SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[Iamtutut]

Send them by PM to someone (me can do), then once they're deleted, just retrieve them from your "sent" messages.

[mosprognoz]

I'm reposting my question.

Does BSV has a premine like Bitcoin gold. BTG had a 200 000 premine and creators (scammers) became millionaires for doing absolutely nothing

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

[sirsplashalot]

I'm reposting my question.

Does BSV has a premine like Bitcoin gold. BTG had a 200 000 premine and creators (scammers) became millionaires for doing absolutely nothing

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

No, but Craig has Submitted under oath the first 70 btc mined transactions. here’s the chance for all you Twitter law graduates to take him down for fraud.

[Cryptotourist]

No, but Craig has Submitted under oath the first 70 btc mined transactions. here’s the chance for all you Twitter law graduates to take him down for fraud.

What does "under oath" actually mean for a con man of Craig's caliber?
Pfff, lollipop?
Don't worry, he'll fuck himself sooner or later.

#

Send them by PM to someone (me can do), then once they're deleted, just retrieve them from your "sent" messages.

Thanks dude, but I got them all in my inbox (& email) already.

[nutildah]

Don't worry, he'll fuck himself soon or later.

Apparently he just did:

Self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator Craig Wright committed fraud according to Florida court documents


https://twitter.com/CarpeNoctom/status/1139806584002023424

[sirsplashalot]

Don't worry, he'll fuck himself soon or later.

Apparently he just did:

Self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator Craig Wright committed fraud according to Florida court documents


https://twitter.com/CarpeNoctom/status/1139806584002023424

Apparently?!

That’s the problem, and I quoted this article last night, you are trusting a writer who is not a lawyer and situated in a country where he is making less than 10$ a day. These ‘journalists’ are paid to dictate the news, not report the news. They have no standard as to what the facts are but are rather paid by a higher source to relay on the standard. Why would some journalist in India be able to conclude that Craig Wright is a fraud prior to an American court of law? You cite these sources and take them at face value. Didn’t Iowa state University teach you this?

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

You literally don’t strike me as a stupid guy, but with all the misinformation on the internet (especially regarding Craig Wright) its insanely easy to side with the majority. The majority isn’t necessarily right mate, just remember what brought you boys to this space in the first place.  You’re selling yourself out interpreting journalism as factual evidence.

Edit: let’s take a deeper look into the author of this article: here’s his LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/priyeshu/

Here’s his reference:

Abhinav worked as a street food vendor aggregator at Streetingo and was responsible for getting vendors onboard our street food aggregating platform. He is a hard working fellow and needs to be given directions and goal for a task,rest assured he puts in his best.


He was a goddamn food vendor coordinator in 2017, he’s not a lawyer, he’s a goddamn peasant, and you’re stupid enough to site him.

‘Apparently’ my ass

[Iamtutut]

Don't worry, he'll fuck himself soon or later.

Apparently he just did:

Self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator Craig Wright committed fraud according to Florida court documents


https://twitter.com/CarpeNoctom/status/1139806584002023424

Apparently?!

That’s the problem, and I quoted this article last night, you are trusting a writer who is not a lawyer and situated in a country where he is making less than 10$ a day. These ‘journalists’ are paid to dictate the news, not report the news. They have no standard as to what the facts are but are rather paid by a higher source to relay on the standard. Why would some journalist in India be able to conclude that Craig Wright is a fraud prior to an American court of law? You cite these sources and take them at face value. Didn’t Iowa state University teach you this?

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

You literally don’t strike me as a stupid guy, but with all the misinformation on the internet (especially regarding Craig Wright) its insanely easy to side with the majority. The majority isn’t necessarily right mate, just remember what brought you boys to this space in the first place.  You’re selling yourself out interpreting journalism as factual evidence.

*cough *cough *cough
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/bdxkii/the_fraud_continues_craig_wright_just_purposely/
https://fr.scribd.com/document/406503654/Fake-email-from-Dave-to-Uyen

[Iamtutut]

F*CKING HUGE !!
https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1139915209739579392

CSW is in DEEP DEEP shit, the house of cards is gonna blow hard.

Brace for impact, I'm gonna LMAO to read BSV shills reactions: "BSV is not about CSW" bla bla bla. The same shills who were writing that CSW is Satoshi therefore BSV is Bitcoin bla bla bla.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Don't worry, he'll fuck himself soon or later.

Apparently he just did:

Self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator Craig Wright committed fraud according to Florida court documents


https://twitter.com/CarpeNoctom/status/1139806584002023424

Apparently?!

That’s the problem, and I quoted this article last night, you are trusting a writer who is not a lawyer and situated in a country where he is making less than 10$ a day. These ‘journalists’ are paid to dictate the news, not report the news. They have no standard as to what the facts are but are rather paid by a higher source to relay on the standard. Why would some journalist in India be able to conclude that Craig Wright is a fraud prior to an American court of law? You cite these sources and take them at face value. Didn’t Iowa state University teach you this?

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

You literally don’t strike me as a stupid guy, but with all the misinformation on the internet (especially regarding Craig Wright) its insanely easy to side with the majority. The majority isn’t necessarily right mate, just remember what brought you boys to this space in the first place.  You’re selling yourself out interpreting journalism as factual evidence.

Edit: let’s take a deeper look into the author of this article: here’s his LinkedIn

https://www.linkedin.com/in/priyeshu/

Here’s his reference:

Abhinav worked as a street food vendor aggregator at Streetingo and was responsible for getting vendors onboard our street food aggregating platform. He is a hard working fellow and needs to be given directions and goal for a task,rest assured he puts in his best.


He was a goddamn food vendor coordinator in 2017, he’s not a lawyer, he’s a goddamn peasant, and you’re stupid enough to site him.

‘Apparently’ my ass

https://www.linkedin.com/in/priyeshu/ (with apologies for the skewed formatting) ...

Experience
Personal Projects
Developer
Company NamePersonal Projects
Dates EmployedNov 2018 – Present
Employment Duration8 mos
LocationGlobal
Ola (ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd)
Full Stack Engineer
Company NameOla (ANI Technologies Pvt. Ltd)
Dates EmployedJul 2017 – Nov 2018
Employment Duration1 yr 5 mos
LocationBangalore
I worked here in Demand Shaping team and we provide platforms to other teams to roll out offers and all communications.

Infosys
Software Intern
Company NameInfosys
Dates EmployedJan 2017 – Jun 2017
Employment Duration6 mos
LocationMysuru Area, India
I did my final semester internship at Infosys and was given generic training in Python & Oracle, followed by specialization training using MVC in .NET , C#. I thoroughly enjoyed by training here. Later my group built a project using our acquired skills which scored very well and was deployment-ready.

Streetingo
Co-Founder
Company NameStreetingo
Dates EmployedMay 2016 – Aug 2016
Employment Duration4 mos
LocationAsaf Ali Road, New Delhi
I co-founded Streetingo, an Android based street food aggregation with my friend Vasu Jain. We tried to make street food more accessible by aggregating and publishing information about 200+ street food vendors across Delhi. The app was downloaded by 800+ people and later discontinued becau... See more

IIIT Delhi
Summer Intern
Company NameIIIT Delhi
Dates EmployedJun 2015 – Jul 2015
Employment Duration2 mos
LocationNew Delhi Area, India
Interned under Dr. P. Biyani under a segment of ongoing research project - TrafficKarma.
There I worked with Django, BeautifulSoup and ElasticSearch. I also worked with team to improvise existing algorithms.

Peerfly
Publisher
Company NamePeerfly
Dates EmployedNov 2009 – Jul 2014
Employment Duration4 yrs 9 mos
LocationNew Delhi Area, India
Media Buying specialist. Working on CPA model for about four years. Work includes scaling of campaigns in insurance, health, loans and education niche by primarily harnessing paid search, media buying & content marketing.

Show fewer experiences
Education
Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology
Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology
Degree NameBachelor’s DegreeField Of StudyComputer ScienceGrade7.7
Dates attended or expected graduation2013 – 2017

Activities and Societies: I actively participate on Codechef & Qualified for ACM ICPC regionals 2015 and serve as Editor of University Magazine ( The Observer)
Silver Line Prestige School
Silver Line Prestige School
Dates attended or expected graduation1998 – 2013

Activities and Societies: Debates & Quizzing

Reads to me like Josh earns more than $10/hr. I'm guessing about $11.37/hr.

[Hueristic]

No, but Craig has Submitted under oath the first 70 btc mined transactions. here’s the chance for all you Twitter law graduates to take him down for fraud.

Craig Wright, who claims he is Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto, was dealt a blow by a Florida court yesterday after they granted a motion to compel him to prove his bitcoin holdings by Monday. He has also been summoned to the federal court by the end of the month, where he will need to speak under oath.

The motion is part of a lawsuit filed against Wright by the estate of Dave Kleiman, a deceased entrepreneur, over claims Wright misappropriated billions of dollars of bitcoin (1.1 million BTC) through a complicated multi-year partnership with Kleiman earlier this decade.

To assess the claim, the Courts requested last month that Wright, an Australian computer scientist, produce records of his private bitcoin addresses as of December 2013.

The new motion to compel means that if Wright fails to comply now, he will be held in contempt of court, which could be a criminal act and punishable by a fine or jail time. It also means the Court has dismissed Wright's explanation that he cannot obtain the bitcoin address information because it is controlled by a blind trust.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/craig-wright-case-sees-motion-164133657.html

[nutildah]

He was a goddamn food vendor coordinator in 2017, he’s not a lawyer, he’s a goddamn peasant, and you’re stupid enough to site him.

What you are doing is a classic example of attacking the source and not the facts. Here are some other sources that all imply the same thing (Wright committed perjury). You can attack the nationality and background of their authors one by one if you must:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/05/man-who-claims-he-created-bitcoin-committed-perjury-lawsuit-says/
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/craig-wright-case-sees-motion-164133657.html
https://www.ccn.com/crypto/court-orders-bitcoin-inventor-craig-wright-to-put-up-or-shut-up/2019/06/15/
https://www.ibtimes.com/craig-wright-appear-court-over-allegations-stealing-11m-bitcoin-2800373


Wright is headed to court on June 28th. We'll have to wait until then to see what happens:

[JayJuanGee]

He was a goddamn food vendor coordinator in 2017, he’s not a lawyer, he’s a goddamn peasant, and you’re stupid enough to site him.

What you are doing is a classic example of attacking the source and not the facts. Here are some other sources that all imply the same thing (Wright committed perjury). You can attack the nationality and background of their authors one by one if you must:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/05/man-who-claims-he-created-bitcoin-committed-perjury-lawsuit-says/
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/craig-wright-case-sees-motion-164133657.html
https://www.ccn.com/crypto/court-orders-bitcoin-inventor-craig-wright-to-put-up-or-shut-up/2019/06/15/
https://www.ibtimes.com/craig-wright-appear-court-over-allegations-stealing-11m-bitcoin-2800373


Wright is headed to court on June 28th. We'll have to wait until then to see what happens:

Whoaza!!!

Seems that the luck of that scamster, Craig Wright, is running low or out, perhaps, and if he shows up in court, as ordered, he may well NOT be able to leave, so he might not show up in court on 6/28 and thereby become a fugitive of the law, like McAfee - but even McAfee has more credibility than the CSW sack of shit liar.

On the other hand, will we be so lucky as to NOT have to hear new phoney baloney from this fraudster while he is locked up, in the event that locking up occurs.  His other lawsuits might dry up too, if we were so lucky to be relieved of his ongoing misrepresentations and distractions.

[nutildah]

On the other hand, will we be so lucky as to NOT have to hear new phoney baloney from this fraudster while he is locked up, in the event that locking up occurs.  His other lawsuits might dry up too, if we were so lucky to be relieved of his ongoing misrepresentations and distractions.

We can only hope... I don't see him coming out of this saving face.

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

I thought I would address this as well. Not only did Wright admit that he changed the blog entry, I've tracked down both archived versions of the entry for your comparison:

Original, snapshot taken June 2, 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html

Edited, snapshot taken May 25, 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.html

You can see in the 5th blog post down (the one in question) he clearly added the sentence "I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon." somewhere between June 2014 and May 2015.

[Baofeng]

"Apparently", here is the full and official context of the script, so no need to cite or attack the author or any other crypto related websites that reports it.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.0.pdf

[TheHas]

Why the hell are exchanges still listing Bitcoin SV.

Like, your reputation is somewhat attached to the projects you list, and you want to attach yourself to someone whose nickname is literally 'Faketoshi?'.

Seriously, this guy is the opposite of what crypto is about. Crypto is bigger than a single person, it is about decentralisation, and this guy keeps trying to make it about him so he can claim credit for Bitcoin and make cash off it. Glad he is being exposed for what he is.

[RivAngE]

That was an interesting read! Thanks for putting everything together!
I was sure he was a conman because he had not provided any cryptographic proof for his claim and because he is acting in such a childish way; I wouldn't be surprised if even his degree is forked.*

Seems like there are many more juicy details though!
It's good that we have a single thread to pinpoint people to when we need to explain them the situation.


*PS: lol my guess was close enough after all!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Steven_Wright

Wright claimed to have a PhD in computer science from Charles Sturt University on his LinkedIn profile as of 2015; but the university told Forbes that it only awarded him two master's degrees and not a doctorate.

[sirsplashalot]

On the other hand, will we be so lucky as to NOT have to hear new phoney baloney from this fraudster while he is locked up, in the event that locking up occurs.  His other lawsuits might dry up too, if we were so lucky to be relieved of his ongoing misrepresentations and distractions.

We can only hope... I don't see him coming out of this saving face.

Look at the beginning of your thread, you don’t understand hearsay evidence. You’ve taken a photo from 2015 from a blogpost that was created in 2008 and have taken it at face value.

I thought I would address this as well. Not only did Wright admit that he changed the blog entry, I've tracked down both archived versions of the entry for your comparison:

Original, snapshot taken June 2, 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html

Edited, snapshot taken May 25, 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.html

You can see in the 5th blog post down (the one in question) he clearly added the sentence "I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon." somewhere between June 2014 and May 2015.

Snapshots from 2014 and 2015 about a 2008 blogpost. This does not hold up, this is nothing.

All your arguments about your pesant mate claiming Craig is a fraud prior to the Florida courts... also nothing.

How do you explain Craig having (as proven in court) 56 million dollars worth of btc in 2013?

Btw why does socialist dictator theymos (who’s got some power on this forum) now want to take away satoshis bitcoin?

Red flag for the core boys.

[nutildah]

I thought I would address this as well. Not only did Wright admit that he changed the blog entry, I've tracked down both archived versions of the entry for your comparison:

Original, snapshot taken June 2, 2014: https://web.archive.org/web/20140602022658/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com.au/2008_08_24_archive.html

Edited, snapshot taken May 25, 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525013625/http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008_08_24_archive.html

You can see in the 5th blog post down (the one in question) he clearly added the sentence "I have a cryptocurrency paper out soon." somewhere between June 2014 and May 2015.

Snapshots from 2014 and 2015 about a 2008 blogpost. This does not hold up, this is nothing.

It proves Craig edited a blog entry previous to the release of the Bitcoin white paper to make it appear he had written it. This is you upon seeing evidence that Craig is a fraud:

All your arguments about your pesant mate claiming Craig is a fraud prior to the Florida courts... also nothing.

So you're just going to steamroll over the other sources I listed that all imply the exact same thing in order to continue being racist. Gotcha.

How do you explain Craig having (as proven in court) 56 million dollars worth of btc in 2013?

It wasn't "proven in court." It was a statement he made in a lawsuit he filed, which was subsequently dismissed. Thanks for reminding me about something, though. During this time, Craig went through a lot of trouble to forge Kleiman's signature and backdate documents to make it look like they had entered contractual agreements (that never existed):

Btw why does socialist dictator theymos (who’s got some power on this forum) now want to take away satoshis bitcoin?

Red flag for the core boys.

This is off-topic nonsense. Stop changing the subject, or better yet stop commenting if it upsets you so much.

[sirsplashalot]

"Apparently", here is the full and official context of the script, so no need to cite or attack the author or any other crypto related websites that reports it.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.0.pdf

The argument was ‘according to court documents Craig committed fraud’ as was the title of the article.

Now show me in these documents where he was convicted of committing fraud.


Edit: Theymos wanting to destroy satoshis Bitcoin has everything to do with this topic because he is literally scared of what Craig Wright will do with those Bitcoins. This is a full on socialist dictatorship.

Do you agree Satoshis Bitcoins should be destroyed?

Do you believe the man who created Bitcoin should loose all his Bitcoins to someone who has no relevance other than censorship to this space?

Looks like Greg Maxwell has nothing better to do then to continue to abuse his superior powers to bend the trust system on this forum.

[TheBeardedBaby]

"Apparently", here is the full and official context of the script, so no need to cite or attack the author or any other crypto related websites that reports it.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.24.0.pdf

The argument was ‘according to court documents Craig committed fraud’ as was the title of the article.

Now show me in these documents where he was convicted of committing fraud.


Edit: Theymos wanting to destroy satoshis Bitcoin has everything to do with this topic because he is literally scared of what Craig Wright will do with those Bitcoins. This is a full on socialist dictatorship.

Do you agree Satoshis Bitcoins should be destroyed?

Do you believe the man who created Bitcoin should loose all his Bitcoins to someone who has no relevance other than censorship to this space?

Looks like Greg Maxwell has nothing better to do then to continue to abuse his superior powers to bend the trust system on this forum.

The community wanted a simple proof to the Craig's claims that he is Satoshi? Why he didn't provide any? It's so simple and easy.. and then attempts to copyright Bitcoins' Whitepaper, without any proof again..

I can just go and copyright the Christmas just because I say I'm Santa. I can prove it by providing a picture of me in a Santa's clothes.