thanks a lot, can you tell me how to stop re-broadcasting it?
do you mean quit the bitcoin-qt?
Yes. If you still want Bitcoin Core open, then you need to start it with the option -zapwallettxes. Also you should upgrade to the latest Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 because 0.8.6-beta is old outdated software. |
|
|
|
How much Internet speed you have ? because downloading the whole block can take a few gigs If you don't really want to download the whole block that can take gigs, you can use wallet like electrum where you don't need any block indexing and ready to go  Though, you will need to import your old private key from Bitcoin core to Electrum, shouldn't be a problem for you right ? Since he is reindexing, internet speed doesn't matter, hard drive and CPU do. The blockchain is not being redownloaded here. |
|
|
|
|
No, you do not have to wait 5 years. That just means the latest block that it had indexed is from 5 years ago. The reindexing should only take a few hours to a day or so.
|
|
|
|
How could an mp3 recording be verified to be what it is supposed to be?
If you hash the file you can post the hash, and retain the file. Anyone you send the file can verify it by using the same hash on it and comparing the result with the advertised one. But that isn't a Zero-knowledge proof. The proof is the data itself, not some subset of the data which proves the data is legit but does not reveal the data itself. |
|
|
|
that was my first intention , but : what happens if they take advantage of the situation and stay with the bitcoins ?
Who are "they"? Again, you should probably talk to support for the site. |
|
|
|
I have an account on a page that buys and sells " bitcoin " . I never made a deposit , and recently see a deposit of 4.19 bitcoins . I do not know the sender. What should I do?. What are the legal consecuencies if i spend it?
On what site? Can you provide a transaction id for the deposit? There are probably no legal consequences of spending the Bitcoin, but just to be safe, you should probably contact the site's support. |
|
|
|
|
I have actually thought of this and I agree that it is somewhat of a legitimate concern especially for third world countries where it is very difficult to access the internet with a speed good enough for doing stuff with Bitcoin. There are several unrelated projects which work to get internet access to everyone such as Google's Project Loon. However, I think the Bitcoin community should come up with their own project for Bitcoin specifically.
I think we should make a Bitcoin Radio network where nodes can connect to each other over radio to relay blocks and transactions. If we get a few cubesats then this radio network can be spread across the world and used for connecting people to Bitcoin without the need for internet.
|
|
|
|
Edit: Build error:
Interesting. I just built the latest version without any problems. What's your platform? It's fixed on the latest version. I'm on Ubuntu 15.10 |
|
|
|
|
When was mining removed from Bitcoin Core? I don't see it removed.
Anyways, I don't think that it will be removed since mining code is required for testnet and regtest. It would be a little pointless to change it to only be able to mine on the test networks and not the mainnet as that just adds extra code. However it could be removed from the mainnet code since there really is no point in attempting to solo cpu mine Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
on /bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log
I found this log
receive version message: Why? Because fuck u, thats why: version 70002, blocks=
Can anyone explain this message to me?
thx
Each node on the network sets a version string to identify the software being run. It looks like someone set their version string to be "Why? Because fuck u, thats why". Setting this string requires changing and recompiling code. |
|
|
|
Build error:
fixed Does armoryd indicate if the transaction is RBF? Or is it just GUI right now?
only the GUI Great. Testing it now. Also, I used to be able to double click an address in my wallet for more details but it seems that I can't do that now. |
|
|
|
but this is an official version of bitcoin wallet?
who "create" and "share" it and decide the implementation?
sorry but I am a newbie and I need to know more in depth BTC
This is Bitcoin Core, which is currently considered the reference implementation. It is an official wallet and it is based off of the original client written by Satoshi. The writers of the software include many people in the community, but most of them aren't active on Bitcointalk because good discussions don't happen here. |
|
|
|
|
Can you post the debug log?
I think that you will probably have to reindex to fix this.
|
|
|
|
|
The only wallet I know of that provides interest, albeit very small, is HaoBTC. AFAIK they are a legitimate company and they have a huge mining operation. There is a thread about that mining op in the mining section.
|
|
|
|
|
In the context of your Sudoku puzzle, what is the proof and how does that proof prove that the sender knows the solution without actually telling the receiver what it is. Can you give an example?
|
|
|
|
Pushed opt-in RBF detection. Regarding inheritence, I went took the simple route: any ZC of ZC is flagged as mempool replaceable, whether the chain of ZC has an RBF input somewhere or not.
If this version passes the test, I'll release the first testing build based on this state.
Awesome. Will be building and testing. Edit: Build error: g++ -Icryptopp -Imdb -DUSE_CRYPTOPP -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/python2.7 -std=c++11 -O2 -pipe -fPIC -c BDM_supportClasses.cpp
BDM_supportClasses.cpp: In member function ‘std::map<BinaryData, std::vector<BinaryData> > ZeroConfContainer::purge(std::function<bool(const BinaryData&)>)’:
BDM_supportClasses.cpp:620:52: error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ‘BinaryData&’ from an rvalue of type ‘BinaryData’
auto& bhash = lastKnownHeader->getPrevHash();
^
Makefile:97: recipe for target 'BDM_supportClasses.o' failed
make[1]: *** [BDM_supportClasses.o] Error 1
Edit 2: Does armoryd indicate if the transaction is RBF? Or is it just GUI right now? |
|
|
|
Pruning and forks are two completely unrelated things.
OK my logic was: the blockchain is used to validate transactions sequentially, the war over max block size is resulting in several code bases with soon-to-be incompatible blocks, at some point there will likely be a fork, so therefore a pruned blockchain might not be ideal for revalidating several months worth of mining and transactions, and/or choosing the right fork. Make sense? Choosing which fork to use is by whichever client you choose to use. In the case of a fork where two blockchain do survive and are viable, pruning would probably not be a good idea. However, no one can really say what will happen and how pruned and unpruned nodes will respond and what would need to be done (whether reindex or redownload) if you switch blockchains after several blocks into a fork. Such a thing has never been done before. Until the fork does happen though, it is safe to use a pruned node, and when the fork does happen, it should (hopefully) happen without issue and there will be consensus. |
|
|
|
Who controls bitcoinarmory.com? It appears that the site is back up and different from the old one. It also has the latest versions posted.
Edit: typos
Domain seems to be still controlled by etotheipi... I wouldn't trust it though. Does anyone have the sig hashes from the latest version? We can compare them with the ones on the website in order to be sure. They're on https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory/releases/tag/v0.93.3 |
|
|
|
I have read that with 0.12 even the biggest noob can enjoy privacy with Tor, you just have to open both programs at the same time (Bitcoin Core and also open a Tor Browser window).
My question is, do you need to open one before the other? Like, first you open Core wallet, then open Tor Browser window, or first Tor Browser window then Core wallet? or this this irrelevant
And when do you know the privacy has been established? I think Core Wallet should show some easy to see visual sign in the corner "Tor mode activated" or something cause I cant see nothing.
only with bitcoin core? but there is a way to see the real ip of tx id? likewise from sender? It is not possible to see what IP sent a transaction. Transactions do not include IP information. |
|
|
|
I am giving away invites to https://keybase.io/. PM me for the invite. Tips to 16mT7jrpkjnJBD7a3TM2awyxHub58H6r6Z are welcomed. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
