Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 01:35:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
81  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: [Warning]:Kupidon ransomware on: June 09, 2020, 04:55:38 PM
The ransomware is unique based on the article provided it doesn't require any kind of user error for it to penetrate the system as the ransomware is able to control your pc if you are connected somehow to a remote desktop server which I don't think a lot of people have. But just like what the article bleepingcomputer created they still don't have a lot of information to go through on how or why this people are getting it so maybe not messing around with websites as well as emails is still a must before we found out how does this ransomware is able to get through with PCs.

I think we may have forgotten the biggest contributor, besides phishing email in the spread of malware/ransomware in recent years, not just Kupidon - "Downloading torrent files". There are literally millions being downloaded everyday, and majority of those files have some have malicious intent. That's why people should stay away from it, specially crypto enthusiast as you might one day be affected by ransomwares.

According to the article of bleepingcomputer it's origin are still unknown and their biggest guess is that it is coming from remote desktop servers, so there are no downloads required or emails needed to be click in order to get the malware. The hacker just need to access your pc with this remote servers in order to infiltrate your computer with the malware. Like I said this kind of ransomware is unique since it doesn't require the user to have any kind of error in his side like visiting websites, clicking emails, or even downloading torrent files.  

It doesn't come from remote desktop servers, it infect your exposed remote desktop servers, which is not the same.

It does require a vulnerability in a remote desktop server application installed on your computer, so it also require you to have a port opened (+ a vulnerability). Otherwise a download is required to get this malware on your computer. A download and an execution (and since you can download and execute files though a remote desktop application then if there is a vulnerability in your application someone can take an advantage of it)

Malwares that require you to visit a website to be infected (by using a Remote code execution vulnerability) are far more dangerous than this kind of old stuff. This malware is new but what he does is not, and not as sophisticated as a remote code execution vulnerability in your web browser (which can be used to infect millions of people even if they don't have any port opened).

You can sleep peacefully if you don't have a remote desktop server with your bitcoin on it  Smiley

Yes, probably practice safety by backing up for files. Malwares/Ransomware are growing everyday and it's really sad to see that those scammers are using bitcoin as method to extract ransom from their victims.

I have Windows based machine, but recently though, I try and exploit Unix flavor for safety purposes. Just a couple of days ago, was able to create a Linux Mint system. Still playing with it and probably will move out from Windows based OS specially if I deal with my crypto.

You are not protected under Linux if you don't know how to protect yourself using it.
People think that there is no malware under linux but they are wrong, most of the malwares are made for windows because there are more windows users. If you don't want to learn a bit of security then whatever if you use linux or mac or windows you must be careful of what you download over internet.
82  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Cop broke the windows at Autozone which sparked riots across America on: June 09, 2020, 05:29:24 AM
Okay Stanley, done.

Thank you  Smiley

Have a good day.
83  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Cop broke the windows at Autozone which sparked riots across America on: June 09, 2020, 03:01:44 AM
It's reasonable to point out that the victim was, in fact, a bad guy.

But this remains an incident where the bad guy, being arrested, should have been treated with respect.


You're not even "pointing out" that the victim was a "bad guy." You're simply giving your opinion. I don't consider it reasonably worth sharing, as it has nothing to do with the issue at hand. By giving this opinion you can only be insinuating that maybe he got what he deserved. He didn't deserve it at all.

Back to licking boots for you.


Hello nutildah.... you gave me a negative feedback few months ago because i "harrassed" someone who disrespected me and who is the same person below that start disrespecting you because of your opinion (he his called "TECSHARE") ... Be serious and honest, maybe you could think about removing your negative feedback on my profil and i'll remove mine. This is just my vision of the common sense i'm not here to offense you and i totally agree with your comment here. I don't disrespect people if they don't do it with me, so i think you are wrong by giving me this feedback but i totally understand why you thought you were right.

Thank you.

Pathetic non-evidence of "resisting arrest." The other cop is standing there with his hands in his pockets. Doesn't exactly seem like he needed a knee to the neck for 8 minutes well afterward. Even if he was resisting arrest for 8 seconds, that's not an excuse to kill somebody after they fall to the ground later on. You are really straining to protect government overreach here.

Whipping out the Hitler comparisons extra early today, are we?

[img ]https://i.imgur.com/KsQsUhT.jpg[/img]

Tell me, what do you think your trendy hive mind leftard "bootlicker" mantra that gets used against anyone who disagrees with you stems from? This is where you lie and pretend it is not a Nazi reference. Calling everyone a Nazi got so played out and turned you into jokes, so you had to find a new creative allegory to call people Nazis without being so obvious.

You want to stop government overreach? Use examples of some one other than violent drug addict felons committing crimes as your poster boys. Its so weird how everyone is not behind pretending victimizers are victims isn't it? Also I noticed you totally avoided responding to the MUCH more serious issue of black on black violence, but that is par for the course for leftards like you.

There is no rage bait packed in that issue, no REEECISM to shout about, no one to call boot licker and target with your pre-programmed cognitive dissonance, so why bother? What is important is you get personal satisfaction from LAARPing as a hero, not that it is a bigger problem that needs a solution. Also if people addressed that issue, they might also have to address the fact that there are larger issues within the black community and culture that have nothing to do with racism.



Intent is irrelevant in this case. Chauvin is being charged with second degree unintentional murder, which is a step up from unintentional manslaughter, seemingly dependent on the level of "recklessness" involved.

[img width= 500]https://i.imgur.com/4IFi39U.png[/img]

As nobody here is a lawyer (let along a criminal lawyer) -- its not our place to argue either way. I'm sure bootlicking trolls here will make the argument for the lesser charge, but that's to be expected.

Regardless of what Chauvin gets convicted of, Floyd's past or blood contents do not factor in at all here. They're only being discussed to lend credence to the idea that his death was justified.

Nobody here is a lawyer, so it is not our place to argue, but of course your argument is valid.



You're not even "pointing out" that the victim was a "bad guy." You're simply giving your opinion. I don't consider it reasonably worth sharing, as it has nothing to do with the issue at hand. By giving this opinion you can only be insinuating that maybe he got what he deserved. He didn't deserve it at all.

Back to licking boots for you.

It is a fact he was a convicted violent felon. No one is saying he "got what he deserved". They are however saying he is by far not simply an innocent victim of racist circumstance as the media, and retards like you present him to be. He made choices that lead himself down that path. He put HIMSELF into that situation. This is all being portrayed as an innocent man minding his own business being victimized by circumstances beyond his control. This is totally a lie. You don't give a fuck about justice, if you did you would be bringing ACTUAL INNOCENTS harmed by police to the forefront. Instead we find you here regurgitating what the media and hive mind command of you like a social justice parrot bot.
84  Other / Politics & Society / Re: 2020 Democrats on: May 02, 2020, 06:56:15 PM
Oh please, there's nothing false about what I said. Your "derangement" that all left bad and right good is just as bad as the TDS on the left. Do we really need to start a list of all the shit the right have turned a blind eye to over the years when it comes to their own? How many on the right screamed for Clintons balls over his blowjobs and give their own a pass. Happens all the time cause they're all the damn same. I love how so many of you talk about the "main stream" media and what you really mean to say is left wing media. Fox has certainly covered Reade and they're one of the "main" media outlets. They certainly love to tout that they have higher ratings than any other cable news network. Besides, I don't know what world you live in but I've certainly seen Reade stuff on CNN. They just don't "obsess" about it like they would if it was about someone on the right. You know. The same way Fox etc obsesses about those on the left. They're all the same.

The Clinton's were but an extension of the Bush cartel, and Killery an extension of her bootlegger father's mob ties. Also, Bill was impeached for perjury, not for getting a blowjob. His presidency set the vast majority of the current day's major issues, either financial, military, and the security of the nation itself. He is always praised for his "surplus", but that was all a fraud, as demonstrated by the later housing market collapse which was engineered under his administration.


You the fraud are talking about a fraud ?  
85  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: 🎮[ANN] Wunbit Video Games Platform 🕹️ Spend & Earn WUN while playing games 🚀 on: April 30, 2020, 06:01:02 PM
Project still alive ?
86  Economy / Reputation / Re: StonerStanley Retarded Attempt At Extortion on: April 17, 2020, 08:57:56 PM
I'll remove it when he will remove ABitNut from the trust list because ABitNut is not a trustable person since he gave me a negative feedback for no reason and that i don't deserve a negative feedback. That is the TECshare fault if ABitNut is in this list.

You had a chance to help yourself out earlier when you PM'd ABitNut, but you blew it:

I've not been active on this forum for long. But I got a notification that I had a private message so I checked it out:

Few years ago you gave me a wrong feedback "untrust" saying that i'm an altcoin which is false. Now i gave you one negative feedback too saying that you are a scammer.

Delete your sh*t.

I checked the feedback I left. Yes, I called you out for being an alt account years ago. And that's exactly what my feedback means. I (as an individual) was convinced that the person that controlled your account had multiple accounts.

Now I'd be open to reasonable arguments but:

1) Your message to me is rude
2) You're abusing the trust system by leaving false feedback
3) You're accusing me of being a scammer

So I'm disinclined to oblige your request.

Have a nice weekend.

You can't talk to people that way if you want them to do something nice for you.

He's the one that referenced his rating to try and get an action from me.  I blocked him PMs and moved on.

You did not "move on." You left him a negative trust and called him a scammer. So much for anybody attempting to be the bigger man.

So he can disrespect me but i can't disrespect him ? You are a very dishonest person.
You had a chance to not get a negative feedback from me, but you blew it. According to the fact you are not a trustable person because you have a sens of the morality that is very wrong by defending someone who disrespect me.

(since i give up this account you can do what you want Smiley )
87  Economy / Reputation / Re: StonerStanley Retarded Attempt At Extortion on: March 20, 2020, 09:19:58 PM
I gave him a negative feedback because he put my name in the distrust list for no reason and he did the same with my second account Virtualis Games for no reason.

He put my name in the distrust list because i was trying to explain myself about a situation where TECshare made an error but TECshare was trying to make me close my mouth like a dishonest person. He put "ABitNut" in the trust list but this user abused of the feedback system since he gave me a negative feedback for "multi account" without any reason (muti account and what ? it makes me a scammer ?)
Sending negative feedback because someone distrusted you is totally wrong... It's total abuse of the trust system and i would advise you to remove it because thing might backfire on you soon if other DT members start tagging you for sending unnecessary feedback.

A trust list is mostly based on what someone personally thinks of other people. You can't force them to change their opinion about you. You should have addressed this issue in another otherwise this is a fail.

I'll remove it when he will remove ABitNut from the trust list because ABitNut is not a trustable person since he gave me a negative feedback for no reason and that i don't deserve a negative feedback. That is the TECshare fault if ABitNut is in this list. And anyway he talked to me like a little kid and a puppet, he disrespect me. I don't even understand how this guy can get a merit for this post with all he did.
Everything are in my "My Messages", any moderators can see how he talked to me like a puppet and how he disrespect the forum.

The fail is when you don't even understand the situation but you talk about it.

Quote
You should have addressed this issue in another otherwise this is a fail.

I didn't ?

I gave him a negative feedback because he put my name in the distrust list for no reason and he did the same with my second account Virtualis Games for no reason.
You're going at this the wrong way. Please start by reading LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system (translated into 12 different languages, which shows broad community support for what I wrote).
First: anyone can include or exclude anyone they want. This isn't moderated, but more importantly: you shouldn't take it personally!
Anyone can also leave anyone any feedback they want. This too isn't moderated. However, if you ever want your feedback to mean something (by reaching DefaulTrust), you'll need others to include you, which they may do if they think you leave valid feedback.

Quote
He put my name in the distrust list because i was trying to explain myself about a situation where TECshare made an error but TECshare was trying to make me close my mouth like a dishonest person.
Again: you're taking the wrong approach. You could discuss this in a new Reputation thread, but none of this is a reason to leave negative feedback.

Quote
He put "ABitNut" in the trust list
TECSHARE included ABitNut more than a year ago. The only thing that changed is that TECSHARE reached DT1 recently.

Quote
but this user abused of the feedback system since he gave me a negative feedback for "multi account" without any reason (muti account and what ? it makes me a scammer ?)
I don't know. If you open a new topic for this, I'm willing to look into the evidence. But it still doesn't justify negative feedback.

At the begginning i contacted TECShare but he talked to me like a puppet and a kid, told me to shut my mouth while trying to help me at the same time (he should start to learn how to control himself before trying to control a keyboard). I made a thread to ask why i have a negative reputation at the same time and he took it personnally because he understood his fault, he tried to defend his own reputation using me and i repeat: he told me to shut my mouth.

You are moderator? Check my private messages, and check how he talked to me.

I already read your link.
88  Economy / Reputation / Re: StonerStanley Retarded Attempt At Extortion on: March 20, 2020, 12:18:06 PM
He gave you negative feedback simply for distrusting him ? I don't know the history between you 2 but kind of agree that it's messed up.

Also what impact does the trust/distrust hold other  than being able to see more clearly the people who get tagged by them ? Is there something else that I'm missing ?




I gave him a negative feedback because he put my name in the distrust list for no reason and he did the same with my second account Virtualis Games for no reason.

He put my name in the distrust list because i was trying to explain myself about a situation where TECshare made an error but TECshare was trying to make me close my mouth like a dishonest person. He put "ABitNut" in the trust list but this user abused of the feedback system since he gave me a negative feedback for "multi account" without any reason (muti account and what ? it makes me a scammer ?)

TECshare was playing a personal fight against "Vod" and others users while trying to "help me", but apparently it was more about his reputation than to really help me, as you can see right now again because it would be simplier to remove ABitNut from the list than making a thread, since ABitNut isn't  able to explain him.

So what if i make another account to present my project ? i'll get a negative feedback because i have another account to present my project and i'll get a big red ribbon saying that i'm a probable scammer. Nice.


I understand but there is some truths that should be said. Sorry. Even if i appreciate your help.

If my account bring back to the normal so i will continue to use it, otherwise i'll leave the forum until my project is finish Wink


I understand why you feel that way but please understand, you are literally handing the worst people on the forum exactly what they wanted and reinforcing their behavior by letting them feel as if they got in the way of a resolution. You are free of course to handle this in any way you feel fit to, but at this point I have invested my time and reputation into solving your problem, and I would appreciate not being hamstrung right before it is potentially resolved over a flock of stalker retards with no intent other than to try to harass.


Hello again,

I know you are trying to help, but please, don't post for now. They are just trying to drag you into it so they can interrogate you. I promise this is more about them stalking me than it is about your topic. I want to help but if I have to manage two conversations instead of one it makes it more difficult. Don't worry these turds have been doing this to me for years, I know how to make them dance and I assure you none of this bothers me in the slightest.
89  Economy / Reputation / Re: Another Lauda topic : Can we review the feedback she lefts? on: March 19, 2020, 11:05:23 AM
[shits out 5000 negative trust ratings]

"occasionally I mess up"




Don't talk about others when you are one of those manipulators and lier who put me on the untrust list for nothing.
90  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust abuse and some "strange" theories. on: December 28, 2019, 02:29:02 AM
Say what you want, i have a new account since few month and you'll get another -1 later with my others accounts,  because i still not happy about what you did to me and you did not repair it Wink

You can put a feedback to say that i have an alt account named "Virtualis Games" which is the name of my project, it's ok, you are very immature  Cheesy

What exactly did I do to you? Didn't you just get done chastising me for a negative rating I didn't even give you? I don't owe you shit little boy. I offered you help and you spit in my face. Now you can deal with the results of me doing nothing for you. Cry me a river.

Right right  Roll Eyes
91  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust abuse and some "strange" theories. on: December 28, 2019, 02:22:57 AM
~

I don't even necessarily disagree with you. The problem is that "lying" is often subjective and is subject to large amounts of interpretation regardless if you are right or not. My opinion on the matter is the ratings you left are counter productive to your own goals, and your fight against these lies would better be served by removing those ratings and simply drawing attention to this abuse via public discussion. You seem to be some what familiar with my history here. I shed no tears for the forum bitstasi. I am speaking only from a position of what I think would honestly help you serve your stated goals here. Right now your abuse of the trust system strips you of any moral authority in the situation, removing those ratings gives you a distinct advantage and would make people much more willing to hear your grievances. That is all. No one can make you do anything, just offering some friendly advice.

Funny. From the part of the guy that manipulated the trust list to give me a -1. You also manipulated the list to avoid getting a -1.

You are very dishonnest TECSHARE.

Aw look who it is. So I conspired to make ABitNut leave you a negative rating years ago, then worked to get on DT all to make sure some retard I don't even know and at the time had zero interactions with, got a negative rating did I? I know you are probably too brain damaged to remember, but YOU ASKED ME for help and I was the one trying to help you get that rating removed. Of course once you got what you wanted you started talking shit and threw me under a bus for my troubles. I guess in your partially functional brain stem I would never be back on default trust, so it didn't matter because you got what you wanted one way or another. Guess you were wrong and you told the one guy who could help you to fuck off and left him a negative rating yourself. Oopsey doopsey.

"StonerStanley   2019-12-27      Dishonest person who manipulate the trust list and opinion."

Quote
The original rating is not your fault. You not listening to the advice of some one sacrificing their time and reputation to help you IS however your fault. Any project you engage in here will fail because you have no clue how to operate in this environment, and people like me won't be there to stand up for you. The kind of insolent behavior you are offering right now is why people like you never get anyone to stand up for them, so enjoy, because you asked for it, you got it.

Hmmm... sounds pretty prescient to me. Thanks for being the perfect example of my point by the way.


Say what you want, i have a new account since few month and you'll get another -1 later with my others accounts,  because i still not happy about what you did to me and you did not repair it Wink

You can put a feedback to say that i have an alt account named "Virtualis Games" which is the name of my project, it's ok, you are very immature  Cheesy

I stopped using this account since few month because you fucked it, but i saw few days ago that you put ABitNut back in the trust list so now my negative reputation has coming back, no doubt that you want to play.
92  Economy / Reputation / Re: Trust abuse and some "strange" theories. on: December 27, 2019, 11:37:03 AM
~

I don't even necessarily disagree with you. The problem is that "lying" is often subjective and is subject to large amounts of interpretation regardless if you are right or not. My opinion on the matter is the ratings you left are counter productive to your own goals, and your fight against these lies would better be served by removing those ratings and simply drawing attention to this abuse via public discussion. You seem to be some what familiar with my history here. I shed no tears for the forum bitstasi. I am speaking only from a position of what I think would honestly help you serve your stated goals here. Right now your abuse of the trust system strips you of any moral authority in the situation, removing those ratings gives you a distinct advantage and would make people much more willing to hear your grievances. That is all. No one can make you do anything, just offering some friendly advice.

Funny. From the part of the guy that manipulated the trust list to give me a -1. You also manipulated the list to avoid getting a -1.

You are very dishonnest TECSHARE.
93  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Government Could Shutdown Bitcoin? on: November 22, 2019, 12:48:44 PM
What's with your timing, dude? The article was published 3 days ago yet you decided to share it here right when the market is in panic mode, blood on the street, and the overall sentiment is bleak...You trying to spread more FUD or what?

Seriously, these type of dumb clickbaity articles are completely unnecesary right now, we get one of these (crackdown on cryptos from X govt) at least twice a week.


Calm your nerves  Cheesy

The market is ok.
94  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Send More Fraudlent Developers to Jail and I still Sanity Into Crypto on: November 22, 2019, 08:45:21 AM
Well done. He even deserves more jail time.
95  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Looking for a Developer To Take Over a Dead Project on: November 21, 2019, 09:36:31 PM
Dead projet is dead.
People who want to bring it alive are those who bought too much of the coins and then want to sell it back.
96  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Why I think all crypto is scam on: November 21, 2019, 09:34:56 PM
First there is an announcement, then there is 3 year Roadmap,
extended each year with meaningless additions, fake recruiting of
employees, trade interrupts, software announcements, wallet updates, changes
quizes, games, givaways, airdrops, forks, ICOs etc, etc, etc.

I've seen several coins with great tech which is perfectly quick and secure, anonymous (or not) and safe.
They all have mobile wallets and wallets for every OS.
Despite this fact they cannot be adopted. Nobody wants to use them, there is no real need for them.
A team of good programmers could develop a blockchain which can replace banks and paper money
in a month. Another month for testing and another month for setting up nodes across the globe.
The main point behind all this is: who controlls these programmers? 

Voilla. it is that easy.That is why I think all these announcements and Roadmaps are bullshit.

Bullshit.
The people need time to know and adopt cryptocurrencies, marchands too.
97  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: All of you Bitcoin Hodlers are mentally ill - *Must Read! on: November 21, 2019, 09:29:35 PM
This entire bitcoin space breeds greed, envy, fear, and lust. All you of hodling bitcoin are mentally ill. You have been conned into thinking bitcoin is going to the moon. It's not. Charts show bitcoin is slowly bleeding to death. Bitcoin is no different than Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme where new bag holders are needed to pay off the earlier investors.

Mass adoption of bitcoin will never occur. Sorry! The price is far too unstable to be used as a form of payment. Businesses would get crushed if they took bitcoin as a payment due to the wild price fluctuations. Then you have to worry about the IRS on your ass to pay taxes. Is hodling worth the stress? Absolutely not. That's why women laugh at bitcoin and think it's a scam. Notice the crypto space is all dudes?

Say what you will about the US dollar, but it's still backed by a democracy and the most powerful military in human history. Accepted everywhere. Bitcoin is backed by absolutely nothing. Gold is backed by 5000 years of history of holding value, and is recognized worldwide. Women love gold. It's beautiful and tangible. A real asset worth owning.

I'm sorry, but you HODL'ers are mentally ill and are going to get crushed when bitcoin collapses in the coming recession. Bitcoin is going to get dumped fast as people need money to pay bills and survive. If you bought bitcoin early and already cashed out with gains, you are a wise investor and have my respect. If you're still hodling, your finances and reputation are on the line here. A reputation with your friends and family you can never get back. Don't risk it. Dump your bitcoin now before it wipes you out!





Not everybody is involved into Bitcoin just to get a return on investment. It could also be for support the technology.
98  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: 【ANN】 ✅ LETHEAN ✅ - Secure, Anon & Fast P2P-VPN-Network backed by the Blockchain on: November 21, 2019, 09:17:13 PM
Is there an electrum wallet ?
99  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: 🎰[ANN] Wunbit Crypto Gaming Arcade 🕹️ Spend & Earn WUN while playing games 🚀 on: November 20, 2019, 07:56:32 PM
How your developpers is gonna gain their life in the long term ?

How much will i pay to play a game and from where come the tokens that i will gain in-game ?
100  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency on: November 20, 2019, 07:33:19 PM
which vulnerability has been used to hack the website ?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!