Hi All,
for those who have the 100% Fan Speed Problem with RX400 Cards, this is a bug in the Driver and it was solved until
Driver Version 16.11.4/.5
https://community.amd.com/thread/203282
Hashrate with Driver v16.11.5 is the same, I  have test it. But the Problem with 100% fan Speed dissapeared ..

Same problem on rx 480 nitro
I changed to 9.5 , less speed but safe.

Here we go... the profitability of XMR in trash

I am geting some odd issues on my AMD 470 mining rigs. Like Fans going on 100% randomly until rig freezes or sometimes it will shutdown it self?
Drivers 16.9.2 and 9.6 miner.
I have tryed to lower voltage to 0 and it don't help also i have lower all the clocks 1100/1750 -0mv same thing happens.

By the way my 380 and 390 mining rigs work like a charm on old risers.

Do you know an other pool with a lower minimum ?

No ETA, sorry. I will do it as soon as I can, but firstly I need to update dual miner. Also don't forget about holidays

maybe you have a to high oc ? did you try it with stock ?

Can't you share your set up? I used stock set up, only got 640~ ea

Would someone be so kind as to post recommended optimal "-h" settings for RX470 4GB GPUs?  I am running a 5-GPU (not bios modded yet) rig of them with "-a 2".  Default -h setting of 1024 gets me about 2860 total hash-rate (~570 per GPU).  However, when I tried increasing that to 1280 last night, it actually resulted in a lower hash-rate of about 2500.  Is there a sweet spot for these cards?  I also have 1 8GB 470 on this rig. should I specify a higher -h value for it vs the 4GB cards?

Also, I think it was Wolf that mentioned 470's are capable of close to 800 H/s on Monero.  Would you mind sharing how you were able to achieve this?  On my other rig with 4x470 4GB (bios strap-1500 modded), I am able to get 690 H/s per card with under-volting, and core/clock settings of 1150/1950.  These cards cannot really be pushed past 2000 so there must be something else to do to get that extra ~100 per card.  Maybe it's the question I asked above about -h value?  If so, would the recommended -h value for strap-modded GPUs be any different that un-modded ones?

I just set up my RX 480 8GB but I'm getting just 620H/s mining Monero. The temperatures also seem to be lower than full load. Full load would be around 75-80 degrees Celsius but right now they are around 68-70.

The Zcash miner works as it should, getting 225-230H/s, card gets in full load. Any clues what it might be? I did set the gpu allocation percent to 100 so I really can't tell what it is. 

I don't dislike Dwarfpool, I have used them extensively for ETH, but I was chiming in on the "categorically" post.  Your comment about "logic" is insulting and implies that you believe that larger is better in regards to choosing a pool.  As any miner should know, diversification of pools is critical for the health of any cryptocurrency and your post actually reveals a lot more about your lack of logic.

Dwarfpool.

I will update this miner as soon as I can. But firstly I need to update ZEC and dual miners, so it will take several days.

Клей,те чё бабла мало с нас рубить? А не можешь rx470 себе позволить купить?Какого хера на твоём майнере 9.6 на 470-ых картах слетают настройки кулеров видюх на 100%,майнерописец хренов.За что тебе бабло народ отслюнявливает? Давай исправляй немедленно...

yup exactly!  newmz got quite lucky that his old cards were good for mining ZEC, now he wants those of us with newer cards to effectively be punished by Claymore not updating this miner?  Man, talk about sour grapes lol.  But all is not lost newmz... you can keep on mining ZEC until it falls to $5 if it makes you happy to see those blazing hashrates lol.
Listen your RX 480 won't hash at like 2000 H/s with XMR. Its pretty much very similar in speeds to a 280x - 290. Only difference is that it uses much less power.

If you don't believe me compare gaming benchmarks with a RX 480 and a R9 290 and see what results you get.

Just because your GPU is newer doesn't mean its faster, its the same speed just uses less power. No idea why so many noobs don't understand that. They keep complaining on the ZEC Claymore thread almost everyday.

NEWER DOESN'T ALWAYS MEAN FASTER!

hello lads, i am getting  2038 H on 3x RX 480 8GB on 1250/2000. is it ok? in the same time i am getting Error in server response......"low difficulty share" failure msg coming al lthe time. any1 an idea?

my bat

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u poloadress.paymentID.1 -p x -a 4 -h 1024


am i doing smth wrong?

And you were exactly one of them. You used your old cards to mine ZEC, and know you dont want other people enjoy full speed XMR?

At 750 h/s on an RX480, unless i'm mistaken, we're already at the top end of what is achievable while being stable.

i cant see anything in image

I'm pretty sure that Claymore can re-write code to support 4xx cards using approach for CDM and ZEC miners.

And we can mine up to 1000H/s per RX 480