[flash] has never been enabled on this forum. That'd be terribly insecure.
|
|
|
|
|
What features are you looking for in a bot?
|
|
|
|
Fee estimation of many services was broken recently. We're rewriting Wallet to use estimate of Core which is more conservative than 21inc.
|
|
|
|
Can you please add a note to include the txid needing confirmation in the initial PM to me? I am receiving an increasing number of PMs asking for help every day, and it is becoming a hassle asking users for the txid in response to a message asking if I can help. This is especially true considering that the time I am able to devote to the forum is declining.
Thanks.
If anyone knows of any other similar threads, please feel free to x-post the above quote. Added. |
|
|
|
Is there any way to set custom fees in that portal? Do we have to switch to Electrum or something?
I am not using Trezor, just sharing the news. But I know that you can use Trezor with many wallets such as Electrum and with those wallets you can in fact set the fee manually. |
|
|
|
Open Source Everything under MIT License  |
|
|
|
You might as well help your fellow bitcoiners while you are at it: ▲▼Does your transactions take too long to confirm?▲▼ [center]▲▼[b]Does your transactions take too long to confirm?[/b]▲▼[/center]
[center]█████[url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1802212.0] Read this topic by achow101 to learn more about what you can do. [/url]█████[/center] |
|
|
|
|
I have seen a couple of these proposals and I always have one shared thought about all of them: I never understand why people even want to have an easily, memorable phrase instead of that scary hash160 string. When you buy something from an online store you never memorize their payment details, you click a button and are redirected to a payment processor and it automatically fills in the data needed for you to make the payment. And nobody is ever scared of seeing that page. So why making a payment with bitcoin which means either clicking a payment link using BIP21 or scanning a QR code. But that's just my thoughts
Other problem that I see here, is being too limited (I believe the word for it is collision):
With bitcoin everyone who is using it has a unique address and will continue having a unique address for years no matter how many millions of people use it and generate new addresses.
In this proposal what happens when I register name "Foo", then 1000 others after me want to register the same name? "Foo.Bar"? "Foo.2"? "Foo.1000"?
There will always be very limited number of proper names to use before we start getting to hard names area. And the main issue you raised in the beginning will show up again. It will be hard to remember "My.Custom.Foo.Bar.Name.That.Is.Unique.To.Me".
Also the "centralization" and the "address reuse" issues that are already mentioned are not small things to overlook.
|
|
|
|
|
Closed source software era is coming to an end. Everything is moving towards a more open-sourced code. All the previously closed source software are even starting to release their code, realizing that is the new world.
For example Microsoft has been releasing .Net Framework source code for some time now.
And for something so sensitive as bitcoin which deals with a lot of money and should have certain aspects such as decentralization must be 100% open source.
|
|
|
|
Stuck tx help: https://goo.gl/HVCXa7 (Choose a better text, not sure how much you can fit in P.M.) (\/)^.^(\/) |
|
|
|
but the function is the function and the code is the code, you set a fee and an amount to send with address plus private key then you send
Not exactly. The cryptography part (generating a true random number, getting the public key and signing transactions correctly and without messing up) is the hardest part. There have been enough incidents leading to losses because of poor implementation of what seems to be easy. but have you thought about how to send out or receive if you don't have a full node?
That, my friend, is the easiest part! it is a simple code making an specific kind of message and sending it to other nodes. I say it is easy because I have done it and I am not even good at coding or Bitcoin! I want to know how could I have my wallet not of my own code but just electrum only connecting it directly to my full node and maybe I could even access my funds on full node wallet while I'm at home and Core running 45 miles away?
Or am I asking too much here? or maybe I need to put a few lilne of codes/ commands in Core wallet and set the Core IP as server in electrum?
Google JSON-RPC+bitcoin |
|
|
|
|
Interesting library, thanks.
|
|
|
|
TimeStamp in a block is just the miner's system time and date in Unix. After they mine a block, they add the TimeStamp to the header and finish up. Maybe what the documentation says means it has the accuracy of a few seconds as in "the code updates the TimeStamp variable right before finishing and hashing the block". And it can be different, if I am not mistaken there can be blocks with bigger block height with TimeStamp which is lower than previous ones. And that is because TimeStamp has a 2 hour room for mistake. Example: 145044: 2011-09-12 15:46:39
145045: 2011-09-12 16:05:07
145046: 2011-09-12 16:00:05 // ~5 minutes before prior block
145047: 2011-09-12 15:53:36 // ~7 & ~12 minutes before 2 prior blocks
145048: 2011-09-12 16:04:06 // after 2 prior blocks but still before 145045Ref.So miners can vary the time stamp, the transaction IDs and even the block version number to tweak the output during hashing to gain mining efficiency?
You can't just change transaction IDs, TXID is just a double SHA of raw transactions and you need to change the signatures to change the TXID and changing anything about it makes the tx invalid! P.S. I suggest moving this topic to "Development & Technical Discussion" board. |
|
|
|
Maybe someday soon this year, I go crazy and open source Sharp Trader™. I've already have something like this (without charts). The problem is that it takes too long to develope and I am super busy in life and only code as a hobby! Right now I'm stuck at different methods of arbitrage and adding some more information to my GUI charts. If you were interested you can see how it looks in my question in this board. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
