Umm, how about the very name itself is stolen intellectual property? Yup, MicroCash is copyrighted and a registered trademark of another business.

This, of course, is par for the course for the same asswipes that stole the intellectual property to form their first group of poorly implemented clones, then tried to claim they owned the copyright, and then stole a 1992 graphical convention from AOL for all of the clients.

Look- I hate to be the prick in the balloon of ShortBusCoin/MiredInShitCash happy, happy, joy, joy circle jerk here... but, why not call the facts as they are?

Once again, RS/CH/Darnell and the Crew of Three Fools has brought forth another scandalous piece of tripe. Yes, dear friends, the same Short Bus gang of thieving, lying, disingenuous simpletons have painted fresh lipstick on the pig that is their little joke of a coin and release it to the world, late, closed and once again INFRINGING ON COPYRIGHTS!!

The term "MicroCash" is copyrighted and a registered trademark held by one Gary Stenstrom, through his business and website devoted to poker chips. Oops, he did it again, caught with his weewee in his hand trying to steal the intellectual property of someone else, one more time. http://www.uniquepokerchips.net/Micro-Cash/

Wonder if this private concern will have a stronger interest in bringing suit against this flagrant and unrepentant thief and his merry band of cretins?

In the interest of transparency... Joe is not the one looking for the hand-out. It's his children, Tom and the Gang who want the massive public subsidy, the abuse of eminent domain to steal other people's property, and for the city to abandon public streets so they can create a privately owned, pay-to-enter alternative to all the existing neighborhood businesses, that they and they alone will profit from.

Papa Joe is an outspoken Conservative with the cash to back up his calling out the Administration, the Children are Liberal sycophants who keep kissing the city leadership's ass to try and get a place at the public pork-barrel feeding trough to benefit themselves. Out of the $100 million they are asking for (and most sources consider that just the first step, look for the final number to be much close to a half billion) none of it will be spent by Papa Joe for his agenda, it will all go to the kids and buying favor with the Obama Slumdogs who took over power in this corrupt cesspool known as Chicago. Typical back-rape way of doing business in Chicago- make sure you curry favor with the politicos, and screw the taxpayers to pay for it all.

Of course not, however it was the gracious expression of that free will that I suggested the conversation be moved to a more appropriate venue for further exploration of your issues. It seems pedantic here, and risks clogging up a high level general thread with repetitive ad hominem specifics.

Acting in good faith is not a compelling argument to reverse clearly stated policy. Coincidentally, none of the soul sellers you cite actually mentioned anything to do with your issue, which further diminishes your argument by veering off into irrelevance, yet again.

I did not offer any judgement on the legality of dragon's stance, just a comment on how your claim has no grounding. You accepted the terms, at whichever point in the action you choose to consider the point of no return, and you should live by the terms that you accepted. Terms which you state yourself repeatedly, are legal, proper and in your full awareness. Just that you don't like them and want them changed to suit your desire. And while your claim that IANAL is catchy, it is equally off-topic- you don't know what my actual circumstances are, have no knowledge of my education or standing with the Bar, or an appreciation for where I drew my inspriation for my clear and direct, factual, statement of opinion about your actions in this matter.

How is it dishonest to offer the tools to use the site in the manner in which you agreed to use it? How can it be "perfectly legal" and "by the book" yet dishonest at the same time? You contradict yourself. It is not dishonest to offer a service, it is not dishonest to create rules for the service, nor is it dishonest to expect paying customers to abide those rules after they agree to them. My broker's website has a big "Withdraw" button on it too, but that does not create any type of valid argument for me to demand that they refund me for the poor decisions I've chosen to make.

I'm sure that is a relief to dragon, and a good choice to keep you out of jail. Posting on this board is a completely appropriate venue for airing your concerns, beating the dead horse to its nineteenth death with the same oblique argument is unnecessary, and inappropriate.

I did not comment on dragon's behavior, I commented on yours. Actually I think he has been more than polite with you and incredibly tolerant of your abusive and public approach. And, quite frankly, I don't think he is being dishonest is honoring the letter of the terms that you and he entered into.

Angry children throwing tantrums rarely appreciate anything said to them that contrasts with their rigid self-centered dogma. I never expected anything less from you given the tone of your approach to this matter.

Just thinking out loud here, but seeing as how this disagreement already has its very own thread, and really does nothing for this thread, for the community at large, or really anything at all except waste bandwidth... could we end the discussion in this thread about wanting to change TOS's and the merits of reading contracts before sending in funds, and return to our regularly scheduled programing about airing dirty laundry on ALL scammers, not just the personal pet peeves of one disgruntled consumer?

And since mcorlett has graciously welcomed opinions- here's mine: changing the subject to your carefully loaded question, is irrelevant. You were not channeling buluboy when you sent your money to dragon, you were acting of your own free will. You chose to send the funds you did, with the intentions only you knew. Sadly for you, the terms of the site that accepted your payment were direct and clear that you don't get to change your mind and get your deposit back. Whether his stated reason for this is acceptable to you or not, it was stated in therms that you prima facie accepted by sending in your deposit. Continuing to ask the same irrelevant question does not change the standing of your claim, you don't have one. If dragon had chosen to offer a refund that would have peachy swell of him, but he has no obligation to do so. Throwing a pity party in public does not change the simple fact that you are in the wrong, and your argumentative and condescending tirade does nothing to change that fact.

Drop it, or move it away from here. You have had enough attention on this matter.

So, round 2, the authorities have been forewarned that I am part of this international honey smuggling ring, and what's this ho, ho? Another loup-bound package from some far away land with curly writing (probably Arabs, and you know what they will do to your basic high-speed modern mail sorting infrastructure given the chance!) This one actually arrived.

Notice I say "arrived". Those smary swine at US Customs and Border Patrol (and how the hell personal mail, properly declared, with proper postage affixed is any of their damn business is beyond me, but I digress!) felt the need to "examine" my package. This involved the rather amateurish use of a box-cutter (these are the bastards that should be denied access to such cutlery) slashing open my package, violating the contents with their filthy little government mitts and sniffing my honey. Yes, those black helicopter wanna-be's actually nose-raped my honey! Finding nothing that their copious lack of wit, intelligence and schooling would consider a threat to national security, the "re-sealed" said package (in fact slapped a single layer of flimsy obnoxious green EXAMINED BY US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION shipping tape over the deep wounds rent into the surface of the box, after throwing away any cushioning and packaging materials they might have found. And, after sitting on the box for a couple of days, just to spite the actual operation of the world economy, forwarded it onward to my lair.

Of course, Mr Chicken-Shit Postman is terrified after the last Loup/Goat/Honey/National Security Adventure so instead of sallying forth in spite of wind, nor rain, nor fog, nor tsunamis the frickin' coward just showed up with a registered tag, and informed me that my box was in isolation at the main post office where I might call and claim it, preferably with disposable haz-mat suits for all involved, and my legal representatives. In spite of his churlish abuse, I did reclaim my precious honey, and am delighted to report that in spite of the nasal violation visited upon it, this nectar remains pretty damn close to the original nectar of the gods.

As in pretty damn tasty, indeed! I especially favor the sweet and sassy notes of A, and the tangy clash between spice and sour of C. F is a truly unique taste treat, social propriety limits me from describing the taste as it truly strikes me, so I will just go with tasting like a she-vixen in heat on a very sweaty day. And a pinch of salt.

F looks almost filtered, with a rich deep amber color. C is full of bee-bits (I may try to clone my own Laotian bee colony for fun!) and has an almost creamy thing going on, while A is a murky, mead-y rogue full of crystals and energy.

If you haven't yet dabbled in the rich viscous world of Asian Honey, get your coins on the way, this is truly an experience, and cheap at the price. Your taste buds will thank you.

And see if you don't think that F taste like it was produced by Cuban cigar rolling virgins if you know what I mean...

Oh please... why must we have crocodile tears for the imbeciles that lost money on this scam? They were warned- in no uncertain terms. There is no such thing as a free lunch, there is no magic machine that makes value out of wishing, and there is no way to game the system by playing junior arbitrage genius to support the kinds of gains that people were wanting to believe in. Sorry Wendy, but this Peter didn't take you to Never Never Land, he fleeced you of your coins. Just as he planned to do from Day One with this load of horse shit.

Stop acting like morons and believing in this bullshit. Scammers are in every venue, and when you line up like willing lambs to the slaughter... well, can you blame them for having a feeding frenzy on your dime? Think before you throw good money after bad, don't throw away the bad on nonsense and silliness to begin with.

And hoo, and the army of like minded children who think that threats doth make a man make of them... stop the threats of violence. You are aiming at the wrong target. The person to blame is yourself. With closed mind and blinded eyes you embraced this rip-off, and then treated everyone who tried to warn you with disrespect and crude taunts. You make yourself look incredibly diminished and like a rather juvenile cretin. You fucked up- deal with it. If all you lost was 5 btc, good on you, if it was every cent you had to your name, too freaking bad- you made a dumb choice in an unregulated marketplace and refused to listen to the multitude of voices that told you just how badly you were being taken. You insisted on believing the Tooth Fairy as he was back-raping you. You got exactly what you deserve.

No buluboy just likes the company in his piss poor decision making world.

Which, oddly enough, investing in horses is not. He really has no call to be here.

Emphasis added.

Perhaps what could have told him is to take a very long walk off a very short pier. You chose to nobly bail out a scammer by assuming his corrupted and unbelievably screwed up criminal enterprise. I assume you are a big boy, and made that decision with proper due diligence and forethought. Too bad, bitscalper turned out to be exactly what a lot of intelligent folks thought it was- the kind of honey pot that sucks in the foolish and naive and steals their funds.

You might have looked at the proposition that you re-open the site using his code as a very clear cut attempt for a criminal to recruit you to be his shill and to front for his criminal activity. You could have told him to stuff himself when he asked for a piece of the action! What action, what profits? He managed to rip off a bunch of folks, and actually had the balls to ask you, his knight in shining armor to put your name on the turd, AND send him a cut?

Just admit that this was a irreparably broken scam, you tried to bail the guy out because he sold you a good line of bullshit, but short of you ponying up the funds to make everyone who lost on this disaster whole, there is no way to put enough lipstick on this pig to make it pretty. The sooner these poor naifs realize that their retirement plan is long gone with that piece of shit bitscalper, the better for all, especially our community. The bad guys won this round, sucks to be us, especially sucks to be you, and played for a fool by this asshole, but seriously, put a stake in this blood-sucking vampire, it's done.

Hey hoo!

Go look in the mirror, right now, do it.

Then come back here.

Okay, done?

That guy you saw in the mirror? That was the guy who got scammed. Stop whining about it, you were the one who stuck up for the assholes involved in this rip-off, you embraced them and called the rest of us foolish, when we were telling you from the first word that you were being scammed.

Guess what? You were scammed. Deal with it.

Better yet, let's make it a rule that once an ad is posted, any ad, 5 registered users selected at random, are required to buy that product or service regardless of price or reputation of the seller. That way the scammers that OP is so concerned about protected can be assured of getting a reasonable return on their efforts from this forum.

You don't like an open conversation when goods and services that are dodgy are offered, don't read the advice.

Just a few observations viv a vis the earlier photos that I have been asked to comment on...

What is the deal with having cap and gown ceremonies for little kids "graduating" from pre-school? No way in hell that kid on the right is old enough for high school or college, so I find it a little twisted and somewhat condescending to have him enjoy his "graduation" pomp and circumstance as a 7 year old.

And why do we have Masonic symbols on his cap? All Illuminati issues aside, this little fellow is far too young to be a Mason of any Level or Degree, so I'm guessing that the hat is a fake. Probably stolen.

As to that cherubic lad on the left... that is clearly not a good example of a Skinhead White. Most of those markings are fakes, executed in Sharpie. Anyone familiar with tattoos at even a rudimentary level could confirm that there is no way on earth you could achieve that level of perfection in ink application in so many diverse regions of the face. Next- the markings are not consistent... a Skin who proclaims he is the "Property of Jolene" above all other labels? Really, a Jewish sounding name like Jolene is more important than swastikas and "HUN"? Un-freaking-likely. And most modern day Skins do not use the traditional swastika, preferring instead the far more arcane images like the twin lightning bolts, 88, the Celtic Cross and the tri-legged cross.

And those piercing baby blue eyes- while clearly a race-baiters wet dream, are nothing more evil than photoshoppery.

And whilst on the subject of the "horrible tragic shooting of Trayvon"... let's take a look at revisionist history, shall we? In an effort to keep the flames of allegorical racism stoked there have been 2,537 edits to the wiki page on this story, so the "facts" that are coming into common hysterical public use here have been so spot on that it has required an average of 3.5 changes PER HOUR since the story broke. That's your liberal media cabal right there, framing reality just the way they want you to see it.

Oh, and if you are one of the sad souls who actually thinks that gassing anybody on the basis of skin color, or any other characteristic... some of those folks are armed. Approach with caution if you want to bring your traveling gas show to my town.

Embedded RFID satellite tracking.

No, you just have a really freakin' big shallow end, filled with willing fucktoys of the nomenklatura.

And fully half those deaths of the Soviet people were caused by order of the Soviet leadership at the time, due to the utterly incredible philosophy of defending sacred places in the Rodina simply because the name matched the fuckwit leader "ograd" and the remaining deaths were from the ally they sided with in the beginning of the conflict, who turned around and tried to fuck them ala Napoleon with Operation Barbarossa. So you want pity for piss poor demonic leadership? Sorry New Soviet Boy, those 25 million were just cleaning up the shallow end of the gene pool. If you were on air defense it's a pity we never bombed your ass, it would have been a cake-walk.

Just for the record, ferreting out scams is part of my RL world. When a duck stinks like this, I consider it a public service to point it out, and I typically do so in my harsh ass-holish manner, without concern for welcoming would be scammer to our world.

You don't want to read my stuff? There's a convenient ignore button right there under my name. You want to support this guy's sale? Buy a laptop and stop whining about social propriety. Just don't tell us when you get ripped off thru Western Union by this scammer- you bent over and invited him to have his way with you. No legitimate business person anywhere in the world uses Western Union as their preferred payment method. None, period.

Vampire- all of your education aside- if you are confronted by a potentially drugged out gang-banger assaulting you for the benefit of looking macho with his group of friends egging him on, shooting multiple times at the legs is not the most prudent course of action to stop the attacker. Center of mass. The biggest possible target area for the most effective use of force to stop the attacker. That's the way to stop the assault and defend yourself.

In air defense school I am quite sure they did not teach you to shoot at the cables that controlled the wing flaps in order to disable the plane, I suspect they taught you to shoot at the biggest part of the plane you could see so that you could hit it and stop the attack on your homeland.

Actually it's getting comparative. And your offer comes off sounding like not such a great deal. Flip 'em for $800 and you might find some buyers, looking to blatantly make a 30% mark off folks isn't that desirable. And the whole "Dad's Friend through work" thing? Tired, lame and pure bullshit. Have a good day scammer, not fools here.

Isn't there something strangely ironic about supporting the pedo allegation by upping the post you upvoted, while signing your post with an ad for SexyBitcoinAds where you are advertising for girls to apply to be objectified?

Just wondering, that's all.

Second Amendment actually was "sponsored" by the Original Framers: here's the whole collection so you can list all of the ext4remist groups that frighten you-


    First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petition

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    Second Amendment – Militia (United States), Sovereign state, Right to keep and bear arms.

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.[57]

    Third Amendment – Protection from quartering of troops.

    No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

    Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

    Fifth Amendment – due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain.

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Sixth Amendment – Trial by jury and rights of the accused; Confrontation Clause, speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

    Seventh Amendment – Civil trial by jury.

    In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

    Eighth Amendment – Prohibition of excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment.

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    Tenth Amendment – Powers of States and people.

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.