Since you've started Bitcoin Core, it downloaded 151.8 MB and uploaded 150.6 MB. So you're taking about the same from others as you're contributing. That's not a bad thing, but also it's not helping the network much in terms of bandwidth. But adding another node is always good for decentralization.

Linux sort by default uses /tmp for sorting files that don't fit it's RAM. I assume the WSL-version does something similar.
But the file you've downloaded from me should have been sorted already.

Bump: I've updated this data yesterday again. This VPS has 3.9 GB disk space left, so at some point it will run out. If that happens, I hope to move it to one that's big enough to handle updating it too (so I can do more frequent updates).

First: you should move (bottom-left) this topic to the Exchanges board.

Second: You're data is outdated. Current Binance withdrawal fees are 0.0002 BTC (and I've been told the SegWit amount on that page is outdated).
The reason for those high fees can be seen from the same page: Binance tries to trick gullible users into accepting their own made-up tokens instead of Bitcoin. There's only one Bitcoin, but Binance offers "BNB Smart Chain (BEP20)", "BNB Beacon Chain (BEP2)" and "Ethereum (ERC20)". As all altcoins, those are only created to make the creator rich. Don't accept substitutes! Even better if you don't use exchanges that promote fake Bitcoins for their own financial gain.
TL;DR: Don't use Binance.

That totally depends on the hardware you have.

Glad it worked I have only one thing to add: all_Bitcoin_addresses_ever_used_sorted.txt.gz was last updated 5 weeks ago (which reminds me to run an update now, but it takes a few hours). If that's okay for your data, you're good. If not, you may have to add a few recently used keys.

OP is looking for addresses that had movement (maybe to recover Forkcoins?), so he needs a much longer list: List of all Bitcoin addresses ever used.
But that's only useful if you have the addresses with the private keys. If you only have private keys, you'll need to convert them into addresses first (with most likely 3 different address types per private key).

If you have an address list it's quick:
Then all you need to do is match those addresses to their private keys again.

Are you trying to win on semantics from a non-native English speaker? I'm with tranthidung on this one:
Timelord2067's (quoted) question isn't clear. If you would have said for instance: "Have you asked others to remove their posts too?", there wouldn't be any confusion.
Tranthidung answered your vague question by stating the request didn't come from someone else. Don't blame non-native English speakers for being confused on vague questions. He didn't say he did not contact anyone else.

That was gone before I joined, but it sounds useful. Even better if the brightness depends on for instance earned Merit by the users who ignored them (to prevent abuse by alt-accounts).

Simply pressing Ignore is much better than high ranking users who continue their little feud with years of drama.

Read this again:
Follow the link to read the full description. This forum is all about freedom, but if you follow what it says there, you could call it mandatory. I believe it's necessary for the Trust system to work properly.
I also believe this:
But unfortunately, many people have a different interpretation.

You forgot the word "judgement". Trusting someone with money is not the same as knowing they leave accurate feedback. But since you're excluded from DT1, it doesn't matter to the rest of the forum anymore if you follow a different line of reasoning.

A user needs 10 votes to reach DT1, so individual votes barely mean anything. The users that were made DT2 by tranthidung won't reach DT1 any time soon.

Any server can see IP-addresses of connecting users. All I can tell you is that I don't care about IP logs (other than using it to stop very aggressive scraping bots). Feel free to access my notifications on Tor browser, I'm not restricting Tor and there isn't even an annoying Captcha. But just as I don't care about IPs, I also don't care if OP doesn't want to use it That's fine It would be a waste though to reject it for the wrong reasons: if you think a HTML page can hack your computer, you should probably not use the internet at all.

It depends: do they have good trust ratings and good trust lists?

It's much more useful for the DT-system if you don't get excluded, but also don't include users just because they've left you positive feedback. I can only speculate why you included some of them, but this is what it looks like.

There's always drama on Bitcointalk But that doesn't mean Timelord2067 (who himself has many DT1-exclusions) can't have a point. It's also something you can (easily) improve.

I'll click Ignore.

Correct:

It can happen. But from what I have seen, it's much more likely to happen to Newbie trolls who (for instance) claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto, than it is for established old members with a very strong conviction about a certain subject.

That link explains it already: "years of continual harassment and misinformation". I recently stumbled upon him again in a topic where someone posted something, and got a huge lecture from franky1 in return. I can't find back the post due to the sheer volume of posts.

It's clear franky1 doesn't like the Bitcoin Lightning Network, and unfortunately he posts this view in any thread he can. You may want to read Is LN Bitcoin? franky1: About scaling, on-chain and off-chain, but it gets worse after a few pages.

Agreed:

Enter it into Blockchair.com's search bar: it doesn't exist. That means, whatever happened, only happened for you, and not for the rest of the Bitcoin network.

Where did you download this "Electrum" version? It sounds like something's seriously wrong with your system. I'd say download Tails, but it onto a DVD, reboot your PC from that DVD, restore your Electrum from seed phrase, and see from there what happened to your Bitcoin.

Thanks again for your flawless timing!

How strict are we on plagiarism nowadays? I stumbled upon this:

The system is based on RHavar's seeding event, and it's the last quote that got my attention because even the name is a combination of 2 other sites that have done the same thing.
I didn't report any of those posts, just bringing it here to discuss.

I just checked for this post, and I found it back in Recent Posts. But only if you log in, which I assume your scraper doesn't do for this.

It's possible to scrape hidden boards too, but those posts aren't supposed to be accessible by anyone (including search engines). That's why they're not scraped.