Latest posts of: Kwansimaa

Why trust a project because it was announced by a legendary member? many people have forgotten that legendary members are also humans and so far as they are humans, they are capable of everything and could be a holder and announcer of a scam projects. personally I only trust projects I have researched into not necessary because it was announced by a legendary member.

Bounty managers do not determine the legitimacy of a cryptocurrency project and never will be able to do so. Many newbies think the ranks of bounty managers are all enough to prove the legitimacy of a bounty campaign but hell no to that. The legitimacy of a bounty can only be found through a good research on the project, the team behind it, the investors and advisers behind it. This alone is what can help determine the legitimacy not the bounty manager.

Many bounty hunters are found of this habit mainly because they refuse to read bounty rules and regulations and at the long round blame bounty managers for adding new rules at the end of the bounty campaign. Bounty managers are not to be blamed for this because they do mostly state in their bounty rules that the bounty rules are subject to change and if in case the change comes, whats new to that?, nothing but new if you refuse to read bounty rules as a hunter.

Badmouthing new projects are not the best thing for the crypto industry. The fact that a similar project came on board and ended up as scam does not mean all new projects are going to follow that trend and badmouthing such projects is really not appreciable to the crypto market as it drastically destroys the reputation of these new projects.

Attempting to do more than you are capable of doing can really be stressful. At first, I used to participate in many bounty campaigns and ended up gaining little tokens which were worthless considering the time I was using but coming to a point where I started with just a single bounty at a time, I am really enjoying what I am capable of chewing rather biting more than I could chew.

bounties can really be unpredictable and its sad to see the projects we ignore participating in being listed with huge volumes and price even higher than the ICO prices. Bounties can be predicted and after your thorough research, just give it your all if it end well, good for you, if it ends the opposite way, you learn from it having in mind that bounties are just unpredictable

yes I will participate in an ICO if it is not listed in any ICO rating website and be proud participating in it because not all projects are willing to pay to be rated on such ico rating websites knowing most projects pays these websites for higher ranking which is highly not fair to the crypto industry or market in general. Participating in such an ico is personal and I will as an individual because off late ico websites have no influence over investors.

This is a cool and amazing idea which will be a warning sign to big investors how as to the project even cheated its bounty hunters and lure them in promoting their project without getting any payment form it. It will always alert project and bounty managers to act accordingly without breaking the rules themselves and this for sure can bring back the respect hunters had. This flag is what hunters need most because it will save us from cheating.

We all make mistakes in life but as to how we react to the mistake we made is what matters and each and every single individual has way of responding to mistakes. The crypto market is considered funny to me because you can lose all your assets in a blink of an eye but in all these mistakes resulting in that, keep going and never be afraid of repeating or making the mistakes, if they do happen, learn from it and move on.

Regulation can be good or bad depending on how you view it or understand it. Personally I consider regulation to be a good thing for the crypto industry especially ICOs. Most ICO project ends as scam and this is preventing real investors off late to even invest their money into ICO project which could have been helpful for the industry. Regulation will help do away with scam ICOs which makes it good.

The one who carries the message is not as important as the message itself, if a newbie announces a bounty project and it ends successfully with each participant getting their share of what they did, that is the most important thing. A legendary member might annouces a project but it won't be worth working for but just a waste of time. The project with its plans and road map is better than the announcer.

Bounties are freaky unpredictable, those we consider real projects and get our hopes too high are not paying and the annoying part is seeing the bounties we ignored being listed with great values even higher than the ico price and that saddens more and more. Treat all bounties the same because you don't know which one will pay you big.

Recommendation is good but still be extra careful investing into a coin that was recommended rather doing your own investigation on a project. Passive income is really good and holding some bunch of altcoins that pay dividends is really worth it. You can give this a shot, $Tele and $Bold are the best for know that most of my friends are talking about.

Its really hard getting a better project to promote that is worth it because most bounties off late end as scam projects and this is a total waste of time and precious resources to the bounty hunter but I think doing a good research will help us prevent scam projects in many ways. You can look into this, it has biweekly bounty payment, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5150860.0

Trusting a project to me has nothing to do with the legendary member who posted it on the thread, it solely depends on the findings from my research and conclusion made on that. Most bounty managers makes us aware that they are not part of the team and just doing their work as bounty hunters and without proper research before participating, I think you promote such bounties at your own risk.

Recommendation is really a great thing but sometimes can be the worst thing in your life. People can recommend for you based on their research and conclusions but making your own research and drawing conclusion for yourself is core but I will rather recommend BNB and XLM for you though based on my research.

I see no tangible reason why you should badmouth new projects. Its no easy to start and project and succeed within 2-3 months. It all takes time, effort and resources which are very scarce to come about off late, some new projects out there ain't scam projects, they are stagnant at where they are because they have no money to run the the project and this is the time they need our support not badmouthing.

I think this is a good initiative and should be a kind of recurring. Majority of projects are already listed but few knows about that project and running a bounty campaign is the right approach to alert the mass that such a project with this coin exist. most investors do not know what specifically some projects are all about and through these bounties, they get to know about the projects and start investing into it.