Quickseller is a dangerous person to deal with - avoid

[Hhampuz]

yada yada yada

I read a couple of reviews online, this could help with all of your issues!



Honk Honk.

[suchmoon]

Added Exhibit E to the OP. Might run out of alphabet at this rate.

[nutildah]

I get it, you don't like that I am calling out Hhampuz for stealing from BestMixer. If Hhampuz were to be labeled a scammer (rightfully so), your earnings from your signature campaign would likely stop. I am sure you don't like actual scammers, but when calling out a scammer means you lose out on income, you are more than willing to put pressure on the person to stop calling out the scammer.

What bothers me is the fact that you frequently engage in yellow journalism when writing up your "accusations." They are usually devoid of actual substance and are presented in a way to maximize sensationalism. A prime example of this is what you just mentioned above. You have zero concrete evidence of what actually happened and are making accusations purely based on speculation.

This is not unlike how you described as selling an account as "borderline evil" and subsequently tried to sell your account for money.

Actually its extremely unlike that. But I'm not retelling the story for the umpteenth time.

[Quickseller]

I get it, you don't like that I am calling out Hhampuz for stealing from BestMixer. If Hhampuz were to be labeled a scammer (rightfully so), your earnings from your signature campaign would likely stop. I am sure you don't like actual scammers, but when calling out a scammer means you lose out on income, you are more than willing to put pressure on the person to stop calling out the scammer.

What bothers me is the fact that you frequently engage in yellow journalism when writing up your "accusations." They are usually devoid of actual substance and are presented in a way to maximize sensationalism. A prime example of this is what you just mentioned above. You have zero concrete evidence of what actually happened and are making accusations purely based on speculation.

I strongly disagree with your characterization of any of my accusations. 

In regards to the Hhampuz accusation, I believe the evidence is very solid. The existence of the loan from Darkstar_ should eliminate any reasonable doubt as to if the money was stolen or not. I believe he is being protected because of who he is associated with, not based on the merits. I believe any the "possible" explanations his friends have posted are excuses not to call him a scammer -- if Hhampuz wanted to go on the record to give some kind of explanation as to what happened, one of the "possible" explanations would perhaps be sufficient to create reasonable doubt, but he has not given any explanation. Another one of his campaigns shut down not long after the BestMixer campaign was shut down, and the owner of that site confirmed receipt of the excess money, so I don't think it is reasonable to say the alligation is so ludicrous to Hhampuz that it does not even deserve to be acknowledged. Obviously, if evidence was later found that contradicted Hhampuz's explanation, it would be clear he is a liar, and it would be more clear the money was in fact stolen from BestMixer.

If I see someone doing something they shouldn't be doing, or doing something unethical, I am not going to stay silent just because they are powerful.   

[suchmoon]

I strongly disagree with your characterization of any of my accusations.  

You're infamous for doing this shit over the years. Every little (or big) butthurt leads to a frivolous accusation of some sort. You seem to be unable to accept being wrong or being rejected like a properly-functioning human should.

[Quickseller]

I strongly disagree with your characterization of any of my accusations. 

You're infamous for doing this shit over the years. Every little (or big) butthurt leads to a frivolous accusation of some sort. You seem to be unable to accept being wrong or being rejected like a properly-functioning human should.

None of my accusations are frivolous.

You are a liar and are intentionally presenting mischaracterized and inaccurate information in the OP. 

[suchmoon]

None of my accusations are frivolous.

You are a liar and are intentionally presenting mischaracterized and inaccurate information in the OP. 

Anyone can click those links and decide for themselves. Considering that the threshold of opposing a flag is very low ("because you believe that it is at least partially false") you should have many users opposing it in your favor, if what you're saying is true.

[The-One-Above-All]

None of my accusations are frivolous.

You are a liar and are intentionally presenting mischaracterized and inaccurate information in the OP. 

Anyone can click those links and decide for themselves. Considering that the threshold of opposing a flag is very low ("because you believe that it is at least partially false") you should have many users opposing it in your favor, if what you're saying is true.

Yes but ANYONE CAN CLICK this link

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153864.msg51452598#msg51452598

then research the ONLY people supporting you are also supporters and pals of this friend/alt of yours lauda?

Why are you NOT pushing for this far more seriously untrustworthy person to have a flag??

This is what ANYONE can verify?

You tried to cast negativity on the board warden theymos for requesting a PROVEN scammer, probable extortionist and shady escrow and blatant trust abuser  was excluded FROM A POSITION OF TRUST.

ANYONE can verify all of these things.

That looks far worse for Lauda and YOU than any of this does for QS. 

This adds lots of credibility to QS suggestion that you DO INDEED USE THESE WEAPONS  SELECTIVELY like you quite probably do your copy and past snitch bot, you fat slob.

ANYONE can see a regular pattern here with you suchmoon/lauda/scumbuster et al

The best part is you are demonstrating how corrupt you are, and now you tried to stab theymos in the back ... a few red pills were force-fed that day to plenty of people. You will do ANYTHING to keep this gang in power. However cracks a starting to open up and this will be eroded from the edges. The core will be left vulnerable very vulnerable and isolated soon.

" I hate asskissers, they are the first to stab you in the back "  -  a smart person told a friend of ours that once. Theymos just found that was the case with you. Snake.

The only acceptable way forward is a fair set of transparent rules that are applied to ALL members equally. No more selective punishment for lesser crimes than those you support your friends for suchmoon. Stop thinking people are so blind they can not see exactly what you are doing here now.

[suchmoon]

Thanks for bumping this, cryptohunter. I can't be bothered to read it but if you didn't call me fat at least once in that wall of text I'd be disappointed. I bet Quickseller is enjoying any exposure he gets for his shenanigans.

[The-One-Above-All]

Thanks for bumping this, cryptohunter. I can't be bothered to read it but if you didn't call me fat at least once in that wall of text I'd be disappointed. I bet Quickseller is enjoying any exposure he gets for his shenanigans.

Okay lauda you are welcome.

This thread is an endorsement of QS because his actions are being put in the context of you and your pal lauda et al.

You don't have the credibility to raise a flag against anyone else without it coming under close scrutiny and being placed in the context of you and your friends. No double standards here any longer.

[suchmoon]

Okay lauda you are welcome.

This thread is an endorsement of QS because his actions are being put in the context of you and your pal lauda et al.

So am I Lauda or Lauda's pal?

You don't have the credibility to raise a flag against anyone else without it coming under close scrutiny and being placed in the context of you and your friends. No double standards here any longer.

I'm sorry, but I can't take seriously any posturing about credibility from a lying trolling sockpuppet. At least man up and post from your main account.

Thank you for a short-enough-to-read post though.

[The-One-Above-All]

Okay lauda you are welcome.

This thread is an endorsement of QS because his actions are being put in the context of you and your pal lauda et al.

So am I Lauda or Lauda's pal?

You don't have the credibility to raise a flag against anyone else without it coming under close scrutiny and being placed in the context of you and your friends. No double standards here any longer.

I'm sorry, but I can't take seriously any posturing about credibility from a lying trolling sockpuppet. At least man up and post from your main account.

Thank you for a short-enough-to-read post though.

Impossible to PROVE 100% either way. Are we the true legend or just a friend, or spokesman for the true legend?  are you lauda or just laudas feltching puppet willing to back stab even theymos for your continued schemes and shared corrupt goals?

After the observable instances have been reviewed previously in this post have been thoroughly analyzed then NOBODY with any credibility here gives one fuck what a fat pig like you can or can not take seriously?

Get it now?

The credibility of your CLAIMS has been crushed by observable instances that are independently verifiable and do not require trust in ourselves. We encourage the reader to verify those instances for themselves. One should never accept anything here at face value.

Get it now?

Your diversion means nothing and is a weak tactic that we will crush at every attempt to use it. Actually it just serves as ANOTHER strength to our own argument that you have NOTHING to prevent observable instances being presented and NOTHING to discredit them. It just looks sneaky and pathetic to even try to mislead people in this way.

[nutildah]

The credibility of your CLAIMS has been crushed by observable instances that are independently verifiable and do not require trust in ourselves.

But are the instances observably verifiable, and if so, can they be independently observable? It's time we got to the bottom of this.

[The-One-Above-All]

The credibility of your CLAIMS has been crushed by observable instances that are independently verifiable and do not require trust in ourselves.

But are the instances observably verifiable, and if so, can they be independently observable? It's time we got to the bottom of this.

hahaha what does that even mean? ooooooglyboooooglywoooooglydoooooogly hahah


Yes, just pick one and tell me which you were unable to verify for yourself OH EVIL ONE. haha

Make sure you try hard because I would hate to have to blast you again for trying to mislead people and bring up your evil scam facilitating past over and over and over and over again.

Make sure they are on topic for this thread or make another thread and we will join you there when we have a care to.

This is about QS being accused of lesser deeds of wrongdoing than suchmoons friends like you and lauda. So therefore demonstrating QS claims of selective weaponizing the systems of control are supported.

[nutildah]

Make sure you try hard because I would hate to have to blast you again for trying to mislead people and bring up your evil scam facilitating past over and over and over and over again.

Something tells me you enjoy it.

Make sure they are on topic for this thread or make another thread and we will join you there when we have a care to.

All of you will join me? Do you do everything together? Tell me, do you shower together?

This is about QS being accused of lesser deeds of wrongdoing than suchmoons friends like you and lauda. So therefore demonstrating QS claims of selective weaponizing the systems of control are supported.

I'm happy to be suchmoon's friend. But that doesn't have anything to do with QS. Not sure what you're trying to say here actually. I just realized a page or two ago I said I'd stop replying to you... So I do apologize for being weak about that.

[babo]

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79

QuickSeller summon me by spam pm for livecoin accusation
I'm investigating on LiveCoin and
i'm investigating on QuickSeller

about him i read all evidence, and him spent time for pm me and respond me (by pm)
does the good Samaritan for the good of all?
i think not

this scheme of vendettas reminds me very much of the children's school

i dont have time for play with retard kids and i HATE so much retard kid and scammers

for this reason, my first part of investigation is close and i support YOUR flag against QuickSeller and i place a red trust

---

this ethic guy support scam BSV - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2371095




by faketoshi, the LIAR aka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright

Code:

Legal issues

In February 2018 the estate of Dave Kleiman initiated a lawsuit at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Wright over the rights to US$5,118,266,427.50 worth of bitcoin claiming that Wright defrauded Kleiman of bitcoins and intellectual property rights.[57][58][59]

In May 2019 it was reported that Wright was using UK libel law to sue people who denied he was the inventor of bitcoin.[60] Wright also served legal notices to Vitalik Buterin, the founder of the cryptocurrency Ethereum, who called Wright a fraud; and Roger Ver, an early bitcoin entrepreneur and advocate.[61] 

----

this ethic guy

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0

support the-one-above-all, alt of cryptohunter

http://loyce.club/trust/flags/37.html

-----

Code:

** investigation continue **

wow... ethics is good for one and is bad for another one.. strange

[nutildah]

Its true, he's been PM spamming everybody in the LC campaign, unironically lecturing us about "ethics."  

Regardless of how you feel about the flag against LC, QS's mass PMings are unnecessary and more evidence that he remains remorseless about his absurdly vindictive behavior.

[babo]

Its true, he's been PM spamming everybody in the LC campaign, unironically lecturing us about "ethics."  

Regardless of how you feel about the flag against LC, these actions are unnecessary and more evidence that QS remains remorseless about his absurdly vindictive behavior.

i'm investigating on livecoin too

is pretty long, because i need to prove evidence.. and i dont use screenshot like clue
i'm not kid

[morvillz7z]

Its true, he's been PM spamming everybody in the LC campaign, unironically lecturing us about "ethics."  

Didn't he join the Yobit sig campaign just two weeks ago while supporting a flag against them?

edit/add

Hopefully this time around, they will do a better job of policing their campaign.

His moral compass seems to be stuck on the north pole. Completely broken and non-existent i'd say.

I have re-reviewed the reference thread and relevant threads, and other information, and after consideration, have decided to remove the signature.

In other words, taking into consideration multiple reports that the payouts were not working, hence nobly removing a signature that wasn't even active. lol

[Quickseller]

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=79

QuickSeller summon me by spam pm for livecoin accusation
I'm investigating on LiveCoin and
i'm investigating on QuickSeller

about him i read all evidence, and him spent time for pm me and respond me (by pm)
does the good Samaritan for the good of all?
i think not

this scheme of vendettas reminds me very much of the children's school

i dont have time for play with retard kids and i HATE so much retard kid and scammers

for this reason, my first part of investigation is close and i support YOUR flag against QuickSeller and i place a red trust

---

this ethic guy support scam BSV - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2371095




by faketoshi, the LIAR aka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright

Code:

Legal issues

In February 2018 the estate of Dave Kleiman initiated a lawsuit at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Wright over the rights to US$5,118,266,427.50 worth of bitcoin claiming that Wright defrauded Kleiman of bitcoins and intellectual property rights.[57][58][59]

In May 2019 it was reported that Wright was using UK libel law to sue people who denied he was the inventor of bitcoin.[60] Wright also served legal notices to Vitalik Buterin, the founder of the cryptocurrency Ethereum, who called Wright a fraud; and Roger Ver, an early bitcoin entrepreneur and advocate.[61] 

----

this ethic guy

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5138419.0

support the-one-above-all, alt of cryptohunter

http://loyce.club/trust/flags/37.html

-----

Code:

** investigation continue **

wow... ethics is good for one and is bad for another one.. strange

I get it, LiveCoin pays a lot to advertise for them. I absolutely understand that you are upset that their scamming activities are being called out because it will probably mean the signature payment will probably stop. Don’t blame the messenger.