I'll take this quote from another topic here: In the list of founded addresses there is unnecessary line "address" (kind of column header) between addresses "3.." and "bc..", line 31808561. Like you had separated lists and you concatenated them. Thanks! That "address" should have been removed (but due to copying code I tried to remove the header from another file). It will be fixed in tomorrow's update.
|
|
|
You must be talking about P2PK UTXOs, if so, Bitcoin Core can spend those. Just import the "Private Key" into a new non-descriptor wallet and it should be able to find those transactions. If OP really has 50 (or more) Bitcoins mined to pubkey, he shouldn't mess with it on an online computer. Sync Bitcoin Core and unplug your internet. Then import the private key, without risking any online exposure. Create, verify and sign a transaction offline, copy it, and broadcast it online. Alternative: Import the pubkey, let Bitcoin Core sync until 2010 (that shouldn't take long), and if anything shows up, you can take it offline to import the privkey. Or let it sync completely to be sure the funds are still there.
|
|
|
3- The maximum total winnings for any player on a single day is 100,000 EURO. I'm pretty sure Bitlucy doesn't have 100,000 euro. 7- Rule 18.5 says "To the extent permitted by law, our maximum liability arising out of or in connection with your use of the Websites, regardless of the cause of actions (whether in contract, tort, breach of warranty or otherwise), will not exceed €100." They copied (plagiarized!) the Terms from Betcoin.ag, who's had them since 2015. So if anything goes wrong, you are only liable to cover losses worth max €100? Maybe that's all they have ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
They copied it from betcoin.ag (2015). And it's also copied by playbetr.com (2018). This is going to be a long list.
|
|
|
You should check out and follow lowendbox.com website, they have some great hosting and VPS deals, among other things. Don't trust all webhosts there, I've been scammed by their "offers". Lowendtalk.com (more or less the same) has good offers too, and I've come to trust some of them (after I got scammed by another one). But I wouldn't expect better uptime than Contabo. High uptime doesn't go well with "low end". I am not sure if they can beat Contabo but hetzner.com should be solid and reliable alternative. They don't accept Bitcoin. I don't want to pay by creditcard.
|
|
|
But full UTXO database is still kept in chainstate DB in pruned node, isn't it? I think so, yes. If so, what is the technical problem of making a sum for a given address? You can try https://github.com/in3rsha/bitcoin-utxo-dump to dump all addresses and their balance. I haven't tested it myself, so use at your own risk.
|
|
|
The best logic to reduce losses is to reduce wagering. Your average loss is your total wagered amount multiplied by the house edge. And this is why I think is better to bet on big multipliers against the low ones. Correct. That's what makes the Landen strategy so good. Yesterday I was thinking about the 95% chance to win, The question is, how many losses you can get consecutive. There's no upper limit. That's what often seems to surprise people, and if you play often enough, you'll get more losses than you can afford. At 95% win chance, the house edge is huge compared to the amount you win! And after making some tests in the simulator I found is really complex to get 4 or 5 consecutive losses But your profits are small compared to what you're risking.
|
|
|
If you have fixed list of address you want to watch, you can create watch only wallet and import the list of the address before you start sync process. You can also add a new watch-only address to a pruned node before it gets funded. Example: importaddress 1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD theymos false Okay, I'm cheating, the address above is funded already. Your pruned node will only know about new transactions.
|
|
|
the goal is to run the bot with multiple accounts and have a bigger number of winning bots than the losing ones. That won't work. Casino games are EV- for the user, which means on average you will lose. That's because of the house edge. So, if someone has a betting logic for the long run with low risk, please share it with us and I will code the bot. The best logic to reduce losses is to reduce wagering. Your average loss is your total wagered amount multiplied by the house edge.
Years ago, back when rollin.io still existed, there was a user (Landen) running a bot for months. He won big before he busted. I made a spreadsheet of what I called the Landen strategy. If your bankroll is big enough, the chance to win one round is incredible high. But if you repeat it a million times, you will at some point lose. In the end, it's just Martingale.
I've seen an interesting way of reaching a 50% odds bet by making many smaller bets at higher risk and the same winning result, but I can't find it back. The math made sense, the total chance of winning was the same, but because you wager less in total, you lose less to the house edge. Or the other way around: you risk the same amount in total, but win slighty more if you win. I'm pretty sure I've merited the post, but that list is too long to find it back.
|
|
|
Update: I have downloaded "calls", "erc-20" and "transactions". The total size is 712 GB, and I don't have the server space to store it on. I have it on my local storage (so I can upload it in about 2 days). Unfortunately, 2 files are corrupted: - blockchair_ethereum_calls_20200113.tsv.gz
- blockchair_ethereum_calls_20211110.tsv.gz
I contacted Blockchair, but they "haven't detected the issue". I'm currently downloading it to compile a list of Eth addresses and their balance from this data. Amazingly, I couldn't find a complete list anywhere. By now Blockchair has the complete Ethereum address list online: blockchair_ethereum_addresses_latest.tsv.gz. That ends my efforts to compile this list myself.
|
|
|
Looks like something exploded in cloudflare's data centers. It looked like a quarter of the internet was gone this morning. As theymos said: The Internet is seriously flawed if everyone needs to huddle behind these huge centralized anti-DDoS companies in order to survive...
|
|
|
I missed posts 60409954-60410008, my scraper couldn't catch them because of Cloudflare. The nearest ones I have are 60409953 and 60410009. That leaves a 15 minute gap.
|
|
|
Your scraper stopped working too, right? For the past 30 minutes, there seems to be a large outage at Cloudflare, and Bitcointalk now shows the "Checking your browser" screen before I can view a normal page. My scraper gets this: HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable 2022-06-21 09:24:05 ERROR 503: Service Temporarily Unavailable. Update: It works again. I missed posts 60409954-60410008
|
|
|
or I'll move somewhere else. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Contabo's rates are hard to beat, better uptimes can get quite expensive. I'm on the lookout too, my (sponsored) AWS is running out soon.
|
|
|
I guess you already figured it out, but no, you can't do that. Any Fork with some value has replay protection against Bitcoin, so the Forkcoins don't move when the Bitcoin moves.
|
|
|
I knew something was fishy when Rose777 muted every communication channel!! It's strange how everyone went blind overnight. Nobody is questioning him, and no one is supporting the flag against him. I've been in contact, and recommended to respond here. Unfortunately, he (she?) didn't. The lack of communication is something I've seen in other cases, and that's what destroys reputations. The Flag has been active since it got it's first DT-support. I'm not in a rush to add to that.
|
|
|
For some reason the site has stopped working. Is it just me or is there anyone else who doesn't have it working? TryNinja announced the downtime.
|
|
|
it is difficult to determine whether these domains are really owned by the original Chipmixer. Actually, it's easy: ChipMixer only owns these sites: (only one clearnet domain) The fake site showing the real .onion is only meant to trick people into believing it's the real site (and judging by your post: it works!). They know that clearnet-users won't switch to .onion if they don't have to.
|
|
|
Isn't this banking system weird all together? It's absurd, for sure. No arguing there. It's probably the weirdest business we have. Then again, "money" is weird too. To quote Henry Ford: It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. I believe this is still true. Why work all your life for a tiny amount of money, while central banks create a million times more money than you earn in a lifetime in a millisecond? This, by the way, is why I'm in Bitcoin. Central banks can't create more. And I believe they truely fear that.
|
|
|
Losing custody of their money, but being able to use Lightning in a simple manner. (e.g., BlueWallet, Phoenix etc.) [emphasis mine]
Small, but important correction! Lightning Network mobile apps: | | Custodial | | | Non-custodial | | | | | BlueWallet (the LN portion of it) | | | Phoenix by Acinq | | | | | | | | Breez.io | | |
While we're doing small corrections: opening a channel in Phoenix Wallet requires trust.
|
|
|
|