|
Can you give us the debug log? Go to %APPDATA%/Bitcoin and find the debug.log file. Post the contents of that file here. If it is too big, post the last 100-200 lines.
|
|
|
|
|
18hqhj58ouipyNiNFSmNXKY8ugrx8Ewm8K is one of your change addresss. As Danny said above, the transaction spending the change from that address did not confirm and was dropped from the network.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you describe the error and post a screenshot?
|
|
|
|
I compress the wallet.dat file with 7 zip using encryption, then back up the files into usb disk. Is 7 zip encryption safe?
AFAIK, 7zip, WinRar, WinZip, etc. have all been cracked already. But as long as the wallet.dat file is encrypted you should be good. No, 7zip's encryption is not cracked. I highly doubt WinRar and WinZip's are cracked either, but I don't use them. 7zip uses AES encryption, which is still not cracked. It is the safest encryption method as of today. |
|
|
|
This "fee" shit is only getting worse, especially during extraordinarily high volume times which out the blue to started thursday nite. What happens when there are no more BTC to be mined? Also I don't understand why the block size can't be increased tramatically to fix this nonsense. The value in mining is not the fees, it's the 25 BTC.
This is nothin but slowing down adoption in a big way, especially when other crypto currencies DO NOT have this problem at all.
Increasing the block size is not trivial and there are many considerations in doing that, particularly the fact that it WILL be a hard fork. That in itself is contentious because HARD FORKS CAN BE BAD. There are no other currencies which have the same transaction volume as Bitcoin, so they aren't even comparable. If you want to compare two things, you need to eliminate all of the other variables which can affect the outcome. The must be compared ceteris paribus, all else equal. Take your off topic ranting elsewhere, we don't need it in tech support threads. And maybe learn some stuff about what you are talking about /Off Topic OP, about your question, since you were unable to set the fee, there are only a few options available to you. You could attempt a Child-Pays-For-Parent transaction in which you create a transaction that spends an output from this transaction but you pay a fee that is enough to cover both transactions. Or you can wait and hope that it confirms. Or you can wait for it to eventually (few days usually) be dropped by the network, making that transaction as if it had never happened. If that happens, then contact whoever sent you the transaction and ask them to resend it with a higher fee so that it gets confirmed. |
|
|
|
Unless we have magic, cracking SHA-256 is almost impossible. Sure, you could crack it first try, but that's like rolling 99.99 on a dice game. 1000000 times in a row.
The supercomputer would guess much faster, yes, but it will still take eons on average for it to crack a private key.
Mining/hashing? Nah. It may be a little faster than an ASIC, but it probably costs hundreds times more than an ASIC.
Private keys don't use SHA-256. It will be significantly faster to crack a private key since there are known algorithms that QCs can do faster that do prime number factorization, an important aspect in ECC which is used to create the private and public keys. Quantum computers would have an advantage over classical computers in getting private keys from public keys, but it will still take a while. But the time it takes is much much less than the time it takes for a classical computer. |
|
|
|
I just see sig campaigns requiring an avatar That's because there are no longer any open avatar campaigns that are not also sig campaigns. They don't all require sigs, but all of those are sig campaigns with the avatar as an afterthought. |
|
|
|
(1) Register on an API
(2) Take an address you're interested in
(3) Request all utxos on the address
(4) Lookup txid on the API.
If coinbase: stop here.
Otherwise: look at inputs, and repeat this step.
At the end you'll have a rather large list of blocks.
Why stop at a coinbase transaction? Coinbase outputs contain the fees of transactions included in its block. Surely we should repeat the iteration with each one of the block's fee-paying transactions. Fees aren't outputs. Fees are the difference between the sum of the inputs and the sum of the outputs of a transaction. There is nothing that links fees back to the transaction that they belong to. Really what they are are coins that disappear into thin air and then are regenerated in the block reward. |
|
|
|
Most likely not. If you have some idea of what the password is, you can attempt to brute force it and recover the password. You could try doing it yourself or asking the guy who runs http://www.walletrecoveryservices.com/. The site is trusted and the owner is a trusted person on the forums. |
|
|
|
mine is crashing too my wallet is running 24/24 last week it crash it try to reindex but it crash when reindexing so 3 days ago i copy wallet folder from an other computer , (wallet i open time to time) but today it was crashed again how to put the log? it s to big end of log 2015-12-12 17:58:44 ERROR: CScriptCheck(): 41d3fd1cb64758e6ebab82a1a2e73cc2c7070ff9eab5d89b29cb2895b5538f3b:1 VerifySignature failed: Non-canonical signature: S value is unnecessarily high
2015-12-12 17:58:44 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: ConnectInputs failed 41d3fd1cb64758e6ebab82a1a2e73cc2c7070ff9eab5d89b29cb2895b5538f3b
2015-12-12 17:58:51 UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000050469c7ba78336b87a649249321cab274c000f7dc685a57 height=388063 log2_work=83.73073 tx=97318343 date=2015-12-12 17:57:48 progress=0.999999 cache=60.7MiB(14477tx)
2015-12-12 17:58:53 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:58:55 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 17:58:56 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:07 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:08 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 17:59:11 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 17:59:12 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:12 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 17:59:20 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:21 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:30 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:32 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:35 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:41 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 17:59:42 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:43 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:45 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:48 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:48 ERROR: CScriptCheck(): 82509307015bf8a65f6338b0171ac446f2d6365cfc39196ab4bcf6ff183ad96c:1 VerifySignature failed: Non-canonical signature: S value is unnecessarily high
2015-12-12 17:59:48 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: ConnectInputs failed 82509307015bf8a65f6338b0171ac446f2d6365cfc39196ab4bcf6ff183ad96c
2015-12-12 17:59:49 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:52 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 17:59:59 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:00 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:02 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:03 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:07 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:07 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:08 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:12 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:14 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:00:17 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:19 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:20 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:22 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:29 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:31 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:33 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:00:34 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:39 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:41 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:00:48 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:49 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:00:54 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:02 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:03 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:13 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:14 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:17 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:21 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:01:21 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:01:21 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:24 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:01:26 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:26 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:34 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:01:41 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:46 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:46 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:01:48 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:01:54 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:01 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:06 ERROR: CScriptCheck(): 80945c72d39955e8037927be329a4048078cc322d6ee4471e606a9279f74d14a:0 VerifySignature failed: Non-canonical signature: S value is unnecessarily high
2015-12-12 18:02:06 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: ConnectInputs failed 80945c72d39955e8037927be329a4048078cc322d6ee4471e606a9279f74d14a
2015-12-12 18:02:11 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:11 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:11 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:16 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:20 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:21 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:21 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:21 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:23 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:23 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:02:32 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: nonstandard transaction: dust
2015-12-12 18:02:42 ERROR: AcceptToMemoryPool: free transaction rejected by rate limiter
2015-12-12 18:03:00 Corruption: block checksum mismatch
2015-12-12 18:03:00 *** System error while flushing: Database corrupted
2015-12-12 18:22:44 socket sending timeout: 1201s
2015-12-12 18:22:44 socket sending timeout: 1201s
2015-12-12 18:22:45 socket sending timeout: 1201s
2015-12-12 18:22:46 socket sending timeout: 1201s
2015-12-12 18:22:46 socket sending timeout: 1201s
2015-12-12 18:22:46 socket sending timeout: 1201s
2015-12-12 18:22:46 socket sending timeout: 1201s
2015-12-12 20:03:03 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: ActivateBestChain failed
2015-12-12 20:03:03 socket send error Une opération a été tentée sur autre chose qu’un socket. (10038)
2015-12-12 20:03:03 Relaying wtx 3b73e47242a653c5c50eeb0c3d215f261b0d63f4dc24e8e299fcd83d799045c3
2015-12-12 20:03:03 Relaying wtx 77e568d24510fbbf41973ff350b633a6b8ba0a10181f8cd25f6520782cae4b32
2015-12-12 20:03:03 ResendWalletTransactions: rebroadcast 2 unconfirmed transactions
2015-12-12 20:03:03 msghand thread interrupt
2015-12-12 20:03:03 scheduler thread interrupt
2015-12-12 20:03:03 opencon thread interrupt
2015-12-12 20:03:03 addcon thread interrupt
2015-12-12 20:03:03 net thread interrupt
2015-12-12 20:03:03 Shutdown: In progress...
2015-12-12 20:03:03 StopNode()
2015-12-12 20:03:04 Corruption: block checksum mismatch
2015-12-12 20:03:04 *** System error while flushing: Database corrupted
2015-12-12 20:03:07 Shutdown: done
have you done a reindex? It looks like you have a database corruption. |
|
|
|
Do you have a transaction ID for the TX in question?
Do you know which payment processor they use? E.g. bitpay?
My best guess currently is that the TX is confirmed and that you need to contact the payment processor they use.
The transaction itself has disappeared from my multibit client after i did my first blockchain and transaction reset. It seems they are using coinbase as their payment processor but without a transaction ID there would be no point in contacting them with no proof. The funny thing i tried to order the same items 11 days earlier from the uk.webuy.com website and again the payment process timed out after i paid and 11 days later they sent me a full refund in bitcoin. This time after i paid and it timed out with 1 confirmation when i was trying to view the transaction on blockchain it was given me a transaction not found error. ive heard something about exporting my private keys to blockchain but not sure what to do. Can you give us an address? |
|
|
|
|
Bitaddress.org is open source, so is bitcoinpaperwallet.com. Bitcoinpaperwallet.com is forked from bitaddress.org
|
|
|
|
What do you need the account to actually do?
I believe he needs it for determining the trust rating. Can't find any other reason That's pretty much it. If someone were to access that account, they could change who it trusts which could mess up a lot of stuff. Now that I think about it, I want that account to be manually banned in a way that most of the profile info cannot be changed, the trust list cannot be changed, and the password cannot be changed. Is that possible?
Seems like the potential problem would better be prevented through better software engineering and release management practices. Asking the forum to provide a limited functionality (banned) account for a very specific software may not be ideal. What if later the forum changes how banned accounts work and the software stops working?
This is a plan B, in case I forget to do plan A which is to be careful when publishing the source. |
|
|
|
Is the ban going to be applied manually or through the autoban button? Both are perma-bans. The results might be different based on that. If you asked a staff (and not an admin) to ban an account, it is probably an autoban. There are 2 types of bans.
Autobans. Isn't what it sounds like, it means someone pressed the ban button, but it's automatically carried out, as opposed to be manually entered. Though there is a mod or two running scripts because of the spammers. This results in the message You were banned by a forum moderator, email xxx. Both global mods and admins use this, so it isn't a guarantee it was a moderator, just more likely. I use autoban instead of manual bans for permanent bans because it's faster and more efficient. All bans in the modlog are autobans, and permanent.
Autobans ban the account involved only, you can still log in and do everything normally, just can't post or pm. It also adds units of evil to the IPs used, a new account created using these IPs will need to pay a fee. Units of evil increase with additional bans. Nuking is essentially an autoban+deletion of posts.
Manual bans are only available to admins, and are generally configured the same way as above, though it's possible to increase the scope of the ban to include things like registering from certain emails/providers, ips, subnets, hostnames, etc. Can also add multiple accounts to the same ban. It's also possible to prevent banned users from logging in at all using the banned account, this will prevent them from being able to read the forum and access pm's too though, so I rarely use it. These result in the customized reason for the ban+duration, insubstantial posts or whatever.
Well that mostly answers my question. I would want the lightest permaban possible (can do everything but post and pm) so an autoban would be fine, except for the units of evil. Since those add units of evil, I would prefer if the account was manually banned. I will pm BB and theymos about this tomorrow, thanks for the help Botany. |
|
|
|
But look at my Avatar the posts etc are still wrong? so not quite there yet it shows 3530 you show 3467 so..
The site counts the posts by itself, it doesn't mirror from bitcointalk. This may lead to some discrepancies if any posts of yours were in a thread that is in a section that a normal account cannot access, like the trashcan. Since the bot can't read those posts, it won't know about them, but the forum still counts those posts since they are still stored in its databases. Took a long time though ..about 4 min (unless that is normal just pointing it out)
Seems about right. I have to wait at least one second between requests to bitcointalk otherwise the forum will give the bot a temporary ip ban. To be safe it waits 1.01 seconds, so the minimum time it could possibly take is the number of pages of posts you have in your show posts page multiplied by 1.01. Of course it will take a little longer because fetching the page takes time and so does parsing it. I have a feeling that the estimations are way too high compared to the actual market price. I think the developers should at least update the formula/code at least once every, say fortnight. Otherwise it's not even an estimation instead it's just misleading information.
It isn't misleading since there is more than just the price that is given. However if you think the prices are to high, suggest me a lower rate for the algorithm specified in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
What exactly can a banned account do? What can they read, what can they change, etc.
I want to know this because I may have the account that I use for part of my account price estimator banned (as in ask a staff member to give it a permaban). I would want this because I fear I may one day accidentally publish the password for the account on giving when I publish each new code update. I don't want random people to be able to access the account and post from it. However before making such a request, I need to know whether having that account banned will work for my purposes.
Also, having that account banned wouldn't get me banned for ban evasion since I will have requested that it be banned, right?
|
|
|
|
edit: found the problem has me NOT as HERO MEMBER but as FULL with my ACTIVITY AT 196 my posts at 590  as you can see from my little Avatar on the side of this message I am a HERO member and my ACTIVITY IS 840 and posts are 3525 quote below: Name: Searing Posts: 540 Activity: 196 (Full Member) Potential Activity: 196 (Potential Full Member) Post Quality: Very Poor Trust: Neutral Estimated Price: 0.11172000 so perhaps I have been 'vindicated' and it is all a bug Heh. Whoops. I forgot to add the wait time code back in when I migrated the program to use JSoup earlier today. It probably got itself IP banned. I'll fix that now. Edit: Should be fixed now. |
|
|
|
|
Blockchain.info's priority thing is not particularly accurate. In fact anything that estimates the confirmation time is probably wrong.
The problem with your transaction was the small fee. You will need a higher fee in order to get transactions to confirm faster.
|
|
|
|
Haha  That service is a little bit amazing for me   On which facts to the Site calculate the Price of an Account? Read the OP for the algorithm details. |
|
|
|
i have idea to your site if can you add bitcoin address have been posted of my bitcointalk account maybe like my stake address at meta or posted at games and round etc. i think it's can help some people it's just my opinion That is a good idea. I think I can make it so that it would only get the addresses that you have posted in non quoted text, so it may grab an address that isn't yours. I would definitely make it so that it would only pull addresses from the stake your address thread and the marketplace section. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
