Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 05:50:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »
81  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BILIBIT PURELY SCAM PROJECT on: March 06, 2018, 04:00:07 AM
I strongly support on this claim. There are already regulations on ICO and Anonymous team is just a crap. Show yourself and be professional even your advisor don't want to reveal their identity, why you are all afraid to show yourself if you have confidence in your project eh? And also don't flag the name of the Philippines in your Announcement. This will be a total shame if anything bad happens on your project.

Edit: Kudos to OP
Your regulation and your old master this old world order is nothing compare to the new one to come the beast has been born people without blb mark can't buy in the future without it you will die in hunger can't do anything I'm here to fulfill an old prophecy of the true master of this world. Caesar is born again in me thats my legacy. We need real change I believe exercising true decentralization as Satoshi stated we humans can achieve freedom not slavary of his old system for real wake up already humanity.

The big point here is your asking for funds here. Decentralization is nothing can do with that.

And if your legit why your team is hiding?

And freedom is separate for this issue since money is involve here. If your hiding then we can't trust you up.
82  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BILIBIT PURELY SCAM PROJECT on: March 06, 2018, 03:37:05 AM
Save your ass guys since Bilibit project is a big SCAM Look at their thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3012723.0 their team is anonymous so we cannot sue them up if they run out the money of the people who invested on them. And guess look at their co partner the scam Airdrop coins who already run out since they collected more money for airdrop and dump scheme.

So watch out for this and don't be a big dumb to throw your money on the scam projects.
Hello Bro!
I am Bounty Manager of Bilibit Bounty,
Your impormation is not enough to prove that Bilibit is scam they have anonymous team but they have a Great Projects for it and they never scam people and their plan are If the pre-sale failed they will airdrop the 50% of Pre-Sale that not sold and the other will be burn and Why you trust Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto is anonymous right? Why you trusting it? Not all Anonymous team are scammers!

Satoshi nakamoto is far different from your team and its so sarcastic to compare him with bilibit team since once and for all Satoshi Nakamoto doesn't ask for any funds nor running an ICO to make his creation run successfully.

But your team had a shady reputation since Once again any of them doesn't show some legitimacy.

And lastly don't be so noob here your explanation is so invalid. Your acting like an alt of the dev itself.
83  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BOUNTY][PRE-ICO] BILIBIT.IO - 🔥Philippines 1st Decentralized Ecosystem🔥 on: March 06, 2018, 03:28:29 AM
PATHETIC PEOPLE FOR PROMOTING THIS SCAM ICO BEWARE OF THIS PROJECT

Invalid explanation on why his team is anonymous is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3069220.msg31673602#msg31673602.

Better save your efforts since I'm 100% sure that you will not get paid for your hardwork since their tokens had no value nor never will be added in costly  big/small exchange.
84  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BILIBIT PURELY SCAM PROJECT on: March 06, 2018, 03:26:06 AM
Save your ass guys since Bilibit project is a big SCAM Look at their thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3012723.0 their team is anonymous so we cannot sue them up if they run out the money of the people who invested on them. And guess look at their co partner the scam Airdrop coins who already run out since they collected more money for airdrop and dump scheme.

So watch out for this and don't be a big dumb to throw your money on the scam projects.
Do you have any proof about this accusations? 😊 If you are talking about PeraBit on that “scam airdrop coin who already run out” whatever that means, we posted on our social page that we are putting our project on hold to help small developers with their project. And how can you collect money from airdrop, educate me please, i got this crypto thing all wrong then haha, since i am using my own money to distribute the tokens for FREE, and the project is non-ICO, no funds coming from external sources. Transactions within the blockchain is transparent, you can see the transaction via etherscan.

The pbit token was created and it will be used to join future airdrops created within the protocol.

Project like Bilibit who does not have the backing of a big corporations or company have lots of reason to stay anon. The crypto business is still unregulated and there are still a lot of gray areas. A lot of tokens listed on cmc right now started as anon project like ether blue, ether gold, equal etc. But look where they are right now. And there are projects who have a army of team members on their site but investors lose tons of money on them anyway. There is a simple solution to this problem, if you don’t beleive in a project, don’t invest. There are literally hundreds of new project that are backed by big companies and corporation that has a structured team, but those project is not gonna be cheap to invest. And still there is no guarantee that you will earn from those project or you will lose money, since crypyo business is so unpredictable.


Hydar
PeraBit Dev

Reason? Or just an exit excuse? Do you think people are so dumb to believe on that one?

Listen mate why your team afraid to show your face here if your confident that your BILIBIT team is so legit?.
85  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BILIBIT PURELY SCAM PROJECT on: March 06, 2018, 03:23:53 AM
Then if all of you are true and running legitimately then you need to be transparent and show your teams identity. Being anonymous and asking for funds is so pathetic mate.

And you can't convince me or neither us to believe for bad excuse for hiding your teams identity.
86  Economy / Scam Accusations / BILIBIT PURELY SCAM PROJECT on: March 05, 2018, 10:22:29 AM
Save your ass guys since Bilibit project is a big SCAM Look at their thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3012723.0 their team is anonymous so we cannot sue them up if they run out the money of the people who invested on them. And guess look at their co partner the scam Airdrop coins who already run out since they collected more money for airdrop and dump scheme.

So watch out for this and don't be a big dumb to throw your money on the scam projects.
87  Economy / Reputation / Re: Everybody who work with jamalaezaz with Neg Tag on: January 25, 2018, 01:35:23 PM
I know the Bounty payment is taking too much time but delay is not from our end which you should understand. On a second note we are not processing payouts and are working on sheets only which we have already finished. We just need to update the list with tokens for which we are waiting for Utrust team to provide.

I already have mentioned that so many times in thread myself.

Also I am also updating in the thread about what's the position of Utrust team and right now they have started counting the exact token pool.

If you need a snip of screenshot to prove this up then I will be more than glad to provide those.

Actually I'm not interested on that bounty payment but I'm interested for the fact that you are the one who's left given a neutral trust by Lauda unlike those poor guys out there who earn the last judgement.
88  Economy / Reputation / Re: Everybody who work with jamalaezaz with Neg Tag on: January 25, 2018, 12:21:22 PM
But how could this guy get only neutral trust? Avirunes: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=860327
That's not a link to Avirunes.

this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.
No. It's an example of the exact opposite, i.e. the trust system working as intended. Avirunes does no longer work with that shady user, and I *trust* them enough not to warrant a negative. If he/she does continue working with him (or them), then they'd be a liar and that would warrant a negative from me as well.

I think His existing camp with jamal is Utrust  which is shady and still not paying their participants eventhough their coins and sale end up for long months ago.
89  Economy / Reputation / Everybody who work with jamalaezaz with Neg Tag on: January 25, 2018, 12:05:24 PM
As I've see the past people who work with jamal with campaign management got red trust due to negligence of work.

And the list of them are.

ShooterXD: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=819403
SmartIphone: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=374823
BitFinnese: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=860327

But how could this guy get only neutral trust? Avirunes: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=175302 this is an example of unfair trust system again since the only people has been tagged is those little guys but they will shaken off if the guy who do the same work is somehow big in their eyes.

Edited*
90  Other / Meta / Re: DT Members joining sig campaigns your share me your though about this. on: January 24, 2018, 09:56:15 AM
OP, you are a fucking troll who will say or do anything to besmirch my reputation in the hopes that I'll stop tagging shitposters like yourself.  I'm not even going to dignify your garbled and irrational attack with any reply, other than to tell you to have fun chasing me around the forum.  Continue the butthurtness if that's what suits you.  You've done exactly zero to help bitcointalk in any way.

Nope I'm not troll I'm just posting what I see  Roll Eyes.

BTW what help did you do on this forum can you name any of those? The way I see you make this forum as your milking cash cow by participatin in sig campaigns and if you really aim to help then take off your sig and show that you're sincere to help the forum. If not then i will just think that tagging those existing accounts is way of eliminating the competitors.
91  Other / Meta / Re: DT Members joining sig campaigns your share me your though about this. on: January 24, 2018, 05:29:24 AM
i was thinking a long time ago that the pharmacist and actmyname are both controlled and farmed by the same person.

TP is in America, actmyname is Canadian. Tf?Huh



locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked because account farmers are smart people and they dont use simillar details from their other accounts.



Also, I don't quite know how the forum benefits from new members coming in. Remember, it's members. Not traffic. If accounts get negged, they will be left, and new accounts will be created. This does NOT result in a higher traffic density.
the forum will get more traffic because of new registrants and that simply means more earnings. if accounts get negged they will still be used along with newly created accounts. why?  because some other campaigns especially on altcoins section are less strict and they still allowed accounts with a negative trust.

Still, please explain how admins make money from extra traffic? New participants have nothing to do with the forum finances. It's been publicly said that money is earnt from mainly advertising, not new registrants.


If traffic is money you know why? It's because if advertisers could see if the site had a huge traffic then then they may come along to advertise their product and services. And that's why you can see some advertisement header on this furom..

Your a campaign manager why you didn't know that?Huh
92  Other / Meta / DT Members joining sig campaigns your share me your though about this. on: January 24, 2018, 03:23:53 AM
Username: The Pharmacist
Post Count: 7072
BTC Address:  3C3tVMZ7ciTt7fiMtD3LtDkgAHPs1oCb2f

Thanks for your consideration.

Jumper his moonlight sig campaign does not end yet but he jump to join on big paying camp.

Fuck it. If I'm in, then cool.

Bitcoin Talk Name: actmyname
Bitcoin Talk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=465017
Rank: Legendary
Post Count (including this post): 2476
BTC Address: 176N1Rz3DhrbBFRxDQEDyienEnDV5MW6fW
ETH Address: 0x8978Da5810Cb38294E36F8729Bd9355030f1BE97


On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?
93  Economy / Reputation / Re: actmyname, please remove your negative trust to my account on: January 24, 2018, 03:10:50 AM
Quote
Name:    8Habits
Posts:    3309
Activity:    476
Position:    Sr. Member
Date Registered:    2016-07-03, 08:21:10

You've been around for more than a year, have more than three thousand posts, and ...

Here's what you do:

1. Remove yourself from any signature campaign. Don't get paid.
2. Start posting like any normal forum member who is NOT in a signature campaign.
3. Maybe you can then join a signature campaign, but only contribute to the threads or the forum as if you are not getting paid.

The problem this forum has is spam and posters (shit or not) that do not really contribute. It wastes time and money and server space and cpu. I'm a father to two children. I don't join signature campaigns. I did before because it was actually something I wanted to support or because it paid a whole bitcoin or something absurd so why not, but that lasted only a couple of weeks.

The problem is, your signature is not your own. Your personal text is not your own. And your avatar is not your own. You are obviously a paid poster. It has gotten out of hand, but the administrators and moderators of this site are still trying to control it.

Just post as if you are not getting paid or as if you are not in any campaign. If you would not post on a thread otherwise, then just don't post at all. It's that simple.

Posting or participating in a forum is not work nor is it a job. You may be working or treating it like a job, if so, then you have to be more professional about it.

Besides, in an early post of yours, you did say you prefer gold over bitcoin.

Now the trust system may be abused or used the wrong way, there is little you can do about changing that. The best is to take it up privately with whoever you are dealing with, but since you've made it public, accept that it's not going away anytime soon.

Posting to get paid is a waste of time the way I see it. Had you studied some alts or ICOs or even did a little bit of "real" trading and not just gambling on games of chance like dice or poker, you may have a little bit of a stash now. I have some. A little. None of it from posting, and I'm not counting my "pay" as a mod either, since that's like an absurd $50 a month.

Now this is all just my opinion, so ... have at it.




But what can you say about this filipino wrecking issue? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2728578.60 your a soldier right if I'm correct? So what is your stand to protect your country men here? Are you going to shout your mouth? We want to here your opinion since you are the Philippines board moderator.
94  Other / Meta / Re: Why Negative trust for Spaming ? Why not BAN them ? on: January 24, 2018, 03:01:11 AM
Why are DT members (Lunda / Pharmist / Actmyname) only giving Red Trust to members for spamming ?

They can still spam after getting -ive trust.

Why Not Permanent Ban them to kill the Shit all at once ?

Lunda?  Grin he/she is from mars. But anyways i will exclude lauda on that list since those two names listed who are pharmacist and  actmyname is creating trouble here now. They tag people  with ungood manners.
95  Economy / Reputation / Re: actmyname, please remove your negative trust to my account on: January 24, 2018, 02:56:49 AM
Dude even the below is a shitpost. 

Did you try sending him a PM? If so did you wait a sensible amount of time for a reply?

Bet the abswer to the above is no.. posting like this won't help your cause

abswer dude you are all fuck up, there at moonlight signature campaign I bet you are all posting also a shitty post.
Step 1 to arguments
Anyone who has a signature campaign is instantly a shitposter.

You are also a shitposter  Cheesy.
96  Other / Meta / Re: A request to Blazed (and others who are in plan to recruit more DT members) on: January 23, 2018, 11:17:06 PM
The tagged are not old ones its new if you view it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017 and he became abuser when join on DT network.

And yeah, I definitely added more feedback since then. Wink

Perfect example of Abusive guy  Grin.
97  Other / Meta / Re: A request to Blazed (and others who are in plan to recruit more DT members) on: January 23, 2018, 10:06:40 PM
Why this request to Blazed
I understand the recent DT inclusions were done due to Blazed's recommendation.

The problem
If we notice most of the DT members are not competing with rest of forum members for selling their signature and avatar spaces.

For example,
hilariousandco and Lutpin are not competing for earning opportunity but accepting offers to show advertisements.
Lauda is intensively looking for earning opportunity in the name of ACE and ALU.

The recent DT members The Pharmacist and actmyname are still competing with rest of forum members for selling their avatar and signature spaces.

(actmyname was in bitsler camp for more than one year and The Pharmacist always competes in Yahoo's altcoin camps.)

Now, after they have the power to disqualify any forum members to lessen the completion to get slots, how we can believe that they will not misuse their DT power ?

(I assume these people must have tons of alt accounts and they want to grab more slots as much as possible)

Until Lauda started managing bitmixer camp, it (the cat) never bothered about account dealing nor shit posting even it was a staff and DT member for years. Why suddenly started giving neg trust to 1000s of accounts along with competing with rest of forum members to earn more.

The clear breach of trust system guidelines for personal benefits

As per theymos' guidelines on trust system, a feedback should not be based on quality of posts.

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.

But these people are providing rating only based on quality of posts whereas "Report to moderator' option is available everywhere or SMAS black-listing also an option against quality of posting.


The request

Please include the members into DT who are not into a situation where they will not misuse their power. When a DT member's behaviors is changing, please monitor them closely.


They were added by me directly not via my recommendation.

Most people that have been here for a long time with good ratings (like myself) do not really compete for campaign spots. I have not formally applied for a slot for 2+ years and have no requirements post wise. Being in the DT network does not get you any such benefits it only causes you headaches. Being trusted means any rating you leave is put under a microscope (as it should be). Both The Pharmacist and actmyname are double checking any of their old feedbacks to make them as error free as possible since their feedback shows up by default.
 
I have also reached out to Theymos to see what his stance on red trust for shit posting is and will let you guys know. This forum has gone so far down hill from the bad posts for pay that it is almost useless. The hope is with a threat of ruined accounts people will behave better...




The tagged are not old ones its new if you view it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017 and he became abuser when join on DT network.

I have also reached out to Theymos to see what his stance on red trust for shit posting is and will let you guys know.

If his reply is the below, what would be your response?  

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.


And same as Ognasty we need a response for this abusing issue.

BTW did Blazed really check on who are the best candidate to be listed on DT network since lately the one added are the greedy baboons who impose their wrong stance for personal gains.
98  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust (DT) Network - DT1/2 Members on: January 23, 2018, 09:59:52 PM
I really think DT system should be used to prevent people from scamming (or make it a little more difficult at least).

If we leave negative trust to shitposters I think people can end up ignoring the feedback left to scammers/untrustworthy users.
While it would be fair to tag shitposters somehow and stop them, it's certainly not fair to put both them and scammers in the same group.
Scamming or trying to scam is definitely worst than spamming.

Maybe leaving a neutral to users with extreme poor post quality would help? I guess signature managers would have to place some rules about those neutrals besides the current negative ones.

This sums it up perfectly. Great points about scammers and some person speaking in poor English being grouped together.



If we leave negative trust to shitposters I think people can end up ignoring the feedback left to scammers/untrustworthy users.

I agree.  I only tag accounts as shitposters if it is obvious to even the brain dead fool.  All one or less liners, no contribution to the post.

To date, I have left negative feedback for 61 shitposters, and most, if not all, have never complained about it.


I have seen your TRUST feedbacks and it seems very fair to me. No sign of being an obvious racism or whatsoever. The problem with tagging is that instead of giving a lesson and CLEAR REASON as to why he/she is being tagged, it is now being portrayed as a hatred to the 3rd world, which I don't totally agree.

*Edit: I have encountered a few people (not from this forum) that came from English Speaking Countries yet their English is more worse and than any of those who came from 3rd World.

Vod is absolutely Fair in his feedbacks. If you get a Neg from Vod rest assured he did his research and you deserved it.

Edit: The person you are referring to leaving feedback based on Race is The Pharmacist.



Finally From the Man Himself. Shouldn't this just end the Discussion right here? He's the Boss.

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.


Their will be no end of discussion here until this man stop his early judgement https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017 all need due process as I seen this as abusive act. Old DT member didn't do that one since they know how to scale things.

I disagree actmyname has not abused anything as far as i can see. There are others that have though.

I disagree also and who are the one who's abusing it? Did you check his reputation history there's tons of account tagged for unethical judgement made by him.
99  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust (DT) Network - DT1/2 Members on: January 23, 2018, 09:45:43 PM
I really think DT system should be used to prevent people from scamming (or make it a little more difficult at least).

If we leave negative trust to shitposters I think people can end up ignoring the feedback left to scammers/untrustworthy users.
While it would be fair to tag shitposters somehow and stop them, it's certainly not fair to put both them and scammers in the same group.
Scamming or trying to scam is definitely worst than spamming.

Maybe leaving a neutral to users with extreme poor post quality would help? I guess signature managers would have to place some rules about those neutrals besides the current negative ones.

This sums it up perfectly. Great points about scammers and some person speaking in poor English being grouped together.



If we leave negative trust to shitposters I think people can end up ignoring the feedback left to scammers/untrustworthy users.

I agree.  I only tag accounts as shitposters if it is obvious to even the brain dead fool.  All one or less liners, no contribution to the post.

To date, I have left negative feedback for 61 shitposters, and most, if not all, have never complained about it.


I have seen your TRUST feedbacks and it seems very fair to me. No sign of being an obvious racism or whatsoever. The problem with tagging is that instead of giving a lesson and CLEAR REASON as to why he/she is being tagged, it is now being portrayed as a hatred to the 3rd world, which I don't totally agree.

*Edit: I have encountered a few people (not from this forum) that came from English Speaking Countries yet their English is more worse and than any of those who came from 3rd World.

Vod is absolutely Fair in his feedbacks. If you get a Neg from Vod rest assured he did his research and you deserved it.

Edit: The person you are referring to leaving feedback based on Race is The Pharmacist.



Finally From the Man Himself. Shouldn't this just end the Discussion right here? He's the Boss.

- Do not rate people based on the quality of their posts.


Their will be no end of discussion here until this man stop his early judgement https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=465017 all need due process as I seen this as abusive act. Old DT member didn't do that one since they know how to scale things.
100  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust (DT) Network - DT1/2 Members on: January 23, 2018, 09:31:27 AM
People get quite and goes to long sleep after getting a DT position ( Most Usually) , only one member that i have ever seen popping out even in bad conditions is Lauda. Only one thing i appreciated about hilariousandco is supporting Lauda, he is a true Member here.

Recently DT system is Just a cleaning crew as mentioned by Ibminer or at least going in that direction. But i still believe in DT system as they have potential to ward of scams.

I disagree with your though's since I think Lauda is doing great for imposing his will here although he made something wrong from the past but he is not so abusive regarding for putting some bad trust on anyone on just one blink of an eye. Those new DT members are the one who's doing some shit right now and for their early days of becoming a DT they abuse it well and they doesn't separate those scam tags and shit tags.

Feel pity for those people who simply live a simple life here and wrecked by those jackals.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!