouts are on the way. |
|
|
|
Welcome Friends, you have been amazing this week! Week 13 payouts are on the way. |
|
|
|
Welcome! Thank you all for a great week / Week 6 payouts are on the way [Exchange rate: 37,180]. |
|
|
|
Friends, week 28 payments are on the way. [exchange rate: 37,180]Do you feel inconvenienced by increased transaction costs? We are NO. And even if the transaction costs us $100, this should not affect you in any way, my friends. |
|
|
|
Пригласил igor72 Чуть позже открою охоту за остальными именами из списка. |
|
|
|
What if we met in the middle? Reduce the cash rewards split between the winners, and keep the physical prize (cold wallets) for the community members who voted. That seems fair to me and
The special wallets would still let voters feel invested. I don't know, just a thought.
Yes, but I cannot use both options since the minimum quantity of wallets that can be ordered is 100 units. So have to choose one or the other (and the wallets definitely wouldn't bear the sponsor's name). |
|
|
|
Welcome Tomorrow I will probably accept 1 more user (or maybe not). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
