|
1. USPS is HEEL traag.
2. ButterflyLabs apparatuur staat er om bekend om bij de EU douane tegengehouden te worden omdat zij allemaal zegels faken (denk hierbij aan FCC/TUV/CE/etc).
|
|
|
|
He offers you 50/50 so take it or offer odds that offer him more in case you lose. There is no reason he would do anything lower than 1:1 (for him) because that's what he's offering.
So if you're just 50% sure why do you talk out of your ass then? Again, take it or leave it. Apparently you think the chance of him not being a Ponzi/Scam is 90% but nobody here is offering you your desired 1:10, so just leave, or offer it yourself and see if somebody is willing to bet against you. |
|
|
|
|
EDIT: OP disagrees with my reaction and to prevent a flamewar between the two of us and a lengthy reply of my own defending my statement, I hereby remove it.
|
|
|
|
|
He offers you 50/50 so take it or offer odds that offer him more in case you lose. There is no reason he would do anything lower than 1:1 (for him) because that's what he's offering.
|
|
|
|
|
I liked the old site better, at least it was different from all other dice sites.
|
|
|
|
|
Quickly checked it out.
Site could use a nicer stylesheet.
Also:
Bet Info
Bet ID:1351
Client ID:035edf0fec4f62f12724b8c2d99c99d3
date:Sun Aug 25 2013 14:22:22 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)
Client Seed:37df362ca797892f
Server Seed:c0a7073b9cd749dca0974a6123394929831c8b975e68143deb0b25f55927aeff
Server HASH:7c829cf0dfe8fc20e65213897554a5ed7be249f4fe339bc7e219993736d9e3bd
HASH:891a87e238ba9491e2b3625cab1fa7481869f6156dc59a44686c79337f02f244
Dice 1:891 = 18 = 1
Dice 2:244 = 10 = 1
Total6
Numbers2,3,4
ResultLoser
That is not my client seed and I did not read up on how you calculate the dice numbers, but to me it looks like Dice 1 = 1 and Dice 2 = 1 so the result is 2, not 6.
|
|
|
|
Just to let you guys know, I am not a scammer and not a lowlife, currently a deal is being worked out to repay all the investments, sorry for the delays.
Will you reimburse only the deposit or the full balance?  This is what can happen when you invest in a Ponzi(alleged). Some of the earlier withdrawers might have got your BTC. Hope you get it back. Nobody has his BTC, if you would read his other posts you would know he got this by paying out his previous deposit + a little bit and let it go up again. |
|
|
|
they could take my idea and run
And as soon as you release your site, someone else quickly recreates it, implements a slightly smaller house edge and gets 100% of the earnings with your gameidea. |
|
|
|
the more you lose the higher probability to win
Sounds like gambler's fallacy to me. |
|
|
|
(...) The odds of casinobit screwing his entire business over a very low amount of coins are low. He must be very dumb to do it and he most likely isn't. (...)
OK. Just to let you guys know, I am not a scammer and not a lowlife, currency a deal is being worked out to repay all the investments, sorry for the delays.
I hereby claim: I will pay you, pedrog, 21 million bitcoins. @anyone else: give pedrog the opportunity to bet that he will actually receive 21 million bitcoins from me. I said it so it must be true. |
|
|
|
Now wait for a genius to play the EV up
Oh, had nothing to do at work today so I played the 0.003 up to 225% and someone quickly took it  |
|
|
|
Sorry the delay, physical world sucks!
I think by now we all know what happened, like bit777 pointed out, CasinoBit will honor investments, maybe not the "gains", but pretty sure no one will lose money.
I don't think there's a reason for betting now...
Where did bit777 point out that he believes that everyone gets his/her money back? I see no reason why CasinoBit would now suddenly pay out?! |
|
|
|
|
Copycat of Boelens server with the same promo graphic?
|
|
|
|
Signed message von Emily oder fake!1!!! |
|
|
|
|
I agree with everything BRules said.
Nice concept of the site though!
|
|
|
|
|
"I had a pocket royal flush but I didn't want to brag so I folded."
|
|
|
|
Why wouldn't it make sense to create a different server seed beforehand for each game and after it is used, immediately publish it?
Just wonder how will you check it? You decide to check our honesty - you check the client seed, remember it, you make a bet - and check what was the server seed - seems ok? But it isn't in this scenario we could just easily fool you by using any seed that will make any outcome we want - just enumerate few random seeds that would give us desired outcome. Even if we would somehow publish a hash of this seed - you cannot be sure that hash you see is for the seed that you will get when you bet, since any other player might use this seed before you. But if a player uses that hash just before me, I could easily confirm this on the right side. Now you can say: doesn't prove anything since we could already do this. Well with your current implementation you could also skip hashes from the batch and add fake bets to the right to compensate. |
|
|
|
|
Why wouldn't it make sense to create a different server seed beforehand for each game and after it is used, immediately publish it?
|
|
|
|
|
I first read it incorrectly and assumed the batch hash was the hash of the next server seed, which is not the case.
Why did you take this approach instead of just publishing the hash of the next seed?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
