Did you receive any response from Bter? What are there working hours? I think they are from Japan so maybe it's 11 PM now for them  Bter.com the Chinese. Falsely represent themselves as an American site. See: http://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/bter.comWhere do they say they are american site? The site is hosted in the US (as listed on that scamadviser.com website). I don't really see why this is an issue. Many webcompanies host their stuff elsewhere than their country of origin. I can imagine China not providing good hosting deals for good global access. This is correct. People know that US protects human rights better than other countries. So hosting servers in US is much more safer. We dont know if they host in US or not. bter.com uses cloudflare to serve the pages faster, but we dont know where their site is actually hosted. Cloudflare has servers across the world to deliver content faster to users globally. Cloudflare being a US company, makes shitty sites like scamadviser.com think bter.com is hosted in US. Think of Cloudflare like a front-end to their site.... which adds a layer of caching, DDoS mitigation, lower latency, etc. Can we stop spreading FUD about hosting locations and etc based on shitty site reports which dont work? |
|
|
|
Did you receive any response from Bter? What are there working hours? I think they are from Japan so maybe it's 11 PM now for them Bter.com the Chinese. Falsely represent themselves as an American site. See: http://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/bter.comWhere do they say they are american site? |
|
|
|
|
WTS 8 FRK @ => 0.25 BTC/FRK ...
Drunk mode special offer... offer valid until i pass out.
Buyer sends first. I have loads of successful trades on YAC spreadsheet.
|
|
|
|
 As you can see i've been playing about with MSI Afterburner settings, still haven't got the sweet spot quite right, it's amazing how sensitive these cards are to such small changes. What MSI? what Afterburner? What cgminer? |
|
|
|
Black arrow please send cgminer free unit
still missing the point. cgminer with these lancelots works fine on my raspberry pi, today almost one week without any interruption.. ur missing the point when I do the Icarus (the last old serial-USB driver in cgminer) change (in the not too distant future) over to USB it may (or may not) still work.
What bitpop says is if cgminer gets a free unit, he can make sure that whatever changes to cgminer does not break lancelot support. |
|
|
|
In Soviet Russia, honest guys scam scammers. |
|
|
|
|
From what i see there r 4 options.
1) Gamecoin premined a long chain before launch, didnt release it. Then a while after release, he inserted the longer chain. It won cause its longer(and also each other installation has OP as peer). A sinister way to premine. At launch people can verify fewer blocks.
2) Gamecoin's butt was violated before launch, and the genisis block got leaked.
3) 51% attack.
4) Security vulnerability in gamecoind/gamecoin-qt
I dont see how the attacking the seed nodes would cause such distruptions. People already connecteded to the network before the seed nodes were allegedly attacked would have continued working like nothing happened... cause they had other peers. I have 70 right now, and > 50 connections before the thing happened.
I am not accusing gamecoin, just listing the possibilities as i understand it. OP is innocent until proven guilty.
|
|
|
|
Block got orphaned after 27 confirmations.
How? Why?
suddenly lost connection for a second and when it came back all blocks that were confirmed a while ago disappeard  be happy, i lose 3.5 mil, feeling that, you find a tons of gold and suddenly goverment come take it away u lost immature or even confirmed ones? |
|
|
|
|
Block got orphaned after 27 confirmations.
How? Why?
|
|
|
|
Great work Narken, very fast! Tried to do the changes myself but that didn't work out.  I think YAC could get you many donations, people are desperately waiting. YAC is not simply a matter of adding... more difficult than this. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=200311.02100YAC - 1st P2P pool with code available, conditions need to be met** Those conditions are by me. Ill accept YAC compatibility in your branch since its has original p2pool in its tree upstream.... but i guess ull be busy counting FRK today..... |
|
|
|
Think I got everything sorted out now, seems to pay out also http://chncoin.no-ip.biz:9225Port changed to 9225 and moved to Ubuntu server cgminer --scrypt -o chncoin.no-ip.biz:9225 -u yourCNCaddress -p 3% fee? Really bro? You know everyone is using my p2pool-altcoin base code, but noone is donating for my work. So I might as well make fake 3% fee for my work P2pool server code will be release here when ready: https://github.com/narken/p2pool-altcoinsF5 raping the commit log... |
|
|
|
Also funny that there's no obj-directory, therefore it can't be compiled.
saw that with another coin a week or so ago. |
|
|
|
|
WARNING: Run it in a sandboxed environment. Even if if you compile from sources.
The git repository is not a fork from existing trusted tree, so peer review of the source would take time.
|
|
|
|
I'm contemplating an automated exchange and have one fundamental question. I see various exchanges using varying amount of confirms, bter uses 4, btc-e and clients use 6 confirms. Have people had experiences with the transaction getting lost with < 4 confirms? How big of a risk that is at all?
Unlikely for individual person to person small trades. But if I were running an automated platform, id use 6 confirmations for BTC and more for faster currencies. I think 51% attack is easier for alt coins... Further reading: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Double-spendingWhat id like to see... is an automated trade platform, ideally without requiring a "trusted" party in between.... Was reading up on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Contracts earlier today, fascinating stuff.... Perhaps some brilliant crypto person can come up with a new coin. Trade coin or Exchange Coin whose sole purpose is to automagically facilitate p2p trades for altcoins... and mining earning could be the trade fees... this stuff is way over my pay grade. |
|
|
|
@sairon
I can build the yac_scrypt module now, but i still bump into the error you mentioned.
Yeah, I've successfully built it, although with environment variable for the compile flags, so that's why it isn't in the repo. So far the P2Pool managed only once to connect to yacoind (out of a million tries, duh -.-") and it failed anyway... Right now I'm trying to get a blockexplorer for YAC online, so I'll stay away from this for a while. OK. FWIW for whenever you get back to it. or for anyone else who takes it up. The first header exception that comes is from https://github.com/saironiq/p2pool/blob/master/p2pool/util/pack.py#L46The values differ by 1 occasionally. I guess getting block explorer up will give you a better handle on p2pool errors... |
|
|
|
@sairon I can build the yac_scrypt module now, but i still bump into the error you mentioned. setup.py needs to look like this. yac_scrypt_module = Extension('yac_scrypt',
sources = ['scryptmodule.c',
'scrypt.c',
'scrypt-jane.c'],
include_dirs=['.'],
extra_compile_args=['-DSCRYPT_KECCAK512', '-DSCRYPT_CHACHA', '-DSCRYPT_CHOOSE_COMPILETIME'])
Stole the compile args from the modified cpuminer. scrypt-jane.c line 235 int z;
for(z=0;z<20;z++) {
^ I guess adding gcc99 or some compiler flag also makes the error go away... Then no errors when building. I suspect the the reason its not working is in this module. But im crypto/c n00b |
|
|
|
Us linuxers had to compile from source so i guess we're all good. As usual  Pretty much from the start YAcoin has been LINUXcoin, seems the dev has a OS of choice and anyone who shares it was able to truly reap the benefits from being a early adopter. Windows instructions: https://github.com/pocopoco/yacoin/blob/master/doc/build-msw.txtLinux instructions: https://github.com/pocopoco/yacoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.txtWhere do you see any favoritism? You could even do "practice builds" few days ago to make sure you had everything u needed once the real genesis block is added and announced. Now if u say YAC is not very n00b friendly... then thats another story... <speculating>I think bitcoin probably did not have a GUI for quite some time... </speculating> |
|
|
|
Sorry turtle thought were joking... ok pushing the barriers Failed attempt at putting my YAC where my mouth is.... Wait. that didnt come out right... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
?
