Just because the name of the "owner" is written, doesn't it's safe. I doubt that name is really the owner, it's probably just a name taken from somewhere, or even if such person exist, I think his identity was stolen just like what happened with fake ICO project. On top of that, this project just run a ponzi scheme, so it's very likely that the true owner is hiding somewhere.

CZ is clearly trying to take over the token industry. Afaik he said that every project who decided to move to Binance chain will be funded and helped by Binance foundation or whatever it's called. It's a pretty good offer if the team is pragmatic and doesn't care about centralized/decentralized blablabla.

Where did the bonus comes from? It kinda sounds like ponzi tbh, just add it with: deposit and refer people to earn more.
So now you have a ponzi wallet.

Can I know why you talk about KYC disadvantage and XRP? I mean, that's kinda a 'heavy' topic, and it's still being debate in the crypto 'industry'. I think you should instead list about interesting topics that they can learn further (including heavy politics), so, instead of talking about that subject, you can list subjects that's controversial or at least interesting to read further. For example:
- KYC dilemma.
- Crypto exchanges practice in general (wash trading, etc)
- How to get crypto without investment (like bounty)
- STO & ICO, etc

@socks435, while the wallet is not yet listed, I think it's not a bad idea to try it or look at it by yourself. Of course this is not to say that you must trust anyone blindly, in fact, you can contribute to the community by testing or trying to find for malicious code for the new wallet. Just do it if you can tho, no need to force yourself.

Some suggestions:
1. Also add a feature to automatically check how much each assets worth (kinda like ethtokenexplorer bot).
2. Add a feature to notify if an asset worth decrease or increase (how much change depends on configuration).

This might modify this bot to more like wallet-watcher, but I think it's cooler than a simple notifier.

Also be careful with virus like clipboard virus, where it can replace your copied BTC address to the attacker address. It aims to send your Bitcoin to their address if you're not aware. Always double check your pasted address and also make sure you that you use the correct wallet.

Definitely. The best answer for this type of question should be in 2009 where Bitcoin is still worth less than a penny.

I'm seeing at least three groups in regards to Bitcoin price movement, those who believe this is the time for accumulation, the next one said that there will be another dump after this, and the next one is those who don't care where the direction will go, they just act in very short-term with leverage to increase their profits.

As for me, it's impossible to know exactly when is the time to enter, so the best option would be to buy in fractions, keeps some for long-term, and another part to be sold when the price increase. In other words, money management.

Too risky for me. 6% sound good but I'd rather trade and make profits daily than sending my bitcoins where I don't have any control, especially if I don't have a lot of bitcoins. But this is more 'safe' compared to ICO, though I don't believe ICO maniacs will see this as a breakthrough. They'll probably send some bitcoins there and still play with ICO. Let's just see how good or bad customer experience with this one.

Semua info termasuk apa yang situ tanyakan sudah ada di atas. Silakan dibaca sebelum komentar. Kalau sudah dibaca, silakan dibaca ulang.

Most of the time it was by the participant 'permission' that they're okay with being paid on lower rank rates. So it's not contradictory either. The manager only told us that he have allocated some spots for this rank, with this rate. However, I do agree that the allocated rank should be prioritized. So just because a Hero wants to be put on Member shoes, doesn't mean the manager should accept it, especially if there's a bunch of Members applying.

In the middle of this, someone predicted that we will see new low ($2k or $1.8k) after we break the $4.2k resistance. I don't know how they arrive at that conclusion but I'm pretty sure if the momentum keeps on going like this, that would likely never happens.

Looks like the account was directly linked to SIFR. Either it was bought, was part of the team or simply someone who wanted to get a bonus by promoting them. Anyway, never receive such message before, seems like they have a list of targets with some specific criteria.

I've seen several Telegram mods usually start by getting close to one of the team, show their interest in the project by freely helping them to manage the chats and then applying for the position. However, I personally think that a project who doesn't manage the chats by themselves (their core team isn't present, like project managed by Amazix) is not so transparent and not good. So If I were you, I'd only apply for the job if the team is also actively answering/managing the chats.

Did you want to say 'weird' instead of 'wired'? I think it's just a small glitch on CMC. You should look at another site such as Coingecko or Coincodex to compare the price, or you can click Bitcoin to see what is the price on each exchange. I'm pretty sure it's just a glitch on CMC server.

Appreciate your enthusiasm but I'm pretty sure we can't exactly predict when Bitcoin will be mainstream. Maybe 5 years, maybe 50 years, maybe 500 years. Let's just enjoy the progress shall we?


It will be so difficult for the majority of people to arrive at that conclusion. I think most of them would use Bitcoin because it's flexible and more importantly, the value is increasing which is a good thing as a store of value.

What do you mean by binary exchanges seriously? This is my first time reading that binance = binary exchanges, something like IQ Option?


I think Bitfinex is the one who controls Tether though, and Binance just uses it. They even opened new stable coin markets.

They're so proud to do this. Basically, they'll use other people deposits and distribute it to other participants. Not even MLM, it's clear ponzi. This is Bitconnect 2.0 with 'transparency' at its core.

Have you tried finding a gem? I mean, low cap coins or tokens that have a bright future but it's massively undervalued right now. It might be not a trading strategy but it worth to try if you can risk $50 or more to try your luck. Last month I invest in one project with $20 and it gives me nearly $200 profits. Of course, this is very risky and I can't guarantee I can repeat it again.

So with your double in a week strategy, maybe use some of them to 'invest' in a potential coins/tokens. Most of these gems are promoted by BlockchainBrad, themoonwalker or other Twitter crypto influencer.

He might be a polyglot. But of course, we can't really make sure about it. As others mentioned, they might use Google Translate to read a post in a different language. But it's interesting, to say the least, that somebody is interested to read a post across different boards. Maybe post the profile here so we can help with the investigation.