I believe Binance DEX is just another name for Binance Exchange. I'm pretty sure they will implement KYC/AML as IDEX does. A vague answer by CZ regarding KYC give clear indication that this DEX won't be what many people expected.[1] So the only difference is we don't have to deposit our crypto to Binance (in theory) to trade[2], but the rest will be the same.

Just another way to make more money and kill competitors to gain more volume.

---

[1] https://beincrypto.com/is-the-upcoming-binance-dex-truly-decentralized/
[2] https://cryptobriefing.com/binance-ready-bnb-dex-fray/

Use general wording like "pay with fiat or other currencies that you like". It is not directly talking about crypto and it cause some short of curiosity to the readers, which will know what you're talking about when they visit your shop. I believe this won't cause any problem with Facebook Ads policies.

Never have any expectation about ETF since the end of last year. I believe they'll continues to postpone this till next year lol.


Correct, oil is manipulated by those who can control the supply. I'm not sure why this manipulation reason is being used again and again while there is an exact historical proof that shows us manipulation is almost impossible to prevent. Instead of making sure an asset is not prone to manipulation, why not design how the market can prevent/decrease the possibility of manipulation?

@OP if you want to read/learn more about Bitcoin ETF, Google is your friend. I'm not sure which source is credible so you can start reading one by one. But maybe you can stick to Investopedia, or something similar.

AFAIK there is no app that can do that for you. Your best alternative would be to manually add the address that you use into a portfolio app like Coinstats. The problem is, you need to pay if you want to add more than 2 address.


The coins supported here is limited and I'm pretty sure we also need to manually add the address, not the xpub.

No, most of them want to get rick quickly and that's why they choose ICO.


That depends on who ask your information. I don't believe anyone who never told me who are they first before giving my personal details. I made a lot of mistakes previously by giving personal details to anonymous exchange which eventually went down. I don't know what will they do with my data in the end, but I keep praying it won't be used for illegal activities. I'd avoid KYC at any cost, and try to use an alternative option if it's available.

I really hope we can solve this option by making our "KYC" as signature verification, just like Bitcoin/PGP message. That way I only need to send my KYC hash or message which can be verified by anyone in the world. Governments around the world should work together to provide a global hash identity ledger.

Designing a security token does not have any relation with investor dashboard/app/whatever you called it. STO token is basically the same as your usual ERC20 ICO tokens. I believe designing the token and building an app for the investor is a separated issue. If we talk about the budget, I don't think it will be really different from the current ICO budget, it will depend on how complex your dashboard/apps will be.

With that said, there are several resources detailing the budget to run your STO, like this[1] or this[2].

---

[1] https://chainplus.one/blog/step-by-step-how-to-launch-an-sto/
[2] https://alwin.io/blog/security-token-offering-development-cost

His code is open on GitHub, TryNinja posted it on the #2 post.

If OP still wants to look for an alternative then you might want to try iasenko Rank & Activity calculator. Again, this assumes the account post at least once in 2 weeks.[1]

---

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2534500.0

Nutrient tokens? What are you talking about?
Of course, it's going to be traded, and again there is no further ICO, it's already finished. I don't know how you miss that when I clearly write something like this:

---

I don't know if my reading skill is bad or not but I've read the article before and I still don't find explicit information that they'll get paid in fiat, only "up to 700 USD per month", which can be interpreted as paid in fiat or tokens/crypto.

May I know why? While a centralized exchange is not ideal, I believe it's in some case safer than dealing with in Localbitcoins. You can also use escrow in this forum when you want to buy/sell bitcoin, there's a lot of reputable escrow here that can help you. If you are not in a rush and don't want to use centralized exchanges, trading via escrow in this forum might be a good alternative.

You can do the same thing with Electrum, or core tbh. The speed of the transaction is not related to which wallet that you use, and there's a better guarantee that the fee you set on Electrum will be the same fee that you paid to for your transaction.


I'm surprised that anyone still uses blockchain.com as their wallet, not to mention any risk of a phishing attack and something like that. You don't store your BTC there, you 'store' your Bitcoin on blockchain and you use a wallet to access it. I prefer a way that is more secure, like Electrum for example.

1. Bisa, tergantung keputusan web wallet tersebut apakah mendukung SegWit atau tidak. Terkadang mereka tidak segera mendukung SegWit karena alasan teknis/praktis tertentu, seperti fee yang ingin lebih banyak diambil dari WD pengguna.
2. Karena P2SH SegWit cenderung lebih banyak didukung oleh exchange, setidaknya untuk saat ini. Contohnya (lokal) Luno, Tokocrypto, dst. Jadi lebih fleksibel dipakai walaupun ukuran transaksi lebih besar (lebih banyak fee), tapi bagi pengguna biasa hal ini ga begitu bermasalah. Silakan baca ulang poin dari OP berikut:

Only the government can request or inspect them thoroughly (at least that's the case in South Korea). But this also creates another problem of trust as we don't exactly know whether the report is objective or not.

Some alternative might be using exchange with open source code like Open Trade, but there's a lack of development and a lot of security issues on the current open source exchange. DEX also lack liquidity, so in the end, we have to trust exchange at some point.

Where did you get this information? And how did they contacted you in the first place?
If I were you I'd avoid this kind of algorithmic trading platform that offers profits without any reputation (no public information at all). Why don't you use GunBot or other services, like Caspian if you want to use sophisticated tools across many exchanges?

Forget this site, I believe they'll scam you sooner or later.

CMIIW, It seems like if you want to buy Bitcoin you have to use cash[1] and then redeem it on Coinme. So then, you need to bring your coins, exchange to cash and then buy Bitcoin with it, or something like that?

Sounds ok to me, but the fee is too big, 11.9%.

[1] https://www.coinstar.com/bitcoin

I'm not sure why you guys considered me talking about Localbitcoins. Did I mention it in my post? I don't even recall writing about Localbitcoin here.

I'm talking about P2P, like peer-to-peer exchange as a way to trade, such as exchanging Bitcoin here on the forum, or using Telegram, or directly face-to-face. We've been able to do that since years ago and I'm sure it will be difficult for the government if they want to eradicate it. That's what I'm trying to say.

I don't really know how Cryptopia handles their private key, but I'm pretty sure even the most secure exchange won't use pen and papers. It's not fast enough and even gave practical problems when they need to move and manage their wallet. Still, that doesn't mean they should leave it online either.

Let's hope the hacker(s) only hack their hot wallet, because if it's not, then Cryptopia is really doomed.

If you want to do some manual work:

1. Find when the member is registered.
2. Find what date is today.
3. Do a simple math = (date_today - date_registered) / 14 (rounded to the smallest number)

That's the potential activity, assuming the account always post at least once in 2 weeks / 14 days.

If you don't want to, then use achow code.

Blockchain is actually stored on many hard drives (replicated) and they 'work' simultaneously. The blockchain is simply a file/database, you can store and copy it many times.

If you're talking about running a node and then split your blockchain file to two different address, I doubt it's not possible because blockchain is stored in a single file, blk*.dat (in Bitcoin). If you split it (that single file) into two (not sure how you did this, I assume you'll split it and therefore break the data, just like a broken zip file) you won't be able to use it because it's corrupt. You can read further here[1].

That's what I understand at least, maybe someone smarter than me has a different opinion.

---

[1] http://learnmeabitcoin.com/glossary/blkdat

Tbh I don't think Bitcoin is that technical (for daily usage). While it's true it is required to have somewhat deeper knowledge to fully embrace the tech, to be able to use it regularly we don't have to do that. For example, to create an address, you don't have to understand how BIP32 works, they can simply open Electrum, generate a new address and so on.

This technical barrier is quite low tbh. We don't have to spend hours learning about it.

Be careful with this strategy. I've known several forum which starts their advertisement by giving away/running a campaign dead after the campaign is over. I'm pretty sure organic traffic will come to your site when someone can find something unique which is not replaceable or can't be found on another site.

Anyway, good luck with your project.