The Nobel foundation keeps the nominee's list in secret, which is why there is no such thing as a "official" nobel prize nominee. Also, almost anyone with a high academic status can nominate someone else for a nobel prize. Bullshit-Marketing tactics only hurt your cause.

Also: about peer reviewed papers - make sure you check who it was that reviewed the paper and where it was published. I could send in a paper which states human shit cures cancer to an "institute" in India and get it published in some BS "science journal" with 50 peer reviews from some indian scientists nobody has ever heard of and probably don't even exist or who do exist and only care about making money.

I would only have to pay a few thousand dollars.

Nope. I'm just curious how people now are behaving like Nazis. I have met some real Nazis, both in the US atomic bomb programs and from the ex-Vichy regime.

They were quite unlike people who wish to vaccinate people these days, you might call them.... chilling, if you had met them.

Let's assume for a moment this granny is a credible source: that would mean they recognize Bitcoin's incredible potential!

...  supposed to prevent the collapse of the health care system .....

Again thanks for your input vapourminer perhaps an evening smoke would be beneficial for them rather than outright abstinence. Sleep is important for them as a poor nights sleep results in worsening dementia symptoms the following day.

[weed]

That is extremely interesting about the sleep part, I asked the question as a good friend has early stages of dementia at a young age, they have given up getting stoned hoping it will help, but like you have irregular sleep, waking up after just 4 hours sleep plus having vivid dreams or nightmares.
Perhaps having a smoke or cookie in the evening might help them sleep better.

That's bullshit.

bitcoin is open to everyone and anyone, even though there might be some traits of conviction and bucking the trends that relate to some of the early adopters who also understand bitcoin sufficiently enough (or are willing to take some chances on it) to both invest into it and to HODL through the negative periods.

It's almost too difficult to attempt to generalize too much about who are what bitcoiners are even though there are various types that have historically existed an there are certain types that might either go through a shitcoin journey before coming over to bitcoin and their experiences and views of shitcoiners might help to define what kind of bitcoiner they are.  Oh yeah, and there are some bitcoiners who are active in forums like this and some bitcoiners who are not.. so youcannot even necessarily judge what a bitcoiner is merely based on the postings of the more actively interactive of bitcoiners even if you might be able to suggest that "an active bitcoiner is like x, y and z" but sometimes even an active bitcoiner might not be telling you about himself/herself even if s/he is posting ideas about bitcoin as a topic.

Oh, as I was typing, I realized that there was another kind of bitcoiner too.. There are some bitcoiners who have been into bitcoin for a decently long period of time and they hardly know shit about bitcoin and whether or not they can provide good reasons for why they are in bitcoin can vary quite a bit too...We are still very new to the bitcoin space, and surely with the passage of time more and more members of the public will come into bitcoin, and largely who is in bitcoin will just become something similar to asserting who is into the dollar.. nearly a meaningless framework - even if now there are some ways to attempt to contrast who's into bitcoin and not and even the fact that those of us into bitcoin are still quite early adopters and those who are coming into bitcoin are early adopters too and some of them recognize that dynamic and others are less clear about the whole matter - nothing wrong with not being very clear about something that is relatively  new in terms of its age and unclear in terms of what some of its future impacts are going to likely be.

This is someone making excuses for being a no-coiner and trying to dissuade others from getting into Bitcoin by suggesting it requires special skills and knowledge of how it works.
Austrian School of Economics (insert laugh or snigger here)....
This Early - I've been in since $67

I'm a farmer for fucks sake.

Special skills - rearing livestock, growing crops, shooting a 3" group at 500 yds.

Simply buy at any price whenever you have spare fiat, and hodl.

Does getting stoned help or hinder your existing memory problem?

Ice hash from fine sieve bags.

I don't use tobacco either just a simple pipe.

I'm just not used to it everyday, like some of you guys.

Tried the butane method through a perfume extractor, but lots of problems, obtaining odorless butane, safety and so on.

LOL
Get a grip, man  
Sorry, I didn't mark my comment (the one you quoted) as irony:
It's all in the thread I linked you to.

Perhaps something lost in translation, even though your English language skills are excellent, but

The vast majority on WO shun regulatory organizations, they cause most of the shit that happens to self reliant, independent people in the world by attempting to remove that self - reliance.

How about working towards being your own boss, that's the best boss you can have.

word!
I think he was thinking the hats are like official badges or something like that.

@naim027:
Really, they're just hats. Hats are cool. And they are a lot more cool if xhomerx10 designed them. WO regulars tend to like his hat designs... As well as observing bitcoin price charts, playing "where-am-i" occasionally, creating haiku's (traditionally on sundays), bashing shitcoiners, beggars and scammers.

our hats are awesome

Excellent skills, plus you have Bitcoin unlike the smartass no coiner in question.

It was a wet day yesterday and I stayed in and smoked some of my home pressed hash.

As an infrequent smoker I wish I had your special skill in this department as I was fucked for the rest of the day.

braggart 

i am a burnout

special skills - shitposting, smoking weed, plinking

anyone else?

I'm a farmer for fucks sake.

Special skills - rearing livestock, growing crops, shooting a 3" group at 500 yds.

Oh, he's asking about the WO cult of hats...

Much activity ahead of options expiry date tomorrow.

Bears happy at $58k,

Of course, you gotta ask MNbag about making such a seemingly stupid-ass and irresponsible dispensation of smerits to such a dweeb called billynocoiner.

I already posted and criticized MNbag for exercising such bad judgement to have had merited billynocoiner with that quantity of merits.. but whatever, no need to have merit envy naim027... just focus on working on the quality of your own posts rather than being concerned about the merits that others are receiving.. For sure, there are subjective components involved in the merit system that allows nearly unlimited discretion to members regarding how to spend their smerits (once they earn them).. Of course, merit source members have more limitations involving being restricted from behavior that amounts to selling of their smerits, but still even merit source members have quite a bit of smerit spending discretion, so it does not seem be psychologically healthy to be questioning whether others deserve as many merits as they had been receiving. .even though sure, you are likely correct that billynocoiner did not deserve any kind of merits and there seems to be some weirdness in why any kind of genuine member would have reasonably concluded that billynocoiner deserves any merits.. let alone 20 for one post.. and put that on MNbag for contributing to that seeming nonsense.. Let's move on..

By the way, you are misquoting me too naim027.. Your quote seems to attribute me with a point that HI-TEC99 made. 

This one:  >>>>>"He's not a nocoiner. He's got a few sats in the address in his profile, and he's hodling them."<<<<<

Sure, mistakes are made, but try NOT to be erroneous in your post attributions.


another good point, d_eddie.. and naim027 ONLY has 109 posts... and of course, there are a decent number of us who are disinclined to grant credibility or even benefit of the doubt when a user shows his lil selfie inclined towards the exaggeration of facts (unless there is an obvious joke attempted therein, which is not the case with what naim027 seems to had been striving to achieve with those representations).