Why such bad incidents taking place for the people. They have not anything bad, they're just supporting people in their bad situation, even when no countries came forward to give support.
You reap what you sow... We shouldn't have colonized the world, we shouldn't have used and destroyed them, we shouldn't have burnt to the ground their cultures and civilization... Now it's too late. No peace is possible. We can either finish them or drawn. Clearly, if you believe this, then you should stop using the computer, and the internet, these being shameful creations built on the backs of those enslaved by the West. I await your announcement of taking this positive step in the direction of fixing your share in the wrongness. Logically this should be the last time we hear from him if he does... I never thought of that. But maybe it's the liberal mantra doctrine where you get to fly the gas guzzler jet while telling everyone else to lower their carbon footprint? |
|
|
|
Well, this sounds freakin scary...Bill Still clip: ------------------------------------------------------ Published on Mar 8, 2016 A supporter of Marco Rubio, sent out the following tweet last Thursday: [insert tweet] “Let me explain something. If having a riot on the convention floor in Cleveland prevents Trump from the nomination, pass me the fire bomb.”... Wait, so there's a convention WITHOUT a riot? |
|
|
|
Yeah? They managed to infiltrate 19 terrorists in 4 different planes. Without any control working. Without finding out their weapons?
Not even talking about the doubts about the planes being enough to destroy the towers.
"PS. We likely would be much closer in agreemenet on the Kennedy killing, lol..."
Well all the same for me. I don't believe in those shits. Without even taking the hijack thing into account, Air force should have taken the planes down.
Yes. They BOUGHT 19 TICKETS. That's how. We saw the planes hit the towers, then we saw the towers collapse after the fire weakened the structures. Pretty obvious. Air Force should have taken them down? You know, I view that as a pretty reasonable assertion. But if you look into the matter, you will find that Air Force flights over the continental US do not routinely carry weapons. Then if you look further, into the approval cycle for that and the time to load them, you would just plain agree that (1) "Well, they still SHOULD have taken them down (2) They couldn't at that time with what they had. |
|
|
|
I don't think I could trust anyone who had only smoked it twice.  |
|
|
|
Why such bad incidents taking place for the people. They have not anything bad, they're just supporting people in their bad situation, even when no countries came forward to give support.
You reap what you sow... We shouldn't have colonized the world, we shouldn't have used and destroyed them, we shouldn't have burnt to the ground their cultures and civilization... Now it's too late. No peace is possible. We can either finish them or drawn. Clearly, if you believe this, then you should stop using the computer, and the internet, these being shameful creations built on the backs of those enslaved by the West. I await your announcement of taking this positive step in the direction of fixing your share in the wrongness. |
|
|
|
... But 357 has this "Dirty Harry" look. Any intruder will freeze at the sight of 357 cocked magnum revolver  Sad. The same guy talking about how stupid and illogical and dangerous religions are is promoting the gun ownership. I find the idea that it is better to resolve a home invasion problem through intimidation than through maiming to be quite rational. The idea that the potential to intimidate (or maim) by use of firearms stops a majority of potential problems before they start is, to me, obviously a good thing and clearly effective. Beat me to it. IMHO some robber may be a really bad example of a human but I'm loathe to shot him, much better to give him a chance to turn and run. Including civilians and law enforcement, guns are probably used a hundred thousand times to peaceably get someone to comply with a request, for one time that it goes bang. Interesting that from this point of view, the bigger and badder and scarier looking the weapon is, maybe good attributes of appearance. |
|
|
|
There are 2 scary things for me about Trump... First is all the hate he speaks... for a president to say such things, people will start to think it's ok to beat up a Mexican or Muslim... that's not cool... they things Trump says about Muslims could start WW3 (seriously) The other thing that scares me about Trump are his policies... he doesn't seem to have any... whenever he is questioned about policies, he either gives a stupid answer or changes the subject entirely None of what you have said is remotely near the truth. First for his policies, please look at his website. Second for Mexicans and Muslims, there is no hate speech. None. Zip. Nada. Look at his actual words, don't believe the scare mongers whose only goal is just to get Hitlery into the job. Muslims certainly could start WW3, but not things people say about Muslims. |
|
|
|
USA is responsible for this.
Idiots in Turkey that flood Europe with these guys, Idiots in Europe like Merkel that build the entire scheme and push it, and you just got to blame the US. Wow. Just wow. |
|
|
|
If they try to screw Trump he can always start a third major political party. With something that serious hanging over them they´ll fall into line. He has a way too big following to be messed with.
It is all about delegates right now and if they can keep diluting the field, he will not get 1237 number. If he does not get 1237 delegates, then they will deny him the nomination. Have someone like Romney run again, just to lose. Hilary will be the next president. Florida and Ohio are a must wins for Trump. If he does that, he will be around 600-620 mark, still a long way to go. The worse would be if Florida goes to Rubio and Ohio to Kasich. You don't want to end up with 900/800/300/400 distribution. As long as Cruz stays close and Trump is denied 1237, party elders will not nominate Trump. It's quite reasonable to assume that Democrat strategists are working and funding to achieve the clusterfuck of an outcome, the brokered convention. But once Rubio loses Florida, which he will, then it's Trump or Cruz. Do not forget, Cruz is the Tea Party guy, and he is much further away than Trump on issues of concern to the establishment. Denied Rubio, they will line up for Trump. |
|
|
|
... Further if there is any practical difference between a 357 magnum revolver and a 45 ACP I really can't see it.
...
I had 357 magnum S&W revolver and it was fun, but the long barrel and the kick was not something I'd recommend. My wife could not shoot 357 with one hand. .45ACP, .40 or even 9mm are much better for other people in your family to learn and become proficient shooters. 9mm hollow points in 147gr would leave a nasty wound, and would kill as well as .45ACP. But 357 has this "Dirty Harry" look. Any intruder will freeze at the sight of 357 cocked magnum revolver Okay, then the gun I want is a styrofoam 375 Dirty Harry mockup over my 22LR revolver. Add the laser, too, please. I do not think it is implausible that the bad guy seeing that red dot on his chest is going to quickly find his inner coward. |
|
|
|
Bah. Crazy talk. The planes DID NOT "bring down the towers." The weight of the towers above the impact point did that. Again, I disproved several of these theories of thermite, nano-magical-thermite, steel does not melt, in a separate thread here. Using high school physics and chemistry only.
And no, the origin of the planes is not questioned. They were scheduled airliners on scheduled flights. Don't make me laugh. Video showing standard Boeing jets slamming into towers, and you want to claim they look "unlike any airliners they have ever seen?"
Get real.
Favorite Spendulus expression. It doesn't change what I said about Kennedy assassination. Or the fact that it seems really incredible that a terrorist organization alone managed to hijack two planes for a suicide attack. Four planes. Right sorry we were focused on the twin towers. But that makes it even a stronger claim. Given that you have only made wild claims, providing no evidence whatsoever of them, your claims have zero credibility. Think about you. You are saying things that make NO sense. "It seems incredible that a terrorist organization could hijack four airplanes..." No it does not. At that time hijacking was understood to be for money or for a specific route to be flown. Pilots had instructions on how to handle such events. They followed those instructions. You are simply making things up. Yeah right. Of course they managed alone to do something like that. Without any intern job. It was not an inside job to give excuses to the war that followed. Incredibly convenient though don't you think so? Listen I'm not saying anything like "I know it's a conspiracy". Just saying that all those shits like the Kennedy assassination, 9/11, Bataclan attacks are way too convenient. And way too stupid! There is no point for a terrorist organization to do things like this! There is no use and that's not how I would do if I wanted to bury the Western world. That's all I say. Way too perfect in my opinion. bah. How did they hijack airliners? They BOUGHT TICKETS. If you don't see why there is a point for a terrorist to do something like this, you don't understand the motives and goals of terrorism. Which, incidentally, a great many people don't understand. These types of actions are exactly as prescribed by Sayyd Qutb, Islamic radical, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, and teacher/mentor of Bin Laden. PS. We likely would be much closer in agreemenet on the Kennedy killing, lol... |
|
|
|
Bah. Crazy talk. The planes DID NOT "bring down the towers." The weight of the towers above the impact point did that. Again, I disproved several of these theories of thermite, nano-magical-thermite, steel does not melt, in a separate thread here. Using high school physics and chemistry only.
And no, the origin of the planes is not questioned. They were scheduled airliners on scheduled flights. Don't make me laugh. Video showing standard Boeing jets slamming into towers, and you want to claim they look "unlike any airliners they have ever seen?"
Get real.
Favorite Spendulus expression. It doesn't change what I said about Kennedy assassination. Or the fact that it seems really incredible that a terrorist organization alone managed to hijack two planes for a suicide attack. Four planes. Right sorry we were focused on the twin towers. But that makes it even a stronger claim. Given that you have only made wild claims, providing no evidence whatsoever of them, your claims have zero credibility. Think about you. You are saying things that make NO sense. "It seems incredible that a terrorist organization could hijack four airplanes..." No it does not. At that time hijacking was understood to be for money or for a specific route to be flown. Pilots had instructions on how to handle such events. They followed those instructions. You are simply making things up. |
|
|
|
Not sure about AR15, but I took M14 hunting a couple of times, and I can tell you, semis are not optimal for hunting. You have to walk loaded because the action is just too loud to load when you need it. I find bolt action nice and quiet. More accurate. You just need one shot when hunting anyway. After you take your shot, you run to (or after) the game.
With semi you always have to check if your safety is on, so that some twig does not unlock it, especially when you go over dense bush with other people near by. Bolt is the "go to" gun for hunting, at least for me.
But for protecting your property, AR15 (or Mini14) is probably the best, 16" barrel, trijcon etc. For inside the house, German Shepherd and .45ACP is a good solution for most issues.
Nothing to disagree with in that, but it remains the AR15 family is the most popular. Quite likely it's due to the platform versatility and interchangeable components. I am okay with the home defense concern with a little 22LR, but that includes being ready to use it as a club if needed.... Posters who keep harping on the "scary black rifle" do not even comprehend that rate of fire from bolt action can be quite comparable to semi automatic. Further the US Military designed the M16(military version of AR15) to do three shot bursts, not "full auto" specifically because of the ineffectiveness of full auto "spray and pray." Which proves that "maximum killing power" is not a function of full auto. And it has little to do with semi-auto. It's not that you can't have a 30 round magazine on a bolt action hunting rifle. Further if there is any practical difference between a 357 magnum revolver and a 45 ACP I really can't see it. Maybe these guys would be happy if all the Scary Black Rifles were outlawed, and rifles could only be owned if they were Pink? |
|
|
|
.....
Times have changed could be your son daughter brother or sister who turn out to be gay why let them suffer by hiding the fact much better for them to be free and happy and loved.
Baron Harkonnan, portrayed as a psychopathic gay..Well maybe if his mum and dad and the people around him excepted his gayness he might not be a psychopath..
Now is this another point you missed in the move dune? Like luke being gay you missed that point
Aw....poor Baron...he had a bad childhood. You know what? Fuck no he didn't. He was just portrayed as pure evil. Look, just admit it. You want pro-gay propaganda in movies. No need to justify it. did you know baron before the movie?..So how would you know what happened to him to make him a psychopath People learn evil? ALL THIS BULLSHIT BORN EVIL NO SUCH THING. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z9WVZddH9w You might learn something So just admit it. You want pro gay propaganda in movies. Maybe a teary eyed blurb backstory about how Baron was such a nice little boy until the family pet gorilla raped him? Wait, you mean we can't just have a pure evil character that wants to take over the galaxy? Be nice to know what made him evil..They told us how darth vader become evil Always nice to know why is he so evil DON'T HUMANS ALWAYS ASK WHY WHY WHY Not all straight and gays are psychopaths..Its the fact he is a psychopath that's the problem.. You mixed the gay with the psychopath not me..And you also have mixed evil with being gay even straight people can have these problems a psychopath or evil. You want pro gay propaganda in movies you say.. To you it's propaganda to me and most young adults with a brain it's normal.Some people in life are gay and most in life are not.So why not add a bit of gayness to some movies Depends on the plot and the scene.If being straight or gay fits in with the scene and plot I don't care as long as the movie turns out to be a good watch. Times are changing you will get used to it could be one day your child who turns out to be gay. You never know. will you hate your own child if it turns out gay. Remember most people when one of there children turn out gay they care more what jo bloggs down the road thinks..Well it's over the more that come out and seen on tv jo bloggs down the road wont care any more because there every where Who cares what other people think it's my children's thoughts that matter not someone next door And what I just said RELIGIONS need to learn this too Actually all I did was give an example of a gay in the movie scripts. Not my problem if he's also a psychopath. I note that nobody has objected to Baron's character. You are the one that keeps spouting social propaganda. I can bring up a dozen other movies with characters who are gay. That's just facts. |
|
|
|
I take the last link, it being the ONLY scientific one you have presented. Read what it says. http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanesIt is premature to conclude that human activities--and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming--have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity.If you have to lie to support your position, doesn't your position have a problem? Hurricanes are becoming more frequent and stronger. For god sakes simply take the data, take the number of hurricanes by year since 1900 and you'll see.What I have told you is if you do that, you will see the position is false. Lying again? I quote myself here. Just reread the whole text not only what you want: They all say the same thing:
Hurricanes are becoming more frequent and stronger. For god sakes simply take the data, take the number of hurricanes by year since 1900 and you'll see.
What we still don't know is if it's directly linked to human activity. It may also be part of a natural cycle. So nobody is saying it's because of global warming, everybody is saying it MIGHT be because of it.
We'll know it un a dozen of years. If hurricanes keep becoming stronger and more frequent we'll know it came from us. Well, which is it? A. Hurricanes are becoming more frequent and stronger. For god sakes simply take the data, take the number of hurricanes by year since 1900 and you'll see. B. We'll know it un a dozen of years. (A) is false. (B) is a future claim. I don't understand how you can't see the difference. A is right. And all articles (including the one you quoted) says so. What would be wrong would be to claim that it's all because of global warming because we still can't say if it's the case as it's too early!But A is right. I quoted the relevant paragraph from A. Here it is again. I take the last link, it being the ONLY scientific one you have presented. Read what it says. http://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes
It is premature to conclude that human activities--and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming--have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity.If you want to assert that the article supports (A) please quote where it does so. Otherwise, lose what little credibility you have... |
|
|
|
AEI has held the annual forum on Sea Island for years. It's so secret that in 2015, Bloomberg News complained that no one would even say whether it had snowed. Federal Aviation Administration records available on FlightAware.com show that a fleet of private jets flew into and out of two small airports near Sea Island this weekend. Fifty-four planes flew out of the airport on St. Simons Island, Georgia, on Sunday -- nearly four times as many as departed from the airport the previous Sunday. Well, I guess the main part is over. large loud jets are taking off one right after the other https://t.co/04fV5mMlr7 — Darlene Bearden (@darlenebearden) March 6, 2016 Many of the planes are registered to jet-sharing companies such as NetJets and Flexjet or private jet services companies such as Jetsetter. At least two of them flew directly to San Jose, California, home of many tech giants, on Sunday. Another plane, which arrived from Eaton, Colorado, on Wednesday and flew back there on Sunday, is registered to Monfort Aviation, LLC, a private, tax-exempt trust. FAA records don't indicate who controls Monfort Aviation, but it shares a name with Dick and Charlie Monfort, the Colorado-based heirs to a meatpacking fortune who now own the Colorado Rockies baseball team. The plane, a Raytheon Hawker 800XP, seats 15 people. Anschutz, the billionaire whose company part owns Sea Island, is also from Colorado. Another private plane, a Canadair Challenger, flew cross-country from St. Simons to Van Nuys Airport in Southern California on Friday. Van Nuys Airport is so associated with millionaires and billionaires that their disputes over space at the field occasionally spill into the news media. Another plane, a tri-jet Dassault Falcon 900, flew into St. Simons on Thursday from Westchester County, New York, and returned on Sunday. It's registered to Northwood Investors LLC, which is run by John Kukral, whose official bio notes he's been involved in real estate deals worth over $40 billion. "The event is private and off-the record, therefore we do not comment further on the content or attendees," said Judy Stecker, a spokeswoman for AEI. She described the forum as "an informal gathering of leading thinkers from all ideological backgrounds to discuss challenges that the United States and the free world face in economics, security and social welfare." Van Nuys is just an airport in Los Angeles, more capable of handling medium size aircraft than Santa Monica Airport. Private aircraft, FOI, are not typically going into LAX. All day long celebrities and business people use the facilities of Van Nuys and Santa Monica. The paragraphs of innuendo about movements of jets into LA shows the typical, not the exceptional, and is totally confusing regarding San Jose, Van Nuys, and Sea Island. In other words, your post makes no sense. |
|
|
|
What type of weapons did the pictures i posted show and why are or should they be legal?
Why the heck should normal citiziens run around with (half) automatic assault rifles ( thats the correct translation i believe)?
They are designed to kill as much people as possible in the shortest timeframe.
You have propaganda on the brain but thankfully ask questions that will reveal the logical errors which are always in propaganda. The word is "semi-automatic." Regarding the bolded, that is inaccurate. Let me please explain something. For the past 100 years or longer, yesterday's military weapon becomes today's hunting or personal protection weapon. I believe most people would agree, AR15 variations are the most popular in the world for hunting, personal protection and so forth. AK47 I don't know of it's use for hunting, but it could be in the West we don't hear of that, we only see it's use by "enemies." Please learn about these things before voicing strong opinion as to what is "right." Also note many things are illegal for average citizen - silencers, rifle barrels shorter than 14", machine gun, etc. etc. In the USA some states have tried banning magazines with capacity higher than 10 rounds. Those efforts I believe, everyone agrees have been failures. |
|
|
|
... That is muslims mistake so islam advices to learn always. Our Holly Prophet says: Learn from craddle to grave.
Science is muslim's lost goods, wherever if you find, take.
....
Please, use softer words for more than 1 billion people's Holy Book. Today's situation of muslims is not Quran's mistake. Today's muslims are reading Quran only for heaven without trying understand Allah's words.
If you have read Quran you really will see miracles and you will understand different by different things. Have you ever read? I don't think
...
Last i have to tell you to stop prejudice about Quran.
Even ona time read and investigate it. Then come and we, discuss again
You want softer words for your old holy book? How about you show some respect for athiests such as I, show some respect for Jews, and other people? Repeating over and over "Read my book" is not showing respect. It is arrogance and hubris. |
|
|
|
.....
Times have changed could be your son daughter brother or sister who turn out to be gay why let them suffer by hiding the fact much better for them to be free and happy and loved.
Baron Harkonnan, portrayed as a psychopathic gay..Well maybe if his mum and dad and the people around him excepted his gayness he might not be a psychopath..
Now is this another point you missed in the move dune? Like luke being gay you missed that point
Aw....poor Baron...he had a bad childhood. You know what? Fuck no he didn't. He was just portrayed as pure evil. Look, just admit it. You want pro-gay propaganda in movies. No need to justify it. did you know baron before the movie?..So how would you know what happened to him to make him a psychopath People learn evil? ALL THIS BULLSHIT BORN EVIL NO SUCH THING. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z9WVZddH9w You might learn something So just admit it. You want pro gay propaganda in movies. Maybe a teary eyed blurb backstory about how Baron was such a nice little boy until the family pet gorilla raped him? Wait, you mean we can't just have a pure evil character that wants to take over the galaxy? |
|
|
|
Islam doesnt hate people.people with the religion of islam hates other people.
There are groups of people that doesnt want other religion than islam.
Islam is a good religion, people makes it bad.
People don't know about islam even one piece, claim that islam hates people. If there's hate muslims heart against to others, jews and christians made it. Isreal kills people in Palestine, but islam is hate religion Do you know few days ago Israeli soldiers killed 12 years old Palestinian boy. They shot him by more than 20 bullets on front of cameras. But Islam hates people Israel bombed Gasa. Destroyed houses and killed 4000 people in their houses. But islam is still hate religion. .... Here we go again. It's the EVILLLL JEEWWWWWWSSSSSS! Takiyya. Were my words wrong? The biggest terrorist is Israel on the world. They clam that they were holocoust aggrieved but they do the worst genocide in Palestine and look behind terrorist organisations carefuly, you'll see Israel. Israel and Us Jewish lobies support terror on the world. The biggest ones like Rothchilds, Rockeffellers organise wars and draw maps. They are racist too. You can believe judaism but you can't be jewish because it is about blood.. And, please look behind islamophobia, you will again see sionist media organs and lobbies. Yes, your words of jewophobia were wrong. But they prove my point. As long as Muslim advocates of hate prattle on like this, they cannot gain any traction with their lying takiyya about being a "Religion of Peace." It's a "religion of peace" Except toward the Jews, the Evil Great Satan, whoever pissed you off last, whoever touched your sister, on and on and on. Fucking total idiocy. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
