I've been meaning to ask: What should the poll be this month?
what will be this month's high? We can do that again. At this rate, $7K might be the low option. yeah not the end of the month's price again, but the high during the month?
|
|
|
I've been meaning to ask: What should the poll be this month?
what will be this month's high?
|
|
|
Is it just me, or are all of you waiting for the delicious drop that's bound to come after this? Ready to buy up again as usual maybe
|
|
|
This is only half true. I'm a monster of economical insights. Everyone here should be aware of my gifts by now.
hmm cryptic. so far, yes, you've been economical with your insights, we're well aware
|
|
|
The explosion was worth as much as $ 5,000, and now it does not have to be a target anymore, and it soon breaks a record.
/thread
|
|
|
Blanket statements are folly.
all of them?
|
|
|
https://bashco.github.io/2x_Countdown/ Thursday, November 16, 2017, 9:38 AM Greenwich Mean Time This is a rough estimate based on the current block height, proposed block height to attempt a hard fork, and an average block time of ten minutes per block. current block: 492686 fork block: 494784 blocks remaining: 2098 https://www.bitcoinabc.org/novemberBitcoin ABC has published version 0.16.0 which contains an updated Difficulty Adjustment Algorithm (DAA). This is a change to the Bitcoin Cash consensus rules, but the change does not activate until November 13th. This is a hard fork, so exchanges, wallets, and other software need to upgrade before November 13th.
|
|
|
I follow the upcoming Bcash hard fork but it's turning into a major shitshow...suprise suprise So one of the Bcash devs are using his algorithm instead of going with consensus while they realease spec without coding and all done behind close-doors I'm not a coder but i'm sure you need to code first, spec and comments after... All of this within a 2 week time line lol. HUH? I find this discussion confusing. Are you really talking about Bcash, or are you referring to segwit2x, especially since you are mentioning a "2 week timeline"? bcash is hard forking again at the same time as the s2x fork. simple
|
|
|
oh god i can't stand the curiosity any more
Jimbo who was at the door?
|
|
|
the twitterati claim to be getting such messages more and more
Currently enjoying the taste of this boot in my mouth. oh man sorry it's just coincidence. i'll get my coat
|
|
|
no not you mate, a grand doesn't impress me . sorry i meant all these ath's now you boys are just showing off
Sorry bro. Just answered his question honestly... the twitterati claim to be getting such messages more and more
|
|
|
now you boys are just showing off
|
|
|
icymi
|
|
|
https://bc-2.jp/mempool.pdf Mempool optimized fees, and the correlation between user costs, miner incentives, and block capacity. moar pdf, brazenly coining the word 'seldomly'.
|
|
|
'''snip" Life became quite a bit more complicated since this summer...
sure did. some of us will be richer than banks any minute <= hence my motto thingie over there, 'be a bank'. it's no longer just a matter of doing your own transactions safely and in real money and soon some of us will be richer than nation states they will be coming to us for capital if we hodl
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uV5KDS2_C4 BD #47: Tales from the Fork - Block Digest https://blockstream.com/simplicity.pdfhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2338626.0a new scripting lang for btc SegWit introduced script versioning so maybe they will be able to deploy Simplicity using that -- which means without a hardfork. But I guess the jury is still out on that one, otherwise they would have explicitely mentioned that in the whitepaper.
::sigh:: People think weird stuff. The paper does not talk about Bitcoin integration in any detail, as it is massively premature for that. But adding a new script system is a softfork, it's always been a softfork. It's pretty much the most softforky thing you can imagine, and moreover it's already been done before! P2SH replaced Script with a nested copy of Script.. In that case the nested thing was the same as the outer thing, but there was no technical reason it couldn't have been different. simple
|
|
|
|