New Counterparty Timeline Highlights Platform's Milestones

The following link is an interactive timeline that includes all the major projects, tokens and developments that happened on Bitcoin's Counterparty platform between 2014 - 2023:

https://time.graphics/line/858561

It covers notable early tokens like TEST, SEBUH, OLGA, JPJA, and projects like NILIcoins, Spells of Genesis, Sarutobi, Rare Pepe, Bitcorns, and Kaleidoscope.



A lot of project/token creators had/have presences on the forum -- some are gone, but a few are still active, such as nili, who was one of the first people ever to experiment with tokenized art projects.

The timeline was developed by davesta, who is a Rare Pepe artist and now one of the most active Counterparty ambassadors. He's a real cool dude and if you're on Twitter I recommend giving him a follow.

There is of course a lot of hype currently surrounding Ordinals, leading a lot of people to believe that this was the first time Bitcoin had NFTs. Well, that's not true at all: Counterparty has been doing it since 2014 and continues to this day with projects like Fake Rares, Notable Pepes, Bassmint, and others.

Uh... I have a hard time believing this is real. Bing AI actually called somebody a troll? Seems like they would steer clear of doing anything that could potentially result in a defamation lawsuit against them, or even say anything bad about people. I asked it the same thing and it returned a totally different answer:


Can anyone else confirm it says "Digaran is known for being a troll"? Here is the website:

https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&showconv=1

Hey, if you're gonna buy a real shitcoin, you should buy one that:

1) knows its a shitcoin,
2) has historical provenance, and
3) is super duper cheap.

This section is filled to the brim with shitcoins... You're gonna tell me you're seriously interested in them and not the Shitcoin? The original second third Shitcoin ever?

Here's how you do it:

1) Simply download & install the Dogewallet.
2) Send yourself a handful of Dogecoin (anywhere between 4 and infinity will work).
3) Send DOGE to the SHITCOIN dispenser address:

https://dogeparty.xchain.io/tx/b3ff46c2c233607c2cfd9d098a52111f8dc8515e0a77ddaa3ce4ee2c315da625

And voila, 100 SHITCOINs will be transferred to your Dogewallet address for every 3 DOGE sent! It's that easy folks. No intermediary required.

Let me know if you do and I'll load you up with some free goodies.

Experience the power of Shitcoin today!

Thanks for finding this and posting it... I spent a few minutes reading through the OpenAI terms and conditions the other day looking for something similar but didn't notice that clause.

I suspect we will continue to have lazy shitposters finding ways to skirt their ChatGPT copy/pastes from being detected by the detectors, rather than bothering to use their own brains to generate thoughts. Here's one such example:


Here you can see the post is buffered by original content ("Exactly!", and "Anyway, ..."). But the middle chunk is largely AI-generated.

Copyleaks: AI content detected
Hivemoderation: 100% likely to be AI generated
Sapling.ai: 100% fake

As a matter of fact I'm going thru this person's posts and will probably find a lot of them to report here. The Gambling section is chock full of such posts. Where will the moderators draw the line? We'll find out.

That's right... I've been doing this for two whole years! I understand that this forum is just about the worst place to advertise my tokens or try to get people interested in Dogeparty in general, but I have to mark the occasion here anyway. Here is a thread on the Dogermint story in case anyone is interested in learning more about what we've accomplished:

https://twitter.com/dogermint/status/1726557138364060039

(ps: there's a secret giveaway at the end of it... all you need is a Dogeparty wallet in order to participate)

The most entertaining aspect of this is that only one DT has since ~Vod. 

I think theymos has been tired of the drama for years, and I don't blame him.

I'm of the opinion that people shouldn't be negged today for 5-year-old offenses, especially if they already have a negative (or more than one) for the offense.

For whatever reason I didn't notice digaran back then, but now I find his takes for the most part humorous and not overly annoying. Let's break down 1miau's trust rating on him:


This much is true but this in itself is not a good reason to red tag somebody. Many (most?) of us that have been around for a while have been a troll in some capacity or another, at least briefly.


I'm not sure about the "spreading lies" part, would need a clearer example than what is referenced in the trust rating. As far as harassing DT members is concerned, yes I believe that would constitute a negative, but only if they are being harassed about DT-related matters. "Stirring shit" is definitely more neutral rating territory.


Well the asking money for negative rating removal was certainly a faux pas, but again it was 5 years ago and I don't think another negative is warranted.

Of course you do, you're in the signature campaign for it.


Yes, that's exactly right.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1392974251011895300
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1433481968692305963
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1396916392629137409


Everybody first noticed bitcoin. You may not be aware of this but bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency.
 

OK, name one coin that requires more energy consumption than bitcoin.


No, not at all. Everything you just said is incorrect. He likes Dogecoin not just because its a "meme coin" but because it has 1 minute block times and low fees. Nobody was shilling Dogecoin to Musk before he decided to invest in it & help its development.

If you post AI-generated text without crediting the AI, how is that any different from plagiarism? You are attempting to take credit for something that you didn't write.


For the AI to be committing plagiarism, it would have to be demonstrated that the AI is directly copying words from another source. It does occasionally do this, but not always.

Dogeparty to Get Curated Collection on Emblem Vault

After the successful transition of vaulted Rare Pepes to their own curated collection, the Emblem Vault team is setting their sights on doing likewise for Dogeparty assets. This will help assure that the contents of vaults match their descriptions, making it easier for anyone to locate assets that have been wrapped for sale on OpenSea (or other ETH-based NFT marketplaces). There are currently 454 vaulted Dogeparty assets, many of which are considered historical or vintage assets. Here are the top 10 most popular vintage assets to be vaulted (assets with issuances from 2014):

 - GOLDENSHIBE (82)
 - HAPPYDOGE (70)
 - SUPERSHIBE (39)
 - JOLLYROGER (36)
 - MILKYWAY (24)
 - HAPPYSHIBE (21)
 - BENGALS (17)
 - FLOWCOIN (17)
 - DOGEDIME (13)
 - NISSANGTR (13)

(just want to point out that 6 of these 10 are Dogermint assets and I'm quite proud of that fact)

Nope, much like this coin, Elon doesn't give a f about SHIB (well he'd have to know about this coin in order to not give a f about it, and I'm almost certain he does not -- it has very little presence outside this forum). One time somebody asked him how much SHIB he held and he answered zero. Elon said he held BTC, ETH, and DOGE, and DOGE is the only coin where he's taken an active interest in its advancement.

Absolutely.


Yes, if its mentioned that ChatGPT was used to write the text, then its OK, because you are crediting the source (similar to putting a reference). It isn't great, and posts that are copy/pastes of articles or tweets with a "Source:" appended to the end of it usually suck to read... But its not technically plagiarism so the posters get away with it.

I don't know about everyone else, but when I start reading a text that is clearly AI-generated, my eyes just kind of gloss over the words... I have no interest in reading it because I know a human didn't write it. We should really do our best not to let the forum turn into a place where this is the norm.

For the first time since Week 5 I'm actually pretty happy about my lineup. But I won't go into depth about it lest I jinx myself. Achane is coming back after 5 weeks out. I'ma keep resting him though, just one more week...

As ChiBitCTy said, those injuries are disappointing AF... what can you do except adjust as quickly as possible. Speaking of adjustments, I think its kind of interesting that there seems to be a slight correlation between a team's number of moves and their league standing. Look at the Potatoes and the Barbarians, league leaders & 32 moves apiece... perhaps there's something to be said for that as a strategy.

This is true. As a collector of old blockchain knick-knacks I looked into it once and all the original Colored Coins protocols are dead. I tried messaging their creators and they never responded to me.


Point taken. The big difference is BRC-20 tokens can't offer any kind of functionality... They aren't being used for anything other than hot potato ponzinomics. I suspect we'll never see them gain functionality as it will be prohibitively expensive to move them around as compared to ETH (usually), MATIC or BSC. Besides, that's not what the players of that particular game are there for, anyway.

OK well there you have it, straight from the horse's mouth.


So this is your coin? You appear to have control over the website & GitHub repository; this along with the info in the quote above makes me believe that it is. Well man I gotta say, this is a real piece of horse excrement. But you do seem dedicated to making it appear less scammy. Probably should have built the entire website first and dispersed the master stash into more wallets before launching the sig campaign, which BTW, seems to have no quality control whatsoever.


I'm not so sure about that -- there's already a token with his name in it that he's never said peep about, Dogelon Mars... Its ticker is even ELON.


LOL. Speak for yourself. Sometimes I wish I was shameless, I'd probably have a lot more money by now.

I was reminded of this meme:



Several years back my state passed a ludicrous law that forbids any USA-based crypto exchange from servicing me as a customer (because the law's demands on exchanges are ridiculous), so what is being proposed is literally impossible for me to follow. I imagine there's at least hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of Americans in a similar situation. As we discussed in the other thread, there's no way the IRS will have the manpower & resources to track us all down, and they will only go after the worst offenders (according to tax data they receive from complying exchanges).


You ask some good questions larry, and seem to be interested in cutting-edge bitcoin tech & policy on your own accord, so you deserve every merit you get, even if it turns out you were a government mole all along

I'm curious (and may open my own poll about it shortly), is there anyone who believes that posting unaccredited AI text isn't plagiarism? It seems to me the general consensus is yes, it is plagiarism, but I am potentially biased because that's what I believe as well.

Aside from one famous example (and kudos to Royse777 for his no-AI policy), I rarely see accounts removed from campaigns after getting caught posting AI. This could be because campaign managers are largely unaware of it happening -- usually at most people will leave a neutral trust rating for the offense, if anything at all.

So AI posters exist in a legal loophole right now:

- its often hard to know 100% for sure that a post is AI-generated
- its not considered plagiarism by moderator standards (as of the moment)
- there's no precedent for red tagging users for doing this.

I'm skeptical of any account that addresses people as "dear".

Edit: @Hamza2424, I know you are currently evading a ban and that you are Cosmic Beyonders, SaimExch, Waleedzain323 and Waleedhaji... I'm sure you have several other accounts as well, some currently active.