Why though? It's just another copy-and-paste masternode project out of countless others. There's no team, no plans, no roadmap, no sponsors, no real innovation going on.

I notice that the Dash white paper is the most highly copied out of all of them. That's probably because of the whole masternodes thing. Just another copy and paste project...

I'm really enjoying the newest iteration of your hats homer, they're 3D A.F.

Speak for yourself. I use it all the time. I quite regularly use it to buy phone plans (mainly mobile data) for myself and others, and as a vehicle to exchange currency. We're talking 3-5 times a week.

I do agree that more real-world transacting and use case scenarios would help it gain more respectability in the minds of many, and help it get away from the whole "Ponzi scheme" image problem it frequently has.

Its just not practical to use in some situations where cash can accomplish the same thing, and is even moreso in periods of high volatility. However, as was mentioned above, its still relatively in its early stages and it might be a while before relatively crazy price fluctuations begin to subside.

Powers out all day
Went to see Godzilla II
Loud -- still fell asleep.

My point is BSV is not the "real bitcoin."

What coin do you think people discuss the most on this forum, which Craig Wright claims to have founded? (this issue has never been brought up but its part and parcel of CSW saying he is Satoshi)

When your average, non-biased crypto investor is talking about "bitcoin", are they talking about BTC, BCH, BSV, BCD, BTG, or BTCP?

When the media talks about "bitcoin", are they talking about BTC, BCH, BSV, BCD, BTG, or BTCP?

This tactic of trying to confuse/trick people into buying your version of bitcoin instead of BTC has already been fully deployed by the BCH camp with feeble results. Its dishonest, untrustworthy behavior, which is why I don't disagree with Kenzawak's tag.

(ps: if you really think your tag is unfair then you should start a thread in Reputation about it and ask for feedback from other DTs -- this isn't really the proper thread to contest it)

Kenzawak's feedback reads as such:


Moments after you wrote this:


Saying BSV is "the real Bitcoin" is a lie. Its a fork of a fork. Did you not see the image I posted earlier which shows that a Bitcoin Cash dev is partly responsible for building your protocol's code?

His statement is only libel if its assertively not true. More people here agree with him that calling BSV "the real bitcoin" is a lie than not. Ergo, no libel has taken place. Using that term at all infers you are considering pursuing some course of legal action, which I guarantee you will not end in your favor. But, do what you gotta do.

This is indeed a cool pic, and I was forced by the hand of Yehova to send you a merit, but still, I have too many questions....

1. Is it like a Western Union fanclub meeting going on?

2. What is generating so much trash on the beach??

3. Did you guys remember to wear sunscreen???

Anyhow, its a big world filled with billions, and its cool that you two could meet up IRL.

Me and Mic were about 50 miles apart at one point, separated by a $40 flight. I hope to make up for that at some point.

It could be... After all, they all pretty much look like the same damn woman. Its like jeez Leo, mix it up a little bit. At least date a brunette or a fair skinned latina or something.

Edit: at least his most recent pick is a part-time brunette.

LOL. That made me chuckle.


This guy started a career as a hardcore troller and basic all-around spammer after getting busted for running a fake signature campaign. Now he's banned.


Most of his comments are more awful than funny, but this one has a certain degree of irony to it.

When I was in the Shanghai airport for a layover, the first thing I did was try to do a Google search for "Tiananmen Square." But, I couldn't connect to Google, so...


Everything Google- and Facebook-related was blocked. Also no Wikipedia.

I could access tor though. Didn't screw around too deeply for fear of being arrested for thought crimes.

Did you miss the part of my reply where I said "who cares"?


You're literally attacking a problem that doesn't exist.

After your adamantly-worded doomsday predictions about bitcoin failed to materialize I don't why you're not too embarrassed to continue posting here.

But for fun let's take a look at your comment edit. Perhaps you thought you were coming off as a bit too trollish and wanted to add some substance.


You're not really thinking outside of the box here.

1. Bigger buckets require more energy
2. So does moving twice as fast between Spot A & Spot B

What if you could create a channel between the two spots to move the water for you?
Then you don't need to bigger buckets, and after having set up the channel the water would move with very little energy.


I merited a different comment than that one:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5105657.msg49576064#msg49576064

It was written previous to you going full retard.

Yep, its a little gag put into all SMF software. It only shows on post 1337.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=619843.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3149325.0

That's straight-up plagiarism, for what looks like scamming purposes. Surprised the plagiabot didn't catch him yet. Normally I wouldn't encourage somebody be banned for 4+ years-old plagiarism but I'm making a special exception for this guy.

Dev: you really should have agreed to a minimum number of words per spam bump from your thread bumping service. These guys have just been regurgitating the same brainless one-liners for months now. I guess its a good thing you hired them. Without them, or me, your thread would be completely lifeless.

How much have you shelled out paying these guys so far?

However much it is, its way too much. I bet you've paid them more than you've collected from your little "project" thus far.

I don't think we'll ever agree as we apparently have different definitions of the word "fact."

I do agree with you on one point: only time will tell.

See ya later chief.

Nobody understands what you're talking about because you're basing your conclusions on too many assumptions.


You're assuming that SV's blocks will be full by then. Currently, the average BSV block size is 153 KB. That's 0.12% of its max capacity of 128 MB. What good is raising the block size limit to 1 GB going to do when you're having such trouble filling its current blocks?


That would be fine but somehow I doubt its true. I welcome honest debate. However, you're not being honest with your calculations thus far.


Bitcoin and Lightning are doing just fine, thanks for your concern.


That's like building a super-sized Wal-Mart in the middle of the desert. Have at it, it's not my money.


With its relatively piddly hash rate BSV will fall to this problem well before BTC.


You don't understand the difference between an original protocol and a fork. You should probably take the time to learn that difference before you start giving lectures.

Oof... extra glad I got into an exchange sig campaign. There's gonna be a lot of sig campaigners out of work when/if ChipMixer shuts down. Better try to up my post quality from now on as there might be some hungry competition out there.


CoinJoin really is a smart way to combine transaction outputs.. Its a meaningful way to take advantage of bitcoin's relatively long block times to mix coins together. Even if something like Wasabi wallet is some day considered a "money laundering service", there will eventually be decentralized applications not owned by anyone that can achieve the same effect.

Have you checked BSV's GitHub repository? BSV isn't the "original protocol" -- its a fork of a fork. Did you know that your code has edits made by Amaury Sechet (BCH) and Pieter Wuille (BTC)?




No, and nobody cares.


It certainly does. It's quite evident that most of BSV's market cap is driven by the idea that Wright is Satoshi. Have you been paying attention?


Why would BTC shrink its block size? You mean to less than 1 MB? Bitcoin has no problem attracting miners. In the 10 years since its inception, it never has.