EDIT: Hornets currently down 7 at the half. Need some offense.
They are tied at 106 now, this game has been entertaining so far but the big question is if the Hornets will be able to cover the spread. We know how bad this Wizards team is, just hope that they'll be careless in the crucial minutes so Hornets will win and cover, good luck, there's still time yahoo. Piss poor free throw shooting in the last 1 min 30 seconds. They shot 4-7 on free throws in that time and ended up playing bad defense only winning by 3. Good game, just didn't go my way.
|
|
|
I'm taking the Phoenix Suns over the Warriors in today's game, ML at 1.74 is already attractive to me.
Nuggets vs Magic, - Nuggets -1.5 at 1.73. Although Jamal Murray is ruled out again in this game, the Nuggets is deep with Jokic, MPJ, Gordon, KCP and Reggie Jackson.
Good game to watch is the Bucks going up against the Celtics. Two top team in the West, but I think the Celtics are going to win this one.
Nuggets vs Magic is going to be a good game. I don't feel like Denver will run away with it with Murray being out. They'll probably still take the game IMO. I have the Hornets -4 myself tonight(Last leg of a parlay but the other games are NCAA). What's everyone think there? EDIT: Hornets currently down 7 at the half. Need some offense.
|
|
|
1miau reminds me of that other impatient hothead Lutpin. (I'll stop short if calling it a hunch, but they do remind me of each other).
Yahoo62278: Proof The proof of distrusting them can be found in their trust feedback they have posted. Same as yours and TSC's, 1miau trust feedback need to be reviewed as they are little more than post-it notes or negatives to sledge etc - not for trades. Practice what you preach as the three of you deserve Tildas.
Conversely, anyone who is Tilda-ing Ratimov (or whatever it is he calls himself these days) is guilty of trust abuse as he (Ratimov) currently has posted no trust feedback. I'm not going to reply to you again, so rant all you want from here in out. Feel free to ~ i'm 100% ok with it. I don't control what you do with your inclusions. It's not my fault you ran yourself right out of DT, it's your own doing. The difference between me and you as far as DT goes is I don't care 1 way or the other. I do my best and I do not use it as a power trip. I will practice what I preach though and use that ignore button as I feel arguing with you is a complete waste of time.
|
|
|
I can post part of the message here: Da du durch die DT-Rotationen absehbar in den nächsten Monaten wieder Teil von DT bist (aufgrund der Rotation bist du es derzeit nicht, was aber bloß durch eine für deinen Account unwahrscheinliche Zufallssituation zustande kommt), bitte ich um Anpassung des Trust entsprechend der Richtlinien: entfernen des Trusts oder Änderung zu neutralem Trust.
Trust zu nutzen heißt, das System zu verstehen und anwenden zu können. Ansonsten wird DT reagieren!
Mit Bitte um Korrektur bis 12.04.2022, 23.59 Uhr! Understand that this is what the message says according to google translate Since you will be part of DT again in the next few months due to the DT rotations (due to the rotation you are not at the moment, but this is only due to a random situation that is unlikely for your account), I ask you to adjust the trust according to the guidelines: remove the trust or change it to neutral trust. Using trust means understanding and being able to apply the system. Otherwise, DT will respond! I do not look at this as a threat. He is asking you to review your tags basically and make sure they are correct. That's what I take from it at least. Maybe he could have said it nicer? Other then that, doesn't look like any sort of threat or bullying. Looks like he was trying to help IMO and by DT will respond I would take it as a thread like this could be made about you not knowing how to use the trust system and shouldn't be in DT if you don't know the basics. I could be wrong but this is my take. I find it odd that he's worried about your inclusions and tags in advance.
|
|
|
I would argue that anyone looking to "start over" with a name change should do exactly that. Start from the beginning, no rank, no merit, no post history. Don't try to hide who you were.
Am I missing something as to why 1 would need a name change? From what I read on his DT case he got caught plagiarizing, he deleted lots of old threads, not sure if caught in lies but the point is now with the name change it feels like he is trying to hide the past.
|
|
|
Anyone who looks at DT from a power standpoint doesn't deserve to be there
So true. No different than a boss taking advantage of his employees saying suck my dick or i'll fire you. It's just wrong to use your power like this. @mikeywith would it be possible for you to compile a list(some reference points) where you show 1miau abusing members and silencing them? It would be easier for anyone reviewing the case to just be able to click the links and see the abuse. Also, maybe some feedbacks you feel are political. Up to you. To anyone who is speaking up or thinking about it, please also include reference links or pms so that it can be reviewed. You want something done, you have to grow some balls and show the proof. You cannot be tagged for speaking up as it would look terrible for 1miau if he tagged you. To sum it up, the burden is on mikey and others to show/provide proof if they want change. At this point 1miau should remain quiet. If no proof is presented, case closed and everyone goes about their business.
|
|
|
After reading this I want to be up front and sat that I decided to ~ both of you for the time being. It's been 3 days and 5 pages of back n forth drama between you 2 with noone backing down or trying to come to a suitable outcome and end the drama. Both of you just seem intent on proving your points without resolving anything.
Thanks for the feedback, yahoo62278. I do not dislike either of you, nor do I want to see this continue. IMO DT needs to be more rational and open to change as well as level headed and fair. Neither of you 2 are being this right now. Just a bunch of i'm right, no i'm right bs.
I hope you guys work it out at some point, but that's not looking like it'll happen. Might be time to ignore each other and go on with life.
DT needs to be more rational that's right. I'm open to listen to the community if mikeywith is willing to do the same. As DT is a decentralized community feedback system, I believe we should listen to the call of the community. I think you are a long time DT member and believe your feedback can help here to get this solved, move on and dedicate our time to more important things. As said before I'm willing to accept any outcome DT will conclude. So, what's your approach to solve the issue? I'm willing to give it a try and look how we can come together. I cannot really say what will end the dispute man. You're not budging and neither is he. Everything that needed to be said was said day 1 IMO between you 2. Having a beer and hashing it out was mentioned and declined. Talking isn't getting anywhere as it just keeps piling up. I get it, you are accused and want to defend your position and he thinks you are in the wrong and wants you to realize it. It's hard to move people from their opinion sometimes. He has brought awareness and people will keep an eye on you no matter what for a bit and see if you are continuing on the path you're being accused of IMO. The community has 5 pages of stuff to read and decipher. If they want to ~ then they will. If they don't they won't. Ignore button seems like the best thing for you 2 at the moment and let each other have some time to think and reflect.
|
|
|
@yahoo, did mikeywith tag someone unfairly for stupid reasons? If not why would you remove him? Because he is doing the right thing?
The right thing or the wrong thing has nothing to do with this. 3 days man. 3 days and both are defending their position with no end in sight. Be level headed, hit the ignore, and move on or take it private, either option is better than keeping the argument going.
|
|
|
If I'm removed, I'll have to accept that and we part ways to avoid drama. If I'm not removed, you'll have to accept that and we part ways to avoid drama. If you are removed, you'll have to accept that and we part ways to avoid drama. If you are not removed, I'll have to accept that and we part ways to avoid drama.
After reading this I want to be up front and sat that I decided to ~ both of you for the time being. It's been 3 days and 5 pages of back n forth drama between you 2 with noone backing down or trying to come to a suitable outcome and end the drama. Both of you just seem intent on proving your points without resolving anything. I do not dislike either of you, nor do I want to see this continue. IMO DT needs to be more rational and open to change as well as level headed and fair. Neither of you 2 are being this right now. Just a bunch of i'm right, no i'm right bs. I hope you guys work it out at some point, but that's not looking like it'll happen. Might be time to ignore each other and go on with life. What a car crash this thread has become since I last logged in last night.
I'll wait a few days, but it's looking more like the subject of this thread will be Tildaed by me because of their inaccurate trust feedbacks.
Same as the other two I've expressed concern over this month (TSC and Yahoo) whose own trust feedbacks are inaccurate / spiteful etc .
Do what you need to do. I'm ok in or out of DT.
|
|
|
Really disheartening seeing how a once trusted casino can loose its reputation over night.
On a side note, efialtis has always been favorable towards this casino. I remembered some people informing him since he's a network of affiliates. He might to look into the piling cases. At the end of the day efialtis is only a person who has affiliates on the website through his website BTCGOSU. He has no control of whether they pay or not. He can try to get a response from their rep and ask them to post here, but cannot force them. About the only action he can take is removing them from his website and labeling them a scam which at this point any added pressure might be the path to take.
|
|
|
Which football are you referring to? Real football like NFL American football or soccer? I personally cannot stand soccer, but i'm only 1 person. My dislike is mainly related to the betting of the sport, it's just not my favorite. Now if you are talking NFL football, I LOVE THAT!!! Big hits, awesome celebrations after scores, many betting options it's just a great sport.
|
|
|
You have not sent me. Why will I pay you back? Think about it man. You are a new account, you come into the forum, and your 1st post is for a loan. On top of that, you offer nothing to cover the loan if something happens(collateral). Do you really think people just hand out money and pray they get repaid? It's not rocket science.
|
|
|
Here is a small collection of 1miau sent feedback Poly#Crypto is a troll account in our German local board. Doesn't provide any value for the forum - only spam, shitposts, inaccurate information and (of course) defamations and insults. Tries to find excuses for Putin's war. This Troll account is usually not using the Trust system, the fraudulent feedback against my account is its first one. Consider the feedbacks left by this account as completely worthless and wrong, should it ever be on DT. Supporting Putins war with Kremlin Propaganda and selling it as "facts". (see my quote in the reference link). Helping to normalize an ongoing war is a shame. For a while thandie has been a disgusting troll abusing the forum with his off-topic spam. I addition he's trying to discredit my efforts to help raise funds for civilians in Ukraine. Shitposting Bitcointalk with low quality spam all day; then openly accusing me for off-topic shitposting... The value Koal-84 is contributing to the forum is vanishingly small. The only occasion when his posts are getting longer is to find excuses for Russia's war against Ukraine. Disgusting behaviour from Koal-84! Avoid this Account to steer clear from unnecessary spam and derangement most probably caused due to paid signature campaigns. Low value shitposts, spam, burst posting and excessive pyramid-quotes (61052011, 61145452 or 61021354). In addition, amishmanish downplayed Putin's war by repeatedly spreading pro-russian lies (60250177). It's discouraged to support such a behaviour by accepting such accounts into signature campaigns. Some of his "political related" feedback is actually negative. Also, I was contacted by someone who is also a victim of 1miau's DT punishment, with a clear message of 1miau's threatening him with his DT power purely for political disagreement, unfortunately, that person is afraid of 1miau punishment and asked me not to reveal his name in public, I am willing to send the conversation via PM to trusted DT members so they can review it. I am not volunteering to have a look, but I would like to state that noone should be afraid to have an opinion and speak it for fear of retaliation. We are not always going to agree with each other, that's just life. Tagging someone for not thinking the same way as me would be ridiculous. DT shouldn't be trying to hold power over anyone here, shouldn't be threatening a tag if users don't conform, shouldn't be extorting money from users to save themselves a tag. That being said, 1miau you might consider looking at your sent feedbacks and making some changes. I'm not telling you that you must do it, I am just asking you to take a look. Leaving a red for someone's opinion shouldn't happen and I see a couple of them on your page. Neutral at best and even then, it's not a trade so technically it's not a correct feedback to use. I've been saying this forever now, we need a new system. We need the current feedback system for trades, and we need a feedback system for reputation. Look at my page, I have tagged a bunch for cheating campaign. Can those users be trusted? Nope, but I technically didn't engage in a trade so is my feedback correct? Serious question there. If people do not believe it is, what should be done instead of a tag?
|
|
|
I disagree with everyone who thinks this should end. News outlets would NEVER lie to any of us. Shame on you for thinking that. This conflict MUST go on until someone dies. Sorry, but that's the rules LMAO.
|
|
|
Well the giants went ahead amd screwd themselves up lol. No clue how Washington let the giants beat them up like that lol. For some reason the giants no matter how bad they are seem to play Washington well. Can't beat the eagles or cowboys but love to beat up on Washington.
Actually took theor defense in 2 of my leagues this week lol.
I played Howell in place of tua and Lawrence. DOHSam Howell is probably going to be a decent QB in the league and the way Lawrence has been playing the last few weeks I wouldn't have started him either. Would have been a tough choice between Howell and Tua. Raiders are hit n miss week to week and with Was at the Gmen I prob would have started Howell as well. Oh well, any given Sunday right?
|
|
|
Our (Betnomi users) data has been compromised from Betnomi for the irresponsibility of the owners. Therefore, they deserve the negative feedbacks even if they refund all the victims. Betnomi team has done everything intentionally and manually, but they never tried to clarify the reasons in the last four and a half months. I'm mentioning those who have left negative feedback on Betnomi representative account.
I dont know if I left them negative feedback but I am one of the people with compromised personal data, and I was receiving many casino spam emails. This could be phishing attack but I never opened this links and I am not using that email address anymore. Not sure what they are talking about here. The representative of Betnomi writes that they chased away the owners, and now they will start the process of returning the funds. Aren't the owners the ones who manage the funds?
Sorsis was always one and only owner of Betnomi. All other people could be his partners or someone who worked for him, and there is no chance that some unknown owner was behind Betnomi all the time. Back when I was working with them I was a part of their slack group. There were more than 50 people on the team at that time. I'm not sure who was or wasn't a partner or who was or wasn't important. All I know for sure is more than 1 person was involved with the day to day. Throughout all of my conversations, no other mention of partners or owners was mentioned either.
|
|
|
Why is it my job to change anyone? In a perfect world everything would be free, people would help each other, noone would kill anyone, no adultry, no famine, no bad shit period. We obviously do not live in a perfect world and most only care about themselves no matter who it hurts.
I haven't seen anyone in such bad shape from gambling that I should intervene. People I know gamble what they can afford and go on with life.
|
|
|
What's the point of a second thread? Just because of the poll? @OP you really shouldn't make a 2nd thread for this. You're basically inviting spam at this point with the 2nd thread. What good is the poll anyways? People can tally up results by just reading replies or use logic and know that most are not in profit.
|
|
|
I'm looking for an active Admin/CM on the forum, semi instant or fairly fast wd times, good mix of games, and support that aren't robots. With an active admin or CM on the forum the likelihood of your issue getting solved is greater as they are looking to keep their reputation in tact(assuming you have a legit issue). Wd times is important as if they make you wait 24+ hours it just feels scammy and like they're looking for a reason to not pay you. I also want to play more than dice, or more than 5 slots. Support is a big thing, when you message customer support with an issue you want to find a solution. There are alot of sites who have clueless support and reply with we will contact you via email within 24 hours usually. What that means normally is we are not smart enough to fix your issue and we have to ask the admin how to respond. Why have support if that's how you're answered?
|
|
|
Looks like the Warriors just dropped their 6th in a row. So brutal to take the lead in the last seconds just to end up going to OT and getting spanked. I think relying on that 3 pointer is killing the Warriors. They took 46 shots from 3, while they made 18 of them it's still not the greatest strategy. If you are going to be shooting that many threes, you have to really crash the boards and have a big edge in rebounds. Probably doesn't help with the Green suspension either.
|
|
|
|