No way! No fuckin' way! Surely not! OMFG! Getting another cup of coffee before reading the next post. Coffee is my  popcorn.

WTF, Garr! This thread has doubled in size since I posted. I was only kidding about starting a bonfire. Now I'm forced to read to catch up to see if any fuel is needed, of which none will be barn wood. Maybe all the posters are thanking you for coming forward with your apology, but I somehow doubt. Hope this episode doesn't interrupt your spring vacation.

Peace.

Now to a reading.

EDIT:

I'm pretty sure the bonfire got started with post 170 at 04:27:19 AM. Back to a reading to see how this now epic thread ends.

We can all agree that the 21M figure was contrived to show the world that a limited number of bitcoins will ever be mined, along with showing the handsome algorithm curve for its creation.

If a lower amount were used (via minus a couple zeros) then the price would have skyrocketed too high, to quickly, spooking too many. Likewise, if a higher amount were chosen, this too would spook the masses for a set of dis/similar factors.

For the common layman, mining or investing in Bitcoin will never be on their radar. But, Bitcoin is something of which could be very beneficial to them, directly a/o indirectly, whether they use it or not.

Down the road, the average Bitcoin user would know, or care less what the exchange rate is, as long as they don't see their dollar, et al., fluctuate wildly on their handware device of choice. If fact, they may not even see a total amount of bitcoins figure (useless they opt to display that option), again, just the amount they have on account based in their local currency. Bitcoin will just be the most honest way to keep score via its back end accountability consisting of ones and zeros, sans any major manipulations in the exchanges.

I'm sure that the above has been expressed a myriad of times more eloquently, but opted to try to put Bitcoin back in perspective, hoping others will expand or correct, if need be, my assessment.

Now, this really pisses me off, Garr. How the hell am I suppose to continue when you're being kind to me?

Depending on your course of study in college, you may not have to work for a traditional employer, probably working for yourself.

Sadly for you, there's still others still sticking it up you butt over this unfortunate episode. I'll only add fuel to the fire if I see a bonfire.

BTW, this is all Josh's fault  , but you're in no position to concur. No need for Josh, either, to weigh in on this comment. He did do the right thing.

As far as for a scammer tag, I feel that there is no way you should get one. Reason being is that it's been stipulated that that aspect has been abolished. In fact, it was mainly that reason that I kinda reneged on my $200 USD donation to Josh/BFL, having no fear of getting tagged. I have since re-reversed that decision and will be honoring it, but it'll be on my terms. But I digress.

Later, bud.

PS: I came damn near to tearing your apology to pieces, but now can't, you fuckin' lucky bastard.  

It wouldn't be if there were a blockchain for gold.

Believe it or not, the company that took over Hostess has a Twinkies clone on the market, albeit they suck--too cakey and the cum filling is bland.

But you brought up a neat stat. Hostess went out of business taking Twinkies with them, yet Twinkies have returned, all within the time frame that BFL has been saying in-two-weeks^TM.

Meanwhile, the guy who told the boldface lie about the FCC cert. tried to accuse me of scamming BFL outta $200 USD.


Shit! There's two lies in that post.


Impossible, for there's no record that a submission was made on the official FCC site.


Impossible, for there's no record that a submission was made on the official FCC site.

Why am I repeating myself?

Why am I repeating myself?

Oddly, they no longer all share the same board, thus all need to be vapor-inspected again.

In the last 20 years, I can count on one hand all the times I've been accused of wrongdoing (all unjustified, with the exception of one, for at night, all goats look the same, and I swore he was one of mine). Yet Josh knows me so well that I'm the worse of the worse that he's ever met.

I love your post above. Pretty spot on, especially this part:


No qualms with you, and my sentiment is genuine, albeit the slight diss.

Later, bud.

BTW, there is a back story as to how all this started. Has something to do with me posting in red and 30pt font about the author of this thread a few days ago. Check my post history to see what I'm in reference to. It'll be easy to spot, like Data's cat.

BTW #2: As of yesterday, the FCC has no information on BFL. I wonder if I can get frequent flyer points for visiting the site so often. If I do, I better make sure of who's flyin' the plane.

You should see it in action. Like party-goers donning it while dancing on some coffee table. 

Xeromucous

Simple instructions:

Fill in your desired numbers.

8pt font will allow you to have five lines, coupled with looking like the activity no., and maybe it won't look fuzzy.

Post it via edited an old post of yours, taking a screenshot then copy, paste, crop, save, upload image.

I'm going to try doing such that with the new format. It doesn't take much time to do.

Any suggestions as to what other numbers could be used is appreciative.

If you opt to use it, then...wait for it...you've lost your fuckin' mind!

---

Posts: 83951
Bowling: 222
Sleep No.: 69
Zip:  42042
Ph: BR549

Going to crop the above oppose to editing an old post.

Per Rassah's request, I'm in the process of vetting them.

#7 is a go, as I've seen they've already embedded and Rassah's ready to send.

#6 ~ I'm curious as to who suggested this one to you, Rassah.

#5 looks okay, for I think I saw a goat.

#4 has been accepting bitcoins since 2011: http://web.archive.org/web/20110924062608/http://spices.org.my/be-involved/donations/

#1, #2 & #3 look swell as well.

As stated above, spices.org.my has been accepting Bitcoin donation since 2011. Depending on their reach (read exposure on the internet), a consideration of a 1/3 of what's currently being doled out if they upped ante up on giving the Bitcon logo a more prominent location on their site. Again, only if their exposure warrants it, coupled with what others feel about it. Overall, they are a very fine organization.

Another way they could earn possibly the fuller amount is if a new press release about their organization is published with Bitcoin mentioned twice (once may not be enough, and three times would be overkill). The news article would have to be some venerable source, oppose to a Yahoo type release. Use thinking outside the box here.

Again, I'm curious as to who suggested harvestlots.org to you.

Later, bud.

I guess theymos ain't too worried about the ~$25,000 USD under Garr's control.



Clearly, one can see that Garr stated that he can be trusted, but then in the very next post bumps his own auction.

I'm not sure what goes through Garr's head, but I'm pretty sure that this is not an isolated incident over and beyond the three shill bids. There is no way Garr can come here and say that that's all he's ever done that was not up to snuff pertaining to Bitcoin. Chances are there's more nefarious activities going on of which we're not yet aware of.

To negate the first sentence of this post, I'm pretty sure theymos has at least made contact with Garr to get the 250 BTC back into his control. If he does get them back, may I suggest placing them in Rassah's control along with the other 750 BTC he has. I truly trust that dude (maybe I should have said him).

Quick aside: How was Garr planning on hosting miners for others when he's planning on attending college this fall? If he lives on campus, he'll be breaking code regulations by operating miners that won't have UL tags.

An idea for some entity who may have a warehouse full of obsolete circuit boards.

I guess there'll be no need to unless you want to discuss Garr's banking and lottery sites.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/garrett-macdonald/4a/234/61


Graduated and over 18, and trusted by theymos as an adult (17 at the time) in currently holding $25K+ USD of this forums money.

And here are Garr's buds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cVvuoG303s Matt being the closest.

Looks like a treasurer may be returning some coins.

Replying in order as I read to catch up, I think you're implying something here. Not exactly what, but I think I have an idea. Hopefully, you and/or I is a wrong. (I sometimes pen via a skewed vernacular)