Welcher Client denn, wenn Core, ist der Sync durch?
Multibit HD hat das manchmal, die Lösung ist dann auf den Reparieren Knopf zu drücken, was ja offenbar auch hier geholfen hat. |
|
|
|
I transferred my bitcoins from a website to my wallet. I put only one receiving wallet. I have both of the wallet addresses but do not know how to access the one that took a chunk of my transfer. How do I access it or is it gone? Why would it have been done like that?
Its under change, which is hidden by default, but it should still be shown as part of your overal balance. |
|
|
|
Bei Blocktrail.com tauchte diese tx erstmals am 16.11. (!) auf. https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/d7b61ed5ab44efa9ae36bd15b566ae3a148723440f3fb84bd0de76be37171469 Es ist/war eine gebührenfreie tx, die 5 inputs von zwei verschiedenen Adressen hat. An Diebstahl glaube ich deshalb immer noch nicht. Es müssten 2 Schlüssel gleichzeitig gestohlen wurden sein und selbst wenn das der Fall wäre, hätte es der Dieb sicherlich nicht gebührenfrei transferiert, was zu diesem Zeitpunkt schon kaum mehr möglich gewesen wäre (wie man sieht). Zwie denkbare Szenarien kann ich mir vorstellen: Du hast in November/Dezember (oder vielleicht sogar noch eher im Laufe diesen Jahres) eine gebührenfreie tx angestoßen um Bitcointeile zusammenzuführen oder irgendwo hin zu überweisen. Du hast dann gemerkt, dass diese tx nicht durchgeht und hast die "-zapwallettxes"-Prozedur schon einmal durchgeführt. Die tx war weg, das Geld war wieder da und der Fall für dich erledigt. Die tx geisterte in den Mempools der anderen Nodes noch herum und erreichte deinen Node, der von der tx schon nichts mehr wusste am 30.12. wieder. Szenario 2 wäre eine Backup/Kopie o.ä. deiner wallet.dat. Denkbar wäre, dass du die Transaktion im Nov. oder früher durchgeführt hast (die nie bestätigt wurde dank fehlender fee) und anschließend ein Backup deiner wallet.dat eingespielt hast, wo eben diese tx noch fehlte. Wie oben beschriebn erreichte dich die tx dann aus dem mempool am 30.12. wieder. Zum Verständnis: Hast du seit November irgend etwas an deiner Core-Software verändert oder läuft diese Installation seit Monaten unangetastet? Wenn du nichts verändert hast, kann sicherlich die debug.log Aufschluss geben, was passiert ist. Anfangen mit suchen würde ich Mitte November. In der roh-tx sollte der Block (und damit der genaue Zeitpunkt) zu erkennen sein, wann diese TX erstmals publiziert wurde. da kann man vielleicht genauer suchen. THEORETISCH ist ein Diebstahl der privat-keys oder -da es zwei sind- der wallte.dat natürlich nicht ausgeschlossen. Glaube ich wie gesagt aber nicht. Wegüberweisen ist natürlich trotzdem der sicherste Weg. nice catch. |
|
|
|
Hi,
A few weeks ago i tried to send all my wallet to another. Accidentally the fee used was 0. After weeks the transaction still unconfirmed and i can´t use the bitcoins that i tried to sed.
Have i lost my bitcoins?. What can do to recover them?.
Thank you
Remove the unconfirmed transaction from your wallet by restoring it from the seed and create a new TX with a higher fee. IIRC you can use ! as amount to send all coins. |
|
|
|
Youd be surprised how many members had been banned before, but got the message and are now contributing to this forum.
I heard that even Lauda and hilarious had once been banned, though I don't know if it's true or not. I don't think either that they will tell if they really were They will probably answer a politely asked question regarding that. |
|
|
|
Danke schonmal.
Da die Dateien aber nicht gelöscht sind verhält es sich ja hier anders.
Es geht ja im Endeffekt darum ein früheren Zustand von mindestens den drei Dateien wieder herzustellen.
Ein Betriebssystem hast du bisher nicht genannt, oder hab ich das übersehen? Ist vermutlich schon wichtig, ich gehe aktuell von Windows aus. Das Tool ShadowExplorer ist nicht ausschließlich für gelöschte Dateien. Wie in meinem thread beschrieben, kann man damit auf Dateiversionen aus den Windows Wiederherstellungspunkten zugreifen. Dh. du kannst auf unterschiedliche Versionen deiner Datei zugreifen, falls alles klappt. Steht im englischen Thread, ist Windows und Schattenkopien sind aus. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Why electrum? What's the difference from the others? In general, they're all described as simple and lightweight.
Its a difficulty question to answer if we dont know what you are looking for. Electrum and Multibit HD are both HD wallets, so its easy to create a backup. Electrum allows some more advanced features like exporting and importing (extra file) private keys, while Multibit HD is aimed more at beginners. Multibit HD's wallet files are better protected against brute force attacks, which can be mitigated by using a longer password if you prefer electrum. I can say almost nothing about Bither, I only used it once in a VM to create a "how to sign a message" tutorial. It looked fine, but I never used it with coins. I have never used GreenAddress, Copay and BitGo. I would not consider mSIGNA a light wallet, because it needs a full node to run. That node can be externally, but thats usually not a good idea. Its been a while since I used it and I found it overly complex. |
|
|
|
Danke schonmal.
Da die Dateien aber nicht gelöscht sind verhält es sich ja hier anders.
Es geht ja im Endeffekt darum ein früheren Zustand von mindestens den drei Dateien wieder herzustellen.
Nicht unbedingt. Eine SSD schreibt in der Regel nicht an der selben Stelle um die Lebensdauer zu erhalten. Das ist unabhängig von OS, Dateisystem, etc. Bei einer mechanischen Festplatte kannst du auch Glück haben, CAUTION: Note that shred relies on a very important assumption: that the file system overwrites data in place. This is the traditional way to do things, but many modern file system designs do not satisfy this assumption. The following are examples of file systems on which shred is not effective, or is not guaranteed to be effective in all file system modes:
https://linux.die.net/man/1/shredAnsonsten sieht es eher schlecht aus -> https://www.heise.de/security/meldung/Sicheres-Loeschen-Einmal-ueberschreiben-genuegt-198816.html |
|
|
|
-snip-
Oh, the poor banned user must be protected until he can be "unpermabanned".
I don't see any support for your objections, except maybe QS.
I think everyone knows the reason this is not implemented is simply because theymos is such a dork.
He loves spammers and scammers and those who talk bollocks on his forum.
Youd be surprised how many members had been banned before, but got the message and are now contributing to this forum. |
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm researching bitcoin wallets, but I still haven't decided. Online wallets are said to be unsafe. I'm thinking of using one of the desktop wallet software. Which wallet you recommend is easy to use.
Did you read? -> https://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet |
|
|
|
-snip-
I think the thing is, you can never trust that your seed is not going to be hacked.
Think again. If your scenario is that the seed is "hacked" (what exactly does that mean?), why can it not be "hacked" if its stored in a file instead? You can trust that your wallet.dat is going to stay safe if you keep them in safe places and encrypted with a strong password,
FTFY. If your idea is to help people, maybe tell us what "safe places" are and what not? you can trust your paper wallets will not move from your closet and so on...
-snip-
Paper wallets still have the problem that you need a secure machine to redeem them. The closet might also burn.
-snip-
a brain wallet is where you put in a password and the code turns that password to your private key. and it is bad because humans can not generate a random enough password.
-snip-
A proper brain wallet can and should be generated randomly, as all private keys or seeds. Easy to remember and randomly generated do not have to be contradictions.
Wow, listened about Brainwallets for the first time.
Ok, I will not go for it. For me best for holding Bitcoin is Paper Wallet and for daily transactions is Online wallet.
Any better suggestions?
Stop following overly generalised advice. Learn the advantages and weaknesses of your methods. Isn't electrum technically a brain wallet?
No, but according to OP it has the same security. |
|
|
|
I have Gpu mining with 6 graphic cards...
6x Rx 470 8Gb.
I don't know where is the problem, also i updated the bios and with this version is required to press any key to continue ( but my pc i don't have at home ... ). This problem just wasted my time...
Just when i'm starting mining , after 2 minutes the pc automatically restarted...
overheating? |
|
|
|
|
Added an old top 500 rich list to the history section. Thread was locked because it was outdated.
|
|
|
|
Hey,
i accidently deleted a wallet file in the byteball application.
In this case there is not just a specific wallet.dat file on the computer but rather changes are made to sqlite and localstorage files.
All these files must be in perfect sync with each other, otherwise your data will be corrupt.
Is there any way to recover these files ? Like bring the whole folder back to a level before i removed the wallet ?
Unfortunately i didn't have the windows snapshot recovery option on.
Thanks for any help.
Will give a bounty of 0.5 BTC to the guy who finds a solution.
Take the bounty money and hire a professional data recovery service. If you want them to even have a slight chance, stop using the disk now. |
|
|
|
Someone please quote me;
1BYSqYfdq3EvjqgiaFx2NhEnaJkYtdQ9eN
Thank you.
Your post containing the bitcoin address has been quoted but since it is a brand new address I would like to know if you can sign a message form this address! Thanks a lot -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- robinH -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0) Address: 1BYSqYfdq3EvjqgiaFx2NhEnaJkYtdQ9eN IC3/d8k04m/hnN+0gdxnNcFdlPu5GsM36z90DvcQn+C8C8vikpfSawm+1ZME4b/2jtVQmSlspO9Tf9WlFiJ4aGY= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- verified, for the future you should use some sort of date within your message to make sure its no longer usefull a year from now when someone just copies it. |
|
|
|
So, nach der Aktion mit ...-zapwallettxes scheint die Transaktion in der Wallet nicht mehr auf.
Interessant.
Soll ich dennoch das Guthaben in eine andere Wallet verschieben?
Um sicher zu gehen, ja. Wenn wir davon ausgehen, dass jemand anderes Zugriff auf (einige) privaten Schlüssel hatte, dann solltest du ab sofort neue Schlüssel benutzen und daher alle Bitcoin an die neue Wallet schicken. |
|
|
|
ignore this post, I missed that we are talking about the LTC electrum variant. Thanks Abdussamad how can i verify the file "Electrum-LTC-2.6.4.2.tar.gz" downloaded from electrum-ltc.org ?
its sha256sum is only listed on the site itself and nowhere else on the web.
The sha256sum file is signed with the devs pgp key. https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x2BD5824B7F9470E6 |
|
|
|
I deposited 1.00 btc there about a year ago just to try it out out of curiosity. Since the coin price has went up I decided to go retrieve my btc from there. When trying to withdraw I got some bull shit withdraw error. So I shot them an e-mail just to get this reply back Hello XXXX,
Thanks for your email. Please verify yourself as an investor, all you have to do is to send in a photo of your id and write in your current address, the system shall verify it within the same day. Also, please confirm with me your latest withdraw address change request. Thanks for reaching out!
Best,
BTCjam Support Team
I never agreed to this intrusion. My guess is they know most users are not willing to send in a photo of their identification. So now they get to keep those users coins. I dont even understand how sending in an id even verifies anything. They are crooks and probably got hacked and lost all the coins they have on deposit. I feel bad for people who have larger amounts on deposit there. This is another gox for sure. STAY AWAY FROM THIS SHADY COMPANY!!! Remember the little checkbox when you signed up? READ. IT. Its what you agreed to, whether you actually read it or not. 15. Verification Procedures
The Company uses procedures to collect and verify information about in order to protect the Company and the community from fraudulent users and to keep appropriate records of the Company’s users.
All Users of the Site, at minimum, must provide identity verification requested by the Company.
https://btcjam.com/terms-of-useSo you have a time machine and went back a year and checked their terms of use when I signed up? Last Updated September 9, 2015
This I'm sure is an updated terms of use.
Not since Sept. 2015, which is at least 3 months over a year. Even if, it is your job to read these terms as you agreed to them when you created an account and you automatically agree to changes unless you explicitly state otherwise. The fact is, they were allowing withdraws, then they weren't. I tested this with small amount before I added my 1btc. It's bait and switch. They don't need my I'd. There are a multitude of ways to confirm that I'm the owner. Just because they changed the terms of use didn't make it right. They are still cunts.
They are trying to cover their asses in terms of AML/KYC. Its perfectly fine to dislike that, but you have to inform yourself. Blaming them in hindsight for your shortcomings is silly.
-snip-
Please stay on topic, you dont see others posting their sob stories here either do you? |
|
|
|
Der Ordner gehört erstmal dem Benutzer für den er erstellt wurde. Wenn der neue Benutzer Administrator-Rechte hat, kann er den Ordner aber übernehmen. Dafür gehst du in die Eigenschaften des Ordners (z.B. c:\Benutzer\Fritz) und dort auf die Erweiterten Sicherheitseinstellungen (vermutlich unter Sicherheit -> Erweitert). Das ganze sieht dann in etwa so aus:  Über Berechtigungen ändern kannst du dem neuen Benutzer Vollzugriff für den Ordner, Unterordner usw. geben. Wenn dann immer noch nichts zu finden ist, in c:\Benutzer\Fritz\Appdata\Roaming\Bitcoin, hast du evtl. den Ordner gelöscht. Dann kannst du nur noch hoffen das noch eine Schattenkopie existiert die du wiederherstellen kannst (falls du das nicht deaktiviert hast). Im Allgemeinen lassen sich solche Probleme, wunderbar durch ein Backup lösen. Hilft jetzt natürlich nicht, aber vielleicht für den nächsten / die nächste Wallet. |
|
|
|
If signature campaigns which pay in altcoins refuse to pay and scam their workers, any DT member cares to tag their managers and admins?
That would be a topic for the scam accusation section. I personally would leave a negative rating, given there is enough evidence. Feel free to send me a link to the scam accusation thread and Ill take a look. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
