Yeah, and you would never do that, would you? You would never leave trust feedback for someone because you consider them to be a "mentally ill stalker," because you're the bigger man, right?

Just as you consider Vod unsafe to trade with because of his "mental illness," we feel the same way about roach.

I assure you your efforts to twist this semantically will be futile, so I wouldn't waste my time if I were you.

No, of course they don't. Because this a cash grab scam. Why else would they hire you? If they were a legitimate project with something interesting to offer, they sure as hell wouldn't have shelled out money for your cheesy-ass bumping service. I can't believe they're still paying you. I'm not sure who's stupider, you or them.

I had found this as well and was going to ask them about what their connection with bitcoinminerhosting.com was.

So OP: do you have a connection with this company? Why is their head office in Canada yet yours is in England?

Nobody is censoring anybody. That's a basic misunderstanding you have. Flags don't censor people, neither do tags for that matter.

Every project has BS Telegram followers, that's nothing new, and I would never tag a project for that.

But in the future, don't consider hiring bump bots. Its pathetic.

Explains a lot really. TimeBits is a squirrel.

I asked you a serious question: what compels you to ignore evidence that isn't in the favor of your narrative?

It proves CSW changed his blog. You were adamantly denying such even after I provided a link for you that he did. So I ask you again the same question in a 3rd framing: what compels you to be so dishonest?

What especially potent brand of dumbfuck juice are you chugging that you did not see the link to Reddit I posted where CSW admits he changed his blog??

He really made the change himself. He even admitted it. As was described already to Tweedle Dum in my Scam Accusation thread against BSV & CSW:

No white paper (links don't work).
Uses cheeseball bump accounts.

2 hallmarks of a scam project.


More than likely to be correct.

OP, want to respond to this Scam Accusation thread about your project?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155440.0

Sorry for misinterpreting your disagreement with him with being against him. How could I ever make such an atrocious error?  

Yet here you are, furthering that which you are claiming to be against... 
Right, he feeds off attention, even if its the wrong kind. He loves it. We get that.

I would merit you for this if it I didn't have to perform a reverse google image search just to make sure you weren't posting a pic of one of your own body parts.


That's pretty compelling evidence of signature forgery. If U.S. courts ever have to take this into consideration for any matter, it will be especially damning against Wright. The capital D and weird checkmark of a v really give it away.

OK splashy: what's your explanation for this? We're just seeing things again? Let me guess:

He is definitely a troll, and that is against the official unofficial rules, but its a rare day when somebody actually gets banned for trolling. Whatever, the ignore button is a pretty effective roach repellent. Every time somebody quotes roach, its just a validating reminder of why I have him on ignore.

Something tells me you enjoy it.


All of you will join me? Do you do everything together? Tell me, do you shower together?


I'm happy to be suchmoon's friend. But that doesn't have anything to do with QS. Not sure what you're trying to say here actually. I just realized a page or two ago I said I'd stop replying to you... So I do apologize for being weak about that.

But are the instances observably verifiable, and if so, can they be independently observable? It's time we got to the bottom of this.

In Pangasinan they say Atse, and in Visayan of course its Day, or Hermana if they have a Spanish influence.

I met a nice lady in Cagayan de Oro who had a fiancee that lived in Arkansas. She also worked at a computer store, so there's a good chance she knew about bitcoin. But there's too many islands to reasonably think that it was you.

Its perjury. Its lying in court. Previously he said he owned a stake in a company with Dave Kleiman, now he's saying he didn't. So was he lying then, or now? Because its definitely one or the other.

Yes Craig Wright is indeed also a fraud in other ways but we don't need court documents to know that. It's just common sense at this point.

If the court convicts him of perjury then that will just be another way in the long list of ways in which he is a fraud.


Whatever happened to this BTW? Craig's big mainstream TV debut... Oh that's right, it was also a lie, just like every other word out of his mouth.

BiteBTC is indeed a scam exchange but you'll need to provide some better evidence along with your claim or nobody has any reason to believe you.

Besides, for a sum that large, youd have better luck hiring a lawyer to pursue recovery of your losses than asking for donations. Youre not likely to receive anything.

It proves Craig edited a blog entry previous to the release of the Bitcoin white paper to make it appear he had written it. This is you upon seeing evidence that Craig is a fraud:




So you're just going to steamroll over the other sources I listed that all imply the exact same thing in order to continue being racist. Gotcha.


It wasn't "proven in court." It was a statement he made in a lawsuit he filed, which was subsequently dismissed. Thanks for reminding me about something, though. During this time, Craig went through a lot of trouble to forge Kleiman's signature and backdate documents to make it look like they had entered contractual agreements (that never existed):




This is off-topic nonsense. Stop changing the subject, or better yet stop commenting if it upsets you so much.