🖤😏

[digaran]

🖤

[1714610933]

1714610933

[1714610933]

1714610933

[SmartGold01]

At least if anyone has any problems with me, GROW some balls and talk to me face to face, using trust system like this is for cowards.

I can't justify what happened between you both but what I understood is that if they gave you R. trust or N. Trust it's as a result of the effect of what you did, because redtrust is not given that way from some information I have read so far about red trust. If you had any issues with anyone I think is something you need to sort out amicably with them except is something that involves scam which is possibly will not end of giving someone a redtag knowing too well that is scam associated.

[paid2]

The reference linked in 1miau's feedback isn't related to the topic about Gaza :

1miau

2023-10-18

Reference

digaran is a proven troll. He is known for spreading lies, harassing forum (DT) members and is known for his past shady dealings. Not to be trusted.

Aren't you mixing up the different problems OP?

[BabyBandit]

I seen many users calling other users "troll" but when I look up the reason for the name calling, it's often because the "troll" don't share the name caller opinions. If you ask me it's a very insecure behavior.
"Don't you dare to challenge me and if you do i give you negative feedback!"
It reminds me of my self......................When I was six and an extreme insecure kid, lucky for me I did grow up and matured.
Now I don't see you as a troll digaran, but if you want to be one here is my best advice.  

[1miau]

1miau, I see you have updated your trust feedback and included a new reference.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=806776

It's not allowed to update it after you have shown for everyone once again, that you are just an obsessed troll who's repeatedly stirring shit out of nowhere and without any reason?
Here are some of your off-topic troll posts:

1miau

This is because these users are examples, indeed. They are also Merit Sources and (with few exceptions) DT1 users. And they act fair and decent.

Thanks for the joke OP.

Don't tell me, you and your nazi friend will give them neutral or even negative, right? Because who really cares if 2 nazis run around the forum and individually harass forum members with threats, trust feedbacks, am I right or am I right?

The way I see some of you weasel nazis operate, soon it will be you and your alts all alone left here with nothing to do but circle fingering each other.😅

Looks like I'm living in your mind-rent free. 
So, if there was any doubt if these feedbacks on your account were justified, at least now we know that they are 100% deserved. 

Just in case he decides to change anything.

Trust updated again. 
Feel free to make a screenshot again, if you feel satisfied doing this. 

[Vod]

I guess God actually considers me trustworthy, which is all I need.

OG believes in god as well.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/religion/nearly-1-700-priests-clergy-accused-sex-abuse-are-unsupervised-n1062396

Do you know that 6,000 - 10,000 churches are recommissioned annually?   

I lock my topics intentionally, just to annoy you

This is trollish behavior.  :/

[nutildah]

I'm of the opinion that people shouldn't be negged today for 5-year-old offenses, especially if they already have a negative (or more than one) for the offense.

For whatever reason I didn't notice digaran back then, but now I find his takes for the most part humorous and not overly annoying. Let's break down 1miau's trust rating on him:

digaran is a proven troll.

This much is true but this in itself is not a good reason to red tag somebody. Many (most?) of us that have been around for a while have been a troll in some capacity or another, at least briefly.

He is known for spreading lies, repeatedly harassing forum (DT) members + stirring shit (msg63185119)

I'm not sure about the "spreading lies" part, would need a clearer example than what is referenced in the trust rating. As far as harassing DT members is concerned, yes I believe that would constitute a negative, but only if they are being harassed about DT-related matters. "Stirring shit" is definitely more neutral rating territory.

and he's known for his past shady dealings. Not to be trusted.

Well the asking money for negative rating removal was certainly a faux pas, but again it was 5 years ago and I don't think another negative is warranted.

[mikeywith]

I'm not sure about the "spreading lies" part, would need a clearer example than what is referenced in the trust rating.

He basically used the previous rating as well as the references, just copy-paste, probably did not even bother reading them, he was in a rush to punish everyone, aint got time for references.

He admitted  that he evaluated digaran's profile long time ago, and back then he saw no need to tag him, but everything changed the moment he found out about his political stand on the political conflict.

He found an excuse to punish him, and then for me because he could not just tag me, he excluded me, and then for another person who also disagreed with him, he removed the positive feedback he left him, so this rating was just one among a streak of 1miau emotional breakdown.

The moment you disagree with 1miau, basically after insulting you in public, sends you a PM full of hate and disrespect, then finds a way to use the trust system against you, because how dare you disagree with his mighty points of view.

Had digaran not disagreed with 1miau on a political subject, that rating would not be there, 1miau can lie all he wants about it but it is crystal clear.

[1miau]

I'm not sure about the "spreading lies" part, would need a clearer example than what is referenced in the trust rating.

He basically used the previous rating as well as the references, just copy-paste, probably did not even bother reading them, he was in a rush to punish everyone, aint got time for references.

It's not allowed to use existing links in our trust feedbacks anymore? Who are you to decide that?
And once again, you are spreading unproven accusations because I'm well aware of the wrongdoings of digaran.
As I've said I gave him a pass way earlier because trolls are a waste of time.

But with your accusation, that I wouldn't have read about the issue, you are once again engaging in pure speculations.
Not the first time, where you've run out of arguments and instead of proof, you are trying to push your weak and unproven accusations like "might", "could" or "probably".
What a weak Clown Show from you but I didn't expect anything else from you. Truly disappointing that you need to resort to such shady practice of defamation to score points here.
Just disgusting.

[mikeywith]

I'm well aware of the wrongdoings of digaran.
As I've said I gave him a pass way earlier because trolls are a waste of time.

And that pass expired the moment he disagreed with your political b.s ? And suddenly "a troll" is no longer a waste of time?

[1miau]

I'm well aware of the wrongdoings of digaran.
As I've said I gave him a pass way earlier because trolls are a waste of time.

And that pass expired the moment he disagreed with your political b.s ? And suddenly "a troll" is no longer a waste of time?

You would be surprised that I've come over digaran's troll posts quite often and some of them also contained "political b.s.", in addition to the things we know so far. Most of his feedbacks are from 2023 and that's no surprise because digaran keeps engaging in excessive trolling, derailing topics etc..
I could have done that way sooner and should have done this way sooner.
I try to avoid trolls as often as possible but like we know from digaran he's quite obsessed with his excessive trolling.

[1miau]

You would be surprised that I've come over digaran's troll posts quite often and some of them also contained "political b.s.", in addition to the things we know so far. Most of his feedbacks are from 2023 and that's no surprise because digaran keeps engaging in excessive trolling, derailing topics etc..
I could have done that way sooner and should have done this way sooner.
I try to avoid trolls as often as possible but like we know from digaran he's quite obsessed with his excessive trolling.

And here we have it, at last "my political bs" and this user is also a merit source? When this is "his" opinion about other people, when he uses the recent unjustifiable trust abuses against me to justify his own tag.

Your negative tags are all within the limits of negative trust due to your abuse in the forum and you can be happy that you are not banned due to your massive trolling. But even plagiarizers don't get banned these days so, thats no benchmark at all.

You are well aware about your abuse, still you are trolling everyone who dares to point this out. Are you surprised why no one trusts your flawed judgement here? Is everyone wrong on DT but our troll digaran is always misunderstood?
And guess what? I can put you on ignore as well and don't give out ans Merit for your troll posts and thats also completely fine (or are you saying otherwise?  )
And still, you are calling me and others on the Forum "Nazi" for no reason.

[suchmoon]

~

Would you like to sign a message with 18Gykh4jE6fuyARzbC3XEzrALuKWFNHra4 ?

[Poker Player]

Would you like to sign a message with 18Gykh4jE6fuyARzbC3XEzrALuKWFNHra4 ?

I don't quite understand the move.

Out of curiosity, I have looked a bit at the OP's post history and it seems to me that he is the same troll today as when he registered. I even discovered that he was red tagged as early as 2016, that is, 3 months after registering on the forum.

Just give up. Cryptodevil is known to give feedbacks and not take them back, no matter what. He only removes them on extreme cases which I've only ever seen one. You, having two counts from cryptodevil have no hope. At least you're not a store high rank.

In spite of this he got the tag removed.

If fail to sign a message from that address would somehow show that he is not the original owner of the account, as everyone does not agree to red tag for that, I think you could still add a couple of new red tags or 3 for that reason, at most, but if for example it was you tagging him for this, it would actually count as one.

And I don't know what the merit is for, but I would say that if you employ someone who has 6 red tags, you won't care much if he has 8 or 9.

Although, obviously, the reading I make, could be incorrect. In which case I would be grateful if someone could enlighten me about it.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Looks like you have a high affinity for drama digaran and you want to pick up fights with anyone you come accross. Back in the day, I actually used to feel sorry for you when you wanted that old feedback you had removed. Maybe because I didn't know who exactly you are, but after this recent comeback of yours. I think my opinion might have changed after all.

Maybe that is just the way you are and nothing can change that. Enjoy your new reputations board wars. We shall read through whenever we are bored and have some time.

[KaosanRoad]

And now I didn't started anything, they did.

Did "they" started this topic?  You cant kill fire with fire.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

Feel sorry for yourself and this circle you love so much to remain undisturbed, one way or another, justice needs to be served, when nobody listens to you, shouting is the solution

Justice can't certainly be served to a stupid troll, can it?

Can you point me to one post causing any reputation drama ever since the end of 2022, which I came back?

I am broadly talking about the posts you made back then, Way beyond 2022 which was there just yesterday. Heck, you were even too ashamed you had to edit them and send them to archival 

What a loser.

Nothing good will come out from a community where its members are all either considered good or garbage posting, lying, cheating, scamming trolls.

It's funny that it's you talking about this because you are an example of those stupid trolls that you loathe 

And now I didn't started anything, they did.

Yeah, you didn't. Do you feel good about yourself now?

[fronti]

is it really needed to answer on such trolling?
After reading some of the posts (which take my time) i do not see a problem here. But true i need to revise the Trust List from time to time and i remember i can use the ~ as well..

[1miau]

...

Thanks for proving once again, that you are just here for trolling, derailing any possibility to find a solution and sowing discord among DT members. And it's visible for everyone, that you are the problem!

But when we are at it, let me address this. Each DT member, who was mentioned in the post above, if you want to review the issue:
The following post is my current suggestion how to solve the issue, where I've already conceded ground:

@1miau, why is it so hard for you to explain for everyone just for one time, and then go on with your life?

@digaran
I'm just trying to find a solution where we both can agree on. That's what LoyceV also wants us to do.
We can also wait for a call that is given from 2 or 3 Top 10 or 20 DT members and both of us have to accept that.
Repeated rants don't bring any solution, its just sowing discord.


Another suggestion for mikeywith, where I'm ready to concede ground:

Lets lock this topic until 01.01.2024 that the dust settles.
You can watch my feedbacks and trust list changes until then.
If you think, from now on until 01.01.2024 there would be "abuse" according to you, you could open this topic again, presenting evidence.
The outcomes:
- If the evidence is weak, DT will judge that accordingly.
- If the evidence is true and DT confirms this, I'll accept further distrusts from DT members.
- If there's no abuse, the topic will remain closed and we will move on.

You could review my trust feedback and trust list any time, from every entry that happens from now on until then. That way, you could interfere into my DT decisions for some time.
So you see, I'm ready to concede massive ground to find a solution here. I'm stepping back from the demand that any interference into my DT decisions is not acceptable.
I'm stepping back from my demand.
So, as I've said I'm ready to concede this massive ground to you.
How about that?

Any DT member voices if this is a reasonable approach are appreciated.

Another approach could be just to lock the topic and if mikeywith still feels it's an issue, he can re-open it on 1st January 2024. That way, some time would pass to find a more level-headed solution as we will be able to review it with a bit distance. Then, a better solution could be found with much less drama.

Happy to hear any answers.  

So, everyone can see that I'm really interested to find common ground, that we can move on and avoid this unnecessary drama.

@fronti
Thanks for your post, I've already suggested the solution above, where I've even conceded ground.

[Lafu]

Maybe that is just the way you are and nothing can change that. Enjoy your new reputations board wars. We shall read through whenever we are bored and have some time.

Yeb it looks like that way , and this reminds me a little bit on our old Trollfriend Cryptohunter.
I guess CH and d would be good friends with there point of view and how they starting Drama.

I'm specifically interested to identify who is my enemy and who is the enemy of this community.

This depends on the point of view you looking at it.
The ignore feature and the ~ is an nice option that will now be activated for you.
Clear your personal problems you have with 1miau or use also the ignore button.

Just my 2 Cents and i am out here.