|
jjjordan
|
 |
July 18, 2015, 01:55:14 PM |
|
Thanks man, worked out great! thanks chryx, I aint an expert, but if filesize is not the same means it's a different file, right? That is why I asked for these. By the way - is there a reason you always use double enter (new line) in your posts? I mean it's not some kind of netiquette that I am not aware of, is it? Because if it's not it just makes us scroll more... |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 18, 2015, 01:59:44 PM |
|
hi rednow ... there is no need to rename or try and locate ... check my previous post and you will see the original thread that wolf released the bins to ... afterall - they are his original bins ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 18, 2015, 02:09:37 PM |
|
Thanks man, worked out great! thanks chryx, I aint an expert, but if filesize is not the same means it's a different file, right? That is why I asked for these. By the way - is there a reason you always use double enter (new line) in your posts? I mean it's not some kind of netiquette that I am not aware of, is it? Because if it's not it just makes us scroll more... no problem at all ... that is the link to wolfs original bins - which are still being used to this day - even with the latest compile ... as for the double entry and the way i post ... the answer is no  ... there is no reason on an etiquette or netiquette level as to why i write the way i do ... it all stems back to the corporate days of my work life - and the dislike of the restrictions that one is placed in corporate situations ... apart from the fact that it is a habitual thing to not only write in an double entry form - but also the dots and signoff ... there is always a means to my method - and that always comes back to being the person who chrysophylax is ... my signature in more than just a signoff - it is also the way that my posts are written ... i dont apologize for it - but do understand that it does take some room and unfortunately will end up getting up some people ... believe it or not - i personally am a concise and forward and 'in your face' human being ... its just me - not any conformation to anything that you are not aware of ... its just me mate ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
jjjordan
|
|
July 18, 2015, 02:18:13 PM |
|
Thanks man, worked out great! thanks chryx, I aint an expert, but if filesize is not the same means it's a different file, right? That is why I asked for these. By the way - is there a reason you always use double enter (new line) in your posts? I mean it's not some kind of netiquette that I am not aware of, is it? Because if it's not it just makes us scroll more... no problem at all ... that is the link to wolfs original bins - which are still being used to this day - even with the latest compile ... as for the double entry and the way i post ... the answer is no ... there is no reason on an etiquette or netiquette level as to why i write the way i do ... it all stems back to the corporate days of my work life - and the dislike of the restrictions that one is placed in corporate situations... apart from the fact that it is a habitual thing to not only write in an double entry form - but also the dots and signoff ... there is always a means to my method - and that always comes back to being the person who chrysophylax is ... my signature in more than just a signoff - it is also the way that my posts are written ... i dont apologize for it - but do understand that it does take some room and unfortunately will end up getting up some people ... believe it or not - i personally am a concise and forward and 'in your face' human being ... its just me - not any conformation to anything that you are not aware of ... its just me mate ... #crysx That's alright - it just makes more sense when one line of thought is put into a paragraph and a new thought is in another paragraph. Also I usually try to limit each line in certain number of characters otherwise it's like being at a tennis game... That's just me..  As far as the bins - I have no idea where rednoW got them but they are different than wolf's and gave me additional ~10%. (I used wolf's bins before I put rednoW's) |
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 18, 2015, 06:41:55 PM |
|
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
|
|
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
July 18, 2015, 07:28:58 PM |
|
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
yeah, those bins do get about 10% more than Wolf0's. BUT it also has a tendency to become idle over time and require stop and restart, a major pain, while Wolf0's just keep going, and going,... At least that is my experience. |
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 19, 2015, 01:10:31 AM
Last edit: July 19, 2015, 01:07:25 PM by chrysophylax |
|
Well, someone FINALLY beat my half-done bins from 7-8 months ago. It's about time.
and for that long ive been asking you and sp to optimize x11 to the max ... so 7-8 months is quite a feat there wolf ... i would still be interested in much more x11 optimizations - ccminer and sgminer - but i have yet to have anyone WANT to do it ... im sure there could be some decent hashes squeezed out of that algo still ... as well as nice donations from the wallet of miners - like us ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
kenshirothefist (OP)
|
|
July 19, 2015, 07:29:36 AM |
|
A small but annoying bug regarding diff was found in cgminer, could somebody please check out if sgminer is affected as well? See this cgminer pull request: https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/pull/679? This is a small but annoying bug, causing small loss of performance (in terms of accounted shares on pool) when changing difficulty - especially when using vardiff or often diff changing (when switching from low to high diff miner immediately sends high diff while is should/could still send low diff and pool might wrongly account for shares). If sgminer is also affected, please push this patch to https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer as well. Thanks! This has now been merged into sgminer-dev. I suggest all of you using custom sgminer forks to also include this patch since it will yield in a few percent better performance/payouts (on any pool). https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/commit/8bf1c1807cca1ca0ec0f87b452e3d1cb395f0b1b |
|
|
|
|
|
Pansyfaust
|
|
July 19, 2015, 10:10:40 PM |
|
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950?  Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How? |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 19, 2015, 11:48:24 PM |
|
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950? Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How? we get about that for a 280x also ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
jjjordan
|
|
July 20, 2015, 01:48:14 AM |
|
I don't think so, no.
Is it ok for x11 on amd 7950? Struggling to get anywhere near this speed for a 7950, and i'm using an 280X. How? we get about that for a 280x also ... #crysx MSI R7950 TF3 is 6.25M steady. at 1050/1250 XFX 7950 is 5.75 at 950/1250 280Xes are 7 to 7.5 depending on brand/clocks |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 20, 2015, 02:25:25 AM |
|
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
im guessing no one has the linux version of the bins - do they? ... they are the ones that would have the '8' notation to them ( darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0.bin is windows - darkcoin-modTahitigw64l8ku0.bin is linux ) ... if so - i would like to try them out also ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
jch9678
|
|
July 20, 2015, 04:40:52 AM |
|
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
im guessing no one has the linux version of the bins - do they? ... they are the ones that would have the '8' notation to them ( darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0.bin is windows - darkcoin-modTahitigw64l8ku0.bin is linux ) ... if so - i would like to try them out also ... #crysx I don't think the 8 means they are for linux. I've been told this l4 for 32-bit, l8 for 64-bit I think you get the 8 if you compile a bin with a 64bit version of sgminer and a 4 with a 32bit version. I don't use linux but I don't think bins are platform specific. You should be able to rename the optimized bins with the names of the bins produced on your system regardless of 4 or 8. |
BTC: 15GqpmqNNJ1REWrDWTfymh7moos1sEvz7A
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 20, 2015, 05:37:39 AM |
|
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
im guessing no one has the linux version of the bins - do they? ... they are the ones that would have the '8' notation to them ( darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0.bin is windows - darkcoin-modTahitigw64l8ku0.bin is linux ) ... if so - i would like to try them out also ... #crysx I don't think the 8 means they are for linux. I've been told this l4 for 32-bit, l8 for 64-bit I think you get the 8 if you compile a bin with a 64bit version of sgminer and a 4 with a 32bit version. I don't use linux but I don't think bins are platform specific. You should be able to rename the optimized bins with the names of the bins produced on your system regardless of 4 or 8. that doesnt work ... tried erlier - and they just refuse to work ( mine ) giving errors all over ... i am pretty sure that the 8 denotes the linux versions ... i would just like to test on the linux compiled sgminer with those bins - if anyone actually does have them of course ... the 'standard' linux bins that get created are actually denoted by an 8 - i can see within the directory ... not sure why they do this - but that seems to be the way to tell the difference between them ... the ones with a '4' - which seems to denote windows - does work at all in linux ... so if anyone has a copy of the bins / miner for linux - we would be very appreciative if we could test it on the 280x cards ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
jjjordan
|
|
July 20, 2015, 05:54:46 AM |
|
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
im guessing no one has the linux version of the bins - do they? ... they are the ones that would have the '8' notation to them ( darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0.bin is windows - darkcoin-modTahitigw64l8ku0.bin is linux ) ... if so - i would like to try them out also ... #crysx I don't think the 8 means they are for linux. I've been told this l4 for 32-bit, l8 for 64-bit I think you get the 8 if you compile a bin with a 64bit version of sgminer and a 4 with a 32bit version. I don't use linux but I don't think bins are platform specific. You should be able to rename the optimized bins with the names of the bins produced on your system regardless of 4 or 8. that doesnt work ... tried erlier - and they just refuse to work ( mine ) giving errors all over ... i am pretty sure that the 8 denotes the linux versions ... i would just like to test on the linux compiled sgminer with those bins - if anyone actually does have them of course ... the 'standard' linux bins that get created are actually denoted by an 8 - i can see within the directory ... not sure why they do this - but that seems to be the way to tell the difference between them ... the ones with a '4' - which seems to denote windows - does work at all in linux ... so if anyone has a copy of the bins / miner for linux - we would be very appreciative if we could test it on the 280x cards ... #crysx The bins work just fine (I4) on 32 bit linux. I8 is the 64 bit one. If you have 64 bit linux I'm pretty sure I4 won't work. |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 20, 2015, 07:02:23 AM |
|
This x11 bins are from original "kachur" sgminer 5.1.1 package. When cryptomining-blog leaked this miner they only supplied with quark and qubit but miss x11 ... )))
im guessing no one has the linux version of the bins - do they? ... they are the ones that would have the '8' notation to them ( darkcoin-modTahitigw64l4ku0.bin is windows - darkcoin-modTahitigw64l8ku0.bin is linux ) ... if so - i would like to try them out also ... #crysx I don't think the 8 means they are for linux. I've been told this l4 for 32-bit, l8 for 64-bit I think you get the 8 if you compile a bin with a 64bit version of sgminer and a 4 with a 32bit version. I don't use linux but I don't think bins are platform specific. You should be able to rename the optimized bins with the names of the bins produced on your system regardless of 4 or 8. that doesnt work ... tried erlier - and they just refuse to work ( mine ) giving errors all over ... i am pretty sure that the 8 denotes the linux versions ... i would just like to test on the linux compiled sgminer with those bins - if anyone actually does have them of course ... the 'standard' linux bins that get created are actually denoted by an 8 - i can see within the directory ... not sure why they do this - but that seems to be the way to tell the difference between them ... the ones with a '4' - which seems to denote windows - does work at all in linux ... so if anyone has a copy of the bins / miner for linux - we would be very appreciative if we could test it on the 280x cards ... #crysx The bins work just fine (I4) on 32 bit linux. I8 is the 64 bit one. If you have 64 bit linux I'm pretty sure I4 won't work. yup - thats it then ... tanx for clarifying that ... it is 64bit linux ... would you ( or anyone ) know where i can get my hands on the x64 ( I8 ) ones? ... #crysx |
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
July 20, 2015, 07:28:41 AM |
|
wolf0's bins do work on 64 bit linux even though they are "l4".
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 20, 2015, 08:08:11 AM |
|
wolf0's bins do work on 64 bit linux even though they are "l4".
i have wolfs bins run under x64 linux ... thats not the issue pallas ... the issue is where i can get my hands on the x11 bins for the russian miner for linux ... rednow has posted the bins that are slightly faster than wolfs ( apparently - by 10% or more ) but they are not working under linux with the current incarnation of the sgminer compile ... any ideas? ... i am not in the office either - wont be till tomorrow night ... so i cant test it out other than a vm here at home - which is not practical ... #crysx |
|
|
|
sp_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
July 20, 2015, 09:11:30 AM |
|
here: https://yadi.sk/d/cIOfdT7UghKAZNote that I haven't tried it myself. (not sure if it's safe) This x11 bin is 1.6Mbyte big, while the wolf0 bin is around 0.920kb |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
July 20, 2015, 09:23:09 AM |
|
here: https://yadi.sk/d/cIOfdT7UghKAZNote that I haven't tried it myself. (not sure if it's safe) This x11 bin is 1.6Mbyte big, while the wolf0 bin is around 0.920kb tanx sp ... ill get to it tomorrow ... ill run it on the test machine when i get into the office tomorrow - which is secured ... tanx ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
