scavern
|
|
December 16, 2016, 03:57:48 PM |
|
Anyone using the linux version?
|
|
|
|
MatBott
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2016, 05:57:33 PM |
|
I keep reading rx480 GPUs can give up to 730 H/s but so far I've only ben able to squeeze 640 H/s on a Sapphire Nitro RX 480 8GB.
Anyone know how to acieve this? Any specific mod or config for the -a and -h value?
4x Asus RX480 8GB Stock BIOS Core clock - 1250 Mem clock - 2200 -a 4 and -h 1024 Results: 710 - 730 H/s https://i.imgsafe.org/42a6cad69c.jpg
|
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
|
December 16, 2016, 06:31:29 PM |
|
I'm pretty sure that Claymore can re-write code to support 4xx cards using approach for CDM and ZEC miners.
And we can mine up to 1000H/s per RX 480
|
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
|
December 16, 2016, 06:46:29 PM |
|
I keep reading rx480 GPUs can give up to 730 H/s but so far I've only ben able to squeeze 640 H/s on a Sapphire Nitro RX 480 8GB.
Anyone know how to acieve this? Any specific mod or config for the -a and -h value?
Sapphire Radeon RX 480 Nitro+ 8G 8.0 GB OC High End 11260-07-20G computeruniverse I have 730 h/s on RX480 - 3 card 2130 h/s. I Flashed the BIOS. Timing from 1750 to 2000. http://prnt.sc/dka6ck
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
|
December 16, 2016, 06:49:37 PM |
|
I keep reading rx480 GPUs can give up to 730 H/s but so far I've only ben able to squeeze 640 H/s on a Sapphire Nitro RX 480 8GB.
Anyone know how to acieve this? Any specific mod or config for the -a and -h value?
Sapphire Radeon RX 480 Nitro+ 8G 8.0 GB OC High End 11260-07-20G computeruniverse I have 730 h/s on RX480 - 3 card 2130 h/s. I Flashed the BIOS. Timing from 1750 to 2000. http://cs1.imwox.com/l/8b/29/8b290bf3b1b039227841d89f5f145a80.pngi cant see anything in image
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
anatolikostis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005
|
|
December 16, 2016, 06:55:30 PM |
|
EDIT hd7970 /// kminer /// @1000c/1500m /// custom vrom /// 620.9h/s
This is my result
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
|
December 16, 2016, 06:56:43 PM |
|
i cant see anything in image
threw again I'm pretty sure that Claymore can re-write code to support 4xx cards using approach for CDM and ZEC miners.
And we can mine up to 1000H/s per RX 480
I agree. Waiting for it for 16 crimson!
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
Hotmetal
|
|
December 16, 2016, 08:03:49 PM |
|
I'm pretty sure that Claymore can re-write code to support 4xx cards using approach for CDM and ZEC miners. And we can mine up to 1000H/s per RX 480
At 750 h/s on an RX480, unless i'm mistaken, we're already at the top end of what is achievable while being stable.
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
|
December 16, 2016, 08:33:53 PM |
|
I'm pretty sure that Claymore can re-write code to support 4xx cards using approach for CDM and ZEC miners. And we can mine up to 1000H/s per RX 480
At 750 h/s on an RX480, unless i'm mistaken, we're already at the top end of what is achievable while being stable. unfortunately while((
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
un4given
|
|
December 16, 2016, 08:41:26 PM |
|
hello lads, i am getting 2038 H on 3x RX 480 8GB on 1250/2000. is it ok? in the same time i am getting Error in server response......"low difficulty share" failure msg coming al lthe time. any1 an idea?
my bat
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u poloadress.paymentID.1 -p x -a 4 -h 1024
am i doing smth wrong?
|
|
|
|
chumurk
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
December 16, 2016, 08:50:57 PM |
|
Hello everybody. Prompt gives this error. Purse with Exchange is the problem? Cards available: 1 GPU #0: name: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 32 units Total cards: 1
Catalyst 15.x is REQUIRED for best performance and compatibility At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests Initializing...
GPU #0: HashCnt = 1024 POOL version GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected 3 pools specified. Remote monitoring is enabled on port 3333 Press "m" key for tune mode. Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - Connected Stratum - Connected Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"exchangeaddressvalidonlywithpayment-id"}} DevFee: Pool Diff 10000 Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec... Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - Connected Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"exchangeaddressvalidonlywithpayment-id"}} Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec... Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - Connected Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"exchangeaddressvalidonlywithpayment-id"}} Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
|
|
|
|
shadabahmed
|
|
December 16, 2016, 08:55:30 PM |
|
Hello everybody. Prompt gives this error. Purse with Exchange is the problem? Cards available: 1 GPU #0: name: Tonga, 4096 MB available, 32 units Total cards: 1
Catalyst 15.x is REQUIRED for best performance and compatibility At least 16 GB of Virtual Memory is required for multi-GPU systems Make sure you defined GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests Initializing...
GPU #0: HashCnt = 1024 POOL version GPU #0: -a 4 mode selected 3 pools specified. Remote monitoring is enabled on port 3333 Press "m" key for tune mode. Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - Connected Stratum - Connected Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"exchangeaddressvalidonlywithpayment-id"}} DevFee: Pool Diff 10000 Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec... Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - Connected Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"exchangeaddressvalidonlywithpayment-id"}} Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec... Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <192.95.39.128> port 8050 Stratum - Connected Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"exchangeaddressvalidonlywithpayment-id"}} Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
this error is because u r mining with xhchange wallet address if u mining with xchange address than u have to put walltet address+payment id example NsGpuCNMiner -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u AAAA.BBBB-p x aaaa= address bbbb= payment id
|
Am I spamming? Report me!
|
|
|
newmz
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 372
Merit: 250
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom
|
|
December 16, 2016, 09:15:54 PM |
|
Personally I hope Claymore leaves this miner just the way it is. The massive influx of RX card miners pretty much destroyed ETH and ZEC mining because so many RX noobs joined in with their gaming/mining rigs and drove difficulty way up (in the case of ETH) and drove the price crashing down (in the case of ZEC) by all the massive dumping on exchanges.
I'm really glad to have something to keep mining with my 290s, 290Xs and 390s.
So Mr. Claymore - please don't try too hard to make it easier for RX card miners, you will just flood the XMR network too! This is the last one left really. If you want to raise the dev fee a bit to leave it alone - I will personally be glad to pay it!
|
Crypto currency enthusiast and miner since 2015. Mined approx 200 ETH during 2016 and 2017 and sold it at approximately $US40 each. Then I watched it reach $1000+ each. If anyone bothers to read this stuff pay attention to this: HODL HODL HODL HODL HODL HODL
I started mining with 1 AMD 7950 and 1 R9-280X. Then I gradually built my AMD operation into 12 R9-290s. Awesome ETH hash but ridiculous power consumption and heat. Over the last year I defected to the Nvidia team. I now use GTX 1070s. They were expensive to buy (probably a bargain now) but awesome hash rate vs. power consumption. blah blah blah blah
|
|
|
ps_jb
|
|
December 16, 2016, 09:32:53 PM |
|
because so many RX noobs joined
And you were exactly one of them. You used your old cards to mine ZEC, and know you dont want other people enjoy full speed XMR?
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
|
December 16, 2016, 09:34:26 PM |
|
hello lads, i am getting 2038 H on 3x RX 480 8GB on 1250/2000. is it ok? in the same time i am getting Error in server response......"low difficulty share" failure msg coming al lthe time. any1 an idea?
my bat
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8050 -u poloadress.paymentID.1 -p x -a 4 -h 1024
am i doing smth wrong?
not normal. I have error on start memory clock more than 2,100. In this case, the GPU 1300 MHZ. I Maini on MinerGate because so many RX noobs joined
And you were exactly one of them. You used your old cards to mine ZEC, and know you dont want other people enjoy full speed XMR?
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
|
December 16, 2016, 09:44:08 PM |
|
because so many RX noobs joined
And you were exactly one of them. You used your old cards to mine ZEC, and know you dont want other people enjoy full speed XMR? yup exactly! newmz got quite lucky that his old cards were good for mining ZEC, now he wants those of us with newer cards to effectively be punished by Claymore not updating this miner? Man, talk about sour grapes lol. But all is not lost newmz... you can keep on mining ZEC until it falls to $5 if it makes you happy to see those blazing hashrates lol.
|
|
|
|
CoM1ner
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
December 17, 2016, 12:03:14 AM Last edit: December 17, 2016, 12:16:34 AM by CoM1ner |
|
I anyone having problems with this miner on a PC that is used for basic browsing? The miner is a bit outdated so I understand it won't be perfect for the 480's. My PC is running: 6700K CPU (5% Usage) 16GB of RAM (30% Usage) 2x MSI 480 on Dwarfpool (100% Usage, Stock Cards) The problem is, every once in a while, the hashate of both of my cards will drop from 700 to 500 and stay there. I have to restart my miner a couple of times and it will jump back to 700. I also have issues randomly with errors: 17:15:28:359 20e8 Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-usa.dwarfpool.com' <_DWARFPOOL CANADA ADDRESS_> port 8005 17:15:28:422 20e8 Stratum - Connected 17:15:28:500 20e8 got 303 bytes 17:15:28:500 20e8 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"_XXX_","job":{"blob":"_XXX_","target":"_XXX_"},"status":"OK"}} 17:15:28:500 20e8 parse packet: 303 17:15:28:500 20e8 new buf size: 0 17:15:28:500 20e8 Pool Diff 10000 17:15:28:500 20e8 df has same pool, skip 17:15:28:578 20d8 Job changed, drop current round 17:15:28:578 20d8 Round ^^ REPEATED A COUPLE MORE TIME ^^ 17:15:28:906 20e4 Round 17:15:30:047 20d8 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1416 ms, hashrate = 723 h/s 17:15:30:063 20d8 Round 17:15:30:297 20e4 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1342 ms, hashrate = 763 h/s 17:15:30:313 20e4 Round ^^ REPEATED A COUPLE MORE TIME ^^ 17:15:33:047 20e4 round found 1 shares 17:15:33:047 20e4 Round 17:15:33:063 20e8 12/16/16-17:15:33 - SHARE FOUND (target 10000) - (GPU 1 of 2) 17:15:33:172 20e8 got 78 bytes 17:15:33:172 20e8 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Low difficulty share"}} 17:15:33:172 20e8 parse packet: 76 17:15:33:172 20e8 Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}} 17:15:33:172 20e8 buf was cleared ^^ REPEATS FROM ABOVE ^^
Oh yeah, I also discovered that f.lux causes issues at times with the PC with the miner running. I assume it has to do with too much GPU usage from Claymore's miner (Expected when running at 100% utilization). My mouse would freeze up for a half second every couple of seconds. Just a note for anyone running f.lux with their PC. EDIT:
I had taken f.lux out of the equation fairly recently so my guess may be that f.lux might have caused the issues. I will try without f.lux for a bit and see if that sorts the problem. Will leave my post up in case someone else runs into the same problem and stumbles upon it for future reference. Took me about a week to realize it
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
December 17, 2016, 03:07:13 AM |
|
because so many RX noobs joined
And you were exactly one of them. You used your old cards to mine ZEC, and know you dont want other people enjoy full speed XMR? yup exactly! newmz got quite lucky that his old cards were good for mining ZEC, now he wants those of us with newer cards to effectively be punished by Claymore not updating this miner? Man, talk about sour grapes lol. But all is not lost newmz... you can keep on mining ZEC until it falls to $5 if it makes you happy to see those blazing hashrates lol. Listen your RX 480 won't hash at like 2000 H/s with XMR. Its pretty much very similar in speeds to a 280x - 290. Only difference is that it uses much less power. If you don't believe me compare gaming benchmarks with a RX 480 and a R9 290 and see what results you get. Just because your GPU is newer doesn't mean its faster, its the same speed just uses less power. No idea why so many noobs don't understand that. They keep complaining on the ZEC Claymore thread almost everyday. NEWER DOESN'T ALWAYS MEAN FASTER!
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
December 17, 2016, 05:15:52 AM |
|
because so many RX noobs joined
And you were exactly one of them. You used your old cards to mine ZEC, and know you dont want other people enjoy full speed XMR? The RX 480 has FEWER cores than the R9 290, though it runs them at a somewhat faster clock rate. It has quite a bit LESS memory bandwidth, which for XMR is CRITICAL as XMR is a memory-hardened coin (more so than ZEC, more comparable to ETH). Specifically 256 bit wide 8000 Mhz for most of the 8GB RX 480 vs 512 bit wide 6000 Mhz for most R9 290 cards, so 2/3d of the memory bandwidth. Compared to the R9 280x, it is the SAME number of cores at a somewhat higher clock rate. It STILL has less memory bandwidth (though it's CLOSE here for most of the 8GB cards, 256 bit wide 8000 Mhz vs 384 bit wide 6000 Mhz for most R9 280x so only 8/9th of the bandwidth). Even the REFERENCE R9 280x at 5000 Mhz has almost identical memory bandwidth to the RX 480 8GB cards. The RX 480 is NOT going to achieve 1000 h/s on XMR (barring nitrogen cooling for INSANE overclocking). In FACT, I suspect the current XMR miners are already optimised about as well as they can be for the RX series. Be happy with your major hash/watt improvement over the older cards, they're ALREADY MINING "full speed XMR". I have no horse in this game on the AMD side, the only thing I have working on XMR at this point is a pair of GTX 750 Ti cards.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
|