@WhyFhy: You're not a spammer, and seem to use the forum the way it was intended. The Merit system was introduced to stop spammers and account farmers from ranking up, and I don't think it you deserve to be held back by it. I've seen your posts many times, and yet, somehow, your Merit couldn't keep up with your Activity. I've dumped 50 Merit on your posts just now, and I suggest to post a few links to your best posts here so others may be able to do the same (I've reached the maximum for 30 days).
|
|
|
Electrum gives error because amount under 1000 sats. I haven't tried, but it could be Electrum has a higher minimum than strictly required by the blockchain. You could always use something like coinb.in, but only do it if you truely understand what you're doing. Or just pay 1000 sat ($0.41) instead of 500.
|
|
|
The list is good. After thinking it over: I don't think it's correct. This address for example has never sent anything, so as far as I know, it's pubkey can't be known. And yet, it's in my list, while other addresses that have been used to send funds aren't in there. You're looking for public keys that can be used to brute-force private keys, right? I'm still not sure what the pubkey in my list belongs to.
|
|
|
maybe there is 1 error with my exadecimal private key How sure are you it's missing the last 5 characters? How was it stored: did you write it down or use digital storage? I'm always curious how people lose a part of their private key. If you know what went wrong, you might be able to find it back.
|
|
|
...Are you sure this is non-custodial? ... I'm presuming as much from the fact the URL alone is (was) enough to redeem the funds. (no passwords or other auth required). The fact that it's an URL instead of a code makes me think it needs the server to release funds. In other words: in that case it's custodial. But if each "URL" has it's own address, that might not be the case. Hence, why I was hoping someone smarter than me might take a peek at the code Sorry, I can't do that ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I would love to add the solution to my overview though!
|
|
|
I bought the ledger wallet primarily for privacy. That's a serious flaw in your plan. If you use Ledger's software, that means Ledger knows your crypto addresses, transactions and your IP address and they can sell that information. See Ledger Live Liars Data Collection. Not to mention the hacks in which they lost confidential customer data. If you want privacy, don't use a centralized wallet service.
|
|
|
Any Bitcoin wallet should be able to do this, but depending on the address type you're sending to, the dust limit might be 546 sats (if the address starts with a 1). Any other address should be able to receive 500 sat. Try Electrum for example, and set the minimum fee. Don't use an exchange for this, they have higher minimum withdrawal amounts and often high withdrawal fees. That being said: what are you trying to accomplish? Sending dust isn't very useful for the receiver, and creating dust on the blockchain isn't very useful to Bitcoin. Maybe the Bitcoin Lightning Network is a good option for your use.
|
|
|
In Bangla Sorry, I was looking for posts I can read: Ideally, some good users who's posts I can read and can bump up 50 Merit each would be great. I don't really have time to Google Translate it, and even if I do, it's hard to assess the quality (and check for plagiarism). Some good topics by Doan9269 Thanks, he can have an avatar now.
|
|
|
I don't think I've seen this before, so I'm intrigued This is all I know about weird private key formats. Your HEX string is 68 characters, if it would be 64 you could enter it into Bitaddress.org's Wallet Details tab to get the address and WIF key. Are you sure this is non-custodial? If it isn't, you can't possibly recover it without the current owner (Coinbase).
|
|
|
Well this project actually gave me an idea to hide a 12 word seed, by simply creating a Coffee table book with pictures that has all the words in the Seed in front of you, but not actually showing that it is a 12 word seed. That won't work for all words. I made a test-seed, and one of the words is "that". You can't print a picture of "that".
|
|
|
Some sensitive data has been posted on the 17th page in this thread > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231446.320. theymos has removed the things that shouldn't be posted on the forum, but with scrappers such as Ninjastic.space, the original posts can still be seen. It's better to PM requests like this. Pointing it out here makes it more likely someone sees it, or even archives the archives. Once it's gone I always post anything I've censored in my topic (for transparency). @LoyceV everything can be seen on loyce.club as well! For future reference: postIDs are much easier than topicIDs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I found 4 posts (one of them in a different topic). Did I catch all of them?
|
|
|
Recovering 5 characters HEX has only a million (1,048,576) possibilities. I would create a simple script that creates all possibilities. I think bitcoin-tool can convert all of them into addresses, then all you have to do is find the address you need. If you don't know the address, use this list to check which one is funded. This works: crunch 5 5 0123456789ABCDEF | sed s/^/18E14A7B6A307F426A94F8114701E7C8E774E7F9A47E2C2035DB29A2063/ > list
|
|
|
Thanks again for your flawless timing ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
That Instagram profile no longer exists. But even if it did, who knows if it's even true. You can claim whatever you want on this forum. From what I've seen on Bitcointalk: when someone claims not to need money because they're rich, they do so to scam you. But i am very persistent and ill make sure this casino will lose more money than i have won. You know what they say: "There is no bad publicity". If anyone can advice every single place i can report this site i would really appreciate. Have you contacted GoDaddy yet? They've registered the domain.
|
|
|
if it's possible, could you add which VPN's keep logs and which aren't. You mean VPNs that claim not to keep logs? You can't ever be sure. But don't they all claim not to keep logs? I mean, are there actually VPNs out there that admit to keep logs? What's the point of using them if they do?
|
|
|
Quoting is easier ( archived here): Also I have to confirm that we really had some page cache issues and it made some problems with payouts. It goes without saying that is was not a kind of trick from our side, it was a real technical issue. As I said before - we always pay winnings. Few more words responding to some comments here about our financial solvency. LTC Casino is a new brand but it is run by the same team like three other non-crypto casinos working since 2015 (TTR Casino, Surf Casino, DLX Casino). Owner of all those casinos including LTC is public person, well-known blogger and casino streamer Andrey "TTR" Nikolaev. You may contact him directly and ask any question, here is his Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ttrandrey and YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTTIyGuNPmRZ-Fm9lhPBOaAHe is noname in crypto community but he is well-known in gambling. You will never find any issue about unpaid winnings in his casinos. And that is one of the reasons for us to have withdrawal limits - WE PAY WINNINGS. If other casinos may keep in mind to go bankrupt, just dissapear of create fake reason to avoind paying winnings, owner of LTC Casino is public person and he is charge of fair payments. Going back to those who wrote that we are not going to pay OP's winning. Andrey "TTR" is multi-millionaire and such comment just make laughing anyone who knows him personally. This last part didn't age well. Claiming that someone is a "multi-millionaire" might sound impressive to LTC Casino, but to me it sounds like they're trying to impress someone. Apparently that's very important to them, unlike paying winnings.
|
|
|
I don't know if people see that he is part of the 1xBit scam campaign with the red tags and don't report him or what. Unfortunately, that's what I do. I've given up on reading the shitposts of many red-trusted accounts that are spamming, so I just hit Ignore on all accounts wearing the scam signature. As long as the forum allows them, and they're tagged already, it's not worth my time to read those posts. I think we could report all the garbage posters We could. But even though it's garbage, I can't in good conscience report them without reading the post. And I don't want to read them anymore, it hurts my brain.
|
|
|
Bitcoin cash bitcoin gold bitcoin SV You're forgetting BCD and eCash. Those 2 are also worth it. But, IMPORTANT: BCH, BSV and eCash don't have replay protection. Meaning: if you send one of them to an exchange without taking precautions, you may lose the other ones. See LoyceV's Bitcoin Fork claiming guide (and service). The price-information is large outdated, other information is still valid. I've never used "Excodus" so can't give you details there. From your screenshots: 50 BTC moved on January 8, 2021. 5 BTC moved on January 5, 2021. 5 BCH moved on April 18, 2022. In the same transaction, BCH and eCash moved too. That's because there is no replay protection between those chains. Depending on where you send it, you may still be able to recover them. DO NOT do the same thing to the 50 BTC ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
FWIW: Sending 50 Bitcoin to a hot wallet is crazy risky.
|
|
|
Get pubkeys out of Bitcoin block data (this was requested here). Note: this list is not meant for verbatim copy/pasting, it's my own notes of what I did (more or less). Get outputs data (currently 148 GB) wget -r blockdata.loyce.club/outputs/ Get all addresses with pubkey for day in `ls outputs/*gz`; do echo $day; gunzip -c $day | grep -v is_from_coinbase | grep -v pubkeyhash | grep pubkey | cut -f 1,2,4-11 >> output.txt; done (output.txt includes more columns than strictly needed) Get currently funded Bitcoin addresses and their balance (1 GB) wget addresses.loyce.club/blockchair_bitcoin_addresses_and_balance_LATEST.tsv.gz Get all unique addresses that are in both lists comm -12 <(cat output.txt | cut -f6 | sort -u -S40%) <(gunzip -c blockchair_bitcoin_addresses_and_balance_LATEST.tsv.gz | grep -v balance | cut -f1 | grep "^1" | sort -S40% ) > list Get list of balances, addresses and pubkeys gunzip -c blockchair_bitcoin_addresses_and_balance_LATEST.tsv.gz | grep "^1" | sort -rS60% | uniq -w30 -d > address_and_balance cat <(cat output.txt | cut -f 6,8) list | sort -rS40% | uniq -w30 -d > address_and_pubkey for addy in `cat list`; do balance="`grep $addy address_and_balance | cut -f2`"; pubkey="`grep $addy address_and_pubkey | cut -f2`"; echo "$balance $addy $pubkey"; done | sort -nr > balance_addy_pubkey.txt (the last for-loop is quick and dirty, slow and inefficient, but considering there's not that much data, I didn't bother improving it)
|
|
|
|