|
it seems that and in my case the /usr/local/bin/btc-update.py
is not running. I try to run it manual but with no luck.
The strange is in the same system in my old vps the update.py still runs fine
|
|
|
|
Can you both read?
By default your hashrate is a vote for Core/QT not XT.
If you want to support XT, you need to change your miners to different port.
Indeed Slush just gives us the choice, that is a good thing. Also hard forks like this are sometimes necessary for Bitcoin to remain free and decentralized, so it is good that Slush supports it. The ability to hard fork in this way represents the check that we have against the power that a core development team could hold. If you think that we should never hard fork it is the equivalent of saying that the core developers have absolute power over the development of the Bitcoin protocol. Or as Mike Hearn said "they believe that the only mechanism that Bitcoin has to keep them in check should never be used". https://medium.com/@octskyward/why-is-bitcoin-forking-d647312d22c1and to be against the power of the core developer team the solution is to give the power to only one developer  Ok.. yeah..  |
|
|
|
|
πιοι υπάλληλοι? Ρε σεις δλδ σε όλα αυτά που λέτε λύση για εσάς είναι να δώσουμε εξουσία σε ένα και μόνο πρόσωπο? Και λύση είναι να κάνουμε fork τον πυρήνα με όλους τους κινδύνους που έχουν αναλυθεί. Και θεωρείς όλα αυτά γίνονται επειδή έχει πληρώσει μια εταιρεία που όχι μόνο δεν έχει κάποια οικονομική δραστηριότητα αλλά και δεν συγκρίνετε ούτε στο 1% των οικονομικών της στοιχείων που έχουν εταιρείες όπως η coinbase, bitpay που για δικούς τους προφανής λόγους χρειάζονται αύξηση του blocksize.
Η μάχη εδώ δεν είναι με υστερίες ούτε με αφορισμούς. Η μάχη εδώ όπως το έχω πει είναι για την προσπάθεια πολιτικής μεταμόρφωσης του Bitcoin. Από την μια έχουμε την προσπάθεια να μετατραπεί το bitcoin σε ένα νέο paypal με κεντρική διαχείριση και από την άλλη έχουμε την προσπάθεια το bitcoin να κρατηθεί ανεξάρτητο και ως ένα p2p ανώνυμο μέσο συναλλαγής
Ολα τα άλλα είναι άλλα λόγια να αγαπιόμαστε. Πάρτε θέση σε ποιο από τα δύο στρατόπεδα θέλετε να είστε.Εγώ έχω επιλέξει ξεκάθαρα το δεύτερο.
|
|
|
|
|
it seems that this script is not working anymore. It cant install even the bitcoind and it not auto runs after each reboot
|
|
|
|
|
yeah and for that crap argument is better to give all the power for developing bitcoin to one person. One man to rule a p2p system.. Wake up! Are you blind?
|
|
|
|
nice move to suicide.. . They are lunatics or they have gain so much money that they dont care.. I dont know why they cant see the storm coming.. |
|
|
|
|
θα το δοκιμάσω να δω αν όντος δουλεύουν οι κάρτες μας
|
|
|
|
|
i think bitcoin need not a fork, not an increase of block but a vote decentralized system based in blockchain for all the users who want to take part and based in blockchain.
|
|
|
|
|
και δέχεται τις Ελληνικές κάρτες με τα capital control?
|
|
|
|
|
this action is not anarchy is not even democracy is clear facism
|
|
|
|
|
and with the first problem we run to a central power or we create a central ruler to take control of bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
https://scalingbitcoin.org/montreal2015/In recent months the Bitcoin development community has faced difficult discussions of how to safely improve the scalability and decentralized nature of the Bitcoin network. To aid the technical consensus building process we are organizing a pair of workshops to collect technical criteria, present proposals and evaluate technical materials and data with academic discipline and analysis that fully considers the complex tradeoffs between decentralization, utility, security and operational realities. This may be considered as similar in intent and process to the NIST-SHA3 design process where performance and security were in a tradeoff for a security critical application.
Since Bitcoin is a P2P currency with many stakeholders, it is important to collect requirements as broadly as possible, and through the process enhance everyone’s understanding of the technical properties of Bitcoin to help foster an inclusive, transparent, and informed process.
this is how you can proper do something with public discussion and not in the old cowboy style with violence.
|
|
|
|
give me one good reason why we must give such power to only one person to rule the code and fork it whatever he think is "good". If he want such a power and if he think that his opinion is above all of others then he must create an altcoin asap. For the Mike hearn you can read this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=333824.0 |
|
|
|
the new developers as you say is core developers. Gavin and hearn choose to fork and destroy bitcoin with their action. is very simple the fear mongering nonsense i just talked about. A sensible, really minor adjustment, that only comes into play if 75% approve is now destroying bitcoin.. Think about it: When in your democracy have been 75% been for something?? This limit is very high. I hope they succeed. give one good reason and why we must give such power to only one person?? What is this?? We all think that bitcoin is a decentralized system and not a system with a central ruler. Why we must change this?? |
|
|
|
ναι βλέπω από τις απαντήσεις σας και γενικα από το ύφος σας και τις πράξεις σας μορφωμένους ανθρώπους ... |
|
|
|
|
BitcoinXT try for political reform of bitcoin to be part of the bank financial system. This is not a simple matter of block increase but this is the future of bitcoin. If you that future to the hand of two developers and if you want bitcoin to have a leader then go to create an altcoin. Is no needing to destroy bitcoin!
|
|
|
|
|
the new developers as you say is core developers. Gavin and hearn choose to fork and destroy bitcoin with their action. is very simple
|
|
|
|
|
i like to see you all when the bitcoin will lost it trust from the people and every coin price will drop below 1 dollar. You must read all of you the basic economic lessons.
Spent one or two hours to read book what means trust and after take part in this bitcoinxt nonsense
|
|
|
|
They are mining both versions, are the miners the ones who choose which version to mine? after three years in slush pool i have drop my mining machines from there. I dont want to be part in this BitcoinXT nonsense Because choices are bad! no because we are in a middle of a political reform of bitcoin. I am not accept to take part in this and to break the freedom of cryptocurrencies in favor of the banks. But you're taking a part, you chose Blockstream Core instead of Gavincoin and you think if a pool gives that choice to its users that's a bad thing, because people should not be able to have choices... i respect your opinion but i dont think is right. Take a moment to read what is Mike Hearn and what he believe about bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
