Bitcoin Forum
July 04, 2024, 09:11:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 [414] 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 ... 591 »
8261  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Want to make a faucet, have no startup capital on: December 01, 2015, 09:39:30 PM
Are you basically asking someone to run the website but you will provide the funds for the faucet?
8262  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] Full Member with Potential Activity and Private keys cont'd on: December 01, 2015, 07:06:16 PM
Let's give it a try: 0.04BTC Smiley

GL.
Big accepted
8263  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcointalk Account price estimator on: December 01, 2015, 01:53:17 PM
Hi OP,

Just tried to check a different account on your site - was returned with a 'Remote Procedure Call - Failure. Please try again' error message.

I got the same result a few months ago when I tried inputting the Sam UID. What seems to cause this problem? Thank you, nice job with the site regardless!
Try it at a different time. If you use it around midnight Eastern Time, then it won't work since that is when the server restart happens.
8264  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Brain wallets generated keys mis-match? on: December 01, 2015, 12:35:04 PM
They use different algorithms to generate the address. I don't think there is any standard way to generate a brain wallet address.
8265  Other / Meta / Re: Potential Activity? on: December 01, 2015, 12:32:06 PM
Potential activity is the activity that an account can potentially have. You can get up to 14 activity every two week period. If you make one post in that two week period, you get 14 potential activity. There is a whole description of how the activity works in a sticky in meta

There are a few sites which can calculate the potential activity of an account such as http://bctalkaccountpricer.info
8266  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Operation not valid with the current stack size on: December 01, 2015, 03:02:01 AM
You need to specify the private key(s) you are signing with in the signrawtransaction command. The second one you did should work. I think you need to escape the double quotes, so just put a backslash (\) before the double quotes.
8267  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: bitcoin daemon issue on: December 01, 2015, 02:49:25 AM
what can happen if i not update the daemon ? i can use it if i feel confortable with without update ?
This version is obsolete, upgrade req..
You can, but the latest version will have a soft fork, so you should be fine but you won't have access to the features the soft fork enables.

i have a question . how can i encrypt the wallet.dat in centos ?
You can encrypt the wallet using Bitcoin Core's wallet encryption. There should be an option to add a password.

any function for move the wallet.dat in encrypted folder and make the bitcoind use it from the encrypted folder ?
i mean the Blockchain in the standard folder but the wallet.dat in encrypted folder how can i do this ?
It is not possible to move the wallet.dat file to another directory and use it from there. You can however move the entire data directory. If you moved the whole thing into an encrypted folder, as long as the folder is decrypted while you are using it, then Bitcoin core can access that. You just need to start it with some options in the command.
8268  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Operation not valid with the current stack size on: December 01, 2015, 02:44:31 AM
What was your command to create the transaction?
8269  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Quickest method to initialize new bitcoind node on: December 01, 2015, 12:42:54 AM
Can someone tell me what is the best practice for initializing a new bitcoind node quickly? Do I really need to wait 2 days for the blockchain to be downloaded and validated before the node is operational? As far as I can tell most of the time is spent not on network resources but on CPU resources, at least for the hardware I am running (Azure & Amazon EC).

If I already have another fully initalized node that I trust, is there anyway I can just copy the blockchain database from a trusted node over to the new node (bypassing all the time consuming validation)?
If you have access (can login and copy stuff to and from) to a fully synced node, you could copy over most of the stuff in the data directory and the node would just pick from where that data was left off.
8270  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: December 01, 2015, 12:41:41 AM
Any ideas yet guys?  I've just given up trying to download the blockchain now.  It just keeps on sticking, so no point.  Any alternatives to being able to transfer to a different wallet?
Export the private keys and import them into another wallet like Electrum. Install Electrum and then open the Debug Window of Bitcoin Core. Go to the console tab and type
Code:
dumprivkey <address>
where <address> is the Bitcoin address that you want the private key for. The string that is output from that command is the private key. It should start with 5, K, or L If your wallet is encrypted, then you will need to type
Code:
walletpassphrase <passphrase> 120
where <passphrase> is the passphrase to unlock your wallet. This will unlock your wallet for two minutes so you can get the private keys. Once you have the private keys, start up Electrum and in the wizard that should pop up, choose "Restore wallet" (or something like that) and follow the instructions to create a wallet with existing private keys.
8271  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Corrupted Database: Is --reindex the only option? on: November 30, 2015, 02:32:24 PM
Also, I do have the blocks and chainstate directories backed up as of a month ago. Would replacing the current directories (and only those two directories) with the backups be safe?

Yes, that would be safe
8272  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: What are the most useful tools in Bitcoin & Blockchain related Development? on: November 30, 2015, 12:38:21 PM
A local bitcoind is very useful
8273  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Help me in solving the issue with Bitcoin Core QT on: November 30, 2015, 12:36:20 PM
Do you have any antivirus running, Windows defender etc. If yes, try disabling them.

What version are you running? Try to update to 0.11.2.
It looks like the database got corrupted somehow. Go to %appdata%/Bitcoin, copy your wallet.dat out and delete everything EXCEPT wallet.dat. Run your Bitcoin Core again.


hope u have read my query. i have done that already and after that only i made the post..yes antivirus is running nd im using avast and my client is 0.11.2
Make sure you add the bitcoin data directory as an exception to your antivirus. Antivirus software can cause these corruptions to happen since they read the files at the same time bitcoin core does.
8274  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Unconfirms and DoS attacks? on: November 30, 2015, 04:17:38 AM
Yes there is a currently an ongoing DoS attack which is preventing blocks from being able to have many transactions. If one of the transaction outputs went to you, you can attempt a CPFP transaction. Otherwise you can just wait.
8275  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] Full Member with Potential Activity and Private keys on: November 30, 2015, 04:03:37 AM
The auction is continued at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1270302
8276  Economy / Auctions / [AUCTION] Full Member with Potential Activity and Private keys cont'd on: November 30, 2015, 04:03:09 AM
[AUCTION] Full Member with Potential Activity and Private keys
This is continued from my previous auction thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1260639.0

I am auctioning off a Full Member account with the private key for the staked address.

Posts: 120+
Activity: 120+
Potential Activity: 160+
Post Quality: Pretty good (Good according to bctalkaccountpricer.info)
Trust: Neutral

Starting Bid: 0.04BTC
Minimum Increment: 0.005BTC
Buy It Now: 0.09BTC

The auction will end on December 02, 2015, 10:00:00 PM in your local time (because I used special BBCode it displays in your time Grin)

The winner must either use an escrow (and pay all fees) from this list: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855778.0 or send first.

A signed message is available but the address staked is only a few weeks old because I forgot to stake an address when I acquired the account.
8277  Economy / Auctions / Re: [AUCTION] Full Member with Potential Activity and Private keys on: November 30, 2015, 03:57:30 AM
The winner of the auction did not reply so the auction will be continued in another thread. The prices will be changed.
8278  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory stuck on Block 385589 on: November 30, 2015, 03:36:39 AM
Bitcoin core is actually showing correct block height which is 385972 as of this post.

Should I still post the debug.log? Would it be safe to post publicly here?
No, you don't need to post it. It is safe to post if you want. The debug.log is meant to be shared.

So this is actually an armory problem. Can you post the armory logs? Go to File > Export Log and export the log somewhere. Then post it here. That file is also safe to post here.
8279  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory stuck on Block 385589 on: November 30, 2015, 02:11:18 AM
Check your Bitcoin core installation. Close armory and just run Bitcoin Core. If it has the same block height (and it should) then you just have a Bitcoin Core error. If that is the case, please post the debug.log.
8280  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin QT not synching on: November 30, 2015, 12:21:23 AM
I think I know why it isn't validating. For some unknown reason, your node is recalculating the difficulty that it is expecting to find in the next block. Except the difficulty keeps getting higher, above what the next block (271,980) actually is. Because the difficulty of that block is too low than what the node thinks it should be, the block is considered invalid and you are stuck.

What we need to figure out is why it keeps calculating the difficulty.
Pages: « 1 ... 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 [414] 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 ... 591 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!