I'm not even sure what does "decentralized recovery system" means. You suggest that there is some centralized system for wallet recovery, like what? Does keeping our own seeds make it centralized? I'd rather keep my own seed and back it up by myself even if it means it's centralized.

Your LinkedIn page suggests that you're building some kind of hardware wallet though, and your website doesn't tell much either. So your product is still confusing, at least to me.

Just in case you still have this issue and the problem is a block from your ISP, as an alternative to Tor, you can also use DNScrypt to bypass it.[1]

[1] https://github.com/jedisct1/dnscrypt-proxy

Thread ini (yang awalnya hanya berisi informasi seputar phising Electrum) telah saya perbarui menjadi thread kumpulan serangan phising, malware dst yang berhubungan dengan Bitcoin dan kriptokurensi pada umumnya. Member-member bisa menambahkan informasi seputar phishing dst, kecuali (dugaan) scam karena hal tersebut terwakili dengan red trust dan ada sub scam accusations. Mohon kerja samanya, indeks akan diperbarui secara berkala dan siapa saja boleh menambahkan informasi. Post-post yang saya persepsi berkualitas rendah, tidak sesuai topik atau lebih pantas dibuat thread tersendiri dan seterusnya akan saya hapus dengan mencantumkan alasannya. Terima kasih, kritik dan saran ditunggu.

It's possible I think. But the fundamental for 2019 is quite good (as long as it did happen). Bakkt, ETF, etc can bring new positive sentiment for the market, after that the halving will happen. I believe the timeframe would be shorter than the previous cycle, but who knows? As long as you don't spend all of your money hoping for this scenario to happen, I guess it's good to try.

As you said, because default trust is "broken" then adding a report to default trust doesn't make sense. Deciding whether someone wants to scam you or not requires proof and sometimes a post is not enough, so a report button doesn't make sense and discussion/argument is fine.

Btw, seems like this kind of suggestion is increasing lately. Is this the time for a report to blablabla thread?

They'll probably answer you with some statement like : "We have described that deposit doesn't require KYC but withdrawal does, here and there, so the fault is in our customer". I know several exchanges who did this, and sadly they don't even give notifications when users are trying to deposit that if they wish to withdraw they have to do KYC first.

Unless there's public information about their team, it's not really that bad. The bad news is when the exchange you use doesn't have any public info, therefore it's almost impossible to sue them. And in the end, you lost your money. There's no one will help in this case, so let's be wary and only use exchanges that don't look suspicious.

You should move this to scam accusations[1]. And if possible, rather than video, provide a screenshot or something like that, it's easier for anyone to check. Btw, it's quite interesting that only newbies saying the same thing. Not saying that this accusation is fake though.

---

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

Seems like OP never online again since December 26, and this thread looks abandoned tbh.

Anyway, rather than asking people for the private key, we can read from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/doc. I have the same suspicion like pooya though, maybe OP wants some free coins?

Nevertheless, happy learning.

An online wallet is definitely not a cold wallet, why would you put that as an option?

If you're looking for a long-term solution and you don't need to access your funds regularly, then paper or steel wallet might be a good option, as long as you can save it correctly.

Bakkt sole purpose is to make profits for investors, they just use Bitcoin to do it. in terms of development, they don't bring anything new at all. Bakkt hype is so great, most of the time, it mentions the physical-backed bitcoin contract. The hype by itself is enough to push the price I believe.

Anyway, as long as it pushes the price then I don't really see any problem with it. The problem is manipulation.

Seems like there's a lot of new exchange recently. What makes your exchange standout from other exchanges? The voucher and free bank charge?

How will you compete with exchanges like DX.Exchange who provide tokenized stock? Or your market is only for Romanian users?

On top of that, there's no information about the team? Are you operating anonymously?

There are several good ICO listing site that I know, such as ICODrops. ICOBench, is actually a platform where anyone as long as their registration is approved, can give their rating to any project. So there's no real standard, some good project where rated very bad while the bad ones are rated very good. And as most people might already know, those "experts" can request money for their rating. So yeah, ICOBench is terrible, but not as terrible as ICOHolder, AFAIK.

I'd rather do my own research though.

There's no need to make a lot of posts. Making 1 post a week as long as it's meaningful is much better. If you want to rank up, what you need to think is how to make a quality post, not how many posts you have to make per week. You can increase your activity later, it doesn't need a lot of effort to do that.

There are several ico projects who claims to provide a new ecosystem for e-commerce and forcing their tokens to be the medium of payment in the platform. But they lack competitive advantage and important relations with users. It's quite hard for them to survive because the old e-commerce platform can simply choose to accept crypto payments. With the advance of LN, Segwit and so on, I believe Bitcoin will be the first choice for merchants, therefore those ICO projects won't go anywhere.

Why did you need to use vanitygen? Do you want those 1000 address to have custom prefixes?
If you're fine with random address then imo it's fine to use Electrum or Core to get your addresses.

Kadang term-term tersebut digunakan secara tumpang tindih, menyebut ICO dengan ITO, kadang TGE juga disebut dengan ICO. Kalau menurut pemahaman saya (secara leksikal):
- ICO : Initial Coin Offering, yang dijual adalah koin, bukan token, sehingga harusnya sudah punya blockchain sendiri.
- ITO : Initial Token Offering, yang dijual token, berarti memakai blockchain tertentu sebelum rilis blockchain sendiri atau sepenuhnya menjadi token pada blockchain tersebut.
- TGE : Token Generation Event, kadang dipakai untuk menunjukkan adanya ICO/ITO ataupun pada waktu minting token dilakukan.

Baik ITO/ICO/TGE gak ada hubungannya dengan harga sama sekali, kecuali yang agan maksud bukanlah penggalangan dana melainkan "offering" dalam arti mining sejak genesis block. Kebanyakan ICO turun jauh di market karena mereka ga punya strategi anti-dump yang baik. Kalau agan melihat proyek tidak punya mekanisme anti-dump (lock token bounty hunter untuk beberapa bulan dst) maka pasti harganya akan turun jauh, terutama proyek yang listing di exchange dengan volume rendah dan proyek tersebut tidak punya hype yang lumayan.


Yang agan sebutin itu biasanya dinamai IEO (Initial Exchange Offering). Menurut ane sih sama saja gan, kecuali exchangenya punya volume besar yang real mungkin bisa mempengruhi demand/supply diawal listing. Tapi tetap saja kalau lebih banyak yang pengen jual daripada beli, harga pasti jatuh. Sulit membandingkan karena saya ga punya data dan sering kali harus dilihat per kasus. Lebih baik dilihat saja produk yang dijual dan tim, serta hype, apakah tinggi atau tidak untuk memastikan kira" berapa demand yang muncul ketika pertama listing.

No escrow mentioned? I believe airdrop/bounty ideally should use an escrow to prevent conflict of interest. Some bounties that I know don't use escrow, and they delay the payment up to months/year, which is a pain in the ass. I think they should respect bounty hunters by not delaying and giving an exact date of distribution, but sadly they seem don't care about it at all. The magic "soon" word is always used to answer when bounty will get paid.

He's not asking about what is Bitcoin, he asks about your opinion of that site.

I think the website target is beginner/entry level investor. There's not enough information about Bitcoin, especially the technical parts. They use analogies to make it easier to grab the basic concepts of Bitcoin & blockchain, which is nice. But if we want to learn Bitcoin more than that, reading Mastering Bitcoin is probably a better start.

How can we verify that you truly own the bitcoin if we don't have a history of past transactions?


Those two are related imo. If we increase block size & time, the size of blockchain will definitely get bigger and probably cause some kind of centralization too in terms of who store the blockchain. We need to find a way where we can verify more transactions without increasing the block size too much, which Segwit did. CMIIW.

Btw, isn't 1st week supposed to be 24-12 to 30-12?
Unless a week = 8 days. Anyway, I hope there won't be any delay for payment.