He doesn't really seem to care about verifying whether it's actually a girl or not or even whether they've got good English skills so it's a bit weird that these are the two criteria he asks for but as long as you just say you're a girl even in broken English you apparently get the job. I think being a girl is irrelevant because there's no quality they could offer here that a man couldn't do. Op should just hire a good English speaker to fix the poor English and grammar on his site and also maybe to take care of the postings on this forum related to the business because I think it's off putting to people when they see poor English (though I respect op for trying his best but should try look at this from a business perspective).

Good job banning every vpn service. New ones would just spring up so it's cat and mouse. There's always tor too which they couldn't do anything about so it's futile even attempting to censor people like this but I guess governments will never learn.

There's always a game starting somewhere in the world, especially with football. You can even bet on virtual football with a new game every three minutes on skybet though I don't see the point of it nor do I really trust it to be 'fair' really.

I don't know as I don't know people with customer service experience but there are likely plenty of people with good english and are willing to do it. Change the criteria for the position and see what you get. Maybe choose one of the people who run or have run signature campaigns successfully in the past.

Should I be allowed to follow you around and blow smoke in your face for hours? No. Should a parent be allowed to force-feed their children doughnuts 24/7? No. This isn't about the smokers liberty but the children's liberty. They have no choice and are forced to breathe that crap in and second hand smoke can cause cancer. It makes it even worse when they're in a car.

I don't think they can compare to be honest. I think dice sites get old pretty fast though they're fast moving with quick profit (or loss), whereas sports betting is a bit more exiting especially if you watch the games you're betting on. It's not entirely down to the skill of the teams or athletes and the betters skill/knowledge though as any sport can be unpredictable but that just ads to the excitement though it also adds to the possibility of losing.


I think this is the same for all gambling is it not?

This is ridiculous. You shouldn't be hiring based on gender but skills relevant to the position. Can they speak good English, do they have good customer service skills, are they active and trusted on the forum etc? Don't just employ anyone who claims to be a woman because they're probably just going to lie to get the job. Gender should be irrelevant so just hire the best person for the job.

The fiat payments are usually not reversible either but it's paypal's system that is the weak link. Paypal doesn't actually take the money back out of your bank account they just minus the balance from your account and then you owe them the money so they essentially take the heat until you pay back. If they handled bitcoin payments it would probably work in a similar way. Either that or they will just hold the money as some sort of escrow until the transaction has been successfully completed.

It will likely be priced in a fiat value so you will know how much it really costs. All you need to do is scan a QR code and everything will be done for you so it's not like you have to type in all the decimal places yourself. Regardless of that I think it'll just take some getting used to but people will adapt to it over time.

Ha. I'm not sure what OP is up to or whether he's attempting some sort of scam but I doubt this is a legitimate deal.


I suggest you give us these details and more if you want any genuine interest. Should be quite easy to prove your legitimacy.


Exactly what I think. He'll get some timewasters or fantasists looking for attention no doubt. Some people just like to get their face on TV even though I doubt their is no documentary here.

http://www.trbimg.com/img-53e55f56/turbine/la-fi-tn-rufus-cuff-hardware-crowdfunding-20140808

First time I've heard of it but it looks huge. No way I'd wear something that big. I don't really get all the fuss about smart watches either. I haven't wore a watch in about 16 years and my phone can do everything I need it to so I have no need for a watch at all.

They market them by getting famous people to wear them. Firstly Dre will get all his artists to wear them in public and in their videos likely for free (Eminem 50 Cent etc), then they will give them out to other artists for free in the hope they wear them out in public. Then they pay other artists and athletes to wear them and that has a knock on effect as it's seen as cool and the new brand to have and it spirals from there. I remember seeing a video of the Manchester United squad getting off their coach before a game and pretty much every other player had a pair or beats headphones around their neck. Just look at all the pop videos too. From Jessie J to Nicki Minaj they always feature beats headphones or products prominently.

You're right, they won't be able to stop the 'underground' trade just like they can't stop the sale of drugs in the underground which is what happens when you make things illegal or put silly restrictions on them, but just like drugs people don't want bitcoins to be 'underground'. We want to be able to use them freely and as a legitimate currency.

Rampton

Thanks for the giveaway.

There will obviously have to be some sort of escrow implemented. What interests me though is how will you get fiat money into these decentralized exchanges? That baffles me. Does any one have any info or ways it can work? I'm very intrigued to how decentralized exchanges or markets will function so I can't wait for them to actually get released. They seem to have been in development for quite some time

The pictures look almost believable but obviously they're not. If we asked for a video of the products or an up to date time stamp we wouldn't get one. Somebody from default should neg trust this guy.


This is exactly how they operate. They know people will be skeptical so offer escrow but will do their best to get out of using it or just hope some naive newb will just get greedy and send them the money without using one. Always remember if it looks too good to be true then it probably is, so don't get greedy or you'll pay the price for it.

That's just the risk they are willing to take. Personally I don't get why people bother lending money as you're going to get scammed at some point if you don't take collateral but for the tiny percent they make in fees it doesn't seem worth it as like you said one bad loan and you lose out big time. I think the best colleteral is probably a bitcointalk account but only lend half of its worth. People then have incentive to return the money but if they don't you've made a decent profit when you sell it on.

I'm sure there will be both positives and negatives to regulation, but one thing is for sure there's nothing we can really do about it. Regulation is inevitable but were going to have to play by their rules whether we like it or not. I can opnly hope that they're fair and don't actually cause harm to the bitcoin ecosystem.

Rampton

Thanks for the giveaway.

He's selling Full Member accounts for more than that so I doubt it. Most Seniors go for around 0.3 at the moment from what I gather. Used to be 0.4 but the market is probably slow or over saturated.