I am bullish on CBTC but 0.001 in a month, that's $3.75 mil evaluation at $125 per btc, for a company that is probably going to do 15-20 BTC profit this week? 

That equates to 0.00000067 BTC per share for the week.

The real thing I want to see (not just at Casinobitco.in) is how btc companies as a whole, are going to maintain profits in BTC for investors because as BTC price increases in USD, then BTC wagered will decrease per Gambler (wagered in USD per gambler will stay the same, IMO). 

The way CBTC accomplishes some of this is gain more players, in sports book and casino.  Right now the market is saturated with both and the amount of BTC people is not growing at a large amount yet.  Therefore CBTC initially needs to gain in other casinos and sportsbook players.  (KOS jumps off the handle a bit but is well versed into a true gamblers thoughts of comparing books looking for the best odds, CBTC needs to become more competitive in that regard without risking to much, which I believe they will do)

But ultimately these companies offer diminishing returns in BTC if BTC continues to grow as it is supposed to do.

For example a standard bettor would bet $1 in USD (~0.01 btc right now) on a 3-4 parlay (once they get this feature up), but let's say BTC price doubles back to $250 for a coin, I would guess the bet in BTC would be halved.

Therefore CBTC is still gaining the USD wagered and percentages but not the BTC wagered like today.  Therefore meaning that share price of 0.001 (at btc of $250) would make the CBTC valuation of $7.5 mil, and still making 15-20 BTC per week. So to get back to your "suggested" 3.75 mil USD valuation it would be back to 0.0005 BTC per share. 

Some are going to get caught holding the bag on these stocks, IMO with the increase in BTC price


** this also does not take into account within a year or 2 US betting will need to be blocked, imo**

All words are counted. That would be 3.3 shares. But it rounds down (I think) to your nearest full 1k, so it would *count* as 3 shares. If you added 700 more words, it would be 4.

I'm coming from a few posts ago, where I said something like "I didn't know that was supposed to be like that" and you said "English is not a hard language to learn".

I don't see where this comes from, though.

I would never have called him out on this were it not for essentially claiming that he is a professional writer and has the degree to prove it. When you flat out lie like this, it makes the rest of us look bad. Furthermore, he wants 1 BTC per 1000 words (due to his extensive knowledge of the English language), although he, again, is lying to earn money.

You can tell based on the press releases posted on BitcoinPRBuzz alone that he is far less than professional. This leads me to believe that he is attempting to use trickery and false claims to get paid more by people who otherwise don't know better. I have morals and I can't see myself sitting by while things like this happen. They destroy the reputation for each and every one of us, so when people do things like this it has a direct effect on me as well.

I did my own revisions prior to your post, and it looks like you edited the first draft I posted. My post now covers everything (including things like correcting "ghost writing" to "ghost-writing").

I just can't fathom how someone can graduate with Honor's in something they don't even full understand. That is beyond me.

Fixed tons of grammatical errors in your post. You should hire me as an editor, considering you're claiming this is professional, :p.

If they sold the company, wouldn't the sale price be paid out to stockholders? At least that's what I would guess would happen. And if that happened, they would sell for a profit (I hope) so stockholders would earn more as a result.

If they end up somehow pulling, say 18 BTC a day in profit, it will have a 100% yearly ROI. There's a bit of work to get it there, but I think it's possible. Note: that's profit, though, not just income/deposits.

We are starting to get some bidders