Uvijek me je zanimalo šta ekipa misli da uradi sa Bitcoinom kojeg skupi nakon par godina raznoraznih aktivnosti u kripto svijetu. Da li svi imaju neku magičnu brojku koju su sebi postavili kao cilj i gdje će taj kripto pretvoriti u fiat, ili priželjkujete promjenu klime i jedan novi svijet gdje će se moći s tim kriptom kupovati na dnevnoj bazi?

Ja sam taj neki svoj cilj stavio na $100.000/BTC. Mislim da bi teško odolio da po toj cijeni ne prodam veći dio Bitcoina.
Kako vi razmišljate? Hoćete bježati nazad u fiat čim se ukaže po vama najbolja prillika? 

Po ovome što vidim na Alibabi, kompanija koja proizvodi ove uređaje je jedna potpuno nova tvrtka registrovana u Julu 2021. I njihov Twitter profil je napravljen u istom mjesecu i imaju tek 5-6 kratkih twetova. Kao i uvijek, treba imati oprez sa ovim novim uređajima, pogotovo kineskim.

Since I always check if users participate in regular merit distribution before meriting their post, I have considered posting a reminder to those users if their merit-worthy post is in a thread that am replying in. Something along the lines of "merits are not meant to be hoarded but distributed to those who deserve them. If receiving merits makes you happy, then make other forum users happy as well. I don't reward merit-hoarders."

Možda nije kompatibilno za ovu verziju forumskog softvera kojeg Bitcointalk koristi. U opisu piše da je taj SimpleSpoiler namjenjen isključivo za SMF 2.0.x. Bitcointalk koristi dosta stariji SMF 1.1.19. U izborniku sa desne strane može se odabrati verzija 1.1.19 ali klikom na dugme "parse" stiže poruka da taj dodatak nije kompatibilan sa odabranom verzijom softvera.

@AmoreJaz
That's a very decent fee reduction that will certainly be welcomed by the community. The Bitcoin mempools have generally been quite empty in the recent weeks and transactions of 1 sat/vByte receive confirmations quickly. It's rare to see over 5.000 to 6.000 transactions waiting to be confirmed, so it makes no sense requesting withdrawal fees that amount to $10 or more. 

I really don't think there are. To be able to make posts without having them deleted, you basically just have to remember a few basic things:

• Post in the correct sub-board.
• Don't copy and paste without providing a source.
• Don't make short, meaningless replies that don't add any value to the flow of information.
• Don't spam.
• Don't make multiple posts one below the other.

I don't think those requirements are hard to follow. For everything else, you can just ask what you don't understand or contact a mod if you have some issues.

Well, there is this post from 2020 where Lauda confirms that he/she was the first person to call you Switzerland. 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224240.msg53810344#msg53810344

Or could it be this one from 2019?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5102731.msg49445178#msg49445178

I think Lauda deleted everything else that mentioned Switzerland (if there was something else).

You touched upon a very important point here. The benefits that Bitcointalk offers. What are they? Earning cryptocurrencies, doing bounties, and offering services and goods in exchange for payments in crypto.

What if one day all that is gone? Hypothetically, that could happen. I don't think it's realistic that it will, but theymos or anyone who comes after theymos could one day get fed up with what the forum has turned into and decide to pull the plug and reset Bitcointalk to factory settings so to speak. No more signature campaigns, no bounties, no marketplace. Just a place to hangout and discuss Bitcoin. Very few would stay if something like that was attempted. Therefore, Bitcoin doesn't need to crash for the forum to drop on its knees. 

They aren't doing that as far as I know. I remember reading about some youtubers having their videos deleted but I don't know the whole story. There are also crypto-related channels with hundreds of thousands of followers who have been broadcasting via YouTube without any problems for years.

A copyright claim could be the reason why a video or a whole channel suddenly disappears. Insert a video or song without the author's consent and that could be the end of your stay on YouTube.   

---

I don't think anyone recommended Steemit or Hive as possible platforms to advertise. YouTube and dTube works with these platforms and their userbase is interested in crypto. Could be interesting.

o_e_l_e_o je napisao jedan vrlo zanimljiv post danas. Nisam znao gdje da ga objavim ali htio sam da bude i u našem lokalu ali opet nije toliko poseban da zaslužuje zasebnu temu. Novosti mogu onda poslužiti u tu svrhu.

Ko je vrijeme provodio na nekim drugim forumima zna da neki od njih imaju spoiler tag. Koristi se kad želite da dio teksta sakrijete ali ipak ostavite čitaocu mogućnost da pročita skriveni tekst klikom na odgovarajuće dugme. Pošto tako nešto ne postoji na Bitcointalku, postoji par stvari koje se mogu uraditi:

Slijedećim kodom tekst prekrijete crnom bojom.
Skriveni tekst
Sa tri brza klika mišem u crno polje, otkrijete sadržaj teksta.

Isto to se može postići i u bijeloj boji.
Skriveni tekst
Tri brza klika mišem iznad!

Link do orginalnog posta > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5353567.msg57656503#msg57656503

Not only that, but the results in eSports competitions can be manipulated easier than in regular sports. That is especially the case with less popular competitions. If someone participates in a Call of Duty event and losses, it's more difficult to prove that the match was fixed and he wasn't just unlucky. The investigations and audits are stricter in regular sports.

The OP played around with bitcoin in the past, quite possibly in the times where older versions of Bitcoin Core could also mine the coin over CPUs. It was possible to use the software both for mining and storing bitcoin many years ago. According to the release notes for version 0.13.0, the internal mining functionality was removed in 2016. 

Advanced preview is unticked by default. I remember having to tick it manually back in an older version of Electrum when it was introduced.

If it's an imported private key (of only one address) like in my example, the software would have to send the change back to the same address the transaction was sent from. Anything else would be a serious bug. Since you only have the private key of one address, if the change were to go to another address, the coins would effectively be lost unless Electrum gives you an option to save the private keys of the new address.

What's interesting is that I have the option to tick the "use change addresses" option in my Electrum for the wallet with the imported private keys. Would Electrum give me an option to save the private keys of a change address in that case?

Are you 100% sure about that? I had version 4.0.9 prior to updating to 4.1.5, and I believe (I can't be absolutely sure though) that change addresses were used in the past for my wallets.

I just checked the Electrum preferences on my other computer where I have an older version of the software installed and the "use change addresses" option is ticked there. After a bit of thinking why it's different on 4.1.5, I can only think of the following two things:

• The option is unticked by default in version 4.1.5. DOUBTFUL
• I remember that the wallet I opened contains imported private keys. That must surely be the reason why the app unticked the option for any change to be sent to change addresses.

I just updated my Electrum software to the most recent 4.1.5 version.

After every install, I always check the preferences and settings to make sure that no unwanted changes were made or if some new features were added. I noticed that the "Use Change Addresses" option is unticked by default in 4.1.5. I can't remember from the older Electrum versions if this was ticked or unticked and why the developers would make changes if there were indeed made. My change has in the past always gone to change addresses.



When you can, please check your Electrum apps and let me know if this option is ticked or unticked in your settings. 
The way it is now, what happens with my change?
Should I tick this option?

My brain froze, I just can't remember how this looked like in the past...

If we are meddling with the "scams are not moderated" policy, that shouldn't be exclusive only for members who participated in scam projects. Any members who stole something, scammed in a trade, didn't repay a loan, etc. should be treated in the same way. They are obviously not trustworthy and shouldn't be allowed to advertise anything.     

To be fair, Safepal was a closed-source hardware wallet even before the new firmware upgrade. There was no way of verifying the code when the user purchased his wallet and that is still the case today. You are right when you said that the end user doesn't know what these new changes mean, but since we didn't know it in the past either, we can only hope they were made to fix bugs and introduce new features.

Bitcoin has already achieved consensus. It's users are in agreement that the POW-based technology has its use case and can be utilized to transfer value from point A to point B. As the time goes by, this agreement between people will either increase or decrease based on whether or not a new and better payment system will be created in the future. What the government thinks about the consensus that was reached between Bitcoin enthusiasts doesn't really matter. If people come to an agreement that Britney Spears posters can be used in exchange for goods and services, a government agency doesn't have a say in that matter.     

I don't think Bitcoin will ever become the ultimate replacement asset for fiat currencies. At least not one that will be private and help people to not pay taxes. But I do believe that the two worlds can coexist and affect each other in a way to iron out their flaws and shortcomings.

Decentralization in essence means that a central authority or a system doesn't have the power to control how something works or what direction it will take in the future. Bitcoin transactions, like the majority of other crypto transactions, are not free. You don't pay a centralized entity, but you need to pay the miner to include your transaction in their block.

Depending on what services you use, your government could have the mechanisms to keep track of your crypto activities. If you use centralized exchanges where you have performed KYC, they could be cooperating with your government and share information about the citizens who transact on their platforms. Or a government agency could contact the exchange and request them to hand over information about a certain individual who they suspect might be laundering money or avoiding to pay their taxes.     

Bitcoin will not be destroyed. The global epidemic has been in the center of attention since March 2020 and as you can see, Bitcoin is still going strong. It even reached a new all-time-high in the middle of the pandemic. The initial reaction was very negative and in line with what the traditional markets were experiencing as well. At the beginning of March 2020, bitcoin dropped from $9.000 to $5.000. But little by little, it recovered to the point where we are now. There are absolutely no indications that the pandemic will signal the end of Bitcoin as we know it.