|
I've updated the nodes on my systems to the new version, so far no issues.
|
|
|
|
When will next payout be on the pending?
Once the Peercoin block matures, payout is usually within the hour. Ok so there are 4 pending blocks and they are waiting to mature? 2015.09.07 to 2015.09.09 Yes, Peercoin blocks have a very long wait time for maturity. I believe it's somewhere around 520 confirms. Also after taking a look, I see that one of the addresses have a '#' sign that will prevent it from being properly paid. Can the owner of that address can please confirm the correction. |
|
|
|
When will next payout be on the pending?
Once the Peercoin block matures, payout is usually within the hour. |
|
|
|
I still haven't identified the root cause of the problem, but I have been able to see a pattern. The payout script is stalling on either ContiniumCoin or Teacoin every Sunday morning. I recently moved these two coins from the old system on to this new platform, hence the sudden issues. I will start expanding the backend part of the platform horizontally (adding more database and payment servers) in the coming days. This should relieve some stress on the one database and payment server currently being used to handle almost 40 pools.
For now, I have manually kicked off the peercoin payments.
So roughly how long will it take for these payments to clear? The reason I ask is because the PPC price is up and I don't want to miss out. Thanks. I will go ahead an expedite the Peercoin payouts to run in the next 20 minutes. |
|
|
|
|
I still haven't identified the root cause of the problem, but I have been able to see a pattern. The payout script is stalling on either ContiniumCoin or Teacoin every Sunday morning. I recently moved these two coins from the old system on to this new platform, hence the sudden issues. I will start expanding the backend part of the platform horizontally (adding more database and payment servers) in the coming days. This should relieve some stress on the one database and payment server currently being used to handle almost 40 pools.
For now, I have manually kicked off the peercoin payments.
|
|
|
|
Hi Tuaris, I was mining Dash for 4 days and my miner stats is still 0 h/s and no payment received Can you check if there is a problem? adress: Xo6yycj9BRhw3WqXaY2xsWAPXCyHKFCrWx  Many thanks, Too the moon (( : At 2-4KH/s is going to be a very long time until a block is found. According to the CoinWarz calculator, it could take 49395 days to find a block. http://www.coinwarz.com/calculators/dash-mining-calculator/?h=2.00&p=600.00&pc=0.0&pf=0.00&d=1987.33065543&r=2.92500000&er=0.01090001&btcer=229.72000000&hc=0.00You could still get lucky and find one sooner! The reason for a 0 H/s being displayed is due to the small amount of shares being submitted. The stats processor does not have enough data to come up with a reasonable number. Try setting a lower difficulty to submit shares more often, see the help section for more information. |
|
|
|
this is literally exactly what i have been looking for, culd you possibly add DASH  , maybe my miners are gonna get lucky DASH can be found here: http://mining.securepayment.cc/pools/dash/There have been some lucky miners who have found a few blocks. I think it was about 1 to 2 days to find a block at 20MH/s last I checked. |
|
|
|
Any ETA on this issue? Thanks.
Payments are running now. It should be just a few more hours before it reaches Peercoin. |
|
|
|
Hi Tuaris, Is there a delay with Peercoin payments? It's been 5/6 days and it's still pending. My address is PLn571Md7o7vqSj4B3ntrAJvaH3qs9hDpk. Thanks  Thanks for the notice. The problem has been identified, I'm currently investigating a root cause. |
|
|
|
About to call this one dead, Only two active connections... Is there anybody else out there?
76.95.178.229:7921
99.63.193.158:7921
There is always: |
|
|
|
I've successfully altered the difficulty to a setting of my choice, using PPCoin QT version v0.4.0ppc-beta. I think i'll just stick with this client for the time being as I don't require any additional functionality that PeerUnity offers anyway.
Please do tell though if the dev team manages to fix the bug. Thanks again!
Received feedback on the bug https://github.com/Peerunity/Peerunity/issues/176It's exactly as I thought. The "magic string" was not matching correctly between the Peercoin reference and Peerunity wallets. The reason it worked for you originally was due to my web control panel using the wrong string, just as Peerunity was. I 'fixed' it about week later based on the reference wallet, which broke it for peerunity. |
|
|
|
Seems like someone couldn't wait anymore (or got scared from Bitrex's de-listing warning) and decided to exit. He or she sold off their holdings and filled all the buy orders, an action they will forever regret. The Block explorer confirms this. According to the sell orders, the price is still in the ~300 range. The buy orders will recover soon. It didn't drop that low. 67 was the lowest. |
|
|
|
I think it was a week or so after you rolled out the control panel feature, I must emphasize though that it was working correctly and I was using the same client also. Hope that helps, I'll try the other Peercoin wallet and report back.
hmm I don't know what is going on. I used Peerunity to sign messages and it also failed for me. The interesting part is that Peerunity fails to verify a message signed by the Peercoin reference wallet, and vice-a-versa. I'll open a bug with Peerunity to see if they can offer some assistance. Thanks for this. |
|
|
|
Hi Tuaris, I'm having a problem with changing the difficulty on the control panel, It just keeps saying "Signature Verification Failed: The signature's public key was incorrect or the messages did not match". I've tried different diff. settings but it refuses to accept my signed messages. It was working fine for a while as I've successfully changed it a few times. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Not sure what may be going on. Are you using the Peercoin Qt client to sign? I just tested it with that and it worked. Make sure you do not leave any spaces (or non-printable charaters) before or after the signature. The web control panel currently does not strip them off. Yes I'm using Peerunity v0.1.1 (QT 4.8.5) which I have used previously to sign messages using your control panel. I've checked the message to make sure that it doesn't contain spaces and it still returns an error. I'll have a closer look at that cleint. Could you give me an aproximation of when it stop working? I have a feeling I know what it is, but it also makes no sense if I am right.  |
|
|
|
Hi Tuaris, I'm having a problem with changing the difficulty on the control panel, It just keeps saying "Signature Verification Failed: The signature's public key was incorrect or the messages did not match". I've tried different diff. settings but it refuses to accept my signed messages. It was working fine for a while as I've successfully changed it a few times. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Not sure what may be going on. Are you using the Peercoin Qt client to sign? I just tested it with that and it worked. Make sure you do not leave any spaces (or non-printable charaters) before or after the signature. The web control panel currently does not strip them off. |
|
|
|
|
If it wasn't for Bitcoin being so high, I'd be loading up on ZET as well.
|
|
|
|
Can someone setup a block explorer for this? I want to see whether or not this has been spent This is the genesis transaction as stated per the original announcement: A transaction was added to the Genesis block for 1% of the total coins and is to be used for promotion, bounties and giveaways. Array
(
[txid] => 2bc1659f7c5cfbbe97b3212bb074ed736d4b52d5b86ba370e77f0ae83754062e
[version] => 1
[locktime] => 0
[vin] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[coinbase] => 04ffff001d01044c4f4170706c652072656d6f76657320426c6f636b636861696e2c206c61737420426974636f696e2077616c6c6574206170702c2066726f6d20694f53204170702053746f726520287063776f726c6429
[sequence] => 4294967295
)
)
[vout] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[value] => 929558
[n] => 0
[scriptPubKey] => Array
(
[asm] => 04080f32a008abb49cc93fb6d23514954e78081a72f26e96163c5218a41888ff21f41ca190603168f00d6d3ed72a4cf7d9f395a82bf2f7c2a5cf60357921a4648c OP_CHECKSIG
[hex] => 4104080f32a008abb49cc93fb6d23514954e78081a72f26e96163c5218a41888ff21f41ca190603168f00d6d3ed72a4cf7d9f395a82bf2f7c2a5cf60357921a4648cac
[reqSigs] => 1
[type] => pubkey
[addresses] => Array
(
[0] => STmuwNdtx6QuWymrXCYLrjJM4pZ7LaYdKw
)
)
)
)
)
|
|
|
|
I am fairly sure this pool is a FRAUD.
I have been mining the litecoin pool and it is saying that I am getting a bunch of blocks which is obviously not true for litecoin with 5 Mh/s
So what is happening? The pool operator is using my hashpower to mine a lower difficulty coin and keeping all of it for himself.
Prove me wrong.
Please do not jump to conclusions and make an accusation like this without some due diligence. It's comes off as being unprofessional. Please review your miner's settings and confirm the following: What is the command line you are using? Litecoin is on port 3339 URL is sratum+tcp://litecoin.securepayment.cc What is the Litecoin address you are using? I can search the database and veryfy that you are indeed on the correct or incorrect stratum port. Do you have backup pools setup? Perhaps your mining client is falling back to an alternate pool and finding blocks there. What is the message you are receiving? It's normal for a mining client to display "Stratum from pool 0 detected new block". Which means a new block was detected in the network, not necessarily mined by you. |
|
|
|
|
I will buy SUNCoins, PM if interested:
1000 SUN = 1 ZET
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
