Well it works this time using the new provided signature. Quoted for the reference and verified.

Well, it is a known issue and afaik, electrum is the only one permitting to sign it. However, the previous message is not signed with a segwit address. I think The-Real-L1nk should avoid extra space / return to line..

Well I am literally trying to find a solution and will write what my mind told me.

- Every user will start with a variable X points.
- Adding a member to your network => he will receive an equivalent of your X points.
- Removing him then he will loose the points that you already gave it to him.
- Excluding him and he will loose an equivalent of your X points.
So PT (personalised trust) score will be like this = your X points plus number of received X points from others adding you minus number of received X points from others excluding you.

For example :
User1 has initially 5 points.
User2 has initially 10 points.
User3 has initially 25 points.
User2 trusts user1, user3 excluded user1 then the final score of user1 will be Total (T) = 5 + 10 - 25 = -10.
PT:   T : - number of negative feedbacks / + number of positive feedbacks
=> T is independent from feedbacks, it is related to how many people trusting you.

- X is calculated considering your rank (R), activity (A), positive trade comments in your trust (T), number of reported posts (Rp) and received smerit (Sm) +/- negative trust feedbacks/proven scam (N/S).
R = 1 point for newbie & jr / 2 member / 3 for full member / 4 senior / 5 hero / 6 legendary / 7 staff / 8 global / 10 admins
A = +1 point for every 100 activity (1 point if less than 100, 2 points from 100 to 199...)
T = +2 point for every 5 successful/positive trade comments when implementing the system (1 points if less than 5, 2 points from 5 to 9 then 4 points from 10 to 14...) [it has to be verified manually by sending a pm to a dedicated staff member for this and feedback about scam, cheat, abuse do not count]
Rp = +1 for every 100 reported post (1 point if less than 100, 2 points from 100 to 199...)
Sm = +1 point for every 50 received smerit when implementing the system (1 point if less than 50, 2 points from 50 to 99...)
N/S = 1 or 0. 0 if the user is a proven scammer. 1 if not. +/- means this proposition could be considered.

X= A * T * RP * Sm (* N/S +/-)
X is somehow a score that will permit to classify users in this forum independently from DT system. It shows your weight in the forum and this score is calculated only once when the system will be implemented and cannot be modified.

Well the number of points could be obviously modified and even implementing 1/2 or 1/4 could be done.

Couldn't verify the message in tools.bitcoin.com nor in brainwalletx.github.io
Please try to verify your message before posting it here

Well, it could be a good idea that bitcointalk generate a message from your bitcoin address in your profile and asks users to sign it then access granted once it is verified. However it should be an option and alternative to recaptcha. So when logging you could choose one of it.


Problem? 

Bitcointalk + altcoins sub => solution : create a new sub for altcoins/bounties and make it exactly like serious discussion. They can spam whatever they want but they will not get a cent nor activity from it!
Obviously, every topic posted outside of that sub = punishment.

I want to have my own trust where I qualify X because he is a trusted member of the community and disqualify Y because he is trading merit for example. I want to keep always an eye on the DT, i don't want to add for example a trusted member because merely 80% of his trust are about broken English and bought accounts...
I don't know if people will understand what i am trying to say. This idea passed from my deep mind to my keyboard without being reviewed by the supreme court to validate it.

Thanks will take a look on it.

Ok this will not definitely make the trust system better but I could say it will be the first step to correct it.
My proposal is simple : make side to side the default trusting and a new one.
1- Centralised trust aka default trust : like everyone knows...
2- Decentralised/personalised trust : where everyone is asked to add & exclude members =~creating something similar to default trust (with people in depth 1...etc)
So we will have then something similar to this under our avatar :
PTrust:   1: -0 / +1  (personalised trust)
DTrust:   0: -0 / +0  (default trust)
A transition period could be determined or both could be kept.
I personally didn't want to do anything to my trust settings, i prefer to have the DT all the time.
-just a suggestion and I will pass-

---

Update :
Well I am literally trying to find a solution and will write what my mind told me.

- Every user will start with a variable X points.
- Adding a member to your network => he will receive an equivalent of your X points.
- Removing him then he will loose the points that you already gave it to him.
- Excluding him and he will loose an equivalent of your X points.
So PT (personalised trust) score will be like this = your X points plus number of received X points from others adding you minus number of received X points from others excluding you.

For example :
User1 has initially 5 points.
User2 has initially 10 points.
User3 has initially 25 points.
User2 trusts user1, user3 excluded user1 then the final score of user1 will be Total (T) = 5 + 10 - 25 = -10.
PT:   T : - number of negative feedbacks / + number of positive feedbacks
=> T is independent from feedbacks, it is related to how many people trusting you.

- X is calculated considering your activity (A), positive trade comments in your trust (T), number of reported posts (Rp) and received smerit (Sm) +/- negative trust feedbacks/proven scam (N/S).

A = +1 point for every 100 activity (1 point if less than 100, 2 points from 100 to 199...)
T = +2 point for every 5 successful/positive trade comments when implementing the system (1 points if less than 5, 2 points from 5 to 9 then 4 points from 10 to 14...) [it has to be verified manually by sending a pm to a dedicated staff member for this and feedback about scam, cheat, abuse do not count]
Rp = +1 for every 100 reported post (1 point if less than 100, 2 points from 100 to 199...)
Sm = +1 point for every 50 received smerit when implementing the system (1 point if less than 50, 2 points from 50 to 99...)
N/S = 1 or 0. 0 if the user is a proven scammer. 1 if not. +/- means this proposition could be considered.

X= A * T * RP * Sm (* N/S +/-)
X is somehow a score that will permit to classify users in this forum independently from DT system. It shows your weight in the forum and this score is calculated only once when the system will be implemented and cannot be modified.

Well the number of points could be obviously modified and even implementing 1/2 or 1/4 could be done.

April 1, that was one of my funniest days here. I should say that (SIR) theymos has too much imagination

When you use a word with repetitive letters then you have to check if these repetitive letters have the same number or not. Obviously, in 'ineptitude' the 't' doesn't have the same number, in 'sweepstake' the 'e' has also different numbers. So your two entries aren't correct.

No. It is made for fun & learning somehow.

No, afaik you can log in anywhere and everywhere even with vpn & tor. Just make sure that your connection is secure and your boss isn't behind you 

SIR, my apologies but you have -1 politeness for using the word d*mn

Merit demerit / politeness rudeness?
Prefer +1 -1 and keep just the total score shown. Politeness link will have the details.

Nah, too much char counts doesn't mean that the post is good. Personally prefer short texts (2-3 lines).

Yes PLEASE SIR theymos PLEAAAAAAASE accept SIR bill gator prayers (at least for politeness with a timer reseted every period PLEASE)
(ok half serious since all the posts will start with dear SIR X, PLEASE... Regards SIR )

The button will be enabled once you receive smerit. Since you don't have any smerit to send then there is no need for you to have a button.

 No. You cannot exceed 14 activity per period of two weeks (maximum).

I already gave you an explanation why this will not happens, you only need to focus in what i wrote.
Having 1 chat for all is useless since it will be flooded with no sense.
Having a personalised chat for 2 persons as you stated or even for a small group will not happens because it needs too much data. A forums where the members lists, general statistics in profile, who is online data...etc are all disabled to reduce data consumption, will not support your in-forum idea.
Am I wrong?
Anyway good luck.

Dear SIR theymos,
Put the politeness score back or i will not say SIR anymore! However I will keep saying PLEASE sometimes tho. Yep, and add a -1 points for every bad word PLEASE.
THANK YOU SIR Theymos

@Semi-serious mode: I think that we saw yesterday an effective way to make the community more "polite".

After legendary we have Bugs bunny.
BTW SIR suchmoon, you forgot to add SIR and PLEASE in your post in order to maintain your Politeness at high level  
Edit : and ah you need to change "refuse to" by "will not"

How the chat will look like :
300,000 users online.
User1: knock knock, how to rank up?
User2: red tagged by Lauda (or pharma or...etc) why tagged they do me i no do nothing bad (<3 Google translate)
User3: noob read sticky at meta...
User4: whine away noob and stop scamming people
User5: https://bitcointalk.org/...
User6: lauda (or pharma or anyone from team1) Is... (bad boy and the song about being alt will start again- singed by team2)
User7: indeed user6, they are alt in addition to nullius
User8 (team1): you got negative trust because you asking for 500 BTC without collateral!
User9 (team2): team1 should be banned!
...

Now, this is why I prefer to not having a chat at all, or maybe a personalised chat? But this will consume too much data...

Hi SIR,
PLEASE SIR stop cheating the new new requirements system SIR.
Thanks SIR.

Holy politeness SIR
Your politeness SIR is passing your activity + merit + virtue + karma combined SIR.

Totally agree with you SIR.

Hi SIR athanz88
I think it is fool merit or funny merit PLEASE
Regards SIR

(I love that day loooooooooool)

Q: What's a henway ?
A: About 2k imagination

BTW SIR, it is impressive that you could still imagine things. The system is inaccurate tho. PLEASE theymos fix it