|
its also the first time i have seen this, im using ubuntu lxc container on debian (proxmox) everywhere and they are rock solid, no clue what is responsible for this.
so i suppose the printed mem map and stuff did not explain whats the issue?
cheers
|
|
|
|
@joblo i got a strange buffer overflow, you might know if this is miner related: system is a Ubuntu server 16.04 LTS LXC container on proxmox (kernel 4.4.13-1-pve) able to use 2GB ram miner got terminated, my log (stdout/err from cpuminer) displayed the following: https://paste.felixbrucker.com/paste/avy2w |
|
|
|
I have an update on supporting cryptonight at nicehash. I implemented the changes and they seem to work and they don't break other pools so there was no need to impmement pool-specific code. My test results on Nicehash are erratic, possibly a pool issue. I was initially submitted 20-25% rejects but that seems to have stopped. The latest session is up to 36 accepts @ 100%, and counting. I also experienced periods of extremely frequent thread hashrate output from one or 2 threads, around 100 per second, showing a hash count of 1 with a normal hashrate. This occurred twice at startup and I killed it. It also happened mid session and cleared itself. This is not associated with the rejects, I still submit valid shares but they show a lower than normal hashrate. This is what it looks like: [2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #0: 1 H, 72.57 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #1: 1 H, 56.63 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #0: 1 H, 55.92 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #1: 1 H, 64.27 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #0: 1 H, 67.63 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #1: 1 H, 54.73 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #0: 1 H, 55.19 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #1: 1 H, 71.66 H/s
[2016-08-25 12:23:28] CPU #0: 1 H, 69.21 H/s
More testing to do. thanks for this! |
|
|
|
i would love to see ivy bridge (i5-3330) and AMD A6-6400K versions of the windows bin, though the AMD part might be tricky if someone knows a good writeup on compiling on windows with mingw (tried to compiled but failed) im willing to compile thhe latest versions for those targets and make them avaiable on github. i have gone ahead and created a github repo with an exact copy of the sourcecode for easier deployment on my rigs, everyone feel free to use it while there is no official repo ( https://github.com/felixbrucker/cpuminer-opt). cheers |
|
|
|
|
@joblo
just remembered i was using your miner with optiminers hodl pool with the proxy just fine for several days straight, so it seems indeed to be nh related, i will try to get in touch with them, as a temporary resolution i will most likely just restart the miner if my app detects it is "hanging"
thanks for your help though
|
|
|
|
|
for me it stays disconnected until restarted (that is killed and started again)
socks is just proxying tcp and udp connections, so its not protocol aware, will test when im back
br
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm i only had this issue if using socks, when connected directly the miner was running fine, socks is setup correctly and working fine with other services as well, will test if this also happens with other miners with nicehash to determine if its a miner or nh problem
will take some time as im leaving for vacations today though
br
|
|
|
|
|
a work restart is perfectly normal
|
|
|
|
hi joblo, im having a rather unusual problem when running the miner (latest version in linux + 3.3.8 on windows tested) and using a socks proxy, after some time the miner loses the connection with Stratum connection failed: Could not resolve host: lyra2re.eu.nicehash.com
...retry after 10 seconds my proxy reports this: sockd[11167]: info: block(3): tcp/accept ]: 10.1.0.47.36480 10.1.0.40.1080: error after reading 4 bytes in 0 seconds: eof from local client
sockd[11168]: info: block(3): tcp/accept ]: 10.1.0.47.36482 10.1.0.40.1080: error after reading 4 bytes in 0 seconds: eof from local client such an error only happend before and directly when starting the miner if i did not specify my proxy was socks by "socks5://" maybe you can look into it  br |
|
|
|
|
a pool does not increase hashrate, more and/or better optimized miners do
|
|
|
|
|
A miner has the choice of solo or pool mining, either way the hashrate increases by the amount of hashes this miner has
If your point is that this miner would not choose to solo mine if there is no pool (and thus not increasing the net hash with his personal hashrate), then i dont believe this until proven otherwise.
Its funny how some people blame pools as is for lower income, whereas they really just cant accept someone invested a significantly higher amount of money into their setup (and im not talking about myself, i invested nothging into hodl mining) and in return increased the nethash. Anyone interested in mining coins will not be stopped by using the wallet.
200 miners mine via solo, 100 switch to the pool, the nethash did not increase, i dont know how to make this clearer
Additionally your statement about gigantic miners doesnt make any sense
|
|
|
|
|
if every "gigantic" miner (which apparently did not show up till now) used the wallet to mine it would be the same
yes a pool simplifies the process to get started, but a "gigantic" miner would not be stopped by setting up a wallet if there is profit to make
setting up a wallet is not like defusing a bomb or something
|
|
|
|
|
a pool does not kill solo mining
imagine everyone in the pool(s) solomining, the nethash/diff would be the same
its just easier for miners to mine on the pool as it does not require a (full) wallet on each machine
br
|
|
|
|
|
json would be fantastic
im interested in addr hashrate, current balance, pending balance, pending payout, pool hashrate and network hashrate
these could be implemented as separate methods as some are addr specific and some are more general (much like mpos does it)
if you got workers working im basically only interested in worker speed and diff
thanks for looking into it!
br
|
|
|
|
@optiminer is there some api interface planned? right now to get stats one has to parse the whole html page and extract information about speed etc manually additionally stats for each worker separately would be nice |
|
|
|
Hello all,
Woow just by using the benchmark mode my 4790k goes to almost 430H/s
I wanted to try the pool but it does not look online
I don't suppose this is usable for wallet or solo mining? for that to work one must implement this block template thingy into the miner, which afaik isnt done here, too |
|
|
|
@optiminer haha noticed you already setup fees  so i guess no pool src :/ |
|
|
|
|
currently there only is one "beta" pool available over ipv6 only, all others are gone for now
http://[2a02:168:5829:0:76d0:2bff:fe92:d5da]:8080/ for stats
-o stratum+tcp://[2a02:168:5829:0:76d0:2bff:fe92:d5da]:5555 -u HODLADDR -p x for stratum
|
|
|
|
yes its "more than a dozen *different* ips", same ip but different miner should not get blocked i used the precompiled bin for hodlminer posted in the hodl ann thread, but the optimizations should be the same for your miner, wil lswitch to yours once cmb compiled them, i like yours better (though github would be really great to get latest sources on linux easily) i use the A6 machine for media purposes (thats why apu), mainly all my cpu miners are running on normal computers built for something else but while idle are mining for fun |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
