|
@Melt_Dem 21h21 hours ago
segwit2x delayed until 2018
still nothing from DCG except the tea-girl
|
|
|
|
 keeping up with the garzicks |
|
|
|
Ms Kaminska writing lovely things about the Honey Badger as usual https://www.ft.com/content/c166aa1e-c303-11e7-a1d2-6786f39ef675And even if all that were possible, none of it changes the fact that if bitcoin’s primary use is for speculation rather than transaction, the energy wastage serves very little constructive social purpose at all. energy wastage is heating my house, my mistresses' houses, the office ... energy from Chinese, Siberian, Canuck dams would be wasted if not used for mining that girl needs a good somethinging |
|
|
|
With CME going live in less than a week, alts better watch their game. This may still be a premature rotation...
Im slightly confused on how CME will affect the price of bitcoin as there is no actual bitcoin bought in their trades and people using CME are basically just betting on the future price. Or have i got it totally wrong? so are they so is erryone |
|
|
|
http://log.mkj.lt/trilema/20171108/#441<davout> logic is that on some platform that offered "prefork coin splitting" the prefork-SW2X-coinz are needed to merge with the prefork-actual-bitcoin in order to have a prefork-full-bitcoin people buying them do so in order to be able to withdraw from platforms immediately without waiting for the contract expiration on nov. 16th therefore, nonzero value will converge to perceived risk pricing of leaving buttcoin on a platform until contract expiration
|
|
|
|
|
ugh Slack noty
a bit more openness right here pls - no nyms
c u next time
|
|
|
|
|
So, farewell, Jeff.
Which developer will they burn with their next attack?
They could hoik Vitalik 'back into bitcoin' to 'make it better'.
|
|
|
|
 in this moment ... I am serene |
|
|
|
We can celebrate, but let's not gloat guys.
I, for one, praise the S2X camp for achieving the internal consensus to pull back from the brink.
We will eventually, in a safe and orderly manner, address their concerns regarding scaling.
In the end, they behaved like rational adults. Perhaps we can have nice things.
Well you're a very nice guy. On the other hand I will never trust any of these guys. They proved they are anti-bitcoin when they didn't back down months ago. These deceitful cowards will be back for your nice things.  |
|
|
|
If anything, Panama Papers and Paradise Papers show that linking BTC with terrorism funding and drug trade are pure FUD. The elites moved $10 trillions+ and hide them around the world with FIAT and all are done "legally" within the legal framework. That being said, I still have nothing but the highest respect for the Sassoon family. Being able to survive the Spanish Inquisition and Ottoman rule, made a fortune in Opium Wars, and still retain their peerage and fortune in the British upper crust, this is nothing short of a miracle. I am sure that Baron Sassoon, being the previous head of G7 task force on Money Laundering, would not have done anything untoward. lol. lovely restraint.  |
|
|
|
Randomly introducing myself. Hi. Been following this thread for a few days now. Fun.
hai. welcome. pull up a chair  you'll find we're all very friendly here |
|
|
|
You might wanna look into what Jeff has done for the wider computing community -- gratis, and predating the existence of satoshi's whitepaper -- before you start slinging shit at his reputation or motivations.
F'ing lousy ingrates. Get some perspective.
No you get some perspective. What he may have done before is not relevant to what he and you both are attempting now - attacking bitcoin. |
|
|
|
I'm going to need stronger popcorn They've released the specs for their futures http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/bitcoin-futures.html ... Special price fluctuation limits equal to 7% above and below prior settlement price and 13% above and below prior settlement price and a price limit of 20% above or below the previous settlement price. Trading will not be permitted outside the 20% above and below prior settlement price. ...  |
|
|
|
What is a transaction replay? In the context of forks, transaction replay is when a transaction is valid on both sides of the fork. So a transaction can be played (i.e. broadcast) on both chains after the fork and be a valid transaction and confirm. This means that if you intend on sending coins on one fork, you could accidentally end up sending your coins on the other fork as well since someone else could take your transaction and replay it (i.e. broadcast it) on the other chain's network. What does replay protection do? Replay protection is something that makes it so that transactions on one chain are invalid on the other chain thus preventing transaction replay. This can be anything from having a blacklisted address or output type (e.g. if an output to address X is in the transaction, consider it invalid) to changing the signature scheme to changing the transaction format entirely. All this does it makes replaying some or all transactions impossible. https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/61212/what-is-transaction-replay-and-replay-protectionhttps://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/segwit2x-and-case-strong-replay-protection-and-why-its-controversial/ |
|
|
|
I'm going to need stronger popcorn
lol. quite the show it'll be. https://youtu.be/kBxnl5nZbr0 Popcaan - Stronger Now couldn't resist. actually it's q jolly. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
?? 
