Bitcoin Forum
June 14, 2024, 11:30:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 [387] 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 ... 514 »
7721  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum on: November 07, 2017, 08:40:28 AM
It's as safe as you make it... it features AES256 encryption for the seed/keys and/or the entire wallet file itself... but if you choose to use a password like "password" or "abc123" then all the encryption in the world won't help you.

Additionally, if you are a fan of downloading spyware/malware ridden apps/utilities and/or visiting "dodgy" websites... then any wallet will be bad. Tongue
7722  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Resetting 2FA in Electrum on: November 07, 2017, 08:33:20 AM
I think you may need to update to v2.9.3... that seemed to fix a number of these "please wait" issues...

If updating is not possible, you might want to try this... Shut down Electrum... find your electrum data directory (~/.electrum on Linux I believe) and delete the "blockchain_headers" file and then start Electrum.
7723  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum 3.0 + Ledger Nano S + Segwit = Cannot read xpub error on: November 07, 2017, 08:30:34 AM
Though a new problem arises, I can't sign from the electrum wallet :/
That's because there is currently no "standard" solution for signing messages using SegWit addresses... so you can't sign messages using any SegWit wallet.

Or are you talking about signing transactions? Huh
7724  Other / MultiBit / Re: Another recovery issue on: November 07, 2017, 08:19:40 AM
NOTE: using wallets generated from BIP39 seeds longterm in Electrum is NOT recommended. The main reason for this is that you are unable to extract your "wallet words" should you lose the copy that you have. This is because Electrum does NOT store the actual wallet words in the wallet file like it does with Electrum generated (non BIP39) seeds. Instead, Electrum simply stores the "xprv" in the wallet file.

It would be wise to create a standard Electrum wallet with an Electrum generated seed... and move all your coins to that if you intend to use Electrum going forward.
7725  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Low transaction fee wallet on: November 07, 2017, 08:13:09 AM
I don't know who is low transaction fee wallet. If anybody know please explain.
Fees are not dictated by the wallet... in fact, a lot of (good) wallets will let you use "custom fees" where you can specify the exact fee rate you want to use. Wallets like Bitcoin Core, Electrum etc.

Generally tho, these wallets will default to using fee rates that should get your transactions confirmed in a reasonable amount of time (hours). By purposely using "low" fees... you are likely to have to wait days.

Recommended fees shown here:
https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/
https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx
7726  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Bitkey OS - Add applications on: November 07, 2017, 08:09:53 AM
What's the recommended way to add applications to this distribution like Exodus while maintaining the integrity and not having to install the app every time you boot up ?
As far as I can tell, the only way to add applications is to download the bitkey source code, add them in yourself... and then compile it all

https://github.com/bitkey/bitkey

You can see how "Electrum" is installed here: https://github.com/bitkey/bitkey/blob/master/conf.d/electrum

Basically, you'd just need to figure out how to add in the application installer, any required/missing dependencies, calculate all the appropriate checksums etc and then build the image. Not sure that this will qualify as "maintaining the integrity" tho Undecided
7727  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: seed phrases on: November 07, 2017, 07:55:57 AM
I have a trezor.  The private key is on the trezor and along with the public key points to the location on the blockchain of my bitcoin?  Yes/no
No. The "seed" is on the Trezor. The seed is used to generate all the private/public key pairs that give you control over certain bitcoins.


on coinbase, my private key is stored by coinbase, has separate private and public keys and if I kept bitcoin there,                        yes/no
it would be in an entirely different location on the blockchain?
Yes. If your coins are in different addresses, with different private/public keys... they are separate from the coins controlled by the Trezor private/public keys.


The seed is just a complicated as hell password that allows me to access the trezor, and the public and private keys?                        Yes/no
No. The "seed" is actually just a (VERY) large random number. The "seed mnemonic" (aka 24 words for Trezor) is a method to turn the "seed" number into a series of words that are a lot easier for humans to write down and store without making mistakes (it also includes a very basic checksum to help prevent errors). What the seed/seed mnemonic allow you to do, is easily recreate the entire wallet along with any address it has generated. Effectively, it is a complete "backup" of your wallet, in just 24 words that you can write down on a piece of paper and store securely offline.


I can make a different seed (I don't actually want to) without affecting the public or private keys, or the location of my bitcoin on the blockchain?                    Yes/no
Depends what you mean by "affecting the public or private keys". If you create a different seed, it will generate a completely different wallet... with different private/public keys and addresses.

Your bitcoins will continue to stay with your previous private/public keys and addresses, as your bitcoins will NOT move from their current private/public keys and addresses unless a transaction is created that moves them.

So, if you created a different seed, without "backing up" your previous seed, you would lose access to the coins controlled by the previous seed... as your Trezor would now be using new private/public keys and addresses and have no access to your old ones.
7728  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Generous donation for whoever can solve my wallet problem on: November 07, 2017, 07:33:28 AM
4- Hearing about an easy way to store bitcoin, I installed Electrum also on the same computer by creating a standard wallet (for some reason now I realised it is a multi-sig wallet, even though I am sure I did not create it this way)

When you installed Electrum, did it actually prompt you to select "Standard wallet", "Wallet with two factor authenticaion", "Multi-Signature wallet" or "watching only wallet"? Did you see something like this:


Or did it just immediately open up a wallet?

NOTE: if you had selected "standard", it would have then prompted you to "create a seed", "I already have a seed", "use public or private keys" or "use a hardware device"... like this:



If it just opened up a wallet and showed you a blank transaction window etc, it is possible that you had already installed Electrum on your computer previously and created a default_wallet... when you uninstall Electrum it does NOT remove the old wallet files... so if you already had used Electrum before and then reinstalled Electrum, it would find and use your old default_wallet.


However, if you definitely had the prompts, and clicked through the options... chances are that you did indeed create a Multi-Sig wallet... especially if the title bar says "2 of 2". If that is the case, then you need the two private keys that you used to create the Multi-Sig.

Without those two private keys, you will never be able to get the coins out of the Multi-Sig. Did you perhaps use the private key from knots and the one from Bitcoin ABC? Huh
7729  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How to sign a message?! on: November 07, 2017, 07:19:17 AM
Hi, this is very good guidance. How can I sign a message so that I can prove a certain email belongs to me?
I don't think there is a way to do it to prove that you own an email address as such... signing only allows you to prove that you are in control of a private key/bitcoin address.


sorry but i use exchanger wallet how can i get the private key ?
The simple answer is that (generally) you can not get the private key for addresses controlled by exchanges, thus you can not sign messages for exchange wallet addresses. Get a "proper" wallet where you can access the private keys Tongue
7730  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Accidentally Sent Bitcoin to ledger nano s Bitcoin cash split Wallet on: November 07, 2017, 06:17:31 AM
It's actually pretty easy to recover BTC sent to BCH address (or BCH sent to BTC address), assuming you control the private keys for the address that the coins have been sent to...

Unfortunately, with regards to the Ledger, the methods required for recovery will require that you use your wallet seed (there is not other way to get the private keys out)... this could potentially expose all the wallets you have created with that seed.

Basically:

1. Goto: https://iancoleman.io/bip39/ and create an offline copy of it ("Offline Usage" instructions at bottom of page)
2. Using offline copy on offline computer, enter your seed as BIP39 Mnemonic
3. Select "BCH - Bitcoin Cash" as the "Coin"
4. All you addresses/private keys will be displayed at the bottom
5. Find the address you sent to, copy the matching private key
6. Either import or sweep that private key into the BTC wallet of your choice.

Optional, but recommended: Create a completely new seed for your Ledger and send all your coins to the new wallets.
7731  Other / Off-topic / Re: Question about Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z270E on: November 07, 2017, 06:04:23 AM
This isn't really the place for computer hardware technical support Wink

You might want to try the "Tom's Hardware" forums: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/forum-30.html

Anyway, according to the Asus page for that mobo, it supports up to 4x DIMMs, max of 64GB, so I don't see why it wouldn't work:

Memory
4 x DIMM, Max. 64GB, DDR4 3866(O.C.)/3733(O.C.)/3600(O.C.)/3466(O.C.)/3400(O.C.)/3333(O.C.)/3300(O.C.)/3200(O.C.)/3000(O.C.)/2800(O.C.)/2666(O.C.)/2400/2133 MHz Non-ECC, Un-buffered Memory
7732  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Funds sent without my knowledge on: November 06, 2017, 08:43:11 PM
They're claiming that the balances displayed on Blockchain.info (and other block explorers) don't show your account balance... I suspect this is because they're doing weird accounting and moving BTC around after they credit your account on their system.

If you look at blockchain.info, you see: Total Balance (which is the sum of ALL Bitcoin that have ever been received to that address) and the Final Balance (which is what the CURRENT balance of the address is at this moment in time).

"Your" address: 3EL14BoZCDXBmV65uCGAawXAZZxvnvZwN7 is currently showing:

Total Balance = 0.11373723 BTC
Final Balance = 0.10993723 BTC

That "Final Balance" is made up of 0.017 from this transaction and 0.09293823 from this transaction.

Therefore, the amount in your wallet *should* be 0.10993723, unless CryptoPay is doing something retarded like re-using deposit addresses for multiple accounts and simply tracking payments using their own database, which I suspect is what is happening... as the funds that you sent to your Electrum wallet originally where sent from address: 36TEeqDrHnMFz9izKjgJipquvooJ7iTDa7 in this transaction... so I'm guessing that you cannot rely on the balances that are being displayed by blockchain.info for your deposit addresses, as CryptoPay are doing weird, confusing things.

At the end of the day... I still think you are chasing the wrong thing... you sent coins from CryptoPay to Electrum, they showed up in Electrum wallet... and then they got sent from Electrum wallet somewhere else... so it would appear they have been stolen due to your Electrum wallet being compromised, not lost within CryptoPay's weird accounting system.
7733  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Seuntjie' Dice bot programmers mode discussion. on: November 06, 2017, 08:33:00 PM
Thank you very much now it actually resets to the correct sub-balance 1rst bet, but it doesnt go to the 3rd sub-balance. I want it every 3 losing streak to go to the next balance! What i have made seems to be that i have to have 6 losing streeak to go to the 3rd sub-balance! Any ideas?
So you're saying that if you are on 2nd sub-balance... and you get a win... it should still stay on 2nd sub-balance and "keep betting 0.00000080 until profit is 0.00001000" right?

If so, you'll probably need to use a boolean flag to keep track of which sub-balance you are betting on... so you can put another if statement inside the "if currentstreak==-3 then" block, so that it will work when you have a streak of 3 losses... I'm not sure it'll work properly with the 3rd sub-balance, after 1 win, I think it will reset to 0.00000008 and start again... but you get the idea

I've made some changes to chilly's script... added in "balance2" flag... I think it should be close to what you are after, but do bear in mind, this is completely untested!

Code:
chance=49.5 --sets your chance for placing a bet
nextbet=0.00000008 --sets your first bet.
basebet=0.00000008 -- moved to only set once
currentbase = basebet -- save the current base bet
balance2 = false -- flag to indicate we are using 2nd sub-balance

function dobet()

if profit > 0.00001000 then
  resetstats()
  currentbase = basebet -- reset to base bet
  balance2 = false -- made our profit, reset to 1st sub-balance
end
if win then

    if balance2 == false then
        nextbet=currentbase -- reset to the current base
    else
        -- using 2nd sub-balance, start from 0.0000080 until profit > 0.00001000
        nextbet=0.00000080
    end

else

    nextbet=previousbet*2.54

end

if currentstreak==-3 then

   if balance2 == false then
       balance2 = true
       nextbet=0.00000080
       currentbase = nextbet -- save current base
   else
       --already betting 2nd sub-balance, move to 3rd sub-balance
       nextbet = 0.00000800
       currentbase = nextbet -- save current base
   end

end

if currentstreak==-10 then

     nextbet=0.00000001

end
end end
7734  Economy / Gambling / Re: Seuntjies DiceBot -Multi-Site, multi-strategy betting bot for dice. With Charts! on: November 06, 2017, 07:35:09 AM
Do anyone have a dicebot script which can help me built some balance from just a faucet claim?
.. or is it recommended to have a certain amount of funds before running the bot generally ?
Honestly, I don't know why people bother trying to build from a faucet claim using scripts... your best bet (#excuseThePun), is to just grind it out doing 99x payout bets with the max faucet... eventually, you'll hit it and you'll finally have a decent balance to try and play with.

For added grind/payoff, try 999x Tongue
7735  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Help please.. Lost 2-step authentication on Electrum on: November 06, 2017, 07:25:37 AM
I am getting a new phone and was wondering how to move the 2fa to the new device. Will I need to restore the wallet, disable 2fa and then again enable? If so, will I need to pay again for the 2fa service?
That depends on what app you use for Google Authenticator... I use Authenticator Plus, it allows you to backup and restore all your "secret keys", so you can migrate to a new phone without issue. I'm not sure what backup options the "original" Google Authenticator app has... It was one of the reasons I started using Authenticator Plus...

You might also want to check out "Authy"... I've heard good reviews about that.

"Disabling" the 2FA wallet by restoring from seed DOES NOT disabled the 2FA secret in Google Authenticator... and when you restore and select "keep" it'll ask for the old code or make you reset it... so it *should* be OK... I'd highly recommend attempting to setup the new phone BEFORE you dispose of the old one so you can test it is OK.
7736  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Can I remove multisig function from wallet? on: November 06, 2017, 07:12:33 AM
I honestly have no idea how that actually worked... none of the xpubs in your 2FA wallet are the same as the co-signer from your Linux MultiSig wallet!!?! Huh Shocked

But I guess that doesn't really matter... what really matters is that it signed the transaction and you "rescued" your BTC!  Cool Grin Glad you got it sorted mate... hopefully things go a bit smoother in the future Wink
7737  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Hitbtc rating? on: November 05, 2017, 09:02:28 AM
HitBtc is in top 10 biggest exchange right now. So i think 100% ours coin secure there.
Just like the way the coins were secure in Mt. Gox when it was Top #1 Biggest exchange? Roll Eyes

One of the single most important concepts in CryptoCurrency... if you don't have sole possession of (and control over) the private keys... you don't have any coins. It's as simple as that. You put them on an exchange, you are literally trusting strangers with your money. Undecided
7738  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: enjoy and sochi tx spring 2017/30000 confi/how to get rid on: November 05, 2017, 08:41:41 AM
Are you using Bitcoin Core? If so, goto "Settings -> options -> Wallet" and tick the "Enable Coin Control Features" box. Then on the "Send" window, click the "inputs" button and then select ALL the inputs except the two that you don't want. You will then be able to send all your coins (except the two inputs you no longer want) to a new address. Perhaps you should even go so far as to create a whole new wallet, so you don't have to worry about those coins ever causing you issues again?

If you're not using Bitcoin Core, does your wallet have "Coin Control" features? I know Electrum does... not sure about other wallets. Electrum even allows you to "freeze" addresses, so you can freeze the address the 1 satoshi inputs are on and that will guarantee that they never get used when sending transactions.
7739  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Protocol: Transaction Confirmations on: November 05, 2017, 06:45:51 AM
"Confirmations" are simply the number of blocks that have been mined since the transaction was put into a block... the block it is put in, counts as 1 confirmation. The formula is:

Number of Confirmations = (current blockchain height - block height it was confirmed in) + 1

For example, your transaction is included in block# 492400... it now has 1 confirmation. 10 blocks later, at block# 492410, it will now have 11 confirmations... 10 blocks after that, at block# 492420, it will have 21 confirmations.

So... if you transaction was in block# 492400... and the current blockheight is 492502... # confirmations = (492502 - 492400) + 1 = 103 confirmations.
7740  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Protocol: Transaction Confirmations on: November 05, 2017, 05:30:46 AM
Does the "transaction.get" method give you the block# or height that it was confirmed in within the hex data? If so, then you could just calculate the difference between that number and the current blockchain height and that is your number of confirmations.

NOTE: I see the Address.get_history method returns block heights for the transactions associated with an address... maybe that's an option?
Pages: « 1 ... 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 [387] 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 ... 514 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!