Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 12:31:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 »
81  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] Interest in a Thoroughbred Racehorse on: May 25, 2012, 10:54:04 AM
Do horses always keep the name they start out with in US racing ?

Maybe this is stupid and soppy but I would like to make a payment (5% or so of what I had invested) towards some form of treat for her for the effort she did put in during training etc ...

I've no idea whether something like these are recommended http://www.thesaddleryshop.co.uk/P/Super_Tasty_Crunchies-(2842).aspx, I'll leave you to decide what's most suitable for her.

Please confirm your GLBSE username and I will make the BTC transfer through that.

Your efforts are much appreciated and thanks for bringing something new and different to GLBSE.

I hope we can try again with a different horse at a later date or maybe even a selection of horses to spread some of the risk around.

As a sign of my faith and confidence I pledge 250% of my original investment to any new horse(s) you choose.

Thanks for the gesture. However, she may be gone already as JE2 was looking for someone to take her last night after the races, rather than have us pay to ship her back.
82  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] RAREEARTH Asset on: May 25, 2012, 10:52:42 AM
Once you are verified on GLBSE I will begin investing.
I want some exposure to rare earth elements, however, I am not willing to invest anything in an asset which is completely unverified.
The amount I will invest depends on the risk which depends completely on how many of the verification steps you complete.

When do you expect to have completed one of the verification steps and when do you expect to have completed them all ?
83  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] Interest in a Thoroughbred Racehorse on: May 25, 2012, 10:13:43 AM
Maybe this is stupid and soppy but I would like to make a payment (5% or so of what I had invested) towards some form of treat for her for the effort she did put in during training etc ...

I've no idea whether something like these are recommended http://www.thesaddleryshop.co.uk/P/Super_Tasty_Crunchies-(2842).aspx, I'll leave you to decide what's most suitable for her.

Please confirm your GLBSE username and I will make the BTC transfer through that.

Your efforts are much appreciated and thanks for bringing something new and different to GLBSE.

I hope we can try again with a different horse at a later date or maybe even a selection of horses to spread some of the risk around.

As a sign of my faith and confidence I pledge 250% of my original investment to any new horse(s) you choose.
84  Economy / Securities / Re: [POTENTIAL] Real-Estate investment group? on: May 24, 2012, 07:52:08 PM
That sounds like a good plan.

Would also assist in building up trust and confidence while at the same time exposing investors to the type of assets such a fund would eventually take on.

My understanding is that most REITs pay quarterly dividends. Are there any that pay more frequently or should we start to encourage GLBSE investors to be a little longer term in their investing ?

A simple way to get started is to collect BTC at GLBSE, and invest into a pre-existing Real Estate Investment Trust, then distribute the dividends back through GLBSE. If that grows big enough, you can grow into buying and managing actual properties.
85  Economy / Securities / Re: [POTENTIAL] Real-Estate investment group? on: May 20, 2012, 10:26:42 AM
I really like this idea.

Maybe have a percentage of the properties where tenants pay rent in BTC if the idea proves less palatable for other investors.

How about renting the properties for bitcoins ?
We're going to get there eventually so might as well start the process.
The initial purchase will be done in Fiat probably but income could be in bitcoins later.

This group could also buy properties and farmland in exotic places around the world and its shareholders can time share.
And outsiders would need to pay in Bitcoins to rent the place or something.

I think it is a great diversification strategy.

My dear parents will be selling an appartment in a small modest Swiss mountain village in less than 12 months Smiley


86  Economy / Securities / Re: [POTENTIAL] Real-Estate investment group? on: May 17, 2012, 02:36:32 PM
Nothing is stopping you from investing in 1000btc and hoarding them too.

Think about such a fund if you would like to own a small piece of many properties, while starving corrupt Banksters of as much of your wealth as possible.
87  Economy / Securities / Re: [POTENTIAL] Real-Estate investment group? on: May 17, 2012, 12:30:09 PM
Of course. Stupid me. I hadn't considered indicating subscription like that but makes excellent sense.

subscribing, i want to get notified when the thread updates.


88  Economy / Securities / Re: [POTENTIAL] Real-Estate investment group? on: May 17, 2012, 12:22:20 PM
What does this mean?

Seen it a few times now.

sub
89  Economy / Securities / Re: [POTENTIAL] Real-Estate investment group? on: May 17, 2012, 12:12:43 PM
I would be interested subject to the same and only with the conversion option detailed in post earlier.

More details would be needed but I think its an interesting proposition.
90  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] [ANNOUNCE] BMF - Bitcoin Miner Fund on: May 16, 2012, 09:53:18 AM
A 50,000 BTC fund is small ?

Fair enough. What experience and credentials as a fund manager do you have ?

How long have you been involved with bitcoin and using GLBSE ?

Trust isn't such an issue as before, as I assume you will be fully verifying with GLBSE ?

What monthly dedicated time commitment will you be making ? Please state hours.

I may be willing to provide access to trading tools which could improve your performance as a fund manager but let's get the basic questions out the way first.

This is the sort of fund I am looking for.
91  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] Interest in a Thoroughbred Racehorse on: May 15, 2012, 11:47:37 PM
Warning griefer detected.
92  Economy / Securities / Re: GLBSE better, harder, stronger, faster, cheaper now with MAKER/TAKER on: May 11, 2012, 02:13:58 PM
Hide by default but provide an ability to include them if the user chooses.

request for some way to strip out the silly bids/asks from the charts, like the 2,000 bonds issued PPT series have 10,000 quantity bid @ 0.00000001 which just messes up the chart & makes the relevant part of the information to be not discernible, like just chart from 0.5 to 1.5 say - apart from this I like the new look & features, thanks!

https://glbse.com/asset/view/PPT.B

completely agree. I was wondering how to solve that problem myself. those silly bids are on a multitude of the assets. Id say the best method would be to hid anything more the 50%(?) off the average stock price.
93  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Detailed Calculator on: February 19, 2012, 04:40:11 PM
BUMP

I have update the URL I am using for the current difficulty and the way the JSON for exchange rate is parsed - suitable values should now be provided by default.

Unfortunately, the replacement provided by blockchain.info for the blockexplorer q API has no nethash method so the functionality utilising that has been discontinued for the time being. If someone knows of a suitable replacement for that URL, let me know and I will add it back.
94  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] LIF.A, LIF.B, LIF.CX, and LIF.M on: February 01, 2012, 08:42:39 AM
Well I for one sold my LIF.A shares to Peter at what he led us to believe was the best price we could hope for. If there are any remaining LIF.A assets, I will be seeking my share of their realised value.

What a fucking mess.

PETER - Your management fees were for professionally operating and winding up these funds. Do your fucking job, rather than expecting others to clear up your mess.



Shareholders could appoint a liquidator(who could I would give power to do the above). But as was mentioned, there doesn't seem to be anything there of any worth. Has anyone calculated the current value of the remaining portfolio?

Nefario

There is 60 BTC of bonds there that are not yet redeemable, if they aren't a scam that is. 

What I was about to say before my computer froze up on me. I emailed the issuer back when they listed because I wanted more info before I invested. I never got a response, so I wasn't confident enough to buy. The February bonds mature on Feb 8, so we'll know soon.

The other issue for a liquidator is knowing which stock belongs to which fund. It looks like Peter was running all the funds out of the one account, so without financial statements we don't know what belongs where.

LIF.B was defunct before all this and the holdings do not apply to LIF.M or LIF.CX so, they are all LIF.A I would imagine.
95  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Ubitex: In-person Bitcoin exchange [STOCK AVAILABLE: 857 SHARES] on: January 25, 2012, 10:50:11 AM
To be blunt Nefario ... a far greater than reasonable number of companies listed on GLBSE have gone belly up with the CEO vanishing with all the invested money. That is of the ones that looked reasonable to begin with and discounts those that were obviously scams from the beginning.

The "poster child" LIF shares were the final straw for many existing or potential investors.

UBX was lauded as a "poster child" too and has ended equally badly.

Early adopters have collectively lost massive amounts. They would be your best form of advertising.

Frankly, the success rate needs to be better than those listed on the mainstream fiat currency stock exchanges, to offset the inherent risk that the Bitcoin currency itself has. I am starting to wonder if that is ever going to be possible, as I don't think the implied ROI can be achieved long term by any business.


DO NOT BUY UBITEX SHARES!

The evaluation for the business is crazy! there is no earnings for the company yet and it doesn't even exists! its just an idea.

This is a text book example in investment what product not to buy the only way you can win is to be the one to pop the bubble (then everything goes downhill).

hmmm

On these forums people say that sort of thing about almost every share. Intersango's bank was having technical issues and they couldn't make bank payouts and people were crying scam from the rooftops.
96  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] LIF.A, LIF.B, LIF.CX, and LIF.M on: January 24, 2012, 04:16:05 PM
No, it is not stupid. However, what is stupid is commenting on the actions of other people without bothering to read the previous posts ...

I put a sell order up at the price I am willing to accept, notified Peter via this thread and Peter has not yet filled it.

I noted earlier that requesting payments be sent to an address was less than ideal, however, it appears someone, possibly Peter, sent the requested payment to the address specified by another investor. Given the lack of communication with Peter, I am certainly willing to try the same.

Requesting bitcoins in this manner is stupid. You all should make sell orders on glbse, proving you own the appropriate number of shares.
97  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] LIF.A, LIF.B, LIF.CX, and LIF.M on: January 24, 2012, 01:43:12 PM
Fair enough.

@Peter - My silence will cost 5 BTCs. Please send to this address 13Wu7W7jmjQot7xnqogHYSmUmR1MzyB3YE
98  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Ubitex: In-person Bitcoin exchange [EARLY BETA!] [STOCK AVAILABLE] on: January 22, 2012, 06:15:07 PM
I really disagree with that position.

Following on from that, will GLBSE be introducing a minimum age for asset issuers ? If so, what age verification will GLBSE be performing ?

I am all for youth opportunity but you shouldn't be able to "just lose interest" when other people have invested their hard earned money.

Further, this company has a significant cash reserve. What steps will GLBSE be taking to ensure investors get back the most they can of their money ?

A robust reaction by GLBSE to this behaviour is required.

I don't think he was a scammer, just lost interest. people need to remember that he was a 14 year old.
99  Economy / Securities / Re: [GLBSE] LIF.A, LIF.B, LIF.CX, and LIF.M on: January 22, 2012, 05:02:54 PM
I don't think there should be any further dealing outside of GLBSE.

Actions have been significantly lacking in transparency as it is. The independent records of share transactions provided by GLBSE are very necessary going forward.

With the information that Peter has come forward with thus far and his behaviours to date, I am not accepting anything less than 0.25 BTC / share.

My ask offer is up as 20 at 0.25 BTC - I expect Peter to honour it.


I have 187 LIF.CX,  49 LIF, 246 LIF.A, Yes, I got burned, I need 100 BTC back out of this Peter, my orders are up or you can send here:  1NHoQh5z9xULBFpF8N23Mu3gxZv5ZxPjSo

I bought a bunch of this stuff too during the past couple weeks before the "announcment" as I thought LIF was in a temporary lull and would bounce back, due to Peter's good reputation, that he had a baby and was probably busy, the fact that it was Christmas time and he probably wanted to be with his family, the fact that he closed LIF.B to "focus" on his other funds.  In other words, the benefit of the doubt. 


100  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Internet Archive (Home of the Wayback Machine) Accepting Bitcoin Donations! on: January 22, 2012, 03:05:04 PM
Thanks for the heads up Obsi. I will donate once I've got some spare BTCs. Cheers.

Thanks to comments left on this blog post

http://blog.archive.org/2011/12/07/please-donate-to-the-internet-archive/

They have set up a donation address. The address I received in an email from june (at) archive.org is

17gN64BPHtxi4mEM3qWrxdwhieUvRq8R2r


I will email her to update the post with the bitcoin donation address, or you can check with her for verification.

Let's show them how much we appreciate all the great work they do & that accepting bitcoin is a fantastic way to supplement their fundraising.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!