Thread ini bukan untuk membahas bounty mana yang bagus om. Kalau mau tanya" hal semacam itu bisa dicoba di beberapa grup tele berikut (bukan ane yg punya): @bitcointalk_id, @infobountyindonesia dst.

Not every coin is listed on Binance regardless of how good the project is.


That sounds suck. I don't know what happens to Bittrex recently but their new program has lots of troubles. Like their first IEO, and now this.

Dari pengalaman pribadi ane memulai dengan daftar di berbagai bounty yang memakai sistem siapa cepat dia dapat. Tapi saat ini sepertinya sangat sulit menemukan proyek yang serupa. Alternatif kedua adalah translate dokumen" onepager dsj dari berbagai proyek tapi harus dikasih tanda tidak resmi (sekedar nunjukkin skill kalau situ punya kemampuan saja). Alternatif berikutnya adalah menjadi asisten translator (harus kontak personal) dan mengajukan bantuan untuk menerjemahkan/mengelola thread dan minta izin menjadikan translate yg dikerjakan bersama sebagai portfolio pribadi agan (atau mungkin kerja bersama selamanya).

Nerjemahin wp koin gede secara sukarela ga begitu berpengaruh sama kredibilitas agan, kecuali agan bisa masuk ke listed contributors bagian translation pada masing" proyek tersebut. Lebih baik aktif di Transifex atau bantu melokalisasi apps berbagai macam proyek.

Authy tidak open source. Kalau agan ingin make yang open source bisa make andOTP[1], tapi terbatas hanya untuk Android saja. Kalau mau dipake di komputer bisa make emulator sih.

[1] https://github.com/andOTP/andOTP

You can still use Bittrex without submitting any KYC? Last time I remember KYC is a must to use their exchange.


It's actually a big deal for me if they're not regulated and don't have strong security protection for sensitive user data. Until this point, I don't really want to do any KYC at all in most sites. If I can avoid KYC I'd definitely avoid that, but if that's not possible I'd think again about the importance of such services. If there's an alternative, I'd probably use them instead.

Any newbie or someone who doesn't understand enough about the market will likely do the same thing because they already see that it has risen so much, so probably it will rise more and it will never stop. That's what basically fomo does to us. On the other hand, buying when the price is at the bottom or there's too much blood on the street makes them feel insecure and they won't risk their asset for that, in other words, they don't know the value of that assets.

Which is why we have 1% ultrarich people. They buy and understand what they're buying and at what price that assets should be in the future.

Last time I remember they require $100,000 deposit for any projects that want to get listed on their DEX. Seems like it's not fully decentralized. The only part that might be improved from their CEX is probably the ability to fully control your funds, but that's it. In the end, they can still make money though. In other words, it's like IDEX.

Can the media stop reporting any ridiculous thing such as this one? Come one, stop give them publication. They will do literally almost everything to get attention and then get money from that.

I'm gonna wait whether he'll start promising thing like eating his own dick and if that does happen I'll literally archive it and then remind him again later.

Lots of traders or crypto users that I know prefer to have some fiat access directly so they can cash out anytime. If they only offer crypto to crypto trading, that means there is still going to be a monopoly because there's only 2-3 a local exchange that supports this afaik. Their service is not that great so that definitely offers something for new player.


Due to legal reasons and stuff like that.

Hacking Linux with virus or something similar might a bit harder as some of the programs might need some library that is not available on the victim computer. On top of that, the majority of users don't love Linux as it requires some 'more advanced tech' knowledge compared to Windows where you can use simple click to do this and that.

---

Brave is also a good alternative for web browser.

Find them on Services section (look for bounty managers, most of them can manage airdrop too). Or see this topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5032713.0.

Keep in mind that some of them are no longer active or has a lot of shady past, so if you want to run a campaign make sure to choose the best one within your budget.

This must be a joke

Who predicts it will reach $100k at the end of last year or this year? Some experts really have no shame. After that, if one of their so-called predictions comes true media will praise them like a god who knows about the future.

If you end up with watch only wallet it means you never actually have any control of the address that you listed over there. That's not a problem per se, your problem is how to relocate your seed or private key.


It is not possible to send any coins with that kind of wallet so I'm not sure how you did you spent your coins in the first place. If you have another wallet that you control and then send it to the watched address above then that might be the case. Make sure to double check whether the address is correct and for personal reason, do you have any control of that address or not. Sending coins to an address which you have no control over is essentially losing the ability to manage that coins.

Your only option is CPFP. See https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Fee_bumping. Use Electrum if you want really simple step (see the "I received the stuck transaction" on Electrum part). Don't forget to use the address that you control.

By agencies, do you mean exchange platform?
There is a lot of exchange platform that you can use to do an ICO, like Binance, Huobi, Gate and so on. Most of them give 2x results or more (depends on the hype of the project).

But truth to be told, just because you do an IEO doesn't mean your project will succeed. Sure you got the funds but it doesn't guarantee you'll get solid holders, most of them will only dump (that's what IEO boys do most of the time).

I think they consider these conations as an investment. So they gain more fame as you said by doing this and that. There are no real benefits of helping poor people for them unless they want to submit their own press release saying 'Hey, I give 1 billion to the poor!'.

But we have a lot of good people out there. They might not be able to raise 1 billion but they dedicate their time and money to help those in need. That's definitely better than nothing.

Title and content do not match imo. What the reports that were quoted in that article only talk about how the participants' perception of blockchain and other digital fintech techs.

There is no increase in blockchain usage. Only more people think it is important now.

I still have doubt over this news. Looks like he's not that professional when it comes to investing and only look for short-term gains. There's no loss as long as they don't sell it, or buying back when the price went deep. Didn't they do any study of Bitcoin to know the 'real value' of it and just went straight FOMOed?

Unbelievable.

In his whitepaper satoshi originally wrote that Bitcoin is a peer to peer electronic currency systems, so I guess it should be compared to the same kind and not fiat in general. If we compare it to PayPal or something similar, though the volume of Bitcoin is not that big, but it already provides that alternative.

And yeah a lot of people use Bitcoin more as an investment instead of currency, so that's that. But if the volatility becomes more stable, I think they might start using some of their saving as currency.

Ban untuk yang memakai signature dan ada report postingan spam (minimal 1) yang bagus atas post mereka. Silakan baca ulang post om pandu (#2) di atas.