Hopefully what you meant to say is you will refund the total amount of BTC sent originally, because that is what is obligated considering you have no agreement in place any longer.

Are you sure you are having a debate? Because to me it looks like you are simply using this discussion as a venue to push your own belief systems rather than discuss the actual topic everyone else is discussing. That's how debates work, there is a premise and the validity of it is debated. If you aren't following the premise, then you are simply just talking at everyone while completely ignoring what anyone else is talking about. Debates go both ways, you are just ignoring the topic of discussion and dictating to everyone else what you think is a better premise to discuss because it supports your own ideals. This isn't an exchange, this is you dictating the topic of discussion to everyone else while claiming I am doing the same by pointing out you aren't even following the topic of discussion.

 Yeah but mostly in communist Russia.

Sorry but that theory has been proven incorrect. It has been demonstrated with peer reviewed studies that gender preferences towards certain toys for example are innate BEFORE socialization. This is also echoed in primate tests.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201212/sex-specific-toy-preferences-learned-or-innate

This also explains why certain industries are dominated by men, and some are dominated by women, in spite of large programs to incentivize a more balanced gender demographic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5LRdW8xw70


As far as designating males blue and females pink, I am not sure I would classify that as "brainwashing". Additionally I find color choices to be largely inconsequential to this discussion, because we are talking about changing a child's gender identity by having them switch gender roles. EVERYONE has a gender role, like it or not. Colors are potentially indicative of gender, but if you saw a boy wearing pink pants, or a girl wearing a blue dress, chances are there would be no confusion about their gender for anyone.

People may feel more like one gender other than their biology, but the fact remains they still are either forced to choose one, or deal with the consequences that come to any individual for being "different". I don't think it is appropriate to confuse the gender identities of every child on an industrial scale just so that a minority of people who are unhappy with their biological gender are unwilling to either accept their biological state, or continue to deal with what happens to ANY individual when they are "different" regardless of gender.

I am not saying ostracizing people for being "different" is acceptable, but I also find it fairly naive to assume that you can condition this response out of people. It is pretty much a biological vestige of evolutionary processes. People who do not look like you are not of your tribe, and therefore potentially pose a threat.

I certainly don't think educational institutions have a right to do this either, because it also has negative effects upon children who are comfortable with their own gender by creating confusion which was not there previously during a critical stage of forming their own gender identity.

Not every boy and girl are brainwashed. In fact most boys and girls are perfectly happy just being boys and girls. What gives anyone the right to take that away from them en-mass to satiate a small group of people?

What no one tells you about the "gun death" stats, is that it includes suicides, self defensive use of firearms, and police encounters with the use of firearms. Gun control pushers love to parade that stat around as if they are all murders.

It is only a matter of time before this is exploited regularly. This is also a good reason to start logging trust rating changes.

As far as I can tell the customer could have done nothing to prevent this situation, if I am wrong about this please explain the mistake the customer made. I don't think it is appropriate for you to just ignore them and keep the funds in spite of your agreement of no returns, because again the customer had no way of preventing this situation as far as I can tell.

If you make an agreement that is impossible for one of the parties to comply with, then that is not a valid contract. This is called "impossibility" under contract law.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/impossibility

He is not required to comply with your agreement of "no returns", because the reasons for which he is unable to comply are of no fault of his own and outside of his control. As a result, the agreement is void, and since you have provided nothing in exchange, you have no legal claim to the coins he sent you.

I would think the ding to the perception of his customer service would be motivating enough, especially for a smaller amount, but IMO this is beyond a simple matter of customer service. It seems to me that in addition he has no legal claim to the sent coins, and is obligated to return them.

What topic are we discussing again? Was it why we should be anticapitalist socialists? Oh wait, it is "What is A Social Justice Warrior", and none of your arrogant, self centered, political masturbation belongs here. I guess you are just so many light years evolved from us "conversatards" that you no longer have a need any longer to follow the same premise and should just completely dictate the conversation to us. After all you are the teacher, what could you possibly have to learn from any one else?

So in short, an insane child couldn't access guns in your comparatively tiny country, therefore gun control works. Cool story bro. Too bad the overall rate of crime and violence percapita is higher in countries where guns are banned.

Unfortunately the damage he has done did not just leave with him... also he will be back (under a new name).

Bitcoin, as the cryptocoin flagship, should not be used as the testing grounds for all these new blockchain technologies, that is what alts are for. If these technologies work on a smaller more expendable coin only THEN should it be implemented into BTC. Bitcoin IS the establishment now, which means it is not as lean and fast as it was when it began. There are too many industries depending on it which may be negatively affected with such experimentation regardless if it was the right choice or not. Alternatively this also solves most of the issues of this debate when done this way, because if it is successful elsewhere then people naturally will support it being added to BTC.

Did I address "every single happening" or just this instance? The FBI as well as other agencies here in the US have a very long and publicly documented history of finding impoverished feeble minded people, pumping them full of drugs and bad ideas, then giving them the weapons and money they need to commit a violent act so they can justify their own existence as well as create more social pressure for gun confiscation or more unconstitutional anti-terror laws.

You are talking James Bond movie conspiracy, I am talking military tactics that have been in use by various interests since society existed. Sure there are plenty of nuts, but nuts don't just randomly pick racially/religious driven targets that happen to create a perfectly timed political firestorm a few months before an election, and in the midst of riots in several places nation wide consisting mostly of blacks reacting to police violence against them. It is very clear various groups are attempting to initiate a race war in the US using a combination of violence and media. Chastise me all you want for seeing patterns you are willfully ignorant of, it doesn't make you any more correct, or make my observations incorrect just because the perpetrators aren't publicly known.

Does the BTM manufacturer have a thread here where I might suggest this?

Do you really believe big oil could only afford 2% of scientists if that was their goal? Your argument doesn't even make sense based on your own premise.

Shia LaBeouf is one of my new favorite weirdos. That thing he does with his hands at the end is completely pointless yet some how hilarious.

Have you noticed that you are the only one here:

1. Judging people based on their race
2. Judging people based on their gender
3. Consistently spewing personal attacks
4. Not understanding your own arguments enough to argue your points in
your own words while simultaneously crying about how easy it is for one to fool themselves, just not you though right?

(P.S., linking a bunch of videos on subjects you believe is not the same as having a premise and an argument. I know it is hard to differentiate debating from an opportunity to inject your favorite brand of politics into a discussion, but doing this is not the same as making an argument.)

You are so convinced of your righteousness that you need not even waste your time understanding your beliefs because they are so just, and anyone who disagrees is so unjust it matters not if you act in a racist, and sexist manner, because anyone who disagrees with you is over privileged anyway and needs to be taken down a notch for the sake of justice.

Self sufficiency is not profitable. In addition people who are self sufficient are not dependent on government, therefore they can not be controlled. Thus they must be forced back into a system of dependence.

This looks to me like another case of a nut they scraped up off the street, pumped him full of drugs, wound him up, handed him a loaded gun and dumped him in front of the church. This method is becoming quite a popular tactic to push gun control. Too bad no one in the church was armed, he might have not killed anyone. He certainly would have never been able to shoot 9 people.