Great use of logic. The only problem is the burden of proof is on you not me. The subjectivity is exactly what you are exploiting to CLAIM he is lying in an effort to punish him for his opinions. You don't give a shit about this community or the fidelity of the trust system, you put your need to punish ideas that upset you above all of it. The trust system is just another tool for you to exploit.
Yeah, and you would never do that, would you? You would never leave trust feedback for someone because you consider them to be a "mentally ill stalker," because you're the bigger man, right? Just as you consider Vod unsafe to trade with because of his "mental illness," we feel the same way about roach. I assure you your efforts to twist this semantically will be futile, so I wouldn't waste my time if I were you.
|
|
|
Dear team, do you have a test version of the product or do you have a Youtube channel where you can show every detail how your product will work in the future?
No, of course they don't. Because this a cash grab scam. Why else would they hire you? If they were a legitimate project with something interesting to offer, they sure as hell wouldn't have shelled out money for your cheesy-ass bumping service. I can't believe they're still paying you. I'm not sure who's stupider, you or them.
|
|
|
FAKE MINING EQUIPMENT:
I had found this as well and was going to ask them about what their connection with bitcoinminerhosting.com was. So OP: do you have a connection with this company? Why is their head office in Canada yet yours is in England?
|
|
|
I never said I was against it or him; I'm calling out the irony/hypocrisy of everyone complaining about him, all while perpetuating his existence. If anything, find it humorous and entertaining, just like your misinterpretation of my post.
if anything it makes me think about why I disagree with him, further cementing my own beliefs.
Sorry for misinterpreting your disagreement with him with being against him. How could I ever make such an atrocious error? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) You made the error due to not understanding the distinct difference between disagreeing with someone and calling for the censorship of said person. Let me know when you do, and we can continue this conversation. Nobody is censoring anybody. That's a basic misunderstanding you have. Flags don't censor people, neither do tags for that matter.
|
|
|
Every project has BS Telegram followers, that's nothing new, and I would never tag a project for that. But in the future, don't consider hiring bump bots. Its pathetic.
|
|
|
do you know what they are? I saw a squirrel eating them so I figured they be safe I ate them for over a week now.
Explains a lot really. TimeBits is a squirrel.
|
|
|
Getting better (why u need ad hominenm?). Does that proof anything ?
I asked you a serious question: what compels you to ignore evidence that isn't in the favor of your narrative? It proves CSW changed his blog. You were adamantly denying such even after I provided a link for you that he did. So I ask you again the same question in a 3rd framing: what compels you to be so dishonest?
|
|
|
Sure - now anyone MUST beleive you since you are long known as independant instance /s
You see - it does not lead to any good.
There is no way of proof here or there inside the internet.
Trolls that try to tell such - will stay in their own realm for ever.
What especially potent brand of dumbfuck juice are you chugging that you did not see the link to Reddit I posted where CSW admits he changed his blog?? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FyV9dMy9.png&t=665&c=9xkPg0XGct-GMg)
|
|
|
Did he really MADE the Change himself or was it to show it WAS changed ?
He really made the change himself. He even admitted it. As was described already to Tweedle Dum in my Scam Accusation thread against BSV & CSW:
|
|
|
No white paper (links don't work). Uses cheeseball bump accounts. 2 hallmarks of a scam project. Guys from this you can understand its a scam . Please dont invest in this.
More than likely to be correct. OP, want to respond to this Scam Accusation thread about your project? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155440.0
|
|
|
I never said I was against it or him; I'm calling out the irony/hypocrisy of everyone complaining about him, all while perpetuating his existence. If anything, find it humorous and entertaining, just like your misinterpretation of my post.
if anything it makes me think about why I disagree with him, further cementing my own beliefs.
Sorry for misinterpreting your disagreement with him with being against him. How could I ever make such an atrocious error? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
When you're on WO, and roach says something ridiculous, stfu. When roach says "Something, something, jew, something, metals, something", stfu. If you stfu and ignore him, you'll never have to worry about roach.
I honestly don't care about his posts, if anything it makes me think about why I disagree with him, further cementing my own beliefs.
Yet here you are, furthering that which you are claiming to be against... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Right, he feeds off attention, even if its the wrong kind. He loves it. We get that.
|
|
|
(gross image redacted) "I am the eye of Satoshi." I would merit you for this if it I didn't have to perform a reverse google image search just to make sure you weren't posting a pic of one of your own body parts. I doubt even if he was that bad he would use a computer generated font : Otto -https://www.wfonts.com/font/otto Write Dave's name and see the outcome.
That's pretty compelling evidence of signature forgery. If U.S. courts ever have to take this into consideration for any matter, it will be especially damning against Wright. The capital D and weird checkmark of a v really give it away. OK splashy: what's your explanation for this? We're just seeing things again? Let me guess: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2Fl0IypMNwQqVbsXQ9W%2Fgiphy.gif&t=665&c=AxAYREKmttRwyg)
|
|
|
If you can do something to keep realr0ach out of here then I am sure you will receive an overwhelming support. Other than that it is not such a big issue.
He is definitely a troll, and that is against the official unofficial rules, but its a rare day when somebody actually gets banned for trolling. Whatever, the ignore button is a pretty effective roach repellent. Every time somebody quotes roach, its just a validating reminder of why I have him on ignore.
|
|
|
Make sure you try hard because I would hate to have to blast you again for trying to mislead people and bring up your evil scam facilitating past over and over and over and over again.
Something tells me you enjoy it. Make sure they are on topic for this thread or make another thread and we will join you there when we have a care to.
All of you will join me? Do you do everything together? Tell me, do you shower together? This is about QS being accused of lesser deeds of wrongdoing than suchmoons friends like you and lauda. So therefore demonstrating QS claims of selective weaponizing the systems of control are supported.
I'm happy to be suchmoon's friend. But that doesn't have anything to do with QS. Not sure what you're trying to say here actually. I just realized a page or two ago I said I'd stop replying to you... So I do apologize for being weak about that.
|
|
|
The credibility of your CLAIMS has been crushed by observable instances that are independently verifiable and do not require trust in ourselves.
But are the instances observably verifiable, and if so, can they be independently observable? It's time we got to the bottom of this.
|
|
|
Just a matter of time Kuya, ~snip
Not 'Kuya', it should 'Ate' for her ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) In Pangasinan they say Atse, and in Visayan of course its Day, or Hermana if they have a Spanish influence. I met a nice lady in Cagayan de Oro who had a fiancee that lived in Arkansas. She also worked at a computer store, so there's a good chance she knew about bitcoin. But there's too many islands to reasonably think that it was you.
|
|
|
The argument was ‘according to court documents Craig committed fraud’ as was the title of the article. Now show me in these documents where he was convicted of committing fraud. Its perjury. Its lying in court. Previously he said he owned a stake in a company with Dave Kleiman, now he's saying he didn't. So was he lying then, or now? Because its definitely one or the other. Yes Craig Wright is indeed also a fraud in other ways but we don't need court documents to know that. It's just common sense at this point. If the court convicts him of perjury then that will just be another way in the long list of ways in which he is a fraud. Whatever happened to this BTW? Craig's big mainstream TV debut... Oh that's right, it was also a lie, just like every other word out of his mouth.
|
|
|
BiteBTC is indeed a scam exchange but you'll need to provide some better evidence along with your claim or nobody has any reason to believe you.
Besides, for a sum that large, youd have better luck hiring a lawyer to pursue recovery of your losses than asking for donations. Youre not likely to receive anything.
|
|
|
Snapshots from 2014 and 2015 about a 2008 blogpost. This does not hold up, this is nothing. It proves Craig edited a blog entry previous to the release of the Bitcoin white paper to make it appear he had written it. This is you upon seeing evidence that Craig is a fraud: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.rebelmouse.io%2FeyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vbWVkaWEucmJsLm1zL2ltYWdlP3U9JTJGZmlsZXMlMkYyMDE2JTJGMTIlMkYwOSUyRjYzNjE2ODQyMTkzMDk5MjA0MTkxNTczNDIyNl9SRUFESU5HU1RVRFlHVUlERS5naWYmYW1wO2hvPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGYXo2MTY1Nzgudm8ubXNlY25kLm5ldCZhbXA7cz04NjImYW1wO2g9OTljY2JmNjc3ZDQyNDNhM2E2ZDMyYzg2OGU3MjJkN2U2ZmE5NGVjMDQ5MTA0OGI1ZDc3MTI5NDVlMmM3ZTQ3MyZhbXA7c2l6ZT05ODB4JmFtcDtjPTU4ODM4Mjg5OSIsImV4cGlyZXNfYXQiOjE1NjA4OTEyMTh9.c--Wj0-ITpbPZ_hGox8QbCKq5vz8eoNXS51ZnjShDKM%2Fimg.jpg&t=665&c=XHm8fE5QptLaWw) All your arguments about your pesant mate claiming Craig is a fraud prior to the Florida courts... also nothing.
So you're just going to steamroll over the other sources I listed that all imply the exact same thing in order to continue being racist. Gotcha. How do you explain Craig having (as proven in court) 56 million dollars worth of btc in 2013?
It wasn't "proven in court." It was a statement he made in a lawsuit he filed, which was subsequently dismissed. Thanks for reminding me about something, though. During this time, Craig went through a lot of trouble to forge Kleiman's signature and backdate documents to make it look like they had entered contractual agreements (that never existed): ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FFUDhvPy.png&t=665&c=qn_46Lp9hKivzA) Btw why does socialist dictator theymos (who’s got some power on this forum) now want to take away satoshis bitcoin?
Red flag for the core boys.
This is off-topic nonsense. Stop changing the subject, or better yet stop commenting if it upsets you so much. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.rebelmouse.io%2FeyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vbWVkaWEucmJsLm1zL2ltYWdlP3U9JTJGZmlsZXMlMkYyMDE2JTJGMTIlMkYwOSUyRjYzNjE2ODQxNTg4ODA5NDAzNi0xNzAwNTY1NDYwX3dhbGtpbmdpbnRvdGhlbGlicmFyeWF0YmVnaW5uaW5nb2Z3ZWVrLmdpZiZhbXA7aG89aHR0cHMlM0ElMkYlMkZhejYxNjU3OC52by5tc2VjbmQubmV0JmFtcDtzPTEzNiZhbXA7aD1lMDQ4ZWJkMTM0YWM3MDk5NTU1NmY4ZWZhZDE2ZWU0ZDNlNWE3NzE0M2IxMzMxMzcxYjU2ZTRjYzliMWI3NDNiJmFtcDtzaXplPTk4MHgmYW1wO2M9NjY2MTE5MzU1IiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTU2MTM1Njc5OH0.VunICoaNwpk1T6Ggm0U3dln0461ZGgvolybLZ1LjQsw%2Fimg.jpg&t=665&c=5sN6BmQyjiRrcg)
|
|
|
|