Check out Siacoin.. still a lot of work in progress but it's getting there.. Almost all the points noted here are there and then some.. The coin looks impressive. You would be able to share your disk storage as you would be your own cloud storage service. Might look more into it. Thanks  No problem  Already noticed that a lot of people don't yet know about this and after they do, most of them are genuinely interested.. |
|
|
|
Check out Siacoin.. still a lot of work in progress but it's getting there.. Almost all the points noted here are there and then some.. |
|
|
|
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950? Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How? we get about that for a 280x also ... #crysx MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250 XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250 280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks On Wolfs bins I only get 6.5Mhs for a 280X(1100/1500), so the bin you're using are definitely faster. Although the bins are Linux versions? thats what i meant ... we get that same speed using wolfs bins on gigabyte 280x / 7970 oc cards - with the same oc clocks ... any higher and the cards become unstable ... and yes - they are under linux - fedora 19 x64 ... with compiled sgminer-dev 5.1.1-17-g6666 ... this is why i would be interested to see how those 'other' bins work under linux - and how much of a hashrate increase ( if any ) in linux ... #crysx I'll check back here if you've tested, although my rig is set up in windows 7, so hopefully there can be some bin for that eventually. The bins do work on windows 7. The same bins can work on linux or windows. Reference Wolf0's instructions here. https://www.reddit.com/r/DRKCoin/comments/2o1yoz/rewritten_x11_binaries/ There is no place where it says if you are under linux do this and if you are under windows do this.. From that link you would download wolf0's I8 bins and rename them to your system which may be is probably I4 or I8. Wolf0 used to make a 64bit version of sgminer for windows and I'm pretty sure those would produce I8 bins. Wolf his bins work on both platforms. That's a fact. I haven't tried the russian ones. I'm not going to because they're compiled on a windows system. And if there's anything else modded besided the .cl files, it won't work on your sgminer version. Wolf his will work because there are no modifications done outside the .cl files. |
|
|
|
For those with Fury cards, i have compiled a Fiji bin for X11 doing 11+Mhz, post regarding this can be found here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1116027.msg11880191#msg11880191Stock speed when compiling with the stock kernel is around 6.5 Mhz When renaming the Hawaii binary from wolf you'll hit around 8.5 Mhz. So this is a good improvement for now link to bin. http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=00265615109400492534This is my own mod, not as fast as the russian one or Wolf his mod. When compiling on a 290x i hit 7.7 Mhz, on wolf his binaries i hit 9.5 Mhz But there aren't any Fiji binaries out there so that's why i'm sharing Greetings |
|
|
|
Quiete good result for x11, What about Quark algo? And also which kernel and miner are you using?is tyhat open source or private? İ 'll buyt some new cards, i didn't decide to buy fury x or 970's .Your answer so important to choosing cards )) On the furyx quark is doing 22 MHASH with the russian closed source miner.(5MHASH with the opensource miner) 2x 970 cards will cost around same as 1 furyx, and the hashrate is much higher. Lyra2re: 3.950 MHASH vs 420khash (9,4 times faster on the 970's) Release 54
2 Gtx 970 / Nicehash (QUARK still the best payout BTC BTC  ) EVGA 04G-2974-KR GeForce GTX 970 Superclocked 4GB QUARK (0.014 BTC / day atm) ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x 31 350 khash/sLYRA2 (0.003 BTC / day atm) ccminer.exe -i 18 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a lyra2 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x 3950 khash/s VS 2383 khash/s Release53 QUBIT (0.006 BTC / day atm) ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -a Qubit -o stratum+tcp://qubit.usa.nicehash.com:3344 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x 25 500 khash/sX11 (0.0087 BTC / day atm) ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://quark.usa.nicehash.com:3336 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x 16 450 khash/sX13 (0.006135 BTC / day atm) ccminer.exe -i 19 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x13.usa.nicehash.com:3337 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x 15 600 khash/sX15 (0.0071 BTC / day atm) ccminer.exe -i 21 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://x15.usa.nicehash.com:3339 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x 15 200 khash/sKECCAK (0.0024 BTC / day atm) ccminer.exe -i 22.9 -r 5 -R 10 --cpu-priority 5 -q -a Keccak -o stratum+tcp://keccak.usa.nicehash.com:3338 -u xxxxxxxxxxx -p x 878 800 khash/sThanks SP, djm34 and all other who help and contribute !! True _sp, quark is only doing 23Mh. But this is with a non Fiji optimized binary. If with the same source a fiji binary is compiled the hashrate will definitely hit 30 if not 35Mhz. Regarding X11: with my mod i hit 11Mhz+, with the same mod i only get 7Mhz on a 290x. Knowing that i hit 9.5 mhz with wolf his mod/binary. So knowing this, Fiji (fury x) will go much higher if optimized correct. I'm waiting for Wolf to get his Fury X, then we will talk again @fenomenhaa It's my own X11 mod, but i'll release the binary if asked. Greetings |
|
|
|
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests. New X11 result: 11Mhz ScreenshotWill do some other tests later. Greetings Wow nice! What was the heat on one of those cards? Stable for long term or just a short term test? The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot. I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any.. Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes. Greetings 33 just seems so damn low! The liquid cooling really keeps them that low even while hashing at 11mh/s? These cards could easily become king of the mining world when the prices dip a bit. 33 = low, i'm 100% sure that they can go higher, when i run my darkcoin mod on a 290x it goes to 7.7 Mhz, knowing that Wolf his mod easiliy reaches 9Mhz that means that my fury's should in theory easily touch 14Mhz.. The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them Wow! What are your ambient temperatures? I know a lot of people who do multiple rigs have a room that gets pretty warm but this can't be the case with this rig right? It's around 25 Degrees in my warehouse. 20 cards in total, all of them under 70Degrees, (i keep em that way though..) So yeah, the Fury's are at full power only 10-15 Degrees hotter then my space |
|
|
|
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests. New X11 result: 11Mhz ScreenshotWill do some other tests later. Greetings Wow nice! What was the heat on one of those cards? Stable for long term or just a short term test? The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot. I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any.. Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes. Greetings 33 just seems so damn low! The liquid cooling really keeps them that low even while hashing at 11mh/s? These cards could easily become king of the mining world when the prices dip a bit. 33 = low, i'm 100% sure that they can go higher, when i run my darkcoin mod on a 290x it goes to 7.7 Mhz, knowing that Wolf his mod easiliy reaches 9Mhz that means that my fury's should in theory easily touch 14Mhz.. The liquid cooling is indeed very awesome. they never exceed +45Degrees and that is when i'm really pushing them |
|
|
|
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests. New X11 result: 11Mhz Screenshot http://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.pngWill do some other tests later. Greetings Wow nice! What was the heat on one of those cards? Stable for long term or just a short term test? The temps didn't go higher than what you see in that screenshot. I let it run for 5 minutes or so, no issues, don't think there will be any.. Got 13mhz with worksize 128 but an occasional hw error after a few minutes. Greetings |
|
|
|
AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Results:
– X11 default: 6.778 MHS
– X11 Wolf0 Mod: 8.123 MHS
– X13 default: 5.614 MHS
– X13 Wolf0 Mod: 7.176 MHS
– X15 default: 4.69 MHS
– X15 Wolf0 Mod: 6.335 MHS
– Quark modified: 22.37 MHS
– Qubit modified: 21.15 MHS
– Neoscrypt default: 147 KHS
– Lyra2RE default: 287 KHS
– Lyra2RE Pallas Mod: 450 KHS
Test from cryptomining blog
I did some new tests. New X11 result: 11Mhz Screenshothttp://s2.postimg.org/5do903dsp/Schermafbeelding_2015_07_14_om_21_18_57.pngWill do some other tests later. Greetings |
|
|
|
Why is Scrypt performance not on that list? Doesn't necessarily matter that GPUs aren't good for scrypt anymore, but moreso because scrypt performance is/was a pretty good baseline indicator of hashing chops between various cards. 280 could do ~600-700khs (unless you had one of those Gigabyte WF3 supercards  ) 280x could do 710-760khs 290/x could do 800-1000khs Very good point. I hoped for some scrypt numbers too. Well, as most know, every driver above 13.11 or so will give Hardware errors or bad hashrate when mining Scrypt. 13.11 drivers just simply do not work with Fury X cards. I have 3 Fury's running and managed to get scrypt running without Hardware errors. Here are the results. I can see that the cards are not even doing their best to perform. If i run any other Algo the temps will go up to 45-50 Degrees. I tried changing worksize, intensity, threads, with every change i did i got Hardware errors, bad results or even Freezing the system. Results  http://s30.postimg.org/fs3zbmtmp/scrypt.pngGreetings! |
|
|
|
|
Also still selling over here..
Preferable in bulk (we can discuss a nice price :-))
Greetings!
|
|
|
|
Regarding the new 390X: It's now pulling 267,5 Watts at full load, Clocks: 1080/1500, Fans @ 100%, 35C outside, card is at 65C Haven't had time yet to do more tests but will definitely do soon. Will update this post when i do. Greetings Edit: Here's a picture of the wattage when running at full load with 5 cards. (Mixed Rig) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_cBBoZ_PTwOYVd4Sk92ZnJFdDd6b2FlbjFubm5vSWtXSGY4A 390X, 2x 290(regular) and 2x 280x @Pallas I might just do a test for you Give me a few minutes! Edit 2: So the wattage i said earlier was at full load when mining Sia. Here's the wattage when mining Quark.. serious difference i might say https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_cBBoZ_PTwOZHEwWXNaa3NRZVFQQUI4STFfU2luQUExeFhvSo let's say 75 Watts for Mobo, proc, mem, etc.. (including Fans connected to mobo) , so around 250 Watts for the card at full load. Give or take.. Also here's a screenshot with some more info http://s15.postimg.org/hi31rrky3/quark390x.pngWill get some testresults of one of my 290x's soon. They're in another rig and don't want to get them out now. |
|
|
|
Buying 50M Siacoins at 0.1 btc per million
Nice one |
|
|
|
Still selling some over here.. for prices, pm me got plenty, so bulk is possible! 20Mil for 3.5BTC for example ;-) |
|
|
|
A single 980ti is aleady doing 23MHASH on the default clocks. (quark)  Fury X will beat that :p Got a new 390x today, it's running fine now Will order a meter and post my findings later this week. Greetings |
|
|
|
I got an R9 390x this weekend.
My first impression.
I ran it next to a Sapphire R9 290X 8Gb Mem, hash rate was almost exactly the same. If you didn't know they were different, you wouldn't have noticed.
What it "did" very well, and yes, it "did" it.. haha, was OC, Sapphire is known to be able to OC very good.
This was no exception.
+ that it stayed almost 10degrees cooler then the 290X
Maybe that's a coincidence, maybe not.
10 min after i did some tests, i rebooted and it never came alive again.
So for those interested in buying a 390x. Think Twice... Buy a 290x, which does the same thing but cheaper!
As soon as The Fury X arrives (next week it seems) i'll be posting my findings.
Greetings
if you don't measure power usage, you might not find big difference, also if you just tried an algo might not be significant either... This is a bit thin, what you say here (and I am not defending amd or else... as I am rather an nvidia guy...). Yes you're right, tested it on 3 algo's, quark, X11 and Sia Difference was close to nothing on all 3 algo's I should get me a new meter to see how much electricity it was pulling. I'll order one tomorrow :-) |
|
|
|
|
I got an R9 390x this weekend.
My first impression.
I ran it next to a Sapphire R9 290X 8Gb Mem, hash rate was almost exactly the same. If you didn't know they were different, you wouldn't have noticed.
What it "did" very well, and yes, it "did" it.. haha, was OC, Sapphire is known to be able to OC very good.
This was no exception.
+ that it stayed almost 10degrees cooler then the 290X
Maybe that's a coincidence, maybe not.
10 min after i did some tests, i rebooted and it never came alive again.
So for those interested in buying a 390x. Think Twice... Buy a 290x, which does the same thing but cheaper!
As soon as The Fury X arrives (next week it seems) i'll be posting my findings.
Greetings
|
|
|
|
I've downloaded the PIMP to check whether it a HW fault or what. I've interchanged the GPUs across their slots again yesterday - the same behaviour, the same sgminer output with -n key.....
Under PIMP both GPUs working well, sgminer sending the shares from both and the pool accepting it... Display Driver Uninstaller does not help, so as complete deleting and reinstalling the drivers both 14.12 and old ones. I will reinstall Windows. I need a quick solution instead of red-eyed nights...  If you're on PIMP you don't need to uninstall drivers. Just download Ati catalyst to the /tmp folder, unzip it there, run it and you'll be fine I have done the same with 14.12 drivers and now with 15.5 drivers. Works perfectly. Greetings |
|
|
|
Selling @ 0.25 /Million (price can be discussed in private convo, especially when buying in bulk!) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
