Haha, davon habe ich auch noch nichts gehört, ist jedenfalls ungewöhnlich aber wenn es für HildeX so besser ist und genehmigt wurde, passt es ja. 
Ist halt extrem schwierig, da den Zeitpunkt herauszufinden, wann das konkret sein soll. Bei Übersetzungen klappt das vllt noch einigermaßen (wenn man den Text abgibt) aber bei Signatur-Bounties / Twitter / FB etc.? Immer, wenn man einen Post macht?
Aber bei den meisten Shittoken würde das eh keinen Unterschied machen, da sie zu beiden Zeitpunkten eh noch nicht gehandelt werden und daher 0$ wert sind.


So ist es. (Allerdings Paragraf 9) 


https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bewg/__9.html

Hab genau die selbe PM bekommen...

Na sicher. Damit der negative Trust wieder entfernt wird und er danach neue Fake-Übersetzungen postet, wie er es schonmal gemacht hat. Habe ihm mal netterweise geantwortet:

Well, actually o_e_l_e_o didn't said that and I guess he wouldn't say such a thing. 

If the Mempool is almost empty there's no reason to set a high fee and that's why checking the Mempool will show you how much you need to pay to get the transaction confirmed...
It's also possible to have a fast transaction while paying a very low fee. That's why I've made the guide. 

Krass, danke für den Hinweis! Ist immer wieder spannend, wen DarkStar_ auswählt. 

Die letzten Wochen wurden nun schon öfter Langzeit-Teilnehmer entfernt (sieht man, wenn man durch das Spreadsheet geht) aber jedoch keine Position neu vergeben, daher nun jetzt.

Allen viel Glück, dass ihr da genommen werdet! Der beste Schlüssel dazu sind natürlich hochwertige Kommentare also strengt euch mal an. 

Every Bitcoin transaction needs a transaction fee, so it is very important to keep it as low as possible while to ensure that the transaction arrives at the receiver in a timely manner. The speed of a transaction depends on how much fees you pay for it. These fees are indicated in Satoshi per byte (sat / byte). The higher the fee in sat / byte, the higher the likelihood that your transaction will be included in the next block. The miners select the transactions always according to the amount of transaction fees (sat / byte). This is logical, because the miners receive not only the block reward but also the transaction fees for all transactions included in the mined block.

Not every wallet allows you to adjust the transaction fees manually and even those who can do it have often very simplified default settings (and are too expensive). A good wallet that allows you to set transaction fees manually is Electrum.

After you've switched the settings, it is important to find out the optimal amount of transaction fees, which can be done on reliable and accurate websites. But at first you need to enable customized fees.

For this guide I'm using Electrum and the Mempool by Jochen Hoenicke.

So, you are only a few simple steps away from saving valuable Bitcoin:



1.

First, open your wallet in Electrum. Now let's start by making your wallet easier to surf through by using shortcuts. Now click on view on the top right corner and click the shortcuts you want as shown in the image below. In this guide I selected all of them.

---

2.

Now on older versions of Electrum, you can edit fees manually on Electrum through the tools and preferences menu, however on the most recent version you can't. The only way to customize your fees is to actually attempt a transaction. Now all you have to do is fill in the required wallet address and amount then proceed to hit pay. The window below should appear.

---

3.

Now you will notice that you can only adjust the fee via the slider which is not good enough. To be able to edit your fees manually click on the icon indicated in the image below.

---

4.

Now if you successfully completed step 3, the mini window bar below with checkable settings should appear.

---

5.

Now all you have to do is select the options you prefer for your transactions. However make sure to select Edit fees manually .

---

6.

Now you will notice that in addition to the slider you now have two check boxes for editing fees as shown in the image below. With the box highlighted in green below, you can edit fees by manually typing your desired fee rate in sat/byte. While with the box highlighted in red you can fill in how much fees you want to pay in BTC or mBTC.

---

7.

Finally, you’ll have to find out how much fees are necessary for your transaction. You can find it out when you follow the next steps:

There are several ways to determine the current transaction fee.
Of which  one way is to check ; Mempool Observer Topic and observe possible fees by the FeeBuddy bot.

Another nice way right now is to have a direct look to the Bitcoin Mempool. The Mempool is not a pool where the best memes are collected, but it represents the Bitcoin transactions waiting for confirmation. So a full Mempool means a high fee to send the transaction quickly, because many transactions are waiting for confirmation and compete to get included in the next block (only those having the highest transaction fees are selected for the next block until it’s full), while an almost empty Mempool is optimal to get your transaction confirmed paying only a low fee.

A good picture of the Mempool can be found on the page of Jochen Hoenicke: https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,24h.

On the website you can choose different time intervals where you can analyze the Mempool. There are 3 different graphs in total:
- Unconfirmed Transaction Count (Mempool)
- Pending transaction fee in BTC
- Mempool Size in MB

For our consideration, the first and the last graph are suitable, while the last graph is more effective for our purpose, as it shows the actual size of the Mempool in MB. Because sometimes it happens that very large transactions (in bytes) are waiting in the Mempool, which are listed in the first graph as a single transaction but need a lot of size (because they have many inputs, for example or are many non-SegWit transactions).  
But after all, the graphs are very similar:


Unconfirmed Transaction Count (Mempool):

---

Mempool Size in MB:





When you move your mouse across the graph, you can see which line represents how many satoshi per byte (sat / byte). This will allow you to estimate how much transaction fees you need to use for your transaction. You should also look back a bit in the past, how much MB of transactions was waiting the last few hours and whether the Mempool was generally emptied regularly. Then, it is reasonable to choose only a few satoshi per byte. Of course, it depends on how fast you have to send the transaction. If it is not necessary, it is advisable to wait or to send with a lower fee, which you think is realistic in the next few hours.

The big unknown variable is when the next block will be found. In rare cases, it may take more than an hour between two consecutive blocks. Then, many transactions accumulate which have to be included in the next blocks and until then a lot of time can pass. In addition, it is possible that many new transactions enter the Mempool in the meantime and if they have a higher fee than yours, they are included into a new block instead of your ones. So, there is also a risk of choosing a low transaction fee.


In addition, you should always check the transaction volume during past days. There are certain, frequently recurring patterns:




- After around 08:00 CET, the transaction volume tends to increase, around 23:00 the Mempool empties gradually (these times can vary, sometimes it’s starting earlier, sometimes later)
- Between 02:00 and 08:00 CET is the best time to send Bitcoin, when the Mempool is emptied regularly
- Monday is often the busiest time
- During the weekend the Mempool is usually much emptier than during the week, even at rush hour


Keep in mind that these patterns may change at any time, especially when BTC is increasing in price, many users doing transactions, so the fees will most likely also increase.

---

And finally, a short example:

Currently it was 01:00 CET here (night) when I made the screenshot, the Mempool is showing the following picture (daily overview):


It was Monday, so the transaction volume during the day was very high as expected. But currently, the Mempool is now almost empty again. It can be assumed that it will be empty several times tonight as in the previous week and it’s still the whole night left.

If you look at the size of all transactions in the Mempool by moving your mouse across the graph, you will see that the last block wasn’t completely full (approx. 0.55 MB (normally more than 1 MB fits into a block)). At this point, I would choose 2 satoshi / byte and the probability will be very high that this transaction gets already included in the next block.

And when you have a look at the graph you’ll also notice some transactions using a fee way too high… They had sent their transaction with more than 100 satoshi / byte, although a fee of only 2 satoshi / byte would have been enough to get the transaction into the next block. ^^

---

Translations:

Language	translated by	Title
___________________________	_____________________	_______________________________________________________________________
Nigeria (Naija)	Mia Chloe	Make sure say u no de waste BTC 4 fees way 2 high– step by step guide (Electrum)
Română (Romanian)	GazetaBitcoin	Evitarea plății unor comisioane BTC prea mari – ghid pas cu pas (Electrum)

Reserving new translations is currently not available.

Muss man nicht...
Soweit ich weiß, ist eine Gewerblichkeit nur dann gegeben, wenn alle folgenden Punkte erfüllt sind:

- Auf Dauer ausgelegt
- Nicht sittenwirdrig
- Eine Gewinnerzielungsabsicht vorhanden ist
- Eine Außenwirkung durch die Tätigkeit gegeben ist und Dritte klar erkennen können, dass es sich um ein Gewerbe handelt
- Die Tätigkeit ist selbstständig (nicht weisungsgebunden)

https://www.juraforum.de/lexikon/gewerbe
siehe auch § 15 EStG


Die Summen sind in den meisten Fällen nicht relevant, sofern keine Außenwirkung entsteht, z.B. bei Trading.

Weiß nicht, ob euch das auch schon aufgefallen ist aber das nimmt in letzter Zeit doch sehr stark zu:

Im Subforum Deutsch => Presse werden neuerdings immer wieder von den selben Accounts neue Beiträge gespamt, bei denen sie einfach nur den Anfang eines deutsprachigen Artikels von einer bekannten Seite kopieren und dann den Link als Quellenangabe verwenden. Beispiele:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182821.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182579.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182522.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181948.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182274.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182476.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182016.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182167.0

Bisher darin involvierte Accounts (beide spammen für die Minter Signaturkampagne):

qtronix
cxboyminer


Das ist soweit nicht gegen die Regeln aber auch nicht Sinn der Sache, da die Nutzer wohl nicht deutsch, sondern russisch sind:

Posts in russisch
Posts in russisch

Würdet ihr sowas melden oder nicht?

Dann kannst du dich freuen, denn privat sind die Anforderungen gemäßigter als wenn du es gewerblich mit allem drum und dran machst. Der Beitrag hier bezieht sich nämlich nur auf eine gewerbliche Tätigkeit. 

Sounds reasonable. I hope they won't let you down when their project will face difficulties (most projects will get them and then, an experienced and honest team is essential to make the right decisions). If their service can be used to buy food in McDonalds in Russia that's already a good achievement.

Hehe, das ist ja nix im Vergleich dazu, wenn jemand vor ein paar Jahren Bitcoin gekauft hat, also so viel ist da mit sponsern nicht, ich gebe allerdings trotzdem mein bestes.  
Aber selbstverständlich werde ich ein neues Tippspiel starten, wenn ich es gewinnen sollte.  

Wer noch Interesse am Tippspiel hat: Bitcointalk Bundesliga Tippspiel 2019/2020

---

Glaube das war in Development + Technical Discussion / Technical Support, das neben lokalen Posts für eine Auswahl präferiert wurde:

---

Ja, das wird schon. Du machst zumindest einen sehr engagierten Eindruck, was immer gut ist.  

Your suggestions are fine to reduce spam in Altcoin Bounties board and that could be already a good thing for moderators although I can't judge which kind of posts are annoying there. It's quite common that Bounty threads are spammy per design. 

In my opinion, the far bigger problem are shitposts in discussion boards such like Bitcoin discussion / Economics / Speculation / Altcoin discussion where shitposters go to submit their weekly required number of posts. They are derailing the discussion to post meaningless one-liners and their content isn't helpful at all. So I think it would be more important to clean up these boards.
Meanwhile, everyone of us is aware that there are tons of spam in Bounties (Altcoins) so we avoid going there because there's nothing to discuss. But the discussion boards are the ones where "discussion" is relevant and that's not possible if there are too many shitposts.

But it's a good intention anyway to make suggestions about limiting spam, so I appreciate your effort 

In most cases bounty managers need a proof that the account is actually owned by the person filling the form to avoid bounty cheaters. Otherwise, everyone could fill a form and claim to be owner of that account. If someone posts in the bounty thred he confirms to own the account.

Hatte die Statistik auch gesehen und gehofft, dass er da noch mehr Tage analysiert, da 3 Tage halt nicht wirklich aussagekräftig und daher anfällig für ungenaue Ergebnisse sind.

Genau das fand ich auch komisch, 48 Posts pro Tag kamen mir sehr wenig vor, 79 stimmen da schon eher. Vielleicht liegt es auch nur daran, dass DTalk lediglich 3 Tage analysiert hat, an denen es dann zudem sehr wenige Posts gab. Am Wochenende ist es generell eher ruhig hier und mit dem 31.08 (Samstag) hatte er einen solche Tag drin, während er nur 2 Tage unter der Woche mit in die Statistik genommen hatte (28.08. und 29.08.)

Und vielen Dank für dein Update in Meta, habe es gerade eben gesehen: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181338.msg52382681#msg52382681 

Also wenn man das mal macht, sollte das kein Problem sein aber habe bereits hin und wieder Kommentare (zumindest von yahoo) gelesen, dass er es nicht gerne sieht, wenn jemand das laufend macht. Und als Bounty Manager kennt man mittlerweile auch viele Accounts. Ebenfalls wird es nicht gerne gesehen, wenn die aktuellen Posts überwiegend nur aus Bewerbungen bei allen möglichen Kampagnen bestehen anstatt konstruktiver Posts (aber das ist überwiegend nur der Fall, wenn man zu diesen Zeitpunkt nirgendwo teilnimmt).

Hier mal ein paar Aussagen:

Dass man bei Kampagnenwechsel keinen Anspruch hat, in der vorigen Kampagne wiederaufgenommen zu werden, wenn die neue kürzer läuft:


Dass man sich nicht unbedingt für jede Kampagne bewerben sollte, die ein paar Satoshis mehr zahlt:

Edit: und ja klar, wenn man seine aktuelle Signatur entfernt, ist man da raus. Daher würde ich die neue Signatur erst übernehmen, wenn ihr auch genommen seid.

Also ich habe mich jetzt angemeldet und die BTC an efialtis gesendet. Weil hier alle so nett sind, habe ich mehr gesendet, als die Teilnahmegebühr erfordert, nämlich 0,0025BTC. Die Transaktion dürfte demnächst ankommen, habe sie mal riskant mit 2 Sat/byte versendet aber da Wochendende ist, sollte es nicht allzu lange dauern.

Steht noch auf unconfirmed: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/5231f38d747af5dcd795f76c953839c89bb84f8ea66ce683865e4d08a9627c63

Hmm, das englischsprache CL Tippspiel ist denke ich passender für den internationalen Forumsteil als ein Tippspiel für die Bundesliga. Zudem weiß ich nicht, ob die anderen dann hier kommentieren können, wenn sie kein Deutsch können.
Prinzipiell finde ich ein internationales Bundesliga-Tippspiel aber eine gute Idee, vielleicht könnte man das zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt machen und dann im internationalen Forenteil (Gambling discussion) posten. Gibt ja jetzt soweiso viele Nutzer hier, die bei einer Gambling-Signatur mitmachen und daher auf Posts in Gambling angewiesen sind.  

So, bin nun endlich dort angemeldet und ebenfalls dabei. 
Bitcoin sende ich morgen an die Adresse, die mir efialtis schon per PM geschickt hat. 

Ja, mach nur mit! Wir würden dich sonst sehr vermissen. =)

Geht bald wieder hoch, wenn man der folgenden Chartanalyse glaubt:


Gefunden auf Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/cz3vlb/when_i_thought_i_have_seen_it_all/

 

DT1 = giving valuable and accurate feedback, that's also possible if an user isn't very long member here but active in exposing scams.  
And even if account age is also a factor to be on DT1, 2 years for getting a Legendary account when the old ranking system was in place wasn't a big deal and doesn't mean that the user is also a good choice for DT. There are numerous "Legendary" accounts just posting nonsense to earn a few shittokens per week and it was pretty easy for them to rank up before Merit was in place. The only thing they needed to do was posting 1 shitpost per day, for 2 years.
The problem are old, farmed accounts before Merit was introduced.

bob123 gave already a very good answer: the time spent on the forum for exposing scams is a better indicator than the age of an account. In Scam Accusations are a few Sr. / Hero Members doing a very good job and their posts prove that they have a good knowledge.


Yes, there is always an incentive to buy accounts. So, why should we strengthen such an incentive if we can achieve it otherwise?


+1

The fact a coin is traded somewhere doesn't prove if it's a legit coin. Bitconnect was also traded on many exchanges and was a scam coin. I don't compare Bitconnect with Minter but a coin listed on exchanges doesn't prove anything.
In addition, most PoS coins with high returns are often ending up as dumped shitcoins because all the stakers are trying to sell them but there are no buyers...

Eben, und versuchen kostet ja auch nichts (außer der Zeit, die man für den Post braucht).
Aber letztendlich hat die strenge Auswahl durch gute BMs auch seine Vorteile:
- Kampagnen mit strengen Regeln setzen im Vergleich zu vielen Altcoin Bounties auf Klasse statt Masse, daher ist die Auszahlung pro Teilnehmer tendenziell höher (anstatt bei Shitcoin-Spamfesten mit mehr als 200 Teilnehmern)
- Es ist unwahscheinlich, dass die Kampagne durch Mehrfach-Accounts missbraucht wird
- Weniger Spam im Forum
- Gute Manager haben die BTC in Escrow, Scam ist dadurch ausgeschlossen

Ok, danke für das Update, kann ja noch werden

Yes, everyone who distributes crypto against Fiat / Fiat against crypto will need a license from BaFin. But I'm not a lawyer if there are some exceptions.

Spot9 (the new company) hasn't even a working product right now. They want to launch their zero-tolerance KYC-ATMs somewhere in the future but are already "cleaning" the market for their entrance. 
They are planning to fund their operations via shitcoin offering for their ecosystem (a Bitcoin bank and Bitcoin ATMs):


https://www.spot9.com/en/

The media released some articles about it like here but I guess Spot9 will use a part of their fundraising to place own articles supporting Spot9's point of view. The article is even giving a statement that existing ATMs are legal right now:


I think Spot9 is knowing very well that the customers will prefer ATMs without KYC and their product has no chance in a free market. So they are trying that way to compete by removing all competitors which they do not want...

But I think it's a bit off-topic here, I will open a new thread some time later. It will take some time until their shitcoin offering goes live. And if we have a look how successful such shitcoin offerings are right now, they will have a bigger problem than removing competitors: getting their own product up and running...   

---

Right now it's still legal without license, it's only mandatory from next year on (2020). BitPay shut down in advance, theoretically their operations would be legal until 12/2019 without license.