Just to add, here's a really hefty list that contains most of the commonly used scams today: https://cryptosec.info/scams/

One of the new nocoiner narratives, and probably the shittiest one YET. It's so shitty that it's like 10x worse compared what comes out of Peter Schiff's and Nouriel Roubini's mouths.

My previous response on this topic:

Stopped sports betting because I spent a lot of time in the past watching sports/eSports because of my bets instead of doing things that are more productive.

As for this fight specifically, planning on going small on Poirier. I'll just wait until a week before the event so I can know how busy or not busy I am at the time of the fight.

It matters, of course.

This has been a pretty hot topic on Twitter quite recently, with some people thinking that Bitcoin being possible to cut up to smaller denominations makes it's supply sort of "unlimited". It's like saying that you can feed 50 families with one whole pizza because you can slice it up to 50 pieces. I really don't get it. I mean holy crap that Frances Coppola woman on Twitter is totally bollocks.

I think it's just either..

1. They find your information quite suspicious

2. It's the holidays, and that Bitcoin interest from the masses have been slowly rising since the recent price rises hence there might be a huge backlog of user registrations that they need to go through.

I'm betting on the 2nd. You can feel free to use other platforms though, I'm personally for peer-to-peer no-KYC platforms like HodlHodl[1] and Bisq[2]. Just make sure to transact with people with good reputation. 

---

[1] https://hodlhodl.com/
[2] https://bisq.network/

Nope. I stick to my plan and sell just when I need the money, and continue stacking sats as per usual regardless of price.

As for this..

I actually think it's more risky to not own any bitcoin in this day and age; but I wish you the best of luck(assuming it actually goes back down to $6000 lol).

Jeebus these odds. While Conor is mostly the better fighter in this case, I wouldn't be surprised if an upset happens either. I mean, this is Dustin Porier, not some random inexperienced fighter.

I've stopped doing SportsBetting for a while now, but these odds are too tasty to ignore. Probably going small on Dustin if I don't forget the date.

Pretty safe to assume that the exchange with the "best" exchange rate would vary a lot throughout the days. Let's not forget that it's the traders on the exchanges that set the buy/sell orders anyway, not the exchange itself.

As for Binance, I'm pretty sure that it's the most recommended exchange mostly for crypto to crypto specifically, but not necessarily the most recommended for buying BTC.

Mostly, yes. But also definitely be familiar with what you're buying. Perfect example being the fidget spinner coin that' just recently being dumpstered due to all those news. 🤣   (hope it does soon)

Disclaimer: While I like writing, I don't run a news site.

Insider information if you're a big news site, from bigger news sites if you're a smaller one.

Mostly, the news giants. Think CNBC, CNN, etc. As far as I know bigger crypto news sites like CoinDesk still are mostly minutes/hours late compared to the giants.

Mostly, especially if you don't have the connections to get early access to events, yes.

Everywhere. Especially when starting out, the likeliness of you out-competing the bigger sites(in terms of speed) is probably next to impossible, so where you can probably excel is the quality of your articles. Try to beat them in terms of depth of information.

I mostly agree. It's pretty easy to take in advice, but the difficulty comes when the problem is placed in front of you. Especially for the newbies, it's going to be pretty hard to think logically and stick to your plan when your emotions are overpowering everything.

Perfect example being bitcoin. "I will hold for 10 years" says the newbie, but then panic sells when a FUD article comes lmao.

To some extent, sure. But regardless where the transaction comes from(from p2p platforms in this case), wouldn't it still count as "demand"? I don't think "demand" should necessarily come from spot exchanges. One huge transaction from 2 parties should still be considered as "demand" as far as I know.

It only seems less profitable if you're only being short-sighted knowing the recent price increase.

Also, it's mostly the ignorance of people when it comes to investing. It's why a lot of people buy coins like XRP because it's "cheap"(totally not taking note of marketcap), with them thinking and hoping that it will be $500 soon or something similarly stupid.

The thing though is, the 1 BTC thing is just a target of many people that likes to accumulate bitcoin. But if they really needed BTC? Like when you're from a country like Venezuela, I could guarantee that it wouldn't matter if you had 1 full BTC or not, what matters is that you hold an uncensorable and easy-to-transfer asset that isn't guaranteed to decrease in value on the daily.

As for bitcoin being more and more expensive(in sats value), that's the reality of markets.

Says the same people who refused to buy at the previous all-time high peaks of the previous years because "it's too expensive". Even in 2017 it probably might've looked like a stupid decision back then to buy at the $19,700 peak, but look where we are at now.

Some of the notable "events" that I remember on the top of my head, but you might've probably heard of already, that I'll list anyway just so if you've missed any of them:

• July 16: Twitter hackers who targeted Elon Musk and others received $121,000 in bitcoin, analysis shows
• August 11: MicroStrategy becomes first listed company to buy bitcoin as part of its capital allocation strategy
• October 8: Square Invests $50 Million in Bitcoin
• October 15: Taproot Has Been Merged Into Bitcoin Core: Here’s What That Means
• October 21: PayPal allows Bitcoin and crypto spending
• December 12: Pornhub Might Have To Push Bitcoin Adoption

Also, Specter Wallet has been getting a lot of attention on Twitter since the past few months:

• https://specter.solutions/
• https://github.com/cryptoadvance/specter-desktop

Yes. Because even me telling a friend to buy $5 worth of bitcoin would still technically count as 'demand', affecting bitcoin's price. It's just that of course, that $5 transaction would just have a very very minuscule effect that it's pretty much nonexistent. Same with Bitcointalk, but obviously the effect would be bigger, but I personally don't think Bitcointalk can affect the price in a noticeable manner; probably more of a 'gentle push' in helping price rises.

Er.. like 5 seconds at maximum if my internet connection is slow? Assuming you're referring to exchange market orders, then these orders should be next to instant.

If you're referring to a limit order, then it's really going to depend on what my intent is.

It would most likely be the case with BCH and LTC. As with XRP, yes, fees are indeed cheap, and that’s because the platform is centralized in the first place; to the point that I’d honestly just use PayPal or a creditcard lol.

Again, layer 2 solutions like LN are the way to go. It’s just that people refuse to try it out even though LN wallets(like Phoenix) have been A LOT better in terms of UX. That, and that unfortunately exchanges still doesn’t accept LN. Apparently Kraken is going to receive LN deposits in early 2021 though.

There’s a reason why I recommended HodlHodl and Bisq(and NOT LocalBitcoins) is because LocalBitcoins requires AML/KYC.

As to your question, you might want to do research on it as I really can’t answer as I’m not from AU. But then again, if you’re transaction peer-to-peer(like you exchanging money with a friend) and not with a business, why would an ID be needed?